Advertisement

Medical Microbiology and Immunology

, Volume 194, Issue 4, pp 193–199 | Cite as

Transmission of hepatitis B in Hamburg, Germany, 1998–2002: a prospective, population-based study

  • R. Diel
  • J. Helle
  • R. Gottschalk
Original Investigation

Abstract

To study the pattern of transmission of HBV in a large urban community, an in-depth prospective study was performed in Hamburg between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2002. In total, 524 patients were classified as hepatitis B cases according to the case definition of the Robert Koch Institute, comprising 197 foreign-born and 327 German-born persons. The principal risk factor was parenteral drug use, with 17.7% (n=93/524) of all documented cases of hepatitis B, followed by immigration as refugees (13.9%; n=73). Of all 524 cases, 72 (13.7%) were associated with heterosexual (n=41) or homosexual (n=31) transmission. Household contacts of HBV carriers or of patients with acute infectious disease contributed to 9.0% of the cases (n=47). Medical procedures were most probably the source in 7.4% (n=39), although only 3.2% (n=17) of all patients were health-care workers. In multivariate analysis of household contacts, male–male sexual activity was found to be the greatest risk factor for acquiring an acute HBV infection, followed by asylum-seeking status and the number of contacts. The incidence was 3.5-fold higher among foreign-born persons (16.1 per 100,000) than among German-born individuals (4.5 per 100,000) suggesting that a targeted intervention in this population group is a public-health need. The current national policy of vaccination in defined age groups should be extended to the immunization of all children of foreign-born parents as well as the screening and immunisation of susceptible foreign-born adults.

Keywords

Hepatitis B transmission Risk factors Household contacts Immigrants 

References

  1. 1.
    Behörde für Umwelt und Gesundheit (2002) Meldepflichtige Infektionskrankheiten in Hamburg 2001. Jahresbericht. Hamburg, Germany, pp 43–48Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Behörde für Umwelt und Gesundheit (2003) Meldepflichtige Infektionskrankheiten in Hamburg 2002. Jahrebericht. Hamburg, Germany, pp 38–40Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bundesministerium für Gesundheit und Soziales (2003) Drogen- und Suchtbericht April 2003. 3.5 Behandlung von Oiatabhängigeen. Excurs: Drogenabhängigkeit und Hepatitis. Berlin, Germany, pp 85–87Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1995) Hepatitis surveillance report no. 56. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, p 5Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2000) Division of Public Health Surveillance and Informatics. Hepatitis, Viral, Acute. Case Definition [http://www.cdc.gov/epo/dphsi/casedef/hepatitiscurrent.htmp].
  6. 6.
    Giacchino R, Zancan L, Vajro P, Verucchi G et al. (2001) Hepatitis B virus infection in native versus immigrant or adopted children in Italy following the compulsory vaccination. Infection 29:188–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jilg W, Hottenträger B, Weinberger K, Schlottmann K, Frick E, Holstege A, Schölmerich J, Palitzsch K-D (2001) Prevalence of markers of hepatitis B in the adult German population. J Med Virol 63:96–102Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jilg W, Rink C, Kallinowski B (2004) Immunprophylaxe der Hepatitis B. Z Gastroenterol 42:698–702Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poschadel S, Höger R, Schnitzler J (2003) Evaluation der Arbeit der Drogenkonsumräume in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Endbericht im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit und Soziale Sicherung. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 12–18Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reese RE, Betts RF (1996) Practical approach to infectious diseases. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 451Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robert Koch Institut (1998) Meldekriterien für ausgewählte Infektionskrankheiten. Epidemiol Bull 34:244Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robert Koch Institut (1999) Jahresbericht 1998 zu wichtigen Infektionskrankheiten in Deutschland. Teil 2: Virushepatitiden. Epidemiol Bull 17:120–123Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robert Koch Institut (2004) Infektionsepidemiologisches Jahrbuch meldepflichtiger Krankheiten für 2003. Berlin, Germany, pp 80–84Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (1999) Meldepflichtige Krankheiten 1998. Fachserie 12, Reihe 2. Wiesbaden, Germany, p 39Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2002) Bevölkerungsfortschreibung 2002. Fachserie 1, Reihe 1.3. Wiesbaden, Germany, p 6Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Statistisches Bundesamt (2004) Krankheitskosten 2002. Wiesbaden, Germany, p 38Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Health c/o Institute of Medical SociologyHeinrich Heine UniversityDüsseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Public Health Office Hamburg-HarburgHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Public Health Department FrankfurtFrankfurt a.M.Germany

Personalised recommendations