Dissociating motor–speech from lexico-semantic systems in the left frontal lobe: insight from a series of 17 awake intraoperative mappings in glioma patients

  • Francesco Corrivetti
  • Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
  • Isabelle Poisson
  • Sébastien Froelich
  • Maxime Descoteaux
  • François Rheault
  • Emmanuel MandonnetEmail author
Original Article


Functional brain mapping during awake surgery procedures is the gold standard technique in the management of left frontal lobe tumors. Nevertheless, a unified picture of the language subsystems encountered during left frontal lobe mapping is still lacking. We retrospectively analyzed the 49 cortical and the 33 axonal sites of functional language mapping performed in 17 patients operated for a left frontal lobe glioma under awake conditions. Sites were tagged on the postoperative MRI, based on anatomical landmarks and intraoperative photography. All MRIs and tags were then registered in the MNI template. Speech disturbances related to motor functions (speech arrest—with or without superior limb arrest—, stuttering, and vocalization) were grouped together as “motor–speech” responses. Anomias, semantic paraphasia, perseverations, and PPTT errors were classified as “lexico-semantic” responses. MNI-registered axonal sites were used as seed for computing disconnectome maps from a tractogram atlas of ten healthy individuals, as implemented in the BCB toolkit. The cortical distribution of lexico-semantic responses appeared to be located anteriorly (pars triangularis of the inferior frontal gyrus and posterior end of the middle and superior frontal gyrus) compared to motor–speech responses (lower end of the precentral gyrus and pars opercularis). Within the white matter, motor–speech responses and lexico-semantic responses overlapped on the trajectory of the aslant and fronto-striatal tracts, but the lexico-semantic sites were located more anteriorly (mean Y coordinate on the MNI system was 21.2 mm for lexico-semantic sites and 14.3 mm for the motor–speech sites; Wilcoxon test: W = 60.5, p = 0.03). Moreover, disconnectome maps evidenced a clear distinction between the two subsystems: posterior fronto-striatal and frontal aslant tracts, corpus callosum and cortico-spinal tract were related to the motor–speech sites, whereas anterior frontal aslant tract, inferior-fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF) and anterior thalamic radiations were related to the lexico-semantic sites. Hence, we evidenced distinct anatomical substrates for the motor–speech and lexico-semantic systems. Regarding the aslant/fronto-striatal system, an anterior to posterior gradient was found, with a lexico-semantic role for the anterior part and a motor–speech involvement for the posterior part. For tumors abutting the precentral sulcus, posterior boundaries of the resection are made of motor–speech sites, meaning that the anteriorly located lexico-semantic system is no more functional, as a result of network reorganization by plasticity.


Awake surgery Intraoperative brain mapping Frontal lobe Electrical stimulation Lexico-semantic system Speech 



Direct electrical brain stimulation


Superior frontal gyrus


Middle frontal gyrus


Inferior frontal gyrus


Frontal aslant tract


Fronto-striatal tract


Functional magnetic resonance imaging


Magnetic resonance imaging


Pars opercularis


Pars triangularis


Supplementary motor area


Ventral pre-motor cortex


Inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus



MTdS received fundings from the “Agence Nationale de la Recherche” [grants number ANR-13-JSV4-0001-01] and from the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM), as well as from the program “Investissements d’avenir” ANR-10-IAIHU-06. EM received funding from the AP-HP (Contrat de Recherche Clinique, CRC chirurgie 2016) and INSERM (Contrat Interface 2018).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the local ethics committee of Pôle Neurosciences of Lariboisière Hospital. This study complied with the ethical standards.

Informed consent

All patients gave signed consent for the retrospective use of clinical and radiological data.

Supplementary material

429_2019_1827_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (4.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (JPG 4427 KB)
429_2019_1827_MOESM2_ESM.tiff (4.3 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (TIFF 4373 KB)
429_2019_1827_MOESM3_ESM.tiff (7.4 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (TIFF 7544 KB)
429_2019_1827_MOESM4_ESM.xls (102 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (XLS 101 KB)


  1. Acioly MA, Cunha AM, Parise M et al (2015) Recruitment of contralateral supplementary motor area in functional recovery following medial frontal lobe surgery: an fMRI case study. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 76:508–512. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alario F-X, Chainay H, Lehericy S, Cohen L (2006) The role of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in word production. Brain Res 1076:129–143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amunts K, Weiss PH, Mohlberg H et al (2004) Analysis of neural mechanisms underlying verbal fluency in cytoarchitectonically defined stereotaxic space—the roles of Brodmann areas 44 and 45. Neuroimage 22:42–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G et al (2011) A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage 54:2033–2044. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Axer H, Klingner CM, Prescher A (2013) Fiber anatomy of dorsal and ventral language streams. Brain Lang 127:192–204. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benzagmout M, Gatignol P, Duffau H (2007) Resection of World Health Organization grade II gliomas involving Broca’s area: methodological and functional considerations. Neurosurgery 61:741–752. (discussion 752–753) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I, Schlesewsky M, Small SL, Rauschecker JP (2015) Neurobiological roots of language in primate audition: common computational properties. Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) 19:142–150. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyer A, Duffau H, Vincent M et al (2018) Electrophysiological activity evoked by direct electrical stimulation of the human brain: interest of the P0 component. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2018:2210–2213. Google Scholar
  9. Briganti C, Sestieri C, Mattei PA et al (2012) Reorganization of functional connectivity of the language network in patients with brain gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:1983–1990. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrabba G, Mandonnet E, Fava E et al (2008) Transient inhibition of motor function induced by the Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator during brain mapping. Neurosurgery 63:E178–E179. (discussion E179).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Catani M, Dell’acqua F, Vergani F et al (2012) Short frontal lobe connections of the human brain. Cortex 48:273–291. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cerri G, Cabinio M, Blasi V et al (2015) The mirror neuron system and the strange case of Broca’s area. Hum Brain Mapp 36:1010–1027. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang EF, Breshears JD, Raygor KP et al (2017) Stereotactic probability and variability of speech arrest and anomia sites during stimulation mapping of the language dominant hemisphere. J Neurosurg 126:114–121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chivukula S, Pikul BK, Black KL et al (2018) Contralateral functional reorganization of the speech supplementary motor area following neurosurgical tumor resection. Brain Lang 183:41–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Benedictis A, Sarubbo S, Duffau H (2012) Subcortical surgical anatomy of the lateral frontal region: human white matter dissection and correlations with functional insights provided by intraoperative direct brain stimulation: laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg 117:1053–1069. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Benedictis A, Petit L, Descoteaux M et al (2016) New insights in the homotopic and heterotopic connectivity of the frontal portion of the human corpus callosum revealed by microdissection and diffusion tractography. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4718–4735. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dick AS, Bernal B, Tremblay P (2014) The language connectome: new pathways, new concepts. Neuroscientist 20:453–467. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duffau H (2005) Lessons from brain mapping in surgery for low-grade glioma: insights into associations between tumour and brain plasticity. Lancet Neurol 4:476–486. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duffau H (2014) The huge plastic potential of adult brain and the role of connectomics: new insights provided by serial mappings in glioma surgery. Cortex 58:325–337. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duffau H (2015) Stimulation mapping of white matter tracts to study brain functional connectivity. Nat Rev Neurol 11:255–265. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duffau H, Capelle L, Sichez N et al (2002) Intraoperative mapping of the subcortical language pathways using direct stimulations. An anatomo-functional study. Brain 125:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duffau H, Gatignol P, Denvil D et al (2003a) The articulatory loop: study of the subcortical connectivity by electrostimulation. Neuroreport 14:2005–2008. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duffau H, Capelle L, Denvil D et al (2003b) The role of dominant premotor cortex in language: a study using intraoperative functional mapping in awake patients. Neuroimage 20:1903–1914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duffau H, Gatignol P, Mandonnet E et al (2005) New insights into the anatomo-functional connectivity of the semantic system: a study using cortico-subcortical electrostimulations. Brain 128:797–810. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duffau H, Moritz-Gasser S, Mandonnet E (2013) A re-examination of neural basis of language processing: Proposal of a dynamic hodotopical model from data provided by brain stimulation mapping during picture naming. Brain Lang. Google Scholar
  26. Dum RP, Strick PL (1991) The origin of corticospinal projections from the premotor areas in the frontal lobe. J Neurosci 11:667–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fernández-Miranda JC, Wang Y, Pathak S et al (2014) Asymmetry, connectivity, and segmentation of the arcuate fascicle in the human brain. Brain Struct Funct. Google Scholar
  28. Ford A, McGregor KM, Case K et al (2010) Structural connectivity of Broca’s area and medial frontal cortex. Neuroimage 52:1230–1237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Foulon C, Cerliani L, Kinkingnéhun S et al (2018) Advanced lesion symptom mapping analyses and implementation as BCBtoolkit. Gigascience. Google Scholar
  30. Friederici AD (2012) Language development and the ontogeny of the dorsal pathway. Front Evol Neurosci 4:3. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Friederici AD (2015) White-matter pathways for speech and language processing. Handb Clin Neurol 129:177–186. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fujii M, Maesawa S, Motomura K et al (2015) Intraoperative subcortical mapping of a language-associated deep frontal tract connecting the superior frontal gyrus to Broca’s area in the dominant hemisphere of patients with glioma. J Neurosurg 122:1390–1396. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gębska-Kośla K, Bryszewski B, Jaskólski DJ et al (2017) Reorganization of language centers in patients with brain tumors located in eloquent speech areas—a pre- and postoperative preliminary fMRI study. Neurol Neurochir Pol 51:403–410. Google Scholar
  34. Ghinda CD, Duffau H (2017) Network plasticity and intraoperative mapping for personalized multimodal management of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Front Surg. Google Scholar
  35. Glasser MF, Coalson TS, Robinson EC et al (2016) A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature 536:171–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Halai AD, Woollams AM, Lambon Ralph MA (2018) Triangulation of language-cognitive impairments, naming errors and their neural bases post-stroke. Neuroimage Clin 17:465–473. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Herbet G, Maheu M, Costi E et al (2016) Mapping neuroplastic potential in brain-damaged patients. Brain 139:829–844. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hertrich I, Dietrich S, Ackermann H (2016) The role of the supplementary motor area for speech and language processing. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 68:602–610. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hickok G, Poeppel D (2004) Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92:67–99. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Howard D, Patterson KE, Company TVT (1992) The pyramids and palm trees test: a test of semantic access from words and pictures. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St EdmundsGoogle Scholar
  41. Kemerdere R, de Champfleur NM, Deverdun J et al (2016) Role of the left frontal aslant tract in stuttering: a brain stimulation and tractographic study. J Neurol 263:157–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kinoshita M, Shinohara H, Hori O et al (2012) Association fibers connecting the Broca center and the lateral superior frontal gyrus: a microsurgical and tractographic anatomy. J Neurosurg 116:323–330. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kinoshita M, de Champfleur NM, Deverdun J et al (2015) Role of fronto-striatal tract and frontal aslant tract in movement and speech: an axonal mapping study. Brain Struct Funct 220:3399–3412. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani BA et al (2009) Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 46:786–802. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kong NW, Gibb WR, Tate MC (2016) Neuroplasticity: insights from patients harboring gliomas. Neural Plast 2016:2365063. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kośla K, Bryszewski B, Jaskólski D et al (2015) Reorganization of language areas in patient with a frontal lobe low grade glioma—fMRI case study. Pol J Radiol 80:290–295. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Krainik A, Duffau H, Capelle L et al (2004) Role of the healthy hemisphere in recovery after resection of the supplementary motor area. Neurology 62:1323–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kristo G, Raemaekers M, Rutten G-J et al (2015) Inter-hemispheric language functional reorganization in low-grade glioma patients after tumour surgery. Cortex 64:235–248. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lambon Ralph MA, Jefferies E, Patterson K, Rogers TT (2017) The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 18:42–55. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lawes INC, Barrick TR, Murugam V et al (2008) Atlas-based segmentation of white matter tracts of the human brain using diffusion tensor tractography and comparison with classical dissection. Neuroimage 39:62–79. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lou W, Peck KK, Brennan N et al (2017) Left-lateralization of resting state functional connectivity between the presupplementary motor area and primary language areas. Neuroreport 28:545–550. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lubrano V, Draper L, Roux F-E (2010) What makes surgical tumor resection feasible in Broca’s area? Insights into intraoperative brain mapping. Neurosurgery 66:868–875. (discussion 875)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mandonnet E, Duffau H (2014) Understanding entangled cerebral networks: a prerequisite for restoring brain function with brain-computer interfaces. Front Syst Neurosci 8:82. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mandonnet E, Winkler PA, Duffau H (2010) Direct electrical stimulation as an input gate into brain functional networks: principles, advantages and limitations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152:185–193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mandonnet E, Dadoun Y, Poisson I et al (2016) Axono-cortical evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study. Neurochirurgie 62:67–71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mandonnet E, Sarubbo S, Duffau H (2017) Proposal of an optimized strategy for intraoperative testing of speech and language during awake mapping. Neurosurg Rev 40:29–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Metz-Lutz M, Kremin H, Deloche G et al (1991) Standardisation d’un test de dénomination orale: contrôle des effets de l’âge, du sexe et du niveau de scolarité chez les sujets adultes normaux. Neuropsychol Rev 1:73–95Google Scholar
  58. Nelson L, Lapsiwala S, Haughton VM et al (2002) Preoperative mapping of the supplementary motor area in patients harboring tumors in the medial frontal lobe. J Neurosurg 97:1108–1114. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ookawa S, Enatsu R, Kanno A et al (2017) Frontal fibers connecting the superior frontal gyrus to broca area: a corticocortical evoked potential study. World Neurosurg 107:239–248. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Papagno C, Casarotti A, Comi A et al (2014) Long-term proper name anomia after removal of the uncinate fasciculus. Brain Struct Funct. Google Scholar
  61. Peraud A, Meschede M, Eisner W et al (2002) Surgical resection of grade II astrocytomas in the superior frontal gyrus. Neurosurgery 50:966–975; (discussion 975–977)Google Scholar
  62. Price CJ (2012) A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. Neuroimage 62:816–847. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rheault F, Houde J, Goyette N et al (2016) MI-Brain, a software to handle tractograms and perform interactive virtual dissection. Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  64. Ripollés P, Biel D, Peñaloza C et al (2017) Strength of temporal white matter pathways predicts semantic learning. J Neurosci 37:11101–11113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rojkova K, Volle E, Urbanski M et al (2016) Atlasing the frontal lobe connections and their variability due to age and education: a spherical deconvolution tractography study. Brain Struct Funct 221:1751–1766. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rosenberg K, Liebling R, Avidan G et al (2008) Language related reorganization in adult brain with slow growing glioma: fMRI prospective case-study. Neurocase 14:465–473. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Russell SM, Kelly PJ (2007) Incidence and clinical evolution of postoperative deficits after volumetric stereotactic resection of glial neoplasms involving the supplementary motor area. Neurosurgery 61:358–367. (discussion 367–368).Google Scholar
  68. Sanai N, Mirzadeh Z, Berger MS (2008) Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection. N Engl J Med 358:18–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sarubbo S, De Benedictis A, Merler S et al (2016) Structural and functional integration between dorsal and ventral language streams as revealed by blunt dissection and direct electrical stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3858–3872. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Saur D, Kreher BW, Schnell S et al (2008) Ventral and dorsal pathways for language. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:18035–18040. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schucht P, Moritz-Gasser S, Herbet G et al (2013) Subcortical electrostimulation to identify network subserving motor control. Hum Brain Mapp 34:3023–3030. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shadmehr R, Krakauer JW (2008) A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp Brain Res 185:359–381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sierpowska J, Gabarrós A, Fernandez-Coello A et al (2015) Morphological derivation overflow as a result of disruption of the left frontal aslant white matter tract. Brain Lang 142:54–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sun H, Zheng D, Wang X et al (2013) Functional segregation in the left premotor cortex in language processing: evidence from fMRI. J Integr Neurosci 12:221–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Swann NC, Cai W, Conner CR et al (2012) Roles for the pre-supplementary motor area and the right inferior frontal gyrus in stopping action: electrophysiological responses and functional and structural connectivity. Neuroimage 59:2860–2870. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tate MC, Herbet G, Moritz-Gasser S et al (2014) Probabilistic map of critical functional regions of the human cerebral cortex: Broca’s area revisited. Brain. Google Scholar
  77. Thiebaut de Schotten M, Ffytche DH, Bizzi A et al (2011a) Atlasing location, asymmetry and inter-subject variability of white matter tracts in the human brain with MR diffusion tractography. Neuroimage 54:49–59. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell’Acqua F, Forkel SJ et al (2011b) A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nat Neurosci 14:1245–1246. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell’Acqua F, Valabregue R, Catani M (2012) Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe association tracts. Cortex 48:82–96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell’Acqua F, Ratiu P et al (2015) From Phineas Gage and Monsieur Leborgne to H.M.: revisiting disconnection syndromes. Cereb Cortex 25:4812–4827. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vassal F, Boutet C, Lemaire J-J, Nuti C (2014) New insights into the functional significance of the frontal aslant tract: an anatomo-functional study using intraoperative electrical stimulations combined with diffusion tensor imaging-based fiber tracking. Br J Neurosurg 28:685–687. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vergani F, Lacerda L, Martino J et al (2014) White matter connections of the supplementary motor area in humans. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. Google Scholar
  83. Vincent M, Guiraud D, Duffau H et al (2017) Electrophysiological brain mapping: Basics of recording evoked potentials induced by electrical stimulation and its physiological spreading in the human brain. Clin Neurophysiol 128:1886–1890. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Voss J, Meier TB, Freidel R et al (2013) The role of secondary motor and language cortices in morbidity and mortality: a retrospective functional MRI study of surgical planning for patients with intracranial tumors. Neurosurg Focus 34:E7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wang X, Pathak S, Stefaneanu L et al (2015) Subcomponents and connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in the human brain. Brain Struct Funct doi. Google Scholar
  86. Wu C, Pu S, Lin Y et al (2008) Fractionated resection on low grade gliomas involving Broca’s area and insights to brain plasticity. Chin Med J 121:2026–2030Google Scholar
  87. Yamao Y, Matsumoto R, Kunieda T et al (2014) Intraoperative dorsal language network mapping by using single-pulse electrical stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 35:4345–4361. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Corrivetti
    • 1
  • Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
    • 2
  • Isabelle Poisson
    • 1
  • Sébastien Froelich
    • 1
    • 3
  • Maxime Descoteaux
    • 4
  • François Rheault
    • 1
    • 4
  • Emmanuel Mandonnet
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author return OK on get
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryLariboisière Hospital, APHPParisFrance
  2. 2.Brain connectivity and behaviour group, FrontlabInserm, CNRS, institut du cerveau et la moelle (ICM), hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, UPMC université Paris 06, Sorbonne universitésParisFrance
  3. 3.University Paris 7ParisFrance
  4. 4.Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Lab (SCIL), Computer Science DepartmentUniversité de SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada

Personalised recommendations