In vitro extreme drug resistance assay to taxanes or platinum compounds for the prediction of clinical outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective cohort study
- 124 Downloads
We sought to investigate the efficacy of in vitro extreme drug resistance (EDR) assay for the prediction of drug response, platinum-resistance (progression-free survival, PFS <6 months) and survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who received taxane- and platinum-based chemotherapy after surgery.
Between December 2005 and August 2007, 43 patients were enrolled prospectively. They underwent staging laparotomy followed by six or nine cycles of taxane- and platinum-based chemotherapy, and their tumors were submitted for in vitro EDR assay to taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) and platinum compounds (carboplatin or cisplatin).
The rates of EDR to taxanes and platinum compounds were 20.9% (9/43) and 23.3% (10/43). Patients with EDR to platinum compounds showed a lower rate of overall response (60 vs. 100%), a higher rate of platinum-resistance (50 vs. 18.2%) and poor overall survival (OS) (median OS; 29.2 vs. 33.7 months) than those without EDR to platinum compounds (P < 0.05), whereas patients with EDR to taxanes showed poor PFS than those without EDR to taxanes (12.5 vs. 19 months, P < 0.01). Moreover, suboptimal debulking surgery and EDR to taxanes were poor prognostic factors for PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 3.215 and 3.984; 95% confidence interval 1.845–7.895 and 3.814–11.674, respectively) although there was no independent risk factor for poor OS by the multivariate Cox’s proportional hazard analysis.
In vitro EDR assay to taxanes and platinum compounds may be helpful for predicting drug response, platinum-resistance and survival in patients with EOC who received taxane- and platinum-based chemotherapy after staging laparotomy.
KeywordsIn vitro extreme drug resistance assay Taxanes Platinum compounds Epithelial ovarian cancer
The authors in the current study wish to appreciate Innocell Company for taking charge of in vitro EDR assay to study successfully. Moreover, we deeply appreciate the committee of the International Symposium on Novel Strategies for Targeted Prevention and Treatment of Cancer for giving us the opportunity to present with young scientist award (December 19–20, 2008).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
- Hillner BE (1987) Medical decision making: a Bayesian approach to laboratory testing. Med Sect Proc 2:7–37Google Scholar
- McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, Kucera PR, Partridge EE, Look KY, Clarke-Pearson DL, Davidson M (1996) Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin versus paclitaxel and cisplatin: a phase III randomized trial in patients with suboptimal stage III/IV ovarian cancer (from the Gynecologic Oncology Group). Semin Oncol 23:40–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ozols RF, Bundy BN, Greer BE, Fowler JM, Clarke-Pearson D, Burger RA, Mannel RS, DeGeest K, Hartenbach EM, Baergen R (2003) Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 21:3194–3200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Panici PB, Maggioni A, Hacker N, Landoni F, Ackermann S, Campagnutta E, Tamussino K, Winter R, Pellegrino A, Greggi S, Angioli R, Manci N, Scambia G, Dell’Anna T, Fossati R, Floriani I, Rossi RS, Grassi R, Favalli G, Raspagliesi F, Giannarelli D, Martella L, Mangioni C (2005) Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:560–566PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piver MS, Eltabbakh GH, Hempling RE, Recio FO, Blumenson LE (1998) Prospective sequential trials of induction weekly cisplatin followed by monthly cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel and cisplatin in optimal (< or =1 cm) stage III and IV ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 19:5–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar