Needle-related pain and distress management during needle-related procedures in children with and without intellectual disability
- 714 Downloads
Children with intellectual disability frequently undergo needle-related procedures for diagnosis or treatment. Nevertheless, only a few studies deal with pain and distress management during the procedure in this population of children. This study aimed to investigate the number of anxiety and pain management techniques performed during needle procedure in children with intellectual disability (cases) compared to a population of children without intellectual disability (controls). This multicenter cohort study was performed from July 2016 to January 2018 in the pediatric ward of four urban hospitals in Italy. Eligible subjects were children with and without intellectual disability, from 4 to 17 years old, who needed venipuncture or intravenous cannulation for diagnosis or treatment. Use of topical anesthesia, distraction techniques, and physical or verbal comfort during procedures were recorded. Pain and anxiety scores were also recorded. Forty-seven cases and 94 controls were recruited. Three pain- and anxiety-relieving techniques were performed during the procedure in 12 (25%) cases and in 10 controls (11%); two techniques were performed in 23 (50%) cases and in 26 (28%) controls; 12 (25%) cases and 52 (55%) controls received only one.
What is Known:
• Children with intellectual disability experience more episodes of pain than cognitively healthy ones, and almost 10% of these episodes are due to medical procedures.
What is New:
• Children with intellectual disability despite receiving more relieving techniques during a needle-related procedure experienced more pain and anxiety when compared to healthy children.
KeywordsIntellectual disability Procedural pain Procedural distress Distraction
Children’s Emotional Manifestation Scale
Non-Communicating Children’s Pain Checklist-Postoperative Version
We would like to thank every health professional worker, especially the nurses, who took care of the hospitalized children.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Written informed consent was obtained from all parents of all children included in the study.
The independent ethical committee of our Institutes and of every participated center approved the study protocol before enrollment of the first participant.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- 7.Felluga M, Rabach I, Minute M, Montico M, Giorgi R, Lonciari I, Taddio A, Barbi E (2016) A quasi randomized-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of clown therapy on children’s anxiety and pain levels in emergency department. Eur J Pediatr 175(5):645–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-015-2688-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Leahy S, Kennedy RM, Hesselgrav J, Gurwitch K, Barkey M, Millar TF (2008) On the front lines: lessons learned in implementing multidisciplinary peripheral venous access pain-management programs in pediatric hospitals. Pediatrics 122(Sup. 3):S161–S170. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-1055i CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Burke C, Merkel S, Tait AR (2006) The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment. Paediatr Anaesth 16(3):258–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01773.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Pillai Riddell RR, Racine NM, Gennis HG, Turcotte K, Uman LS, Horton RE, Ahola Kohut S, Hillgrove Stuart J, Stevens B, Lisi DM (2012) Cochrane review: non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD006275. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006275.pub3. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Slifer KJ, Hankinson JC, Zettler MA, Frutchey RA, Hendricks MC, Ward CM, Reesman J (2011) Distraction, exposure therapy, counter conditioning, and topical anesthetic for acute pain management during needle sticks in children with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 50:688–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922811398959 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Thrane SE, Wanless S, Cohen SM, Danford CA (2016) The assessment and non-pharmacologic treatment of procedural pain from infancy to school age through a developmental lens: a synthesis of evidence with recommendations. J Pediatr Nurs 31(1):e23–e32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2015.09.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Zanchi C, Massaro M, Ferrara G, Montico M, D'Osualdo F, Rutigliano R, Taddio A, Vecchi Brumatti L, Cozzi G, Barbi E (2017) Validation of the Italian version of the Non-Communicating Children’s Pain Checklist-Postoperative Version. Ital J Pediatr 43(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-017-0388-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar