European Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 171, Issue 6, pp 935–940 | Cite as

Lessons learned from 5 years of newborn screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia in the Czech Republic: 17-hydroxyprogesterone, genotypes, and screening performance

  • Felix Votava
  • Dana Novotna
  • Petr Kracmar
  • Hana Vinohradska
  • Eva Stahlova-Hrabincova
  • Zuzana Vrzalova
  • David Neumann
  • Jana Malikova
  • Jan Lebl
  • Dietrich Matern
Original Article

Abstract

The aims were to summarize the experience and to determine the performance metrics of newborn screening (NBS) for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) in the Czech Republic. 17-Hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) was measured in NBS samples prospectively in 545,026 newborns and retrospectively in 31 CAH patients born outside the study period. A total of 2,811 screened newborns had abnormal 17OHP; CAH was confirmed in 46 probands. One patient with a severe–moderate genotype of CAH had 17OHP below the cut-off and was diagnosed clinically. This corresponds to a screening sensitivity of 98% and a false positive rate (FPR) of 0.51%. The median of 17OHP in the most severe genotypes was 484 nmol/L (n = 21); in severe/moderate, 321 nmol/L (n = 30); in moderate, 61 nmol/L (n = 20); and in mild genotypes, 31 nmol/L (n = 7). NBS is efficient to detect severe CAH but may fail to detect milder variants. However, the FPR is too high but could be improved by application of a second tier test.

Keywords

Newborn screening Congenital adrenal hyperplasia 17-Hydroxyprogesterone CYP21 gene 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to Dr A.M. Wallace, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Glasgow, Scotland, and Mark McCann, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA for 17OHP measurements in NBS samples. The study was supported by the Czech Ministry of Health, project IGA numbers 9981-3 and NT12213 and by the Czech Ministry of Education, project numbers MSM0021620814 and grant numbers MSMT LC06023.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Blankenstein O, Stopsack M, Fingerhut R, Loeber G, Torresani T (2009) The ISNS 17OHP initiative: Establishing of 17OHP cut-offs levels by international collaboration. Ces-slov Pediatr 64(4): 192–193. And available at: http://www.isns-neoscreening.org/htm/studies.htm (ISNS members only).
  2. 2.
    Fingerhut R (2009) False positive rate in newborn screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH)-ether extraction reveals two distinct reasons for elevated 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) values. Steroids 74(8):662–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hughes I (2002) Congenital adrenal hyperplasia: phenotype and genotype. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 15:1329–1340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kovacs J, Votava F, Heinze G, Sólyom J, Lebl J, Pribilincová Z, Frisch H, Battelino T, Waldhauser F, Middle European Workshop on Paediatric Endocrinology-Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Study Group (2001) Lessons from 30 years of clinical diagnosis and treatment of congenital adrenal hyperplasia in five middle European countries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86(7):2958–2964PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lacey JM, Minutti CZ, Magera MJ, Tauscher AL, Casetta B, McCann M, Lymp J, Hahn SH, Rinaldo P, Matern D (2004) Improved specificity of newborn screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia by second-tier steroid profiling using tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 50(3):621–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee JE, Moon Y, Lee MH, Jun YH, Oh KI, Choi JW (2008) Corrected 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone values adjusted by a scoring system for screening congenital adrenal hyperplasia in premature infants. Ann Clin Lab Sci 38(3):235–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Olgemöller B, Roscher AA, Liebl B, Fingerhut R (2003) Screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia: adjustment of 17-hydroxyprogesterone cut-off values to both age and birth weight markedly improves the predictive value. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(12):5790–5794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schreiner F, Brack C, Salzgeber K, Vorhoff W, Woelfle J, Gohlke B (2008) False negative 17-hydroxyprogesterone screening in children with classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Eur J Pediatr 167(4):479–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Speiser PW, Azziz R, Baskin LS, Ghizzoni L, Hensle TW, Merke DP, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Miller WL, Montori VM, Oberfield SE, Ritzen M, White PC (2010) Congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to steroid 21-hydroxylase deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95(9):4133–4160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strnadova KA, Votava F, Lebl J, Mühl A, Item C, Bodamer OA, Torresani T, Bouska I, Waldhauser F, Sperl W (2007) Prevalence of congenital adrenal hyperplasia among sudden infant death in the Czech Republic and Austria. Eur J Pediatr 166(1):1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Torresani T, Biason-Lauber A (2007) Congenital adrenal hyperplasia: diagnostic advances. J Inherit Metab Dis 30(4):563–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Votava F, Kracmar P, Rakosnikova V, Lebl J, Hnikova O, Brejchova J, Vackova P, Zatloukalova R (2002) Neonatal screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia in the Czech Republic—results of a one-year pilot study in males. Czech-Slovac Pediatr 57(12):690–696, Article in CzechGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Votava F, Torok D, Kovacs J, Möslinger D, Baumgartner-Parzer SM, Solyom J, Pribilincova Z, Battelino T, Lebl J, Frisch H, Waldhauser F, Middle European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology- Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (MESPE-CAH) Study Group (2005) Estimation of the false-negative rate in newborn screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Eur J Endocrinol 152(6):869–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vrzalova Z, Hruba Z, Hrabincova ES, Vrabelova S, Votava F, Kolouskova S, Fajkusova L (2011) Chimeric CYP21A1P/CYP21A2 genes identified in Czech patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Eur J Med Genet 54(2):112–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waisbren SE, Albers S, Amato S, Ampola M, Brewster TG, Demmer L, Eaton RB, Greenstein R, Korson M, Larson C, Marsden D, Msall M, Naylor EW, Pueschel S, Seashore M, Shih VE, Levy HL (2003) Effect of expanded newborn screening for biochemical genetic disorders on child outcomes and parental stress. JAMA 290(19):2564–2572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wedell A (2011) Molecular genetics of 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Endocr Dev 20:80–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    White PC (2009) Neonatal screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Nat Rev Endocrinol 5(9):490–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    White PC, Speiser PW (2000) Congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Endocr Rev 21(3):245–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Working Group on Neonatal Screening of the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (2001) Procedure for neonatal screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Horm Res 55(4):201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yoo BK, Grosse SD (2009) The cost effectiveness of screening newborns for congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Public Health Genomics 12(2):67–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felix Votava
    • 1
  • Dana Novotna
    • 2
  • Petr Kracmar
    • 1
  • Hana Vinohradska
    • 3
  • Eva Stahlova-Hrabincova
    • 4
  • Zuzana Vrzalova
    • 4
  • David Neumann
    • 5
  • Jana Malikova
    • 6
  • Jan Lebl
    • 6
  • Dietrich Matern
    • 7
  1. 1.3rd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Department of PediatricsCharles University in PraguePrague 10Czech Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, BrnoMasaryk University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
  3. 3.Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Department of Clinical BiochemistryMasaryk University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
  4. 4.Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Center of Molecular Biology and Gene TherapyMasaryk University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
  5. 5.Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Department of PediatricsCharles University in PragueHradec KraloveCzech Republic
  6. 6.2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Department of PediatricsCharles University in PraguePragueCzech Republic
  7. 7.Biochemical Genetics LaboratoryMayo Clinic College of MedicineRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations