Parents whose children are affected by systemic diseases, anomalies, deformities, or further orthopedic defective positions use the Internet to increase their knowledge. However, there have been few studies that focus, as this one does, on Internet enquiries done before the parents contact the pediatric orthopedic surgeon. This study analyzed data gathered through a standardized questionnaire on general habits of Internet use, parents’ hardware, age, and educational background of the parents. A total of 521 questionnaires were completed for a response rate of 96%. One-quarter of parents (n = 127) attended the consultation because of a gait anomaly or foot deformity, followed by children with DDH (20%, n = 99), clubfoot (9%, n = 47), and scoliosis (6%, n = 29). Parents of children with clubfoot were especially likely to look for health information online (84%, n = 38), followed by parents of children with scoliosis (69%, n = 20), with DDH (67%, n = 66), and with foot deformity/gait anomaly (49%, n = 62). Most people (97%, n = 295) using the Internet for health research purposes made use of a search engine. Concerning use of social media, respondents with clubfoot children were the most numerous (38%, n = 18). There were 35 parents who intended to discuss the results of their Internet research with the pediatric orthopedic surgeon. Most (84%, n = 254) of the respondents who used the Internet for health research planned to do so again.
Conclusion: This study documented that the Internet is an important and popular source of information for parents or caregivers in the field of pediatric orthopedics.
Level of evidence: Level II; prospective study
What is known:
•Parents and caregivers often search the Internet for information, particularly before an upcoming operation in the field of orthopedic disorders.
What is new:
•This study provides recent data on parental Internet research in a large study population.
Internet Study Pediatric orthopedics Social media Clubfoot Scoliosis DDH Cerebral palsy
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies on human participants or animals.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Aslam N, Bowyer D, Wainwright A, Theologis T, Benson M (2005) Evaluation of internet use by paediatric orthopaedic outpatients and the quality of information available. J Pediatr Orthop B 14(2):129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker J, Devitt B, Lynch S, C G, Byrne D, Kiely P (2012) Internet use by parents of children attending a dedicated scoliosis outpatient clinic. Eur Spine J 21(10):1972–1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall MS 3rd, Golladay GJ, Greenfield ML, Hensinger RN, Biermann JS (2002) Use of the internet by pediatric orthopaedic outpatients. J Pediatr Orthop 22(2):261–264Google Scholar
Eysenbach G, Kohler C (2003) What is the prevalence of health-related searches on the World Wide Web? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the internet. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. American Medical Informatics Association, p 225Google Scholar
Gupte C, Hassan A, McDermott I, Thomas R (2002) The internet–friend or foe? A questionnaire study of orthopaedic out-patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84(3):187–192Google Scholar
Hand F, Mc Dowell DT, Glynn R, Rowley H, Mortell A (2013) Patterns of internet use by parents of children attending a pediatric surgical service. Pediatr Surg Int 29(7):729–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey S, Memon A, Khan R, Yasin F (2017) Parent’s use of the Internet in the search for healthcare information and subsequent impact on the doctor–patient relationship. Ir J Med Sci 1971:1–6Google Scholar
Kirchhoff S, Kuhnt S, Lipp PS Siegfried (2010): Der Fragebogen. Datenbasis Konstruktion und Auswertung. 5. Aufl WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz KD, Windhager R (2016) YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop 40(10):1995–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lysenko M, Law P, Jarvis J, Wright JG (2016) Improving education and coping of scoliosis patients undergoing surgery, and their families, using e-health. J Child Orthop 10(6):673–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod MG, Hoppe DJ, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Philippon MJ, Ayeni OR (2015) YouTube as an information source for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of video content. Arthroscopy 31(1):136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C (2013) A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res 15(4):e85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morcuende JA, Egbert M, Ponseti IV (2003) The effect of the internet in the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot. Iowa Orthop J 23:83Google Scholar
Pehora C, Gajaria N, Stoute M, Fracassa S, Serebale-O'Sullivan R, Matava CT (2015) Are parents getting it right? A survey of parents’ Internet use for children’s health care information. Interact J Med Res 4(2):e12. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.3790Google Scholar
Rajagopalan MS, Khanna VK, Leiter Y, Stott M, Showalter TN, Dicker AP, Lawrence YR (2011) Patient-oriented cancer information on the internet: a comparison of wikipedia and a professionally maintained database. J Oncol Pract 7(5):319–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuyler KS, Knight KM (2003) What are patients seeking when they turn to the internet? Qualitative content analysis of questions asked by visitors to an orthopaedics web site. J Med Internet Res 5(4)Google Scholar
Sim NZ, Kitteringham L, Spitz L, Pierro A, Kiely E, Drake D, Curry J (2007) Information on the World Wide Web—how useful is it for parents? J Pediatr Surg 42(2):305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar