European Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 177, Issue 5, pp 691–697 | Cite as

Sociocultural risk factors for developmental delay in children aged 3–60 months: a nested case-control study

Original Article

Abstract

Identifying children at risk for developmental delay (DD) is important for improving prognosis. In this sense, we estimated sociocultural factors that may be associated with DD in early childhood. In our nested case-control study, 95 were included in the case group and 190 were randomly selected to control group. To identify the risk factors, we conducted a backward conditional logistic regression and a final multivariable model was developed. Maternal age of ≥35 years, low maternal and paternal education level, low socioeconomic level, consanguineous marriage, and delivery by cesarean section increased the risk of DD. After adjustment, the risk of DD was significantly increased by maternal age ≥ 35 years (odds ratio (OR) 3.04, 95%CI 1.38–6.70), maternal education level of primary school or lower (OR 14.56, 95%CI 5.40–39.24), consanguineous marriage (OR 3.99, 95%CI 1.69–9.40), and delivery by cesarean section (OR 3.34, 95%CI 1.80–6.18).

Conclusion: DD can be identified early during well-child visits. In such cases, it is critical for the health of the child and community to screen for possible risk factors, eliminate the causes, and refer families to rehabilitation services.

What is known:

The causes of DD may be classified into prenatal, perinatal, and postnatal factors.

Early identification may improve later outcomes of DD. Most studies conducted on this topic have focused on prematurity.

What is new:

This study focused on maternal, paternal, and sociocultural factors that may be associated with DD in early childhood in this study that was conducted on a community-based sample.

The risk of DD was increased by maternal age ≥ 35 years, maternal education level of primary school or lower, consanguineous marriage and delivery by cesarean section.

Keywords

Developmental delay Ages and Stages Questionnaires Risk factors Child 

Abbreviations

ASQ-TR

Ages and Stages Questionnaire-Turkish Version

CI

Confidence interval

DD

Developmental delay

OR

Odds ratio

PHC

Primary healthcare centers

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the executive support of the Ministry of Health, the Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, and Maya Academia. The ASQ-TR was provided by Maya Academia. We also acknowledge the sincere cooperation of Dr. Dilek Guldal, Dr. Nilgun Ozcakar, and Dr. Ferhat Demirci and all the family physicians who helped in this study.

Authors’ Contributions

Aylin Demirci, Mehtap Kartal conceived the project, prepared the questionnaires, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. Aylin Demirci applied the ASQ-TR and the prepared questionnaires to mothers on a voluntary basis via face-to-face interview.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

The Non-Interventional Research Ethics Committee of Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine (resolution number 2012/41–01 dated 17.12.2012) approved the study. Necessary permissions were also obtained from the Ministry of Health, Turkish Public Health Institution, and the Governorship of Izmir, Director of Public Health, to conduct the study in primary healthcare centers (PHC). The families and/or primary care physicians of children who were found to be at risk for DD at the end of the evaluation were given additional information about monitoring and further examination. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Due to the nature of the research present, however, no informed consent was required from the individual participating in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Bricker D, Squires J, Kaminski R, Mounts L (1988) The validity, reliability, and cost of a parent-completed questionnaire system to evaluate at-risk infants. J Pediatr Psychol 13(1):55–68.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/13.1.55 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Saade GR, Eddleman KA, Klugman S, Dugoff L, Timor-Tritsch IE, Craigo SD, Carr SR, Wolfe HM, Bianchi DW, DʼAlton M (2005) Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol 105(5, Part 1):983–990.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000158118.75532.51 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Demirci A, Kartal M (2016) The prevalence of developmental delay among children aged 3-60 months in Izmir, Turkey. Child Care Health Dev 42(2):213–219.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12289 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ecker JL, Chen KT, Cohen AP, Riley LE, Lieberman ES (2001) Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(4):883–887.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.117364 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Epir S, Yalaz K (1984) Urban Turkish children’s performance on the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Dev Med Child Neurol 26(5):632–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gottlieb CA, Maenner MJ, Cappa C, Durkin MS (2009) Child disability screening, nutrition, and early learning in 18 countries with low and middle incomes: data from the third round of UNICEF’s multiple indicator cluster survey (2005–06). Lancet 28 374(9704):1831–1839.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61871-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, Glewwe P, Richter L, Strupp B, International Child Development Steering Group (2007) Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet 6 369(9555):60–70CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kapci EG, Kucuker S, Uslu RI (2010) How applicable are Ages and Stages Questionnaires for use with Turkish children? Topics early child. Special Education 30(3):176–188Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kerstjens JM, de Winter AF, Sollie KM, Bocca-Tjeertes IF, Potijk MR, Reijneveld SA, Boss AF (2013) Maternal and pregnancy-related factors associated with developmental delay in moderately preterm–born children. Obstet Gynecol 121(4):727–733.  https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182860c52 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koller H, Lawson K, Rose SA, Wallace I, McCarton C (1997) Patterns of cognitive development in very low birth weight children during the first six years of life. Pediatrics 99(3):383–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar R, Bhave A, Bhargava R, Agarwal GG (2013) Prevalence and risk factors for neurological disorders in children aged 6 months to 2 years in northern India. Dev Med Child Neurol 55(4):348–356.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12079 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mukaddes NM, Bilge S, Alyanak B, Kora ME (2000) Clinical characteristics and treatment responses in cases diagnosed as reactive attachment disorder. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev Summer 30(4):273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neyzi O, Alp H, Orhon A (1975) Sexual maturation in Turkish girls. Ann Hum Biol 2(1):49–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oberklaid F, Efron D (2005) Developmental delay—identification and management. Aust Fam Physician 34(9):739–742PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ozkan M, Senel S, Arslan EA, Karacan CD (2012) The socioeconomic and biological risk factors for developmental delay in early childhood. Eur J Pediatr 171(12):1815–1821.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-012-1826-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paulson RJ, Boostanfar R, Saadat P, Mor E, Tourgeman DE, Slater CC, Francis MM, Jain JK (2002) Pregnancy in the sixth decade of life: obstetric outcomes in women of advanced reproductive age. JAMA 13;288(18):2320–2323Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pilz EM, Schermann LB (2007) Environmental and biological determinants of neuropsychomotor development in a sample of children in Canoas/RS. Cien Saude Colet 12(1):181–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Resnick MB, Gueorguieva RV, Carter RL, Ariet M, Sun Y, Roth J, Bucciarelli RL, Curran JS, Mahan CS (1999) The impact of low birth weight, perinatal conditions and sociodemographic factors on educational outcome in kindergarten. Pediatrics 104(6):e74.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.104.6.e74 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shevell M, Ashwal S, Donley D, Flint J, Gingold M, Hirtz D, Majnemer A, Noetzel M, Sheth RD, Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society (2003) Practice parameter: evaluation of the child with global developmental delay: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and The Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 60(3):367–380.  https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000031431.81555.16 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Simeonsson RJ, Sharp MC (1992) Developmental delays. In: Hoekelman RA, Friedman SB, Nelson NM et al (eds) Primary pediatric care. Mosby-Year Book, St Louis, pp 867–870Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simon GR, Baker C, Barden GA 3rd, Brown OW, Hardin A, Lessin HR, Meade K, Moore S, Rodgers CT, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, Curry ES, Dunca PM, Hagan JF Jr, Kemper AR, Shaw JS, Swanson JT, Bright Futures Periodicity Schedule Workgroup (2014) 2014 recommendations for pediatric preventive health care. Pediatrics 133(3):568–570.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-4096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Timofeev J, Reddy UM, Huang CC, Driggers RW, Landy HJ, Laughon SK (2013) Obstetric complications, neonatal morbidity, and indications for cesarean delivery by maternal age. Obstet Gynocol 122(6):1):1184–1195.  https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Torabi F, Akbari SA, Amiri S, Soleimani F, Majd HA (2012) Correlation between high-risk pregnancy and developmental delay in children aged 4-60 months. Libyan J Med 7(1):18811.  https://doi.org/10.3402/ljm.v7i0.18811 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vohr RB, Oh W (1983) Growth and development in preterm infants small for gestational age. J Pediatr 103(6):941–945.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(83)80726-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bayrakli District Directorate of HealthIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Family MedicineDokuz Eylul University School of MedicineIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations