European Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 162, Issue 9, pp 629–633 | Cite as

Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP)

  • Maria De Lourdes Levy
  • Victor Larcher
  • Ronald Kurz
  • the members of the Ethics Working Group of the CESP
Original Paper


Informed consent means approval of the legal representative of the child and/or of the competent child for medical interventions following appropriate information. National legal regulations differ in regard to the question when a child has the full right to give his or her autonomous consent. Informed assent means a child's agreement to medical procedures in circumstances where he or she is not legally authorised or lacks sufficient understanding for giving consent competently. Doctors should carefully listen to the opinion and wishes of children who are not able to give full consent and should strive to obtain their assent. Doctors have the responsibility to determine the ability and competence of the child for giving his or her consent or assent. All children, even those not judged as competent, have a right to receive information given in a way that they can understand and give their assent or dissent. This consent/assent process must promote and protect the dignity, privacy and confidentiality of the child and his or her family. Consent or assent is required for all aspects of medical care, for preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic measures and research. Children may effectively refuse treatment or procedures which are not necessary to save their lives or prevent serious harm. Where treatment is necessary to save a life or prevent serious harm, the doctor has the duty to act in the best interest of the child. However, parents may also refuse to consent and in this case national laws and legal mechanisms for resolving disputes may be used.


Children Ethics Informed consent 

Further reading

  1. 1.
    Alderson P (1990) Choosing for children: parents' consent to surgery. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alderson P, Montgomery J (1996) Healthcare choices. Making decisions with children. Institute of Public Policy Research, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Devereux JA, Jones DH, Dickenson DI (1993) Can children withhold consent to treatment? BMJ 303:1459–1461Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doyal L (1993) Needs, rights and the moral duties of clinicians. In: Gillon R (ed) Principles of health care ethics. Wiley, London, pp 217–230Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP) (2003). Guidelines for informed consent in biomedical research involving paediatric populations as research participants. Eur J Pediatr 162:455–458Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foreman DM (1999) The family rule. A framework for obtaining ethical consent for medical interventions from children. J Med Ethics 25:491–496PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gillon R (1991) Philosophical medical ethics. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    King NMP, Cross AW (1996) Children as decision makers. Guidelines for paediatricians. J Pediatr 115:10–16Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurz R, Ethics Working Group of the CESP (2001) Decision making in extreme situations involving children: withholding of withdrawal of life supporting treatment in paediatric care. Statement of the ethics working group of the Confederation of the European Specialists of Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 160: 214–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lansdown R (1998) Listening to children; have we gone too far ( or not far enough )? J Roy Soc Med 91: 457–461Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nuffield Council on Bioethics (1995) Human tissue and legal issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ondrusek N, Abramowitch R, Pencharz P, Koren G (1998) Empirical examination of the ability of children to consent to clinical research. J Med Ethics 24: 158–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pearce J (1994) Consent to treatment during childhood: the assessment of competence and the avoidance of conflict. Br J Psychiatry 165: 1–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sauer PPJ, Ethics Working Group of the CESP (2002) Research in children. Report on behalf of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics. Eur J Paediatr 161: 1–5Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    United Nations Children's Fund (1995) The Convention of the Rights of the Child. UK Committee for UNICEF, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria De Lourdes Levy
    • 2
  • Victor Larcher
    • 3
  • Ronald Kurz
    • 1
  • the members of the Ethics Working Group of the CESP
  1. 1.Ethics Working Group of the CESP, Department of PaediatricsUniversity Hospital GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.University Clinic of PediatricsHospital de Santa MariaLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Queen Mary's School of Medicine and DentistryLondonUK

Personalised recommendations