Advertisement

Intrinsic prefrontal organization underlies associations between achievement motivation and delay discounting

  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

Achievement motivation is a core component of human decision making. However, neural mechanisms that link achievement motivation and intertemporal choice have not yet been elucidated. Here, we examined neural pathways underlying the relationship between achievement motivation and intertemporal choice using a delay discounting task and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging on 86 healthy subjects. Behaviorally, delay discounting rate was positively correlated with achievement motivation. Functional coupling of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) with the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), medial orbitofrontal cortex and ventral striatum was positively correlated with achievement motivation. Notably, the mediation analysis showed that the impact of achievement motivation on delay discounting was mediated by intrinsic connectivity between the dlPFC and mPFC. Our findings suggest that intrinsic organization within the prefrontal cortex plays a key role in linking achievement motivation and intertemporal choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Ainslie G (1975) Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol Bull 82:463–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076860

  2. Atkinson JW (1957) Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychol Rev 64:359–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445

  3. Ballard K, Knutson B (2009) Dissociable neural representations of future reward magnitude and delay during temporal discounting. Neuroimage 45:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.004

  4. Biswal B, Zerrin Yetkin F, Haughton VM, Hyde JS (1995) Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 34:537–541. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910340409

  5. Brunstein JC, Heckhausen H (2018) Achievement motivation. In: Heckhausen J, Heckhausen H (eds) Motivation and Action. Springer, Cham, pp 221–304

  6. Calluso C, Tosoni A, Pezzulo G et al (2015) Interindividual variability in functional connectivity as long-term correlate of temporal discounting. PLoS One 10:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119710

  7. Chib VS, Rangel A, Shimojo S, O’Doherty JP (2009) Evidence for a common representation of decision values for dissimilar goods in human ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 29:12315–12320. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2575-09.2009

  8. Cho SS, Ko JH, Pellecchia G et al (2010) Continuous theta burst stimulation of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex induces changes in impulsivity level. Brain Stimul 3:170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2009.10.002

  9. de Ridder DTD, Lensvelt-Mulders G, Finkenauer C et al (2012) Taking stock of self-control. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 16:76–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311418749

  10. Elliot AJ, Thrash TM (2002) Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:804–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804

  11. Elliot AJ, Thrash TM (2010) Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. J Pers 78:865–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00636.x

  12. Eppinger B, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD (2012) Reduced sensitivity to immediate reward during decision-making in older than younger adults. PLoS One 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036953

  13. Ericson KM, Laibson D (2019) Intertemporal choice. In: Handbook of Behavioral Economics. Elsevier B.V., pp 1–67

  14. Ericson KM, White JM, Laibson D, Cohen JD (2015) Money earlier or later? simple heuristics explain intertemporal choices better than delay discounting does. Psychol Sci 26:826–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615572232

  15. Figner B, Knoch D, Johnson EJ et al (2010a) Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2516

  16. Figner B, Knoch D, Johnson EJ et al (2010b) Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci 13:538–539. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2516

  17. Frost R, McNaughton N (2017) The neural basis of delay discounting: a review and preliminary model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 79:48–65

  18. Gabaix X, Laibson D (2017) Myopia and discounting. NBER Working Paper No. w23254

  19. Gjesme T, Nygard R (1970) Achievement-related motives: theoretical considerations and construction of a measuring instrument. Unpubl Manuscr Univ, Oslo

  20. Göttert R, Kuhl J (1980) LM-Fragebogen: Deutsche Übersetzung der AMS-Scale von Gjesme und Nygard., Psychol Inst der Ruhr-Universität Bochum

  21. Halfmann K, Hedgcock W, Denburg NL (2013) Age-related differences in discounting future gains and losses. J Neurosci Psychol Econ 6:42–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.371

  22. Han SD, Boyle PA, Yu L et al (2013) Ventromedial PFC, parahippocampal, and cerebellar connectivity are associated with temporal discounting in old age. Exp Gerontol 48:1489–1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2013.10.003

  23. Hare TA, Camerer CF, Rangel A (2009) Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science 324:646–648. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168450

  24. Hare TA, Hakimi S, Rangel A (2014) Activity in dlPFC and its effective connectivity to vmPFC are associated with temporal discounting. Front Neurosci 8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00050

  25. Hariri AR, Brown SM, Williamson DE et al (2006) Preference for immediate over delayed rewards is associated with magnitude of ventral striatal activity. J Neurosci 26:13213–13217. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3446-06.2006

  26. Harrison J, McKay R (2012) Delay discounting rates are temporally stable in an equivalent present value procedure using theoretical and area under the curve analyses. Psychol Rec 62:307–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395804

  27. Hayes AF (2012) PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf

  28. Hinsz VB, Jundt DK (2005) Exploring individual differences in a goal-setting situation using the Motivational Trait Questionnaire. J Appl Soc Psychol 35:551–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02135.x

  29. Jimura K, Chushak MS, Braver TS (2013) Impulsivity and self-control during intertemporal decision making linked to the neural dynamics of reward value representation. J Neurosci 33:344–357. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0919-12.2013

  30. Kable JW, Glimcher PW (2007) The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nat Neurosci 10:1625–1633. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2007

  31. Kirby KN (2009) One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates. Psychon Bull Rev 16:457–462. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.457

  32. Lempert KM, Pizzagalli DA (2010) Delay discounting and future-directed thinking in anhedonic individuals. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 41:258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.02.003

  33. Li X (2008) The effects of appetitive stimuli on out-of-domain consumption impatience. J Consum Res 34:649–656. https://doi.org/10.1086/521900

  34. Li N, Ma N, Liu Y et al (2013) Resting-state functional connectivity predicts impulsivity in economic decision-making. J Neurosci 33:4886–4895. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1342-12.2013

  35. Luo S, Ainslie G, Giragosian L, Monterosso JR (2009) Behavioral and neural evidence of incentive bias for immediate rewards relative to preference-matched delayed rewards. J Neurosci (Behav/Syst/Cognit) 29:14820–14827. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4261-09.2009

  36. Manning J, Hedden T, Wickens N et al (2014) Personality influences temporal discounting preferences: behavioral and brain evidence. Neuroimage 98:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.066

  37. Mason L, O’Sullivan N, Blackburn M et al (2012) I want it now! Neural correlates of hypersensitivity to immediate reward in hypomania. Biol Psychiatry 71:530–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.10.008

  38. Matsui T, Okada A, Kakuyama T (1982) Influence of achievement need on goal setting, performance, and feedback effectiveness. J Appl Psychol 67:645–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.645

  39. McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD (2004) Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306:503–507. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100907

  40. McGuire JT, Kable JW (2013) Rational temporal predictions can underlie apparent failures to delay gratification. Psychol Rev 120:395–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031910

  41. Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:167–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167

  42. Mischel W (1961) Delay of gratification, need for achievement, and acquiescence in another culture. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 62:543–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0039842

  43. Mizuno K, Tanaka M, Ishii A et al (2008) The neural basis of academic achievement motivation. Neuroimage 42:369–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.253

  44. Myerson J, Green L, Warusawitharana M (2001) Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. J Exp Anal Behav 76:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235

  45. Ohmura Y, Takahashi T, Kitamura N, Wehr P (2006) Three-month stability of delay and probability discounting measures. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 14:318–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.14.3.318

  46. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES (1995) Factor structure of the Barratt Impusiveness Scale. J Clin Psychol 51:768–774

  47. Peters J, Büchel C (2010) Neural representations of subjective reward value. Behav Brain Res 213:135–141

  48. Peters J, Büchel C (2011) The neural mechanisms of inter-temporal decision-making: understanding variability. Trends Cogn Sci 15:227–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.002

  49. Pine A, Seymour B, Roiser JP et al (2009) Encoding of marginal utility across time in the human brain. J Neurosci 29:9575–9581. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1126-09.2009

  50. Pochon JB, Levy R, Fossati P et al (2002) The neural system that bridges reward and cognition in humans: an fMRI study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:5669–5674. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082111099

  51. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40:879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

  52. Raynor JO, Smith CP (1966) Achievement-related motives and risk-taking in games of skill and chance. J Pers 34:176–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1966.tb01707.x

  53. Schultheiss OC, Schiepe-Tiska A (2013) The role of the dorsoanterior striatum in implicit motivation: the case of the need for power. Front Hum Neurosci 7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00141

  54. Schultheiss OC, Wirth MM, Waugh CE et al (2008) Exploring the motivational brain: effects of implicit power motivation on brain activation in response to facial expressions of emotion. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 3:333–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn030

  55. Schultz DP (2010) Psychology and work today, 10th edn. Pearson Education India, New Delhi

  56. Sellitto M, Ciaramelli E, Di Pellegrino G (2011) The neurobiology of intertemporal choice: insight from imaging and lesion studies. Rev Neurosci 22:565–574. https://doi.org/10.1515/RNS.2011.046

  57. Shamosh NA, DeYoung CG, Green AE et al (2008) Individual differences in delay discounting: relation to intelligence, working memory, and anterior prefrontal cortex. Psychol Sci 19:904–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02175.x

  58. Steinmayr R, Spinath B (2009) The importance of motivation as a predictor of school achievement. Learn Individ Differ 19:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.004

  59. Swanson SD, Tricomi E (2014) Goals and task difficulty expectations modulate striatal responses to feedback. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 14:610–620. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0269-8

  60. Takeuchi H, Taki Y, Nouchi R et al (2014) Regional gray matter density is associated with achievement motivation: evidence from voxel-based morphometry. Brain Struct Funct 219:71–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0485-3

  61. Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL (2004) High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers 72:271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x

  62. Taylor SF, Welsh RC, Wager TD et al (2004) A functional neuroimaging study of motivation and executive function. Neuroimage 21:1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.032

  63. Treadway MT, Zald DH (2011) Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: lessons from translational neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:537–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.006

  64. Uhlinger CA, Stephens MA (1960) Relation of achievement motivation to academic achievement in students of superior ability. J Educ Psychol 51:259–266. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041083

  65. Wainer HA, Rubin IM (1969) Motivation of research and development entrepreneurs: determinants of company success. J Appl Psychol 53:178–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027414

  66. Yan C (2010) DPARSF: a MATLAB toolbox for “pipeline” data analysis of resting-state fMRI. Front Syst Neurosci 4:13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2010.00013

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971026, 31571128; 31500920; 31530031; 3192010300; 81471376); KQTD (2015033016104926); 973 Program (2014CB744600) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU1509392). X.Y.Y. collected and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. X.P.F. participated in the interpretation of the data and revised the manuscript. F.T.Y. participated in the design of the study, the interpretation of the data and the revision of the manuscript. L.Y.J. participated in the revision of the manuscript. A.A. participated in the revision of the manuscript and provided language help. All the authors approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Yuejia Luo or Tingyong Feng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors assert that they have no competing final or personal interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xin, Y., Xu, P., Aleman, A. et al. Intrinsic prefrontal organization underlies associations between achievement motivation and delay discounting. Brain Struct Funct (2020) doi:10.1007/s00429-019-01982-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Delay discounting
  • Achievement motivation
  • Resting-state functional connectivity