Advertisement

Converging measures of neural change at the microstructural, informational, and cortical network levels in the hippocampus during the learning of the structure of organic compounds

  • Marcel Adam Just
  • Timothy A. KellerEmail author
Original Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

The critical role of the hippocampus in human learning has been illuminated by neuroimaging studies that increasingly improve the detail with which hippocampal function is understood. However, the hippocampal information developed with different types of imaging technologies is seldom integrated within a single investigation of the neural changes that occur during learning. Here, we show three different ways in which a small hippocampal region changes as the structures and names of a set of organic compounds are being learned, reflecting changes at the microstructural, informational, and cortical network levels. The microstructural changes are sensed using measures of water diffusivity. The informational changes are assessed using machine learning of the neural representations of organic compounds as they are encoded in the fMRI-measured activation levels of a set of hippocampal voxels. The changes in cortical networks are measured in terms of the functional connectivity between hippocampus and parietal regions. The co-location of these three hippocampal changes reflects that structure’s involvement in learning at all three levels of explanation, consistent with the multiple ways in which learning brings about neural change.

Keywords

Diffusion imaging fMRI Functional connectivity Learning Hippocampus Multi-voxel pattern analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Zachary Anderson for assistance in designing and conducting the experiment, Theodore Depietro Jr. for machine learning analyses of the data, and Vladimir Cherkassky and Robert Mason for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Office of Naval Research (Grant number N00014-16-1-2694).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research involving human participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

All participants gave signed informed written consent on a consent form approved by the Carnegie Mellon Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Carnegie Mellon University and were in accordance with the ethical standards of this committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Andersson JLR, Skare S, Ashburner J (2003) How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 20:870–888.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assaf Y, Basser PJ (2005) Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED) MR imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage 27:48–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai Y, Alexander DC (2008) Model-based registration to correct for motion between acquisitions in diffusion MR imaging. In: 2008 IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro. Paris, France, pp 947–950Google Scholar
  4. Bakker A, Kirwan CB, Miller M, Stark CEL (2008) Pattern separation in the human. Science 319:1640–1642.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152882 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer AJ, Just MA (2015) Monitoring the growth of the neural representations of new animal concepts. Hum Brain Mapp 36:3213–3226.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22842 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Amitay S, Jones DK, Assaf Y (2012) Motion correction and registration of high b-value diffusion weighted Images. Magn Reson Med 67:1694–1702.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.23186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berron D, Schutze H, Maass A et al (2016) Strong evidence for pattern separation in human dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 36:7569–7579.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0518-16.2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS (1995) Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 34:537–541.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910340409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blumenfeld-Katzir T, Pasternak O, Dagan M, Assaf Y (2011) Diffusion MRI of structural brain plasticity induced by a learning and memory task. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020678 Google Scholar
  10. Bonnici HM, Chadwick MJ, Kumaran D et al (2012) Multi-voxel pattern analysis in human hippocampal subfields. Front Hum Neurosci 6:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown TI, Hasselmo ME, Stern CE (2014) A high-resolution study of hippocampal and medial temporal lobe correlates of spatial context and prospective overlapping route memory. Hippocampus 24:819–839.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Büchel C, Coull JT, Friston KJ (1999) The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. Science 283:1538–1541.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5407.1538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chadwick MJ, Hassabis D, Weiskopf N, Maguire EA (2010) Decoding individual episodic memory traces in the human hippocampus. Curr Biol 20:544–547.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen J (1969) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunlop WP, Cortina JM, Vaslow JB, Burke MJ (1996) Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychol Methods 1:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofstetter S, Friedmann N, Assaf Y (2017) Rapid language-related plasticity: microstructural changes in the cortex after a short session of new word learning. Brain Struct Funct 222:1231–1241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-016-1273-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith SM (2002) Improved optimisation for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17:825–841.  https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jung K-J (2010) Sensitivity of motion estimation to the anisotropic diffusion of white matter in diffusion MRI. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. Stockholm, Sweden, p 4036Google Scholar
  19. Jung K-J, Kohli N, Yeh F-C, Keller TA, Zhao T (2013) Motion correction in diffusion spectrum imaging using simulated diffusion images at multiple b bands. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, p 3192Google Scholar
  20. Just MA, Cherkassky VL, Aryal S, Mitchell TM (2010) A neurosemantic theory of concrete noun representation based on the underlying brain codes. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008622 Google Scholar
  21. Keller TA, Just MA (2009) Altering cortical connectivity: remediation-induced changes in the white matter of poor readers. Neuron 64:624–631.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keller TA, Just MA (2016) Structural and functional neuroplasticity in human learning of spatial routes. NeuroImage 125:256–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim CH, Heath CJ, Kent BA et al (2015) The role of the dorsal hippocampus in two versions of the touchscreen automated paired associates learning (PAL) task for mice. Psychopharmacology 232:3899–3910.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-3949-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kohl MM, Shipton OA, Deacon RM et al (2011) Hemisphere-specific optogenetic stimulation reveals left-right asymmetry of hippocampal plasticity. Nat Neurosci 14:1413–1415.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lacy JW, Yassa MA, Stark SM et al (2010) Distinct pattern separation related transfer functions in human CA3/dentate and CA1 revealed using high-resolution fMRI and variable mnemonic similarity. Learn Mem 18:15–18.  https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.1971111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mack ML, Preston AR (2016) Decisions about the past are guided by reinstatement of specific memories in the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex. Neuroimage 127:144–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mack ML, Love BC, Preston AR (2016) Dynamic updating of hippocampal object representations reflects new conceptual knowledge. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:13203–13208.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614048113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maguire EA, Gadian DG, Johnsrude IS et al (2000) Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4398–4403.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.070039597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marr D (1971) Simple memory: a theory for archicortex. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 262:23–81.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1971.0078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mason RA, Just MA (2016) Neural representations of physics concepts. Psychol Sci 27:904–913.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616641941 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitchell TM, Shinkareva SV, Carlson A et al (2008) Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science 320:1191–1195.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morris RGM, Garrud P, Rawlins JNP, O’Keefe J (1982) Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature 297:681–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nam H, Park H-J (2011) Distortion correction of high b-valued and high angular resolution diffusion imagesusing iterative simulated images. Neuroimage 57:968–978.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Keefe J, Nadel L (1978) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. O’Reilly RC, McClelland JL (1994) Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: avoiding a trade-off. Hippocampus 4:661–682.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.450040605 Google Scholar
  36. O’Reilly RC, Rudy JW (2000) Computational principles of learning in the neocortex and hippocampus. Hippocampus 10:389–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ et al (2012) Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59:2142–2154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sagi Y, Tavor I, Assaf Y (2012) Learning in the fast lane: new insights into neuroplasticity from diffusion MRI. Neuron 73:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schipul SE, Williams DL, Keller TA et al (2012) Distinctive neural processes during learning in autism. Cereb Cortex 22:937–950.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schlichting ML, Preston AR (2014) Memory reactivation during rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:15845–15850.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404396111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schlichting ML, Mumford JA, Preston AR (2015) Learning-related representational changes reveal dissociable integration and separation signatures in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Nat Commun 6:8151.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shipton OA, El-Gaby M, Apergis-Schoute J et al (2014) Left–right dissociation of hippocampal memory processes in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:15238–15243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW et al (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23:208–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H et al (2006) Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 31:1487–1505.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tavor I, Hofstetter S, Assaf Y (2013) Micro-structural assessment of short term plasticity dynamics. Neuroimage 81:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D et al (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15:273–289.  https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van Kesteren MTR, Fernandez G, Norris DG, Hermans EJ (2010) Persistent schema-dependent hippocampal-neocortical connectivity during memory encoding and postencoding rest in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:7550–7555.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914892107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yassa MA, Stark CEL (2011) Pattern separation in the hippocampus. Trends Neurosci 34:515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Center for Cognitive Brain ImagingCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations