Advertisement

European Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 176, Issue 4, pp 465–474 | Cite as

Palatable food consumption in children: interplay between (food) reward motivation and the home food environment

  • Annelies De DeckerEmail author
  • Sandra Verbeken
  • Isabelle Sioen
  • Wendy Van Lippevelde
  • Caroline Braet
  • Gabrielle Eiben
  • Valeria Pala
  • Lucia A. Reish
  • Stefaan De Henauw
  • on behalf of the I.Family Consortium
Original Article

Abstract

To understand the importance of the home food environment on unhealthy food consumption in children high in reward sensitivity, this study tested the hypothesis that the home availability of unhealthy food moderates the effect of reward sensitivity on children’s fast-food consumption frequency, exerted via food cue responsiveness. Children between 7.5 and 14 years (n = 174, 50.6% boys) reported on reward sensitivity and food cue responsiveness (by means of the subscale ‘external eating’). Their height and weight were measured. Parents reported on their children’s fast-food consumption frequency, food cue responsiveness (by means of the subscale ‘food responsiveness’), and on the home availability of unhealthy foods. Two moderated mediation models were conducted, one with the parent- and one with the child-reported food cue responsiveness as mediator. Findings suggested that with a high home availability of unhealthy foods, (a) a higher fast-food consumption frequency was found in children high in reward sensitivity and (b) the relation between reward sensitivity and the fast-food consumption frequency was mediated by external eating.

Conclusions: The findings point at the importance of the home food environment in children high in reward sensitivity. They suggest to limit the home availability of unhealthy foods.

What is Known:

Reward sensitivity (RS) is positively associated with children’s palatable food consumption

In adolescents, this effect is mediated by food cue responsiveness, which determines the strength of an individual’s motivation to obtain food when perceiving food cues

What is New:

Children high in RS may be more vulnerable to palatable food cues in their everyday food environment because of a higher food cue responsiveness

The home food environment may be an important determining factor of the palatable food consumption of these children

Keywords

Reward sensitivity Palatable food Home availability Food responsiveness External eating Child 

Abbreviations

IDEFICS

Identification and Prevention of Dietary- and Lifestyle-Induced Health Effects in Children and Infants

RS

Reward sensitivity

zBMI

Age- and sex-independent z-score of body mass index

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the participating children and their parents for their voluntary participation. This work was done as part of the I.Family Study (http://wwwifamilystudy.eu/) and as part of the REWARD study (www.rewardstudy.be/); we gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the European Community within the Seventh RTD Framework Programme Contract No. 266044 and the Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship (grant number SBO-120054), respectively. Further, I. Sioen received funding from the Research Foundation - Flanders (grant number 1.2.683.14.N.00).

Authors’ contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study. ADD, ISioen and SV organized the data collection. ADD carried out the analyses, made the figures and drafted the paper. All authors contributed to the interpretation of data, critically revised the paper and approved the final paper as submitted.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was funded by the European Community within the Seventh RTD Framework Programme (Contract No. 266044), the Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship (grant number SBO-120054), and, for I. Sioen, the Research Foundation - Flanders (grant number 1.2.683.14.N.00).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The I.Family-Forces study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ghent University Hospital (approval number EC/2013/058).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all parents and from all children older than 12 years. Younger children gave verbal assent.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahrens W, Bammann K, Siani A, Buchecker K, De HS, Iacoviello L, Hebestreit A, Krogh V, Lissner L, Marild S et al (2011) The IDEFICS cohort: design, characteristics and participation in the baseline survey. Int J Obesity 35(Suppl 1):S3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauer DJ, Curran PJ (2005) Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behav Res 40:373–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belsky J, van Ijzendoorn MH (2015) What works for whom? Genetic moderation of intervention efficacy. Dev Psychopathol 27:1–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berridge KC, Ho C, Richard JM, DiFeliceantonio AG (2010) The tempted brain eats: pleasure and desire circuits in obesity and eating disorders. Brain Res 1350:43–64CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bjornebekk G (2009) Psychometric properties of the scores on the behavioral inhibition and activation scales in a sample of Norwegian children. Educ Psychol Meas 69:636–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blundell JE, Stubbs RJ, Golding C, Croden F, Alam R, Whybrow S, Le NJ, Lawton CL (2005) Resistance and susceptibility to weight gain: individual variability in response to a high-fat diet. Physiol Behav 86:614–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown IJ, Tzoulaki I, Candeias V, Elliott P (2009) Salt intakes around the world: implications for public health. Int J Epidemiol 38:791–813CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bruening M, MacLehose R, Eisenberg ME, Nanney MS, Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D (2014) Associations between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and fast-food restaurant frequency among adolescents and their friends. J Nutr Educ Behav 46:277–285CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carver CS, White TL (1994) Behavioral-inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment—the Bis/Bas scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 67:319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chopra M, Galbraith S, Darnton-Hill I (2002) A global response to a global problem: the epidemic of overnutrition. Bull World Health Organ 80:952–958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen DA, Babey SH (2012) Contextual influences on eating behaviours: heuristic processing and dietary choices. Obes Rev 13:766–779CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cole TJ, Lobstein T (2012) Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatr Obes 7:284–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Covey J (2014) The role of dispositional factors in moderating message framing effects. Health Psychol 33:52–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cribb V, Emmett P, Northstone K (2013) Dietary patterns throughout childhood and associations with nutrient intakes. Public Health Nutr 16:1801–1809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davis C, Patte K, Levitan R, Reid C, Tweed S, Curtis C (2007) From motivation to behaviour: a model of reward sensitivity, overeating, and food preferences in the risk profile for obesity. Appetite 48:12–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Cock N, Van Lippevelde W, Goossens L, De Clercq B, Vangeel J, Lachat C, Beullens K, Huybregts L, Vervoort L, Eggermont S et al (2016) Sensitivity to reward and adolescents’ unhealthy snacking and drinking behavior: the role of hedonic eating styles and availability. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Cock N, Van Lippevelde W, Vervoort L, Vangeel J, Maes L, Eggermont S, Braet C, Lachat C, Huybregts L, Goossens L et al (2016) Sensitivity to reward is associated with snack and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in adolescents. Eur J Nutr 55:1623–1632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Decker A, Sioen I, Verbeken S, Braet C, Michels N, De Henauw S (2016) Associations of reward sensitivity with food consumption, activity pattern, and BMI in children. Appetite 100:189–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Los RA, Thomas SA, Goodman KL, Kundey SM (2013) Principles underlying the use of multiple informants’ reports. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 9:123–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Diethelm K, Jankovic N, Moreno LA, Huybrechts I, De Henauw S, De Vriendt T, Gonzalez-Gross M, Leclercq C, Gottrand F, Gilbert CC et al (2012) Food intake of European adolescents in the light of different food-based dietary guidelines: results of the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) Study. Public Health Nutr 15:386–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Diethelm K, Huybrechts I, Moreno L, De Henauw S, Manios Y, Beghin L, Gonzalez-Gross M, Le Donne C, Cuenca-Garcia M, Castillo MJ et al (2014) Nutrient intake of European adolescents: results of the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) Study. Public Health Nutr 17:486–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fisher JO, Birch LL (2002) Eating in the absence of hunger and overweight in girls from 5 to 7 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr 76:226–231PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Groppe K, Elsner B (2014) Executive function and food approach behavior in middle childhood. Front Psychol 5Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guerrieri R, Nederkoorn C, Jansen A (2008) The interaction between impulsivity and a varied food environment: its influence on food intake and overweight. Int J Obesity 32:708–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hayes AF (ed) (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Holland JC, Kolko RP, Stein RI, Welch RR, Perri MG, Schechtman KB, Saelens BE, Epstein LH, Wilfley DE (2014) Modifications in parent feeding practices and child diet during family-based behavioral treatment improve child zBMI. Obesity 22:E119–E126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Huybrechts I, De Henauw S (2007) Energy and nutrient intakes by pre-school children in Flanders-Belgium. Brit J Nutr 98:600–610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Huybrechts I, Boernhorst C, Pala V, Moreno LA, Barba G, Lissner L, Fraterman A, Veidebaum T, Hebestreit A, Sieri S et al (2011) Evaluation of the Children’s Eating Habits Questionnaire used in the IDEFICS study by relating urinary calcium and potassium to milk consumption frequencies among European children. Int J Obesity 35:S69–S78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Johnson L, van Jaarsveld CHM, Wardle J (2011) Individual and family environment correlates differ for consumption of core and non-core foods in children. Brit J Nutr 105:950–959CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lamerz A, Kuepper-Nybelen J, Wehle C, Bruning N, Trost-Brinkhues G, Brenner H, Hebebrand J, Herpertz-Dahlmann B (2005) Social class, parental education, and obesity prevalence in a study of six-year-old children in Germany. Int J Obesity 29:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lanfer A, Hebestreit A, Ahrens W, Krogh V, Sieri S, Lissner L, Eiben G, Siani A, Huybrechts I, Loit HM et al (2011) Reproducibility of food consumption frequencies derived from the Children’s Eating Habits Questionnaire used in the IDEFICS study. Int J Obesity 35:S61–S68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McGowan L, Croker H, Wardle J, Cooke LJ (2012) Environmental and individual determinants of core and non-core food and drink intake in preschool-aged children in the United Kingdom. Eur J Clin Nutr 66:322–328CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mejia D, Berchtold A, Belanger RE, Kuntsche EN, Michaud PA, Suris JC (2013) Frequency and effects of meeting health behaviour guidelines among adolescents. Eur J Pub Health 23:8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Melbye EL, Ogaard T, Overby NC (2011) Validation of the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire with parents of 10-to-12-year-olds. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:113CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Michels N, Sioen I, Boone L, Clays E, Vanaelst B, Huybrechts I, De Henauw S (2015) Cross-lagged associations between children’s stress and adiposity: the children’s body composition and stress study. Psychosom Med 77:50–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mooreville M, Davey A, Orloski A, Hannah EL, Mathias KC, Birch LL, Kral TVE, Zakeri IF, Fisher JO (2015) Individual differences in susceptibility to large portion sizes among obese and normal-weight children. Obesity 23:808–814CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Muris P, Meesters C, de Kanter E, Timmerman PE (2005) Behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation system scales for children: relationships with Eysenck’s personality traits and psychopathological symptoms. Pers Indiv Diff 38:831–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Musher-Eizenman D, Holub S (2007) Comprehensive feeding practices questionnaire: validation of a new measure of parental feeding practices. J Pediatr Psychol 32:960–972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Roelants M, Hauspie R, Hoppenbrouwers K (2009) References for growth and pubertal development from birth to 21 years in Flanders, Belgium. Ann Hum Biol 36:680–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rollins BY, Loken E, Savage JS, Birch LL (2014) Effects of restriction on children’s intake differ by child temperament, food reinforcement, and parent’s chronic use of restriction. Appetite 73:31–39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rollins BY, Loken E, Savage JS, Birch LL (2014) Maternal controlling feeding practices and girls’ inhibitory control interact to predict changes in BMI and eating in the absence of hunger from 5 to 7 y. Am J Clin Nutr 99:249–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rolls ET (2011) Taste, olfactory and food texture reward processing in the brain and obesity. Int J Obesity 35:550–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Santos JL, Ho-Urriola JA, Gonzalez A, Smalley SV, Dominguez-Vasquez P, Cataldo R, Obregon AM, Amador P, Weisstaub G, Hodgson MI (2011) Association between eating behavior scores and obesity in Chilean children. Nutr J 10Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schachter S (1968) Obesity and eating. Internal and external cues differentially affect the eating behavior of obese and normal subjects Science 161:751–756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sleddens EF, Kremers SP, Thijs C (2008) The children’s eating behaviour questionnaire: factorial validity and association with body mass index in Dutch children aged 6-7. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5:49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Snoek HM, Engels RCME, van Strien T, Otten R (2013) Emotional, external and restrained eating behaviour and BMI trajectories in adolescence. Appetite 67:81–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
  48. 48.
    UNESCO (1997) International standard classification of education.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Van Strien T, Frijters JER, Bergers GPA, Defares PB (1986) The Dutch eating behavior questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional and external eating behavior. Int J Eat Disorder 5:295–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vandeweghe L, Verbeken S, Moens E, Vervoort L, Braet C (2016) Strategies to improve the willingness to taste: the moderating role of children’s reward sensitivity. Appetite 103:344–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wardle J, Guthrie CA, Sanderson S, Rapoport L (2001) Development of the children’s eating behaviour questionnaire. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 42:963–970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annelies De Decker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sandra Verbeken
    • 2
  • Isabelle Sioen
    • 1
    • 3
  • Wendy Van Lippevelde
    • 1
  • Caroline Braet
    • 2
  • Gabrielle Eiben
    • 4
  • Valeria Pala
    • 5
  • Lucia A. Reish
    • 6
  • Stefaan De Henauw
    • 1
    • 7
  • on behalf of the I.Family Consortium
  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public HealthGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Developmental, Personality and Social PsychologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  3. 3.Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Food Safety and Food QualityGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  4. 4.Department of Public Health and Community MedicineUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  5. 5.Department of Preventive and Predictive MedicineFondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale dei TumoriMilanItaly
  6. 6.Department of Intercultural Communication and ManagementCopenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark
  7. 7.Department of Health Sciences, VesaliusUniversity College GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations