High throughput screening for spores and vegetative forms of pathogenic B. anthracis by an internally controlled real-time PCR assay with automated DNA preparation
- 118 Downloads
Human infections with Bacillus anthracis have become rare but in cases of intentional release, masses of samples would have to be expected. Current PCR assays for anthrax are appropriate for use in single cases, but they have not been formulated for high throughput screening. This article describes a high throughput real-time PCR for anthrax, including automated sample preparation without the need for pre-culturing of samples. The assay detects single copies of target gene. An internal control monitors the whole assay including sample preparation. The limit of detection in blood was 1,066 (95%CI, 741–1,739) copies/ml, corresponding to 4.4–32.3 organisms/ml. Using spore preparations, 20 colony-forming units (CFU) per sample could be detected reliably (0.8 CFU per PCR). The extraction procedures depleted viable spores from solution by factors of 10,000 (automated procedure) and >100,000 (conventional column procedure). One hundred and ten clinical and environmental specimens were retested, 50 of them sampled during a period of heightened anthrax awareness in 2001. A widely used assay yielded two false positive results (cross-reaction with B. cereus), while the new assay tested all samples negative. The internal control operated stable in all clinical samples. The assay is capable of testing for anthrax in the high throughput mode.
KeywordsFluorescent Resonance Energy Transfer Bacillus Anthracis Viable Spore Sheep Blood Agar Intentional Release
This work was supported by grants from the Bundesministerium für Gesundheit und Soziales (No. 325-4539-85/3) and the Bundesamt für Bevölkerungsschutz und Katastrophenhilfe (BBK-F-440-00-1). We thank Britta Liedigk for excellent technical assistance. We are grateful to Drs. Nattermann and Ellerbrok, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, for the donation of B. anthracis strain Sterne.
- 2.Jackson PJ, Hugh-Jones ME, Adair DM, Green G, Hill KK, Kuske CR, Grinberg LM, Abramova FA, Keim P (1998) PCR analysis of tissue samples from the 1979 Sverdlovsk anthrax victims: the presence of multiple Bacillus anthracis strains in different victims. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:1224–1229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Jernigan JA, Stephens DS, Ashford DA, Omenaca C, Topiel MS, Galbraith M, Tapper M, Fisk TL, Zaki S, Popovic T, Meyer RF, Quinn CP, Harper SA, Fridkin SK, Sejvar JJ, Shepard CW, McConnell M, Guarner J, Shieh WJ, Malecki JM, Gerberding JL, Hughes JM, Perkins BA (2001) Bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax: the first 10 cases reported in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 7:933–944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hoffmaster AR, Meyer RF, Bowen MD, Marston CK, Weyant RS, Thurman K, Messenger SL, Minor EE, Winchell JM, Rassmussen MV, Newton BR, Parker JT, Morrill WE, McKinney N, Barnett GA, Sejvar JJ, Jernigan JA, Perkins BA, Popovic T (2002) Evaluation and validation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid identification of Bacillus anthracis. Emerg Infect Dis 8:1178–1182PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kiratisin P, Fukuda CD, Wong A, Stock F, Preuss JC, Ediger L, Brahmbhatt TN, Fischer SH, Fedorko DP, Witebsky FG, Gill VJ (2002) Large-scale screening of nasal swabs for Bacillus anthracis: descriptive summary and discussion of the National Institutes of Health’s experience. J Clin Microbiol 40:3012–3016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.La Scola B, Fournier PE, Raoult D (2003) Searching for Bacillus anthracis in suspect powders: a French experience. J Clin Microbiol 41:524; author reply 524–525Google Scholar
- 28.Drosten C, Chiu LL, Panning M, Leong HN, Preiser W, Tam JS, Gunther S, Kramme S, Emmerich P, Ng WL, Schmitz H, Koay ES (2004) Evaluation of advanced reverse transcription-PCR assays and an alternative PCR target region for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus. J Clin Microbiol 42:2043–2047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar