Advertisement

The rostrodorsal periaqueductal gray influences both innate fear responses and acquisition of fear memory in animals exposed to a live predator

  • Rodrigo de Andrade Rufino
  • Sandra Regina Mota-Ortiz
  • Miguel Antonio Xavier De Lima
  • Marcus Vinicius C. Baldo
  • Newton Sabino CanterasEmail author
Original Article
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

A few studies have evaluated the behavioral roles of the periaqueductal gray (PAG) in animals facing ethologically relevant threats. Exposure to a live cat induces striking activation in the rostrodorsal and caudal ventral PAG. In the present investigation, we first showed that cytotoxic lesions of the rostrodorsal and caudal ventral PAG had similar effects on innate fear responses during cat exposure, practically abolishing freezing and increasing risk assessment responses. Conversely, rostrodorsal PAG lesions but not caudal ventral lesions disrupted learned contextual fear responses to cat exposure. Next, we examined how muscimol inactivation of the rostrodorsal PAG at different times (i.e., during, immediately after and 20 min after cat exposure) influences learned contextual fear responses, and we found that inactivation of the rostrodorsal PAG during or immediately after cat exposure but not 20 min later impaired contextual fear learning. Thus, suggesting that the rostrodorsal PAG is involved in the acquisition, but not the consolidation, of contextual fear memory to predatory threat. Notably, the dosolateral PAG contains a distinct population of neurons containing the neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) enzyme, and in the last experiment, we investigated how nitric oxide released in rostrodorsal PAG influences contextual fear memory processing. Accordingly, injection of a selective nNOS inhibitor into the rostrodorsal PAG immediately after cat exposure disrupted learned contextual responses. Overall, the present findings suggest that the acquisition of contextual fear learning is influenced by an optimum level of dorsal PAG activation, which extends from during to shortly after predator exposure and depends on local NO release.

Keywords

Defensive behavior Fear memory Innate fear Nitric oxide 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)—Research Grants #2014/05432-9 (awarded to N.S.C) and #2009/53390-5 (awarded to S.R.M.O.). R.A.R. and M.A.X.L. were supported by FAPESP fellowships (R.A.R. #2014/02540-5/M.A.X.L. #2016/10389-0).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Experiments were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publications No. 80-23, 1996). All experimental procedures had been previously approved by the Committee on The Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Brazil (Protocol number 085/2012). In the present study, the experiments were planned to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering. In addition, all surgical procedures were performed under deep anesthesia, and analgesic and antibiotic medications were given postoperatively.

Supplementary material

429_2019_1852_MOESM1_ESM.doc (9.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 9805 KB)

References

  1. Aguiar DC, Guimarães FS (2009) Blockade of NMDA receptors and nitric oxide synthesis in the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray attenuates behavioral and cellular responses of rats exposed to a live predator. J Neurosci Res 87:2418–2429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assareh N, Sarrami M, Carrive P, McNally GP (2016) The organization of defensive behavior elicited by optogenetic excitation of rat lateral or ventrolateral periaqueductal gray. Behav Neurosci 130:406–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Back FP, Carobrez AP (2018) Periaqueductal gray glutamatergic, cannabinoid and, vanilloid receptor interplay in defensive behavior and aversive memory formation. Neuropharmacology 135:399–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandler R, Keay KA (1996) Columnar organization in the midbrain periaqueductal gray and the integration of emotional expression. Prog Brain Res 107:285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandler R, Shipley MT (1994) Columnar organization of the midbrain periaqueductal gray: modules for emotional expression. Trends Neurosci 17:379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bindi RP, Baldo MVC, Canteras NS (2018) Roles of the anterior basolateral amygdalar nucleus during exposure to a live predator and to a predator-associated context. Behav Brain Res 342:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bittencourt AS, Carobrez AP, Zamprogno LP, Tufik S, Schenberg LC (2004) Organization of single components of defensive behaviors within distinct columns of periaqueductal gray matter of the rat: role of N-methyl-d-aspartic acid glutamate receptors. Neuroscience 125:71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanchard RJ, Blanchard DC, Hori K (1989) Ethoexperimental approaches to the study of defensive behavior. In: Blanchard RJ, Brain PF, Blanchard DC, Parmigiani S (eds) Ethoexperimental approaches to the study of behavior. Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 114–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanchard DC, Li CI, Hubbard D, Markham CM, Yang M, Takahashi LK, Blanchard RJ (2003) Dorsal premammillary nucleus differentially modulates defensive behaviors induced by different threat stimuli in rats. Neurosci Lett 345:145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanchard DC, Griebel G, Pobbe R, Blanchard RJ (2011) Risk assessment as an evolved threat detection and analysis process. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:991–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrive P (1993) The periaqueductal gray and defensive behavior: functional representation and neuronal organization. Behav Brain Res 58:27–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cezário AF, Ribeiro-Barbosa ER, Baldo MV, Canteras NS (2008) Hypothalamic sites responding to predator threats—the role of the dorsal premammillary nucleus in unconditioned and conditioned antipredatory defensive behavior. Eur J Neurosci 28:1003–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiavegatto S, Scavone C, Canteras NS (1998) Nitric oxide synthase activity in the dorsal periaqueductal gray of rats expressing innate fear responses. Neuroreport 9:571 576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Comoli E, Ribeiro-Barbosa ER, Canteras NS (2000) Afferent connections of the dorsal premammillary nucleus. J Comp Neurol 423:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Comoli E, Ribeiro-Barbosa ER, Canteras NS (2003) Predatory hunting and exposure to a live predator induce opposite patterns of Fos immunoreactivity in the PAG. Behav Brain Res 138:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Oca BM, DeCola JP, Maren S, Fanselow MS (1998) Distinct regions of the periaqueductal gray are involved in the acquisition and expression of defensive responses. J Neurosci 18:3426–3432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Lima MA, Baldo MV, Canteras NS (2017) A role for the anteromedial thalamic nucleus in the acquisition of contextual fear memory to predatory threats. Brain Struct Funct 222:113–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Lima MA, Baldo MV, Canteras NS (2018) Revealing a cortical circuit responsive to predatory threats and mediating contextual fear memory. Cereb Cortex.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy173 Google Scholar
  19. Deng H, Xiao X, Wang Z (2016) Periaqueductal gray neuronal activities underlie different aspects of defensive behaviors. J Neurosci 36:7580–7588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Di Scala G, Sandner G (1989) Conditioned place aversion produced by microinjections of semicarbazide into the periaqueductal gray of the rat. Brain Res 483:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Di Scala G, Mana MJ, Jacobs WJ, Phillips AG (1987) Evidence of Pavlovian conditioned fear following electrical stimulation of the periaqueductal grey in the rat. Physiol Behav 40:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edeline JM, Hars B, Hennevin E, Cotillon N (2002) Muscimol diffusion after intracerebral microinjections: a reevaluation based on electrophysiological and autoradiographic quantifications. Neurobiol Learn Mem 78:100–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fanselow MS (1991) The midbrain periaqueductal gray as a coordinator of action in response to fear and anxiety. In: Depaulis A, Bandler R (eds) The midbrain periaqueductal gray matter: functional, anatomical and neurochemical organization. Plenum Press, New York, pp 151–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Furlong TM, Cole S, Hamlin AS, McNally GP (2010) The role of prefrontal cortex in predictive fear learning. Behav Neurosci 124:574–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goto M, Canteras NS, Burns G, Swanson LW (2005) Projections from the subfornical region of the lateral hypothalamic area. J Comp Neurol 493:412–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gray JA, McNaughton N (2000) The neuropsychology of anxiety, 2nd edn. University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Guimarães FS, Beijamini V, Moreira FA, Aguiar DC, de Lucca AC (2005) Role of nitric oxide in brain regions related to defensive reactions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:1313–1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johansen JP, Tarpley JW, LeDoux JE, Blair HT (2010) Neural substrates for expectation-modulated fear learning in the amygdala and periaqueductal gray. Nat Neurosci 13:979–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim EJ, Horovitz O, Pellman BA, Tan LM, Li Q, Richter-Levin G, Kim JJ (2013) Dorsal periaqueductal gray-amygdala pathway conveys both innate and learned fear responses in rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:14795–14800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kincheski GC, Mota-Ortiz SR, Pavesi E, Canteras NS, Carobrez AP (2012) The dorsolateral periaqueductal gray and its role in mediating fear learning to life threatening events. PLoS One 7:e50361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koutsikou S, Crook JJ, Earl EV, Leith JL, Watson TC, Lumb BM, Apps R (2014) Neural substrates underlying fear-evoked freezing: the periaqueductal grey-cerebellar link. J Physiol 592:2197–2213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koutsikou S, Watson TC, Crook JJ, Leith JL, Lawrenson CL, Apps R, Lumb BM (2015) The periaqueductal gray orchestrates sensory and motor circuits at multiple levels of the neuraxis. J Neurosci 35:14132–14147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. LeDoux JE, Iwata J, Cicchetti P, Reis DJ (1988) Different projections of the central amygdaloid nucleus mediate autonomic and behavioral correlates of conditioned fear. J Neurosci 8:2517–2529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Linke R, Braune G, Schwegler H (2000) Differential projection of the posterior paralaminar thalamic nuclei to the amygdaloid complex in the rat. Exp Brain Res 134:520–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin JH (1991) Autoradiographic estimation of the extent of reversible inactivation produced by microinjection of lidocaine and muscimol in the rat. Neurosci Lett 127:160–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martinez RC, Carvalho-Netto EF, Ribeiro-Barbosa ER, Baldo MV, Canteras NS (2011) Amygdalar roles during exposure to a live predator and to a predator-associated context. Neuroscience 172:314–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Motta SC, Carobrez AP, Canteras NS (2017) The periaqueductal gray and primal emotional processing critical to influence complex defensive responses, fear learning and reward seeking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 76:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Onstott D, Mayer B, Beitz AJ (1993) Nitric oxide synthase immunoreactive neurons anatomically define a longitudinal dorsolateral column within the midbrain periaqueductal gray of the rat: analysis using laser confocal microscopy. Brain Res 610:317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ribeiro-Barbosa ER, Canteras NS, Cezário AF, Blanchard RJ, Blanchard DC (2005) An alternative experimental procedure for studying predator-related defensive responses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:1255–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Risold PY, Canteras NS, Swanson LW (1994) Organization of projections from the anterior hypothalamic nucleus: a Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin study in the rat. J Comp Neurol 348:1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rufino RA (2015) Investigation of periaqueductal gray (PAG) in the organization of defensive antipredatory behavior. Master Thesis. Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São PauloGoogle Scholar
  42. Souza RR, Carobrez AP (2016) Acquisition and expression of fear memories are distinctly modulated along the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray axis of rats exposed to predator odor. Behav Brain Res 315:160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Swanson LW (2004) Brain maps structure of the rat brain, 3rd edn. Elsevier, AmesterdamGoogle Scholar
  44. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Pearson Education Inc, BostonGoogle Scholar
  45. Tovote P, Esposito MS, Botta P, Chaudun F, Fadok JP, Markovic M, Wolff SB, Ramakrishnan C, Fenno L, Deisseroth K, Herry C, Arber S, Lüthi A (2016) Midbrain circuits for defensive behaviour. Nature 534:206–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Groen T, Wyss JM (1992) Projections from the laterodorsal nucleus of the thalamus to the limbic and visual cortices in the rat. J Comp Neurol 324:427–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vertes RP, Hoover WB, Do Valle AC, Sherman A, Rodriguez JJ (2006) Efferent projections of reuniens and rhomboid nuclei of the thalamus in the rat. J Comp Neurol 499:768–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vianna DM, Landeira-Fernandez J, Brandão ML (2001) Dorsolateral and ventral regions of the periaqueductal gray matter are involved in distinct types of fear. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25:711–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vincent SR, Kimura H (1992) Histochemical mapping of nitric oxide synthase in the rat brain. Neuroscience 46:755–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walker P, Carrive P (2003) Role of ventrolateral periaqueductal gray neurons in the behavioral and cardiovascular responses to contextual conditioned fear and poststress recovery. Neuroscience 116:897–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodrigo de Andrade Rufino
    • 1
  • Sandra Regina Mota-Ortiz
    • 1
  • Miguel Antonio Xavier De Lima
    • 1
  • Marcus Vinicius C. Baldo
    • 2
  • Newton Sabino Canteras
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical SciencesUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical SciencesUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical SciencesUniversity of Sao PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations