Skip to main content
Log in

Dwell times and risk of non-elective removal of 1-French peripherally inserted central catheters according to catheter tip position in very preterm infants

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated dwell times and risk of non-elective removal of 975 single-lumen 1-French peripherally inserted central catheters (1FR-PICC) according to tip position in a cohort of very preterm infants with a mean (SD) gestational age of 27+6 (2+1) weeks and a mean (SD) birth weight of 988 (294) g over an eight-year period. Infants with a 1FR-PICC inserted for continuous infusion of intravenous fluids within the first 30 days of life were eligible. Dwell times of PICC with elective versus non-elective removal, risk of non-elective removal of PICC according to tip position, and differences between upper versus lower limb catheter insertion were analysed. 33.8% PICC were removed non-electively. Median (IQR) dwell time was 193 (142–287) versus 154 (102–260) h for elective versus non-elective removal (p < 0.001). Non-elective removal was more common for lower limb insertion sites: 41 versus 31% (p = 0.002). PICC were significantly more likely to be removed non-electively when located in the axillary (odds ratio (OR) 2.08), cephalic (OR 8.93), external iliac (OR 4.99), and femoral (OR 10.31) vein.

Conclusion: In this cohort, dwell times of 1FR-PICC lines removed non-electively were similar to 1.9- or 2.0FR-PICC. PICC tips positioned in the axillary, cephalic, external iliac, and femoral veins had a higher risk of non-elective removal.

What is Known:

•Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are widely used in neonatal intensive care.

•Previous studies focused on 2-French PICC and newborns of all gestational ages.

What is New:

•Dwell times of 1-French PICC removed non-electively were similar to 2-French PICC.

•1-French PICC tips positioned more peripherally had a higher risk of non-elective removal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FR:

French

IQR:

Interquartile range

IVC:

Inferior vena cava

NICU:

Neonatal intensive care unit

PICC:

Peripherally inserted central catheter

SD:

Standard deviation

SVC:

Superior vena cava

References

  1. Colacchio K, Deng Y, Northrup V, Bizzarro MJ (2013) Complications associated with central and non-central venous catheters in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 32:941–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Costa P, Bueno M, Aparecida Alves AM, Kimura AF (2013) Incidence of nonelective removal of percutaneously inserted central catheters according to tip position in neonates. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 42:348–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenberg RG, Cochran KM, Smith PB et al (2015) Effect of catheter dwell time on risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection in infants. Pediatrics 136:1080–1086

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoang V, Sills J, Chandler M, Busalani E, Clifton-Koeppel R, Modanlou HD (2008) Percutaneously inserted central catheter for total parenteral nutrition in neonates: complications rates related to upper versus lower extremity insertion. Pediatrics 121:e1152–e1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Isemann B, Sorrels R, Akinbi H (2015) Effect of heparin and other factors associated with complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in neonates. J Perinatol 32:856–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jain A, Deshpande P, Shah P (2013) Peripherally inserted central catheter tip position and risk of associated complications in neonates. J Perinatol 33:307–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wrightson DD (2013) Peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates with upper versus lower extremity insertion sites. Adv Neonatal Care 13:198–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai König.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the institutional Human Research Ethics Committee (Mercy Health Inc., Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). The need for written consent was waived by the Committee as the study was considered a low-risk, quality assurance project, and all data were reviewed de-identified.

Additional information

Communicated by Patrick Van Reempts

Revisions received: 05 December 2016; 03 January 2017

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erhard, D.M., Nguyen, S., Guy, K.J. et al. Dwell times and risk of non-elective removal of 1-French peripherally inserted central catheters according to catheter tip position in very preterm infants. Eur J Pediatr 176, 407–411 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2854-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2854-7

Keywords

Navigation