Advertisement

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

, Volume 139, Issue 9, pp 1515–1522 | Cite as

Patients with advanced cancer and their usage of complementary and alternative medicine

  • Magda Paul
  • B. Davey
  • B. Senf
  • C. Stoll
  • K. Münstedt
  • R. Mücke
  • Oliver Micke
  • F. J. Prott
  • J. Buentzel
  • Jutta Hübner
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

A total of 40 % of cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), and patients with advanced cancer use CAM more often than others. The aim of our study was to gather data on CAM use and reasons to use CAM of patients with advanced cancer being admitted for residential palliative care and their relatives.

Methods

Structured interviews were carried out with 25 patients and 25 relatives of those patients, respectively, of a German comprehensive cancer center based on a standardized questionnaire of the working group Prevention and Integrative Oncology of the German Cancer Society.

Results

Median age of patients was 64.5 years (relatives: 53.5); 15 patients were male and 10 were female (relatives: 7 and 18). In total, 40 % of all patients used some CAM method at the time of the study, supplements and prayer being the most frequent method. Main reasons for using CAM were to sustain one’s own strength (52 % for patients and 72 % for relatives) and to be able to do something by oneself (36 and 40 %). Sources of information were television/radio (48 and 28 %) and family/friends (40 and 48 %). Relatives also use the Internet (40 %).

Conclusions

Also for patients in palliative care and their relatives, CAM is important. Reasons for using CAM are similar for patients with less advanced cancer. As most patients do not discuss using CAM with their physician, side effects and interactions of biologically based treatments may be dangerous. The desire of patients to act autonomously should be encouraged. Yet, physicians should ensure safe administration of complementary methods by including CAM in their communication with the patient and the family.

Keywords

Complementary and alternative medicine Palliative care Cancer Source of information Lay concepts of etiology 

Notes

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brauer JA, El Sehamy A, Metz JM, Mao JJ (2010) Complementary and alternative medicine and supportive care at leading cancer centers: a systematic analysis of websites. J Altern Complement Med 16(2):183–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broom A, Tovey P (2008) The role of the Internet in cancer patients’ engagement with complementary and alternative treatments. Health (London) 12(2):139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Büntzel J, Glatzel M, Bruns F, Kisters K (2003) Use of complementary/alternative therapy methods by patients with breast cancer. Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd 10(6):304–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eng J, Ramsum D, Verhoef M, Guns E, Davison J, Gallagher R (2003) A population-based survey of complementary and alternative medicine use in men recently diagnosed with prostate cancer. Integr Cancer Ther 2:212–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eschiti VS (2007) Lesson from comparison of CAM use by women with female-specific cancers to others: it‘s time to focus on interaction risks with CAM therapies. Integr Cancer Ther 6(4):313–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hlubocky FJ, Ratain MJ, Wen M, Daugherty CK (2007) Complementary and alternative medicine among advanced cancer patients enrolled on phase I trials: a study of prognosis, quality of life, and preferences for decision making. J Clin Oncol 25(5):548–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Horneber M, Bueschel G, Dennert G, Less D, Ritter E, Zwahlen M (2012) How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Integr Cancer Ther 11(3):187–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Klafke N (2012) Prevalence and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by men in Australian cancer outpatient services. Ann Oncol 23:1571–1578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Matthews SC, Camacho A, Mills PJ, Dimsdale JE (2003) The internet for medical information about cancer: help or hindrance? Psychosomatics 44(2):100–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Micke O, Bruns F, Glatzel M, Schönekaes K, Micke P, Mücke R, Büntzel J (2009) Predictive factors for the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in radiation oncology. Eur J Integr Med 1:22–30Google Scholar
  11. Molassiotis A, Fernadez-Ortega P, Pud D, Ozden G, Scott JA, Panteli V, Margulies A, Browall M, Magri M, Selvekerova S, Madsen E, Milovics L, Bruyns I, Gudmundsdottir G, Hummerston S, Ahmad AM, Platin N, Kearney N, Patiraki E (2005) Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. Ann Oncol 16:655–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Richardson MA (2000) Complementary/alternative medicine use in a comprehensive cancer center and the implications for oncology. J Clin Oncol 18(13):2505–2514PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sollner W (1997) Attitude toward alternative therapy, compliance with standard treatment, and need for emotional support in patients with melanoma. Arch Dermatol 133(3):316–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sollner W, Maislinger S, DeVries A, Steixner E, Rumpold G, Lukas P (2000) Use of complementary and alternative medicine by cancer patients is not associated with perceived distress or poor compliance with standard treatment but with active coping behavior: a survey. Cancer 89(4):873–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yates JS et al (2005) Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer patients during treatment. Support Care Cancer 13(10):806–811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zeller T, Muenstedt K, Stoll C, Schweder J, Senf B, Ruckhaeberle E et al (2013) Potential interactions of complementary and alternative medicine with cancer therapy in outpatients with gynecological cancer in a comprehensive cancer center. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 139:357–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magda Paul
    • 2
  • B. Davey
    • 3
  • B. Senf
    • 3
  • C. Stoll
    • 4
  • K. Münstedt
    • 5
  • R. Mücke
    • 6
  • Oliver Micke
    • 7
  • F. J. Prott
    • 8
  • J. Buentzel
    • 9
  • Jutta Hübner
    • 1
  1. 1.Arbeitsgruppe Integrative Onkologie, Dr. Senckenbergisch Chronomedical InstituteJ.W. Goethe UniversityFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.J.W. Goethe UniversityFrankfurtGermany
  3. 3.Johann Wolfgang Goethe University HospitalFrankfurtGermany
  4. 4.Clinic HerzoghoeheBayreuthGermany
  5. 5.Department of GynecologyUniversity Hospital of GießenGiessenGermany
  6. 6.Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation OncologyRuhr UniversityBochumGermany
  7. 7.Department of Radiotherapy and RadiooncologyFranziskus HospitalMünsterGermany
  8. 8.RNS Praxisgemeinschaft GbRWiesbadenGermany
  9. 9.Department of Head and Neck DiseasesClinic NordhausenNordhausenGermany

Personalised recommendations