European Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 164, Issue 12, pp 783–784

Applicability of the Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Intensive Care Registry diagnostic codes and Paediatric Index of Mortality 2 scoring system in a Croatian paediatric intensive care unit

  • Julije Mestrovic
  • Goran Kardum
  • Branka Polic
  • Ante Omazic
  • Luka Stricevic
  • Alan Sustic
Short Report

References

  1. 1.
    Gemke RJBJ, van Vught AJ (2002) Scoring systems in pediatric intensive care: PRISM III versus PIM. Intensive Care Med 28: 204–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marcin JP, Pollack MM (2000) Review of the methodologies and applications of scoring systems in neonatal and pediatric intensive care. Pediatr Crit Care Med 1: 20–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slater A, Shann F, McEnirey J (2003) The ANZPIC registry diagnostic codes: a system for coding reasons for admitting children to intensive care. Intensive Care Med 29: 271–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Slater A, .Shann F, Pearson G (2003) PIM2: a revised version of the Paediatric Index of Mortality. Intensive Care Med 29: 278–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tibby SM, Taylor D, Festa M, Hanna S, Hatherill M, Jones G, Habibi P, Durward A, Murdoch IA (2002) A comparison of the three scoring systems for mortality risk among retrieved intensive care patients. Arch Dis Child 87: 421–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julije Mestrovic
    • 1
  • Goran Kardum
    • 2
  • Branka Polic
    • 1
  • Ante Omazic
    • 1
  • Luka Stricevic
    • 1
  • Alan Sustic
    • 3
  1. 1.Paediatric Intensive Care UnitDepartment of Paediatrics, Clinical Hospital SplitSplit Croatia
  2. 2.Department of NeuroscienceMedical School, University of SplitSplit Croatia
  3. 3.Department of Anaesthesiology and ICUUniversity Hospital RijekaRijeka Croatia

Personalised recommendations