Somatotopy of corticospinal tract fibres of the intercostal muscles: report of a case and review of literature
- 87 Downloads
This study aimed at describing the first case of subcortical stimulation of the corticospinal tract leading to selective contraction of the intercostal muscles during surgery for removal of a tumour centred in the right central lobule/supplementary motor area. A 53-year-old male presented with partial motor seizures. Imaging demonstrated a low-grade glioma affecting the posterior aspect of the superior and middle frontal gyri and invading the precentral gyrus. Preoperative motor Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and advanced diffusion tractography were performed to establish the relationship of the tumour with the motor cortex and corticospinal tract. Intraoperative motor mapping and monitoring were performed with monopolar stimulation (“train of 5” technique). At the posterior margin of resection, subcortical stimulation demonstrated a selective response from intercostal muscles, medial to responses from the lower limb and lateral to responses from the upper limb. PubMed literature search was performed to identify any case reporting similar findings. There were no cases previously reported in the literature. The location of the subcortical response for intercostal muscles confirms the somatotopy of the corticospinal tract. Intercostal muscles are controlled by selective fibres within the corticospinal tract. Damage to these fibres can lead to paralysis of voluntary respiratory muscles. Further studies are needed to define the cortico-subcortical network controlling voluntary respiratory muscles.
KeywordsCorticospinal tract Intercostal muscle Motor cortex Motor mapping Subcortical stimulation
Authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by the Department of Neurosurgery, King’s College Hospital and the intraoperative neurophysiology Team at Inomed.
No funding obtained.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. No funds were obtained for this study. This paper partly represents independent research on BRCMAP project funded by the NIHR-Wellcome Trust, King’s Clinical Research Facility and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Supplementary material 1 (M4V 5094 KB)
- Bassal M, Bianchi AL (1981) Effets de la stimulation des structures nerveusses centrales sur les activités respiratoires efférentes chez le chat. I. Réponses à la stimulation corticale. J Physiol (Paris) 71:741–757Google Scholar
- Bello L, Riva M, Fava E, Ferpozzi V, Castellano A, Raneri F, Pessina F, Bizzi A, Falini A, Cerri G (2014) Tailoring neurophysiological strategies with clinical context enhances resection and safety and expands indications in gliomas involving motor pathways. Neuro Oncol 16(8):1110–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neuloh G, Schramm J (2002) Mapping and monitoring of supratentorial procedures. In: Deletis V, Shills J (eds) Neurophysiology in neurosurgery: a modern intraoperative approach. Academic Press, Sand DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Planche D (1972) Effects of cerebral cortex stimulation on the activity of the phrenic nerve. J Physiol (Paris) 64(1):31–56Google Scholar
- Silver JR, Moulton A (1969) The physiological and pathological sequelae of paralysis of the intercostal and abdominal muscles in tetraplegic patients. Paraplegia 7(2):131–141Google Scholar
- Simon MV, Shields DC, Eskandar EN (2009) Functional cortical mapping. In: Simon MV (ed) Intraoperative neurophysiology: a comprehensive guide to monitoring and mapping. Demos Medical Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Szelényi A, Bello L, Duffau H, Fava E, Feigl GC, Galanda M, Neuloh G, Signorelli F, Sala F (2010) Workgroup for intraoperative management in low-grade glioma surgery within the European low-grade glioma network. Intraoperative electrical stimulation in awake craniotomy: methodological aspects of current practice. Neurosurg Focus 28(2):E7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.12.FOCUS09237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar