Brain Structure and Function

, Volume 224, Issue 1, pp 133–148 | Cite as

Neural networks of aggression: ALE meta-analyses on trait and elicited aggression

  • Ting Yat WongEmail author
  • Azah Sid
  • Tobias Wensing
  • Simon B. Eickhoff
  • Ute Habel
  • Ruben C. Gur
  • Thomas Nickl-Jockschat
Original Article


There is considerable evidence that emotion dysregulation and self-control impairments lead to escalated aggression in populations with psychiatric disorders. However, convergent quantitative evidence on the neural network explaining how aggression arises is still lacking. To address this gap, peak activations extracted from extant functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies were synthesized through coordinate-based meta-analyses. A systematic search in the PubMed database was conducted and 26 fMRI studies met the inclusion criteria. Three separate activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analyses were performed on (1) individual differences in trait aggression (TA) studies, (2) individual differences in TA studies examining executive functioning, and (3) elicited aggression (EA) studies across fMRI behavioral paradigms. Ensuing clusters from ALE meta-analyses were further treated as seeds for follow-up investigations on consensus connectivity networks (CCN) delineated from meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM) and resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) to further characterize their physiological functions. Finally, we obtained a data-driven functional characterization of the ensuing clusters and their networks. This approach offers a boarder view of the ensuing clusters using a boarder network perspective. In TA, aberrant brain activations were found only in the right precuneus. Follow-up analyses revealed that the precuneus seed was within the frontal-parietal network (FPN) associated with action inhibition, visuospatial processing and higher-level cognition. With further restricting to only experiments examining executive functioning, convergent evidence was found in the right rolandic operculum (RO), midcingulate cortex (MCC), precentral gyrus (PrG) and precuneus. Follow-up analyses suggested that RO, MCC and PrG may belong to a common cognitive control network, while the MCC seems to be the hub of this network. In EA, we only revealed a convergent region in the left postcentral gyrus. Follow-up CCN analyses and functional characterizations suggested that this region may also belong to the same cognitive control network found in the TA sub-analysis. Our results suggested that escalated aggression arises from abnormal precuneus activities within the FPN, disrupting the recruitment of other large-scale networks such as adaptive cognitive control network. Consequently, failure to recruit such a network results in an inability to generate adaptive responses, increasing the likelihood of acting aggressively.


fMRI ALE MACM Resting-state functional connectivity Meta-analysis 



This study is supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, International Research Training Group IRTG2150). SBE is supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457), the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme “Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain” and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under Grant Agreement Bi. 7202070 (HBP SGA1).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no existing conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

429_2018_1765_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1481 kb)


  1. Alegria AA, Radua J, Rubia K (2016) Meta-analysis of fMRI studies of disruptive behavior disorders. Am J Psychiatry 173:1119–1130. Google Scholar
  2. Allen JJ, Anderson CA, Bushman BJ (2018) The general aggression model. Curr Opin Psychol 19:75–80. Google Scholar
  3. Amft M, Bzdok D, Laird AR et al (2015) Definition and characterization of an extended social-affective default network. Brain Struct Funct 220:1031–1049. Google Scholar
  4. Anderson CA, Bushman BJ (2002) Human aggression. Annu Rev Psychol 53:27–51. Google Scholar
  5. Barratt ES, Stanford MS, Dowdy L et al (1999) Impulsive and premeditated aggression: a factor analysis of self- reported acts. Psychiatry Res 86:163–173. Google Scholar
  6. Blair RJR (2010) Psychopathy, frustration, and reactive aggression: the role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Br J Psychol 101:383–399. Google Scholar
  7. Blair RJR (2016) The neurobiology of impulsive aggression. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 26:4–9. Google Scholar
  8. Bobes MA, Ostrosky F, Diaz K et al (2013) Linkage of functional and structural anomalies in the left amygdala of reactive-aggressive men. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 8:928–936. Google Scholar
  9. Bressler SL, Menon V (2010) Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles. Trends Cogn Sci 14:277–290. Google Scholar
  10. Bushman BJ, Anderson CA (2001) Is it time to pull the plug on the hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? Psychol Rev 108:273–279. Google Scholar
  11. Buss DM, Shackelford TK (1997) Human aggression in evolutionary psychological perspective. Clin Psychol Rev 17:605–619. Google Scholar
  12. Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C et al (2013) Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:365–376. Google Scholar
  13. Bzdok D, Heeger A, Langner R et al (2015) Subspecialization in the human posterior medial cortex. Neuroimage 106:55–71. Google Scholar
  14. Cavanna AE, Trimble MR (2006) The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129:564–583. Google Scholar
  15. Cherek DR, Moeller FG, Dougherty DM, Rhoades H (1997) Studies of violent and nonviolent male parolees: I. Laboratory and psychometric measurements of aggression. Biol Psychiatry 41:514–522. Google Scholar
  16. Chester DS, Lasko EN, Chester DS, House T (2018) Validating a standardized approach to the Taylor aggression paradigm. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. Google Scholar
  17. Coccaro EF, Kavoussi RJ, Berman ME, Lish JD (1998) Intermittent explosive disorder-revised: development, reliability, and validity of research criteria. Compr Psychiatry 39:368–376. Google Scholar
  18. Coccaro EF, Sripada CS, Yanowitch RN, Phan KL (2011) Corticolimbic function in impulsive aggressive behavior. Biol Psychiatry 69:1153–1159. Google Scholar
  19. Cole MW, Reynolds JR, Power JD et al (2013) Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control. Nat Neurosci 16:1348–1355. Google Scholar
  20. Davidson RJ, Putnam KM, Larson CL (2000) Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation—a possible prelude to violence. Science (80-) 289:591–594. Google Scholar
  21. Denson TF, DeWall CN, Finkel EJ (2012) Self-control and aggression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 21:20–25. Google Scholar
  22. Diamond A (2013) Executive Functions. Annu Rev Psychol 64:135–168. Google Scholar
  23. Dodge KA, Coie JD (1987) Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. J Personal Soc Psychol 53:1146–1158. Google Scholar
  24. Dolan MC (2010) What imaging tells us about violence in anti-social men. Crim Behav Ment Health 20:199–214. Google Scholar
  25. Dosenbach NUF, Fair DA, Cohen AL et al (2008) A dual-networks architecture of top–down control. Trends Cogn Sci 12:99–105. Google Scholar
  26. Dosenbach NUF, Fair DA, Miezin FM et al (2007) Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:11073–11078. Google Scholar
  27. Douglas KS, Guy LS, Hart SD (2009) Psychosis as a risk factor for violence to others: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 135:679–706. Google Scholar
  28. Eickhoff SB, Bzdok D, Laird AR et al (2012) Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. Neuroimage 59:2349–2361. Google Scholar
  29. Eickhoff SB, Bzdok D, Laird AR et al (2011) Co-activation patterns distinguish cortical modules, their connectivity and functional differentiation. Neuroimage 57:938–949. Google Scholar
  30. Eickhoff SB, Laird AR, Grefkes C et al (2009) Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Hum Brain Mapp 30:2907–2926. Google Scholar
  31. Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H et al (2005) A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 25:1325–1335. Google Scholar
  32. Fox PT, Lancaster JL, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB (2014) Meta-analysis in human neuroimaging: computational modeling of large-scale databases. Annu Rev Neurosci 37:409–434. Google Scholar
  33. Freeman SM, Clewett DV, Bennett CM et al (2015) The posteromedial region of the default mode network shows attenuated task-induced deactivation in psychopathic prisoners. Neuropsychology 29:493–500. Google Scholar
  34. Girard LC, Pingault JB, Falissard B et al (2014) Physical aggression and language ability from 17 to 72 months: cross-lagged effects in a population sample. PLoS One. Google Scholar
  35. Glenn AL, Raine A (2008) The neurobiology of psychopathy. Psychiatr Clin N Am 31:463–475. Google Scholar
  36. Goodkind M, Eickhoff SB, Oathes DJ et al (2015) Identification of a common neurobiological substrate for mental Illness. JAMA Psychiatry 72:305–315. Google Scholar
  37. Gur RC, Ragland JD, Reivich M et al (2009) Regional differences in the coupling between resting cerebral blood flow and metabolism may indicate action preparedness as a default state. Cereb Cortex 19:375–382. Google Scholar
  38. Gusnard DA, Raichle ME (2001) Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:685–694. Google Scholar
  39. Hawkins KA, Trobst KK (2000) Frontal lobe dysfunction and aggression: conceptual issues and research findings. Aggress Violent Behav 5:147–157. Google Scholar
  40. Hillman KL (2013) Cost-benefit analysis: the first real rule of fight club? Front Neurosci 7:248. Google Scholar
  41. Hoaken PNS, Shaughnessy VK, Pihl RO (2003) Executive cognitive functioning and aggression: is it an issue of impulsivity? Aggress Behav 29:15–30. Google Scholar
  42. Hoffstaedter F, Grefkes C, Caspers S et al (2014) The role of anterior midcingulate cortex in cognitive motor control: evidence from functional connectivity analyses. Hum Brain Mapp 35:2741–2753. Google Scholar
  43. Hopkins J, Cleveland WS, Mcgill R et al (2016) Behavior, sensitivity, and power of activation likelihood estimation characterized by massive empirical simulation. Neuroimage 137:70–85. Google Scholar
  44. Hoptman MJ, Antonius D, Kline N (2011) Neuroimaging correlates of aggression in schizophrenia: an update. Curr Opin Psychiatry 24:100–106. Google Scholar
  45. Joyal CC, Putkonen A, Mancini-Marïe A et al (2007a) Violent persons with schizophrenia and comorbid disorders: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Schizophr Res 91:97–102. Google Scholar
  46. Kalnin AJ, Edwards CR, Wang Y et al (2011) The interacting role of media violence exposure and aggressive-disruptive behavior in adolescent brain activation during an emotional Stroop task. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 192:12–19. Google Scholar
  47. Kohn N, Eickhoff SB, Scheller M et al (2014) Neural network of cognitive emotion regulation—an ALE meta-analysis and MACM analysis. Neuroimage 87:345–355. Google Scholar
  48. Kumari V, Aasen I, Taylor P et al (2006a) Neural dysfunction and violence in schizophrenia: an fMRI investigation. Schizophr Res 84:144–164. Google Scholar
  49. Laird AR, Eickhoff SB, Fox PM et al (2011) The BrainMap strategy for standardization, sharing, and meta-analysis of neuroimaging data. BMC Res Notes 4:349. Google Scholar
  50. Lancaster JL, Tordesillas-Gutiérrez D, Martinez M et al (2007) Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM-152 brain template. Hum Brain Mapp 28:1194–1205. Google Scholar
  51. Lee TMC, Chan SC, Raine A (2009) Hyperresponsivity to threat stimuli in domestic violence offenders: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Clin Psychiatry 70:36–45. Google Scholar
  52. Liu J (2004) Concept analysis: aggression. Issues Ment Health Nurs 25:693–714. Google Scholar
  53. Mathiak K, Weber R (2006a) Toward brain correlates of natural behavior: fMRI during violent video games. Hum Brain Mapp 27:948–956. Google Scholar
  54. McTeague LM, Huemer J, Carreon DM et al (2017) Identification of common neural circuit disruptions in cognitive control across psychiatric disorders. Am J Psychiatry 174:676–685. Google Scholar
  55. Miller EK (2000) The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Nat Rev Neurosci 1:59–65. Google Scholar
  56. Milton J, Amin S, Singh SP et al (2001) Aggressive incidents in first-episode psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 178:433–440. Google Scholar
  57. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4:1–9. Google Scholar
  58. Müller VI, Cieslik EC, Serbanescu I et al (2017) Altered brain activity in unipolar depression revisited. JAMA Psychiatry 74:47–55. Google Scholar
  59. Nakagawa S, Takeuchi H, Taki Y et al (2017) The anterior midcingulate cortex as a neural node underlying hostility in young adults. Brain Struct Funct 222:61–70. Google Scholar
  60. Nickl-Jockschat T, Rottschy C, Thommes J et al (2015) Neural networks related to dysfunctional face processing in autism spectrum disorder. Brain Struct Funct 220:2355–2371. Google Scholar
  61. Niendam TA, Laird AR, Ray KL et al (2012) Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 12:241–268. Google Scholar
  62. Olvera RL (2002) Intermittent explosive disorder: epidemiology, diagnosis and management. CNS Drugs 16:517–526. Google Scholar
  63. Paus T (2001) Primate anterior cingulate cortex: where motor control, drive and cognition interface. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:417–424. Google Scholar
  64. Schiffer B, Müller BW, Scherbaum N et al (2011) Disentangling structural brain alterations associated with violent behavior from those associated with substance use disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 68:1039–1049. Google Scholar
  65. Shackman AJ, Salomons TV, Slagter HA et al (2011) The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci 12:154–167. Google Scholar
  66. Shenhav A, Botvinick M, Cohen J (2013) The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron 79:217–240Google Scholar
  67. Siever LJ (2008) Neurobiology of aggression and violence. Am J Psychiatry 165:429–442. Google Scholar
  68. Simon JJ, Walther S, Fiebach CJ et al (2010) Neural reward processing is modulated by approach- and avoidance-related personality traits. Neuroimage 49:1868–1874. Google Scholar
  69. Snyder HR, Miyake A, Hankin BL (2015) Advancing understanding of executive function impairments and psychopathology: bridging the gap between clinical and cognitive approaches. Front Psychol 6:328. Google Scholar
  70. Soloff PH, Abraham K, Burgess A et al (2017) Impulsivity and aggression mediate regional brain responses in borderline personality disorder: an fMRI study. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 260:76–85. Google Scholar
  71. Taylor SP (1967) Aggressive behavior and physiological arousal as a function of provocation and the tendency to inhibit aggression. J Personal 35:297–310. Google Scholar
  72. Tedeschi JT, Quigley BM (1996) Limitations of laboratory paradigms for studying aggression. Aggress Violent Behav 1:163–177. Google Scholar
  73. Thijssen S, Ringoot AP, Wildeboer A et al (2015) Brain morphology of childhood aggressive behavior: a multi-informant study in school-age children. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 15:564–577. Google Scholar
  74. Turkeltaub PE, Eden GF, Jones KM, Zeffiro TA (2002) Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation. Neuroimage 16:765–780. Google Scholar
  75. Turkeltaub PE, Eickhoff SB, Laird AR et al (2012) Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses. Hum Brain Mapp 33:1–13. Google Scholar
  76. Utevsky AV, Smith DV, Huettel SA (2014) Precuneus is a functional core of the default-mode network. J Neurosci 34:932–940. Google Scholar
  77. Vogt BA (2005) Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:533–544. Google Scholar
  78. Weiss EM (2012) Neuroimaging and neurocognitive correlates of aggression and violence in schizophrenia. Scientifica (Cairo) 2012:1–12. Google Scholar
  79. Zhang S, Li CR (2012a) Functional connectivity mapping of the human precuneus by resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 59:3548–3562. Google Scholar
  80. Zhang S, Li CR (2012b) Functional networks for cognitive control in a stop signal task: independent component analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 33:89–104. Google Scholar

Studies on Trait Aggression (TA)

  1. Barkataki I, Kumari V, Das M, Sumich A, Taylor P, Sharma T (2008) Neural correlates of deficient response inhibition in mentally disordered violent individuals. Behav Sci Law 26:51–64Google Scholar
  2. Coccaro EF, McCloskey MS, Fitzgerald DA, Phan KL (2007) Amygdala and orbitofrontal reactivity to social threat in individuals with impulsive aggression. Biol Psychiatry 62:168–178Google Scholar
  3. Gan G, Preston-Campbell RN, Moeller SJ, Steinberg JL, Lane SD, Maloney T et al (2016) Reward vs. retaliation-the role of the mesocorticolimbic salience network in human reactive aggression. Front Behav Neurosci 10:179Google Scholar
  4. Gregory S, Blair RJ, Ffytche D, Simmons A, Kumari V, Hodgins S, Blackwood N (2015) Punishment and psychopathy: a case-control functional MRI investigation of reinforcement learning in violent antisocial personality disordered men. Lancet Psychiatry 2:153–160Google Scholar
  5. Joyal CC, Putkonen A, Mancini-Marïe A, Hodgins S, Kononen M, Boulay L et al (2007b) Violent persons with schizophrenia and comorbid disorders: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Schizophr Res 91:97–102Google Scholar
  6. Kumari V, Aasen I, Taylor P, Ffytche DH, Das M, Barkataki I et al (2006b) Neural dysfunction and violence in schizophrenia: an fMRI investigation. Schizophr Res 84:144–164Google Scholar
  7. Kumari V, Das M, Taylor PJ, Barkataki I, Andrew C, Sumich A et al (2009) Neural and behavioural responses to threat in men with a history of serious violence and schizophrenia or antisocial personality disorder. Schizophr Res 110:47–58Google Scholar
  8. McCloskey MS, Phan KL, Angstadt M, Fettich KC, Keedy S, Coccaro EF (2016) Amygdala hyperactivation to angry faces in intermittent explosive disorder. J Psychiatr Res 79:34–41Google Scholar
  9. Prehn K, Schlagenhauf F, Schulze L, Berger C, Vohs K, Fleischer M et al (2013a) Neural correlates of risk taking in violent criminal offenders characterized by emotional hypo- and hyper-reactivity. Soc Neurosci 8:136–147Google Scholar
  10. Prehn K, Schulze L, Rossmann S, Berger C, Vohs K, Fleischer M et al (2013b) Effects of emotional stimuli on working memory processes in male criminal offenders with borderline and antisocial personality disorder. World J Biol Psychiatry 14:71–78Google Scholar
  11. Schiffer B, Pawliczek C, Murüller B, Forsting M, Gizewski E, Leygraf N, Hodgins S (2014) Neural mechanisms underlying cognitive control of men with lifelong antisocial behavior. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 222:43–51Google Scholar
  12. Schiffer B, Pawliczek C, Müller BW, Wiltfang J, Brüne M, Forsting M et al (2017) Neural mechanisms underlying affective theory of mind in violent antisocial personality disorder and/or schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 43:1229–1239Google Scholar
  13. Tikàsz A, Potvin S, Lungu O, Joyal CC, Hodgins S, Mendrek A, Dumais A (2016) Anterior cingulate hyperactivations during negative emotion processing among men with schizophrenia and a history of violent behavior. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 12:1397–1410Google Scholar

Studies on Elicited Aggression (EA)

  1. Beyer F, Münte TF, Krämer UM (2014) Increased neural reactivity to socio-emotional stimuli links social exclusion and aggression. Biol Psychol 96:102–110Google Scholar
  2. Buades-Rotger M, Beyer F, Krämer UM (2017) Avoidant responses to interpersonal provocation are associated with increased amygdala and decreased mentalizing network activity. eNeuro 4:e0337Google Scholar
  3. Chester DS, DeWall CN (2016) The pleasure of revenge: retaliatory aggression arises from a neural imbalance toward reward. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 11:1173–1182Google Scholar
  4. Chester DS, DeWall CN (2018a) Aggression is associated with greater subsequent alcohol consumption: a shared neural basis in the ventral striatum. Aggress Behav 44:285–293Google Scholar
  5. Chester DS, Dewall CN (2018b) Intimate partner violence perpetration corresponds to a dorsal-ventral gradient in medial PFC reactivity to interpersonal provocation. Soc Neurosci. Google Scholar
  6. Dambacher F, Sack AT, Lobbestael J, Arntz A, Brugman S, Schuhmann T (2013) Out of control: evidence for anterior insula involvement in motor impulsivity and reactive aggression. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 10:508–516Google Scholar
  7. Emmerling F, Schuhmann T, Lobbestael J, Arntz A, Brugman S, Sack AT (2016) The role of the insular cortex in retaliation. PLoS One 11:e0152000Google Scholar
  8. Krämer UM, Jansma H, Tempelmann C, Münte TF (2007) Tit-for-tat: the neural basis of reactive aggression. Neuroimage 38:203–211Google Scholar
  9. Krämer UM, Riba J, Richter S, Münte TF (2011) An fMRI study on the role of serotonin in reactive agggression. PLoS One 6:e27668Google Scholar
  10. Mathiak K, Weber R (2006b) Toward brain correlates of natural behavior: fMRI during violent video games. Hum Brain Mapp 27:948–956Google Scholar
  11. Mathiak KA, Klasen M, Weber R, Ackermann H, Shergill SS, Mathiak K (2011) Reward system and temporal pole contributions to affective evaluation during a first person shooter video game. BMC Neurosci 12:66Google Scholar
  12. Repple J, Pawliczek CM, Voss B, Siegel S, Schneider F, Kohn N, Habel U (2017) From provocation to aggression: the neural network. BMC Neurosci 18:73Google Scholar
  13. Skibsted AP, da Cunha-Bang S, Carré JM, Hansen AE, Beliveau V, Knudsen GM, Fisher PM (2017) Aggression-related brain function assessed with the point subtraction aggression paradigm in fMRI. Aggress Behav 43:601–610Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of MedicineRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Brain Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.JARA-BRAIN, Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance-Translation Brain MedicineAachenGermany
  4. 4.Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7)Research Center JülichJülichGermany
  5. 5.Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical FacultyHeinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
  6. 6.JARA-Brain Institute I: Brain Structure Function RelationshipsAachenGermany
  7. 7.Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of MedicineUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  8. 8.Iowa Neuroscience InstituteUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations