Advertisement

Wired for musical rhythm? A diffusion MRI-based study of individual differences in music perception

  • Archith Rajan
  • Jeffrey M. Valla
  • Jacob Antony Alappatt
  • Megha Sharda
  • Apurva Shah
  • Madhura Ingalhalikar
  • Nandini C. SinghEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Music perceptual abilities are subjective and exhibit high inter-individual variability. Twenty-nine participants with varying degrees of musical training were tested for musical perception ability with the Profile of Music Perception Skills (PROMS) and brain structural measures obtained via diffusion tensor imaging. Controlling for the period of training, TBSS results showed that individuals with better musical perception abilities showed increased deviations from linear anisotropy in the corpus callosum. Specifically, mode of anisotropy in the genu and body of the corpus callosum was negatively correlated with music perception score suggesting the presence of crossing fibers. A multi-compartment model of crossing fibers revealed a significant positive relation for partial volumes of secondary fiber populations with timing aspects of music perception. Our results suggest that inter-hemispheric connectivity differences in the anterior parts of the corpus callosum may reflect innate differences in the processing of the rhythmic aspects of music.

Keywords

Music perception Diffusion-weighted imaging Corpus callosum Rhythm Tempo TBSS PROMS-S 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee of the National Brain Research Centre, Manesar, and were in compliance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Written and informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aboitiz F, Scheibel AB, Fisher RS, Zaidel E (1992) Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum. Brain Res 598:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aboitiz F, López J, Montiel J (2003) Long distance communication in the human brain: timing constraints for inter-hemispheric synchrony and the origin of brain lateralization. Biol Res 36:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assaf Y, Blumenfeld-Katzir T, Yovel Y, Basser PJ (2008) AxCaliber: a method for measuring axon diameter distribution from diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 59:1347–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avants BB, Epstein CL, Grossman M, Gee JC (2008) Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med Image Anal 12:26–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D (1994) Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J Magn Reson 103:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behrens TE, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MFS, Woolrich MW (2007) Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fiber orientations: what can we gain ? Neuroimage. 34:144–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bengtsson SL, Nagy Z, Skare S, Forsman L, Forssberg H, Ullén F (2005) Extensive piano practicing has regionally specific effects on white matter development. Nat Neurosci 8:1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bermudez P, Lerch JP, Evans AC, Zatorre RJ (2008) Neuroanatomical correlates of musicianship as revealed by cortical thickness and voxel-based morphometry. Cereb Cortex 19:1583–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charness N, Ericsson KA (1994) Expert performance: its structure and acquisition. American Psychology. 49:725–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen JL, Penhune VB, Zatorre RJ (2008) Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain. Cereb Cortex 18:2844–2854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheung VK, Meyer L, Friederici AD, Koelsch S (2018) The right inferior frontal gyrus processes nested non-local dependencies in music. Sci Rep 8:3822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Manzano Ö, Ullén F (2018) Genetic and environmental influences on the phenotypic associations between intelligence, personality, and creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Intelligence 69:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, Albert MS (2006) An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 31:968–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Douaud G, Jbabdi S, Behrens TE, Menke RA, Gass A, Monsch AU, Rao A, Whitcher B, Kindlmann G, Matthews PM, Smith S (2011) DTI measures in crossing-fiber areas: increased diffusion anisotropy reveals early white matter alteration in MCI and mild Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 55:880–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elmer S, Hänggi J, Jäncke L (2016) Interhemispheric transcallosal connectivity between the left and right planum temporale predicts musicianship, performance in temporal speech processing, and functional specialization. Brain Struct Funct 221:331–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engel A, Hijmans BS, Cerliani L, Bangert M, Nanetti L, Keller PE, Keysers C (2014) Inter-individual differences in audio-motor learning of piano melodies and white matter fiber tract architecture. Hum Brain Mapp 35:2483–2497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ennis DB, Kindlmann G (2006) Orthogonal tensor invariants and the analysis of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 146:136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ericsson KA (2007) Deliberate practice and the modifiability of body and mind: toward a science of the structure and acquisition of expert and elite performance. Int J Sport Psychol 38:4Google Scholar
  19. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Romer CT (1993) The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 100:363–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ericsson KA, Roring RW, Nandagopal K (2007) Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: an account based on the expert performance framework. High Ability Stud 18:3–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischl B (2012) FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62:774–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foster NEV, Zatorre RJ (2010) Cortical structure predicts success in performing musical transformation judgments. Neuroimage 53:26–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Galton F (1869) Hereditary genius: an inquiry into its laws and consequences. 27: (Macmillan, 1869)Google Scholar
  24. Gardner H (1995) “Multiple Intelligences” as a Catalyst. Engl J 84:16–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaser C, Schlaug G (2003) Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. J Neurosci 23:9240–9245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Giacosa C, Karpati FJ, Foster NE, Penhune VB, Hyde KL (2016) Dance and music training have different effects on white matter diffusivity in sensorimotor pathways. Neuroimage 135:273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Habibi A, Damasio A, Ilari B, Veiga R, Joshi AA, Leahy RM, Haldar JP, Varadarajan D, Bhushan C, Damasio H (2017) Childhood music training induces change in micro and macroscopic brain structure: results from a longitudinal study. Cereb Cortex 28:4336–4347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Halwani GF, Loui P, Rueber T, Schlaug G (2011) Effects of practice and experience on the arcuate fasciculus: comparing singers, instrumentalists, and non-musicians. Front Psychol 2:156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hambrick DZ, Tucker-Drob EM (2015) The genetics of music accomplishment: evidence for gene–environment correlation and interaction. Psychon Bull Rev 22:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jbabdi S, Behrens TE, Smith SM (2010) Crossing fibers in tract-based spatial statistics. Neuroimage 49:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johansen-Berg H, Della-Maggiore V, Behrens TE, Smith SM, Paus T (2007) Integrity of white matter in the corpus callosum correlates with bimanual co-ordination skills. Neuroimage 36:16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karpati FJ, Giacosa C, Foster NE, Penhune VB, Hyde KL (2015) Dance and the brain: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1337:140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Law LN, Zentner M (2012) Assessing musical abilities objectively: construction and validation of the profile of music perception skills. PLoS One 7:e52508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Limb CJ (2006) Structural and functional neural correlates of music perception. Anat Record 288:435–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Macnamara BN, Hambrick DZ, Oswald FL (2014) Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: a meta-analysis. Psychol Sci 25:1608–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Micheyl C, Kaernbach C, Demany L (2008) An evaluation of psychophysical models of auditory change perception. Psychol Rev 115:1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore E, Schaefer RS, Bastin ME, Roberts N, Overy K (2014) Can musical training influence brain connectivity? Evidence from diffusion tensor MRI. Brain Sci 4:405–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mori S, Zhang J (2006) Principles of diffusion tensor imaging and its applications to basic neuroscience research. Neuron 51:527–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mosing MA, Madison G, Pedersen NL, Kuja-Halkola R, Ullén F (2014) Practice does not make perfect: no causal effect of music practice on music ability. Psychol Sci 25:1795–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ohnishi T, Matsuda H, Asada T, Aruga M, Hirakata M, Nishikawa M, Katoh A, Imabayashi E (2001) Functional anatomy of musical perception in musicians. Cereb Cortex 11:754–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patston LL, Kirk IJ, Rolfe MHS, Corballis MC, Tippett LJ (2007) The unusual symmetry of musicians: Musicians have equilateral interhemispheric transfer for visual information. Neuropsychologia 45:2059–2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Raffelt D, Tournier JD, Rose S, Ridgway GR, Henderson R, Crozier S, Salvado O, Connelly A (2012) Apparent fiber density: a novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage 59:3976–3994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ravignani A, Delgado T, Kirby S (2017) Musical evolution in the lab exhibits rhythmic universals. Nat Hum Behav 1:0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Savage PE, Brown S, Sakai E, Currie TE (2015) Statistical universals reveal the structures and functions of human music. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:8987–8992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schlaug G, Jancke L, Huang Y, Staiger JF, Steinmetz H (1995) Increased corpus callosum size in musicians. Neuropsychologia 33:1047–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schlaug G, Forgeard M, Zhu L, Norton A, Norton A, Winner E (2009) Training-induced neuroplasticity in young children. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1169:205–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmithorst VJ (2005) Separate cortical networks involved in music perception: preliminary functional MRI evidence for modularity of music processing. Neuroimage. 25:444–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schneider P, Sluming V, Roberts N, Bleeck S, Rupp A (2005) Structural, functional, and perceptual differences in Heschl’s gyrus and musical instrument preference. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1060:387–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seesjärvi E, Särkämö T, Vuoksimaa E, Tervaniemi M, Peretz I, Kaprio J (2016) The nature and nurture of melody: a twin study of musical pitch and rhythm perception. Behav Genet 46:506–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, Watkins KE, Ciccarelli O, Cader MZ, Matthews PM, Behrens TE (2006) Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 31:1487–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steele CJ, Bailey JA, Zatorre RJ, Penhune VB (2013) Early musical training and white-matter plasticity in the corpus callosum: evidence for a sensitive period. J Neurosci 33:1282–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sternberg RJ (1996) Costs of expertise. In: Ericsson KA (ed) The road to excellence: the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 347–354Google Scholar
  53. Stikov N, Perry LM, Mezer A, Pauly JM, Wandell BA, Dougherty RF (2011) Modeling and measuring the myelin g-ratio. Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med 19:225Google Scholar
  54. Thapaliya K, Vegh V, Bollmann S, Barth M (2017) Assessment of microstructural signal compartments across the corpus callosum using multi-echo gradient recalled echo at 7 T. Neuroimage 182:407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Turker S, Reiterer SM, Seither-preisler A, Schneider P (2017) ‘When music speaks’: auditory cortex morphology as a neuroanatomical marker of language aptitude and musicality. Front Psychol 8:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vaquero L, Ramos-Escobar N, François C, Penhune V, Rodríguez-Fornells A (2018) White-matter structural connectivity predicts short-term melody and rhythm learning in non-musicians. NeuroImage 181:252–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yoncheva YN, Somandepalli K, Reiss PT, Kelly C, Di Martino A, Lazar M, Zhou J, Milham MP, Castellanos FX (2016) Mode of anisotropy reveals global diffusion alterations in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 55:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zatorre RJ (2013) Predispositions and plasticity in music and speech learning: neural correlates and implications. Science 342:585–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zentner M, Strauss H (2017) Assessing musical ability quickly and objectively: development and validation of the Short-PROMS and the Mini-PROMS. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1400:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Archith Rajan
    • 1
  • Jeffrey M. Valla
    • 1
  • Jacob Antony Alappatt
    • 1
  • Megha Sharda
    • 2
  • Apurva Shah
    • 3
  • Madhura Ingalhalikar
    • 3
    • 4
  • Nandini C. Singh
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Language Literacy and Music LaboratoryNational Brain Research CentreManesarIndia
  2. 2.International Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound (BRAMS)University of MontrealMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Symbiosis Center for Medical Image Analysis, Symbiosis International (Deemed University)PuneIndia
  4. 4.Department of Electronics and Tele CommunicationSymbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University)PuneIndia

Personalised recommendations