Advertisement

European Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 172, Issue 12, pp 1649–1656 | Cite as

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen for bronchiolitis in a pediatric ward: a pilot study

  • Silvia BressanEmail author
  • Marco Balzani
  • Baruch Krauss
  • Andrea Pettenazzo
  • Stefania Zanconato
  • Eugenio Baraldi
Original Article

Abstract

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a widely used ventilatory support in children with bronchiolitis in the intensive care setting. No data is available on HFNC use in the general pediatric ward. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of HFNC oxygen therapy in infants hospitalized in a pediatric ward for moderate–severe bronchiolitis and to assess the changes in ventilatory parameters before and after starting HFNC support. This prospective observational pilot study was carried out during the bronchiolitis season 2011–2012 in a pediatric tertiary care academic center in Italy. Interruptions of HFNC therapy and possible side effects or escalation to other forms of respiratory support were recorded. Oxygen saturation (SpO2), end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), and respiratory rate (RR), measured for a baseline period of 1 h before and at specific time intervals in 48 h after the start of HFNC were recorded. Twenty-seven infants were included (median age 1.3 months; absolute range 0.3–8.5). No adverse events, no premature HFNC therapy termination, and no escalation to other forms of respiratory support were recorded. Median SpO2 significantly increased by 1–2 points after changing from standard oxygen to HFNC (p <0.001). Median ETCO2 and RR rapidly decreased by 6–8 mmHg and 13–20 breaths per minute, respectively, in the first 3 h of HFNC therapy (p <0.001) and remained steady thereafter. Conclusions: Use of HFNC for oxygen administration is feasible for infants with moderate–severe bronchiolitis in a general pediatric ward. In these children, HFNC therapy improves oxygen saturation levels and seems to be associated with a decrease in both ETCO2 and RR.

Keywords

Bronchiolitis Oxygen inhalation therapy Children Carbon dioxide 

Abbreviations

ETCO2

End-tidal carbon dioxide

FiO2

Fraction of inspired oxygen

HFNC

High-flow nasal cannula

HR

Heart rate

PICU

Pediatric intensive care unit

RR

Respiratory rate

RSV

Respiratory sincitial virus

SpO2

Oxygen saturation

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Silvia Carraro for her assistance with the statistical analysis and Dr. Lisanna Tomasi and Dr. Laura Cesca for their contribution in recruiting patients and data collection. The authors also thank the head nurses Ms. Francesca Selmin and Ms. Mariella Rubin and all the nurses for their precious support with the research project.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Krauss is a consultant for Oridion Medical, a capnography company, and holds three patents in the area of capnography. The other authors have no conflicts of interest or funding to disclose. The authors have not received any financial support, salary, or other personal benefits by Fisher & Paykel Healthcare for the present study and do not hold stock in the company.

Source of funding

None

References

  1. 1.
    Abboud PA, Roth PJ, Skiles CL, Stolfi A, Rowin ME (2012) Predictors of failure in infants with viral bronchiolitis treated with high-flow, high-humidity nasal cannula therapy. Pediatr Crit Care 13:e343–e349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abramo TJ, Wiebe RA, Scott SM, Primm PA, McIntyre D, Mydler T (1996) Noninvasive capnometry in a pediatric population with respiratory emergencies. Pediatr Emerg Care 12:252–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Diagnosis and Management of Bronchiolitis (2006) Diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics 118:1774–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Campbell DM, Shah PS, Shah V, Kelly EN (2006) Nasal continuous positive airway pressure from high flow cannula versus infant flow for preterm infants. J Perinatol 26:546–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colman Y, Krauss B (1999) Microstream capnograpy technology: a new approach to an old problem. J Clin Monit Comput 15:403–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dani C, Pratesi S, Migliori C, Bertini G (2009) High flow nasal cannula therapy as respiratory support in the preterm infant. Pediatr Pulmonol 44:629–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Klerk A (2008) Humidified high-flow nasal cannula: is it the new and improved CPAP? Adv Neonatal Care 8:98–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donlan M, Fontela PS, Puligandla PS (2011) Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in acute viral bronchiolitis: a systematic review. Pediatr Pulmonol 46:736–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dysart K, Miller TL, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH (2009) Research in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action. Respir Med 103:1400–1405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    González Martínez F, González Sánchez MI, Rodríguez Fernández R (2013) Clinical impact of introducing ventilation with high flow oxygen in the treatment of bronchiolitis in a paediatric ward. An Pediatr (Barc) 78:210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hartling L, Fernandes RM, Bialy L, Milne A, Johnson D, Plint A, Klassen TP, Vandermeer B (2011) Steroids and bronchodilators for acute bronchiolitis in the first two years of life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 342:d1714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hasan RA, Habib RH (2011) Effects of flow rate and airleak at the nares and mouth opening on positive distending pressure delivery using commercially available high-flow nasal cannula systems: a lung model study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 12:e29–e33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hedge S, Prodhan P (2013) Serious airleak syndrome complicating high-flow nasal cannula therapy: a report of 3 cases. Pediatrics 131:e939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hilliard TN, Archer N, Laura H, Heraghty J, Cottis H, Mills K, Ball S, Davis P (2012) Pilot study of vapotherm oxygen delivery in moderately severe bronchiolitis. Arch Dis Child 97:182–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holleman-Duray D, Kaupie D, Weiss MG (2007) Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula: use and a neonatal early extubation protocol. J Perinatol 27:776–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krauss B (2008) Advances in the use of capnography for nonintubated patients. Isr J Emerg Med 8:3–15Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lenglet H, Sztrymf B, Leroy C, Brun P, Dreyfuss D, Ricard JD (2012) Humidified high flow nasal oxygen during respiratory failure in the emergency department: feasibility and efficacy. Respir Care 57:1873–1878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mandelberg A, Amirav I (2010) Hypertonic saline or high volume normal saline for viral bronchiolitis: mechanisms and rationale. Pediatr Pulmonol 45:36–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McKiernan C, Chua LC, Visintainer PF, Allen H (2010) High flow nasal cannulae therapy in infants with bronchiolitis. J Pediatr 156:634–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nagakumar P, Doull I (2012) Current therapy for bronchiolitis. Arch Dis Child 97:827–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Plewa MC, Sikora S, Engoren M, Tome D, Thomas J, Deuster A (1995) Evaluation of capnography in nonintubated emergency department patients with respiratory distress. Acad Emerg Med 2:901–908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schibler A, Pham TM, Dunster KR, Foster K, Barlow A, Gibbons K, Hough JL (2011) Reduced intubation rates for infants after introduction of high-flow nasal prong oxygen delivery. Intensive Care Med 37:847–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Bronchiolitis in children. NHS Quality improvement Scotland. Available at www.sign.ac.uk. Accessed 30 May 2012
  24. 24.
    Shoemaker MT, Pierce MR, Yoder BA, Di Geronimo RJ (2007) High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective study. J Perinatol 27:85–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, Osiovich H (2001) High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics 107:1081–1083PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Trevisanuto D, Giuliotto S, Cavallin F, Doglioni N, Toniazzo S, Zanardo V (2012) End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in very low birth weight infants: correlation and agreement with arterial carbon dioxide. Pediatr Pulmonol 47:367–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Walsh M, Engle W, Laptook A, Kazzi SN, Buchter S, Rasmussen M, Yao Q, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (2005) Oxygen delivery through nasal cannulae to preterm infants: can practice be improved? Pediatrics 116:857–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang EE, Milner RA, Navas L, Maj H (1992) Observer agreement for respiratory signs and oximetry in infants hospitalized with lower respiratory infections. Am Rev Respir Dis 145:106–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O’Donnell CP, De Paoli AG (2011) High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 5:CD006405Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wing R, James C, Maranda LS, Armsby CC (2012) Use of high-flow nasal cannula support in the emergency department reduces the need for intubation in pediatric acute respiratory insufficiency. Pediatr Emerg Care 28:1117–1123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Woodhead DD, Lambert DK, Clark JM, Christensen RD (2006) Comparing two methods of delivering high-flow gas therapy by nasal cannula following endotracheal extubation: a prospective, randomized, masked, crossover trial. J Perinatol 26:481–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Wainwright C, Klassen TP (2011) Nebulized hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.;(4):CD006458Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zorc JJ, Hall CB (2010) Bronchiolitis: recent evidence on diagnosis and management. Pediatrics 125:342–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Bressan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marco Balzani
    • 1
  • Baruch Krauss
    • 2
  • Andrea Pettenazzo
    • 1
  • Stefania Zanconato
    • 1
  • Eugenio Baraldi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Women’s and Children’s HealthUniversity of PadovaPadovaItaly
  2. 2.Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital and the Department of PediatricsHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations