Pain reduction in children during port-à-cath catheter puncture using local anaesthesia with EMLA™
- 382 Downloads
Alleviating pain is of high importance for children undergoing chemotherapy. Eutectic mixture of lidocain-prilocain cream (EMLA) is assumed to require 60 min application time.
Materials and methods
We prospectively compared the pain during port-à-cath punctures after 40 min compared to 60 min of application time. A prospective, unblinded, cross-over study was performed. The children received two punctures during their chemotherapy protocol. Patients in group 1 had the first puncture after 40 min EMLA application time. Their second puncture (approximately a week later) was done after 60 min. Patients in group 2 started after 40 min. Pain was scored using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Bieri scale. Patients, parents and a nurse scaled the pain after the intervention. Eighty-seven children between 2 and 18 years with different malignant diseases were included.
Results and discussion
On the VAS pain scale, the mean pain was 2.3 (minimum 0, maximum 9.2) after 40 min and 1.9 (minimum 0, maximum 9.4) after 60 min according to the observations of the nurse and very similarly according to the parents’ observations. The children expressed more pain after 40 min of EMLA application time (mean pain, 3.5) and a significant pain reduction after 60 min application time (mean pain 1.7).
In this study children experienced less pain after 60 min application time, but pain reduction was already seen after 40 min. The child’s perception of pain differed from observers’ point of view and should therefore always be included in pain management.
KeywordsPain Port catheter EMLA Cancer Childhood
The authors thank the patients and their families who participated in this trial, the physicians and nurses of the paediatric oncology ward for their input in performing this study. The authors also thank Annette Frank-Hoppe, Ute Nikolaizik and Christiane Schirmer for excellent study monitoring. Clemens Betzel is acknowledged for revising the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
- 14.Wongaprarasuk P (1998) Adverse local reactions to amethocaine cream-audit and case report. Anaesth Intensive Care 26(3):312–314Google Scholar