- 1.2k Downloads
Childhood functional constipation has an estimated prevalence of 3% in the Western world and is probably the most common gastrointestinal complaint in children. It is characterized by infrequent painful defecation, faecal incontinence and abdominal pain. Only less than 5% of children with constipation have an underlying disease. Only recently two evidence-based guidelines (the Netherlands and Great Britain) have been developed concerning the diagnostic and therapeutic approach for childhood constipation which we both discuss in this article. At present, a thorough medical history and complete physical exam are usually sufficient to confirm the diagnosis of functional constipation. Further laboratory or radiological investigations should only be performed in case of doubt, to exclude an underlying disease. Treatment of childhood constipation consists of four steps: (1) education, (2) disimpaction, (3) prevention of re-accumulation of faeces and (4) follow-up. Surprisingly, there is only limited evidence that laxative treatment is better than placebo in children with constipation. However, according to the available evidence, the Dutch guideline recommends lactulose for children <1 year as first-choice treatment. For children below the age of older than 1 year, both lactulose and polyethylene glycol (PEG) with or without electrolytes can be used as first-choice treatment. According to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guideline, PEG plus electrolytes is the first-choice treatment for all ages. Conclusion: Children with functional constipation should be diagnosed and treated according to recently developed evidence-based guidelines.
KeywordsFunctional constipation Children Evidence-based guideline Diagnostics Treatment
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
Randomised controlled trial
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they do not have conflict of interest and no financial relationships that might have influenced the present work.
- 7.Brazzelli M, Griffiths P (2006) Behavioural and cognitive interventions with or without other treatments for the management of faecal incontinence in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19(2):CD002240Google Scholar
- 9.Dupont C, Leluyer B, Maamri N, Morali A, Joye JP, Fiorini JM, Abdelatif A, Baranes C, Benoît S, Benssoussan A, Boussioux JL, Boyer P, Brunet E, Delorme J, François-Cecchin S, Gottrand F, Grassart M, Hadji S, Kalidjian A, Languepin J, Leissler C, Lejay D, Livon D, Lopez JP, Mougenot JF, Risse JC, Rizk C, Roumaneix D, Schirrer J, Thoron B, Kalach N (2005) Double-blind randomized evaluation of clinical and biological tolerance of polyethylene glycol 4000 versus lactulose in constipated children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 41:625–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (2006) Evaluation and treatment of constipation in children: summary of updated recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 43:405–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.NVK, NHG (2009) Richtlijn obstipatie bij kinderen van 0 tot 18 jaar. Utrecht; http://www.cbo.nl
- 23.Tabbers MM, Boluyt N, Berger MY, Benninga MA (2010) Constipation in children. Clinical Evidence 03:303Google Scholar