Advertisement

Brain Structure and Function

, Volume 223, Issue 9, pp 4259–4274 | Cite as

Stress-induced brain activation: buffering role of social behavior and neuronal nicotinic receptors

  • Anne NosjeanEmail author
  • Fabrice de Chaumont
  • Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin
  • Sylvie Granon
Original Article
  • 170 Downloads

Abstract

Social behavior and stress responses both rely on activity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and amygdala. We previously reported that acute stress exposure impoverishes social repertoire and triggers behavioral rigidity, and that both effects are modulated by β2-containing nicotinic receptors. We, therefore, hypothesized that the activity of brain regions associated with the integration of social cues will be modulated by stress exposure. We mapped the expression of c-fos protein in all subregions of the PFC and basolateral (BLA) and central (Ce) areas of the amygdala in C57BL/6J (B6) and β2−/− mice. We show altered brain activity and differences in functional connectivity between the two genotypes after stress: the PFC and BLA were hyperactivated in B6 and hypo-activated in β2−/− mice, showing that the impact of stress on brain activity and functional organization depends on the nicotinic system. We also show that the effects of the opportunity to explore a novel environment or interact socially after acute stress depended on genotype: exploration induced only marginal PFC activation in both genotypes relative to stress alone, excluding a major role for β2 receptors in this process. However, social interaction following stress only activated the rostral and caudolateral areas of the PFC in B6 mice, while it induced a kindling of activation in all PFC and amygdalar areas in β2−/− mice. These results indicate that acute stress triggers important PFC-amygdala plasticity, social interaction has a buffering role during stress-induced brain activation, and β2 receptors contribute to the effects of social interaction under stress.

Keywords

Amygdala c-fos Corticosterone Nicotinic receptors Prefrontal cortex Social cognition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS, UMR 9197), by the ANR-FLEXNEURIM and ANR-10-INBS-04 FranceBioImaging Grants. We thank Layla Veleanu for help with some behavioral and immunohistochemical experiments.

Funding

This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS, UMR 9197), by the ANR (FLEXNEURIM 09-BLAN-034002) and ANR (10-INBS-04 FranceBioImaging).

Compliance with ethical standards

Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. This research involves only animals.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. All experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the EU Directive 2010/63/EU, Decree N 2013-118 of February 1st, 2013, and the French National Committee (87/848).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

429_2018_1745_MOESM1_ESM.tif (2.6 mb)
Supplementary Fig. 1. The number (top) and the total time (bottom) of social events statistically correlated with brain area activation in B6 or β2-/- dyads (see Figure 6 and Supplementary Table 4) during the 8 minute social interaction task. Only host mice were submitted to acute stress. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. Histograms show similar quantitative data in the two genotypes. (TIF 2686 KB)
429_2018_1745_MOESM2_ESM.tif (2.8 mb)
Supplementary Fig. 2. Plasma corticosterone levels (µg/dl) in different experimental conditions in B6 and β2-/- mice (stressed or not). Blood samples were collected in 3 different experimental conditions: A. 60 min after exit from animal facility. B. after the 45 min of restraint stress. C. after the exploration period. Values are means ± SEM. All comparisons were performed using Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA followed by Mann-Whitney U-tests. Effect of exploration in not stressed mice: *p = 0.01; **p = 0.006. Effect of stress: †† p = 0.01. Effects of stress and exploration: ‡ ‡ p ≤ 0.007. Effect of exploration in stressed mice §p = 0.029. For each experimental procedure, the genotype effect was not significant (0.132 ≤ ps ≤ 0.686). Not Stress mice: n = 4 for each genotype. Stressed mice: n = 6 for each genotype. Mice submitted to exploration with no stress: n = 6 (B6) and n = 7 (β2-/-). Mice submitted to exploration and stress: n = 7 (B6) and n = 9 (β2-/-). (TIF 2876 KB)
429_2018_1745_MOESM3_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary Table 1. Statistical comparison between B6 and β2-/- mice with their respective controls (S vs Cnt) and between genotypes (β2-/- vs B6) in not stressed mice (Cnt) and in mice submitted to acute stress (S). Comparisons were performed on 4 independent groups with Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on Ranks (p) in the Global PFC and in the amygdala (a) and in the rostral, median and caudal PFC (b). When normality passed, data were subsequently analyzed with the Holm-Sidak method test (HS) and when data did not follow a Gaussian distribution it was tested with Mann-Whitney U-tests (MW). p of each test is indicated. Gray areas showed not significant comparisons. (DOCX 23 KB)
429_2018_1745_MOESM4_ESM.docx (23 kb)
Supplementary Table 2. Statistical analyses in B6 and β2-/- mice submitted to stress with no behavioral procedure (S), to stress followed by exploration of a novel environment (SE), and to stress followed by exploration and social interaction (SESI). Comparisons were performed on six independent groups using Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on Ranks (p) in the Global PFC and in the amygdala (a) and in the rostral, median and caudal PFC (b). When normality passed, data were subsequently analyzed with the Holm-Sidak method test (HS) and when data did not follow a Gaussian distribution it was tested with Mann-Whitney U-tests (MW). p of each test is indicated. Gray areas showed not significant comparisons. (DOCX 24 KB)
429_2018_1745_MOESM5_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary Table 3. Statistical analyses between B6 and β2-/- mice submitted to stress with no behavioral procedure (S), to stress followed by exploration of a novel environment (SE), and to stress followed by exploration of a novel exploration and social interaction (SESI). Statistical analyses were performed on six independent groups using Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on Ranks (p) in the Global PFC and in the amygdala (a) and in the rostral, median and caudal PFC (b). When normality passed, data were subsequently analyzed with the Holm-Sidak method test (HS) and when data did not follow a Gaussian distribution it was tested with Mann-Whitney U-tests (MW). p of each test is indicated. Gray areas showed not significant comparisons. (DOCX 22 KB)
429_2018_1745_MOESM6_ESM.docx (57 kb)
Supplementary Table 4. Social behaviors correlated with c-fos protein expression in specific brain areas. Categories and sub-categories of behavioral events during social interaction between an isolated host mouse (IH, black) and a social visitor mouse (SV, white) are extracted from MiceProfiler software (de Chaumont et al. 2012). Only events that correlated with brain structures (see Fig. 6) are represented, i.e., 12 events over the 27 events analyzed. These events are: contact events (close contacts, oral-genital and side-by-side contacts, categories 1 to 3), relative position events (defined by the position of one mouse with regard to the other one, SV mouse is behind IH mouse, category 4), dynamic events initiated by the SV mouse (categories 5 to 7) or by the IH mouse (categories 8 to 11) and IH stop events (category 12). Aggressiveness defined by cumulated numbers of tail rattling exhibited by IH mice and battles defined by cumulated numbers of fight between IH and SV mice, as well as dominance were also analyzed. (DOCX 56 KB)

References

  1. Adolphs R, Anderson D (2013) Social and emotional neuroscience. Curr Opin Neurobiol 23:291–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnsten AF (2009) Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:410–422PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Avale ME, Chabout J, Pons S, Serreau P, De Chaumont F, Olivo-Marin JC, Bourgeois JP, Maskos U, Changeux JP, Granon S (2011) Prefrontal nicotinic receptors control novel social interaction between mice. FASEB J 25:2145–2155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballesteros-Yáñez I, Benavides-Piccione R, Bourgeois JP, Changeux JP, DeFelipe J (2010) Alterations of cortical pyramidal neurons in mice lacking high-affinity nicotinic receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:11567–11572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Beerling W, Koolhaas JM, Ahnaou A, Bouwknecht JA, de Boer SF, Meerlo P, Drinkenburg WH (2011) Physiological and hormonal responses to novelty exposure in rats are mainly related to ongoing behavioral activity. Physiol Behav 103:412–420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bicks LK, Koike H, Akbarian S, Morishita H (2015)) Prefrontal cortex and social cognition in mouse and man. Front Psychol 6:1805PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bland ST, Schmid MJ, Der-Avakian A, Watkins LR, Spencer RL, Maier SF (2005) Expression of c-fos and BDNF mRNA in subregions of the prefrontal cortex of male and female rats after acute uncontrollable stress. Brain Res 1051:90–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourgeois JP, Meas-Yeadid V, Lesourd AM, Faure P, Pons S, Maskos U, Changeux JP, Olivo-Marin JC, Granon S (2012) Modulation of the mouse prefrontal cortex activation by neuronal nicotinic receptors during novelty exploration but not by exploration of a familiar environment. Cereb Cortex 22:1007–1015PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Buijs RM, Van Eden CG (2000) The integration of stress by the hypothalamus, amygdala and prefrontal cortex: balance between the autonomic nervous system and the neuroendocrine system. Prog Brain Res 126:117–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cerqueira JJ, Almeida OF, Sousa N (2008) The stressed prefrontal cortex. Left? Right! Brain. Behavior Immunity 22:630–638Google Scholar
  11. Chowdhury GM, Fujioka T, Nakamura S (2000) Induction and adaptation of Fos expression in the rat brain by two types of acute restraint stress. Brain Res Bull 52:171–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Coura RS, Cressant A, Xia J, de Chaumont F, Olivo-Marin JC, Pelloux Y, Dalley JW, Granon S (2013) Nonaggressive and adapted social cognition is controlled by the interplay between noradrenergic and nicotinic receptor mechanisms in the prefrontal cortex. FASEB J 27:4343–4354PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Craig AD (2010) The sentient self. Brain Struct Funct 214:563–577PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cullinan WE, Herman JP, Battaglia DF, Akil H, Watson SJ (1995) Pattern and time course of immediate early gene expression in rat brain following acute stress. Neuroscience 64:477–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Curtis AL, Bello NT, Connolly KR, Valentino RJ (2002) Corticotropin-releasing factor neurones of the central nucleus of the amygdala mediate locus coeruleus activation by cardiovascular stress. J Neuroendocrinol 14:667–682PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalgleish T (2004) The emotional brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:583–589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Day HE, Nebel S, Sasse S, Campeau S (2005) Inhibition of the central extended amygdala by loud noise and restraint stress. Eur J Neurosci 21:441–454PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Dayas CV, Buller KM, Crane JW, Xu Y, Day TA (2001) Stressor categorization: acute physical and psychological stressors elicit distinctive recruitment patterns in the amygdala and in medullary noradrenergic cell groups. Eur J Neurosci 14:1143–1152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. de Andrade JS, Abrão RO, Céspedes IC, Garcia MC, Nascimento JO, Spadari-Bratfisch RC, Melo LL, da Silva RC, Viana MB (2012) Acute restraint differently alters defensive responses and fos immunoreactivity in the rat brain. Behav Brain Res 232:20–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. de Chaumont F, Coura RD, Serreau P, Cressant A, Chabout J, Granon S, Olivo-Marin JC (2012) Computerized video analysis of social interactions in mice. Nat Methods 9:410–417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Del Arco A, Mora F (2009) Neurotransmitters and prefrontal cortex-limbic system interactions implications for plasticity and psychiatric disorders. J Neural Transm 116:941–952PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Demolliens M, Isbaine F, Takerkart S, Huguet P, Boussaoud D (2017) Social and asocial prefrontal cortex neurons: a new look at social facilitation and the social brain. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 12:1241–1248PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. dos Santos Coura R, Granon S (2012) Prefrontal neuromodulation by nicotinic receptors for cognitive processes. Psychopharmacology 221:1–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Douglas LA, Varlinskaya EI, Spear LP (2004) Rewarding properties of social interactions in adolescent and adult male and female rats: impact of social versus isolate housing of subjects and partners. Dev Psychobiol 45:153–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dragunow M, Faull R (1989) The use of c-fos as a metabolic marker in neuronal pathway tracing. J Neurosci Methods 29:261–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Faure A, Pittaras E, Nosjean A, Chabout J, Cressant A, Granon S (2017) Social behaviors and acoustic vocalizations in different strains of mice. Behav Brain Res 1:320:383–390Google Scholar
  27. Fowler CD, Arends MA, Kenny PJ (2008) Subtypes of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in nicotine reward, dependence, and withdrawal: evidence from genetically modified mice. Behav Pharmacol 19:461-484PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Gabbott PL, Warner TA, Jays PR, Bacon SJ (2003) Areal and synaptic interconnectivity of prelimbic (area 32), infralimbic (area 25) and insular cortices in the rat. Brain Res 993:59–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gallagher M, Chiba AA (1996) The amygdala and emotion. Cur Opin Neurobiol 6:221–227Google Scholar
  30. Giovannini MG, Rakovska A, Benton RS, Pazzagli M, Bianchi L, Pepeu G (2001) Effects of novelty and habituation on acetylcholine, GABA, and glutamate release from the frontal cortex and hippocampus of freely moving rats. Neuroscience 106:43–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Goebel M, Stengel A, Wang L, Taché Y (2009) Restraint stress activates nesfatin-1-immunoreactive brain nuclei in rats. Brain Res 1300:114–124PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Granon S, Faure P, Changeux JP (2003) Executive and social behaviors under nicotinic receptor regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9596–9601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gu X, Liu X, Van Dam NT, Hof PR, Fan J (2013) Cognition-emotion integration in the anterior insular cortex. Cereb Cortex 23:20–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Heidbreder CA, Groenewegen HJ (2003) The medial prefrontal cortex in the rat: evidence for a dorso-ventral distinction based upon functional and anatomical characteristics. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:555–579Google Scholar
  35. Herman JP, Cullinan WE (1997) Neurocircuitry of stress: central control of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. Trends Neurosci 20:78–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hogg RC, Raggenbass M, Bertrand D (2003) Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: from structure to brain function. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 147:1–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Holmes A, Wellman CL (2009) Stress-induced prefrontal reorganization and executive dysfunction in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33:773–783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Honkaniemi J, Fuxe K, Rechard L, Koistinaho J, Isola J, Gustafsson J, Okret S, Pelto-Huikko M (1992) Colocalization of fos- and glucocorticoid receptor-like immunoreactivities in the rat amygdaloid complex after immobilization stress. J Neuroendocrinol 4:547–555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoover WB, Vertes RP (2007) Anatomical analysis of afferent projections to the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat. Brain Struct Funct 212:149–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hurtubise JL, Howland JG (2017) Effects of stress on behavioral flexibility in rodents. Neuroscience 345:176–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Insel TR, Fernald RD (2004) How the brain processes social information: searching for the social brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:697–722PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ito A, Miyoshi M, Ueki S, Fukada M, Komaki R, Watanabe T (2009) “Green odor” inhalation by rats down-regulates stress-induced increases in Fos expression in stress-related forebrain regions. Neurosci Res 65:166–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Janak PH, Tye KM (2015) From circuits to behaviour in the amygdala. Nature 517:284–292PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Jolkkonen E, Pitkänen A (1998) Intrinsic connections of the rat amygdaloid complex: projections originating in the central nucleus. J Comp Neurol 395:53–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. König M, Thinnes A, Klein J (2017) Microdialysis and its use in behavioural studies: Focus on acetylcholine. J Neurosci Methods S0165-0270(17):30294–30297Google Scholar
  46. Kovács KJ (1998) c-Fos as a transcription factor: a stressful (re)view from a functional map. Neurochem Int 33:287–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kovács KJ (2008) Measurement of immediate-early gene activation- c-fos and beyond. J Neuroendocrinol 20:665–672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Krach S, Paulus FM, Bodden M, Kircher T (2010) The rewarding nature of social interactions. Front Behav Neurosci 4:22PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Lamm C, Singer T (2010) The role of anterior insular cortex in social emotions. Brain Struct Funct 214:579–591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Lampl I, Katz Y (2017) Neuronal adaptation in the somatosensory system of rodents. Neuroscience 343:66–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Larrieu T, Sandi C (2018) Stress-induced depression: is social rank a predictive Risk Factor? Bioessays 40:e1800012PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Levin ED (2013) Complex relationships of nicotinic receptor actions and cognitive functions. Biochem Pharmacol 86:1145–1152PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Lupien SJ, McEwen BS, Gunnar MR, Heim C (2009) Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:434–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Maier SF, Watkins LR (2010) Role of the medial prefrontal cortex in coping and resilience. Brain Res 1355:52–60PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. McDonald AJ (1991) Organization of amygdaloid projections to the prefrontal cortex and associated striatum in the rat. Neuroscience 44:1–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. McEwen BS, Nasca C, Gray JD (2016) Stress Effects on neuronal structure: hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology 41:3–23PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. McKlveen JM, Myers B, Herman JP (2015) The medial prefrontal cortex: coordinator of autonomic, neuroendocrine and behavioural responses to stress. J Neuroendocrinol 27:446–456PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Medford N, Critchley HD (2010) Conjoint activity of anterior insular and anterior cingulate cortex: awareness and response. Brain Struct Funct 214:535–549PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Muigg P, Scheiber S, Salchner P, Bunck M, Landgraf R, Singewald N (2009) Differential stress-induced neuronal activation patterns in mouse lines selectively bred for high, normal or low anxiety. PLoS One 4:e5346PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Murray EA (2007) The amygdala, reward and emotion. Trends Cogn Sci 11:489–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Nagai M, Kishi K, Kato S (2007) Insular cortex and neuropsychiatric disorders: a review of recent literature. Eur Psychiatry 22:387–394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Nieuwenhuys R (2012) The insular cortex: a review. Prog Brain Res 195:123–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Nosjean A, Callera JC, Bonagamba L, Machado B, Hamon M, Laguzzi R (2002) Serotonin(3) receptor stimulation in the nucleus tractus solitarii activates non-catecholaminergic neurons in the rat ventrolateral medulla. Neuroscience 112:935–949PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Nosjean A, Cressant A, de Chaumont F, Olivo-Marin JC, Chauveau F, Granon S (2015) Acute stress in adulthood impoverishes social choices and triggers aggressiveness in preclinical models. Front Behav Neurosci 8:447PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. O’Mahony CM, Sweeney FF, Daly E, Dinan TG, Cryan JF (2010) Restraint stress-induced brain activation patterns in two strains of mice differing in their anxiety behaviour. Behav Brain Res 213:148–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Pacák K, Palkovits M (2001) Stressor specificity of central neuroendocrine responses: implications for stress-related disorders. Endocr Rev 22:502–548PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Pace TW, Gaylord R, Topczewski F, Girotti M, Rubin B, Spencer RL (2005) Immediate-early gene induction in hippocampus and cortex as a result of novel experience is not directly related to the stressfulness of that experience. Eur J Neurosci 22:1679–1690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Patel S, Roelke CT, Rademacher DJ, Hillard CJ (2005) Inhibition of restraint stress-induced neural and behavioural activation by endogenous cannabinoid signaling. Eur J Neurosci 21:1057–1069PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ (2001) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates, 2nd edn. N.Y. Elsevier Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Picciotto MR, Zoli M, Lena C, Bessis A, Lallemand Y, Le Novere N, Vincent P, Pich EM, Brulet P, Changeux JP (1995) Abnormal avoidance learning in mice lacking functional high-affinity nicotine receptor in the brain. Nature 374:65–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Picciotto MR, Higley MJ, Mineur YS (2012) Acetylcholine as a neuromodulator: cholinergic signaling shapes nervous system function and behavior. Neuron 76:116–129PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Picciotto MR, Lewis AS, van Schalkwyk GI, Mineur YS (2015) Mood and anxiety regulation by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: a potential pathway to modulate aggression and related behavioral states. Neuropharmacology 96:235–243PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Pitkänen A, Savander V, LeDoux JE (1997) Organization of intra-amygdaloid circuitries in the rat: an emerging framework for understanding functions of the amygdala. Trends Neurosci 20:517–523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Pitkänen A, Savander M, Nurminen N, Ylinen A (2003) Intrinsic synaptic circuitry of the amygdala. Ann N Y Acad Sci 985:34–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Pittaras EC, Faure A, Leray X, Moraitopoulou E, Cressant A, Rabat AA, Meunier C, Fossier P, Granon S (2016) Neuronal nicotinic receptors are crucial for tuning of E/I balance in prelimbic cortex and for decision-making processes. Front Psychiatry 7:171PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Poorthuis RB, Goriounova NA, Couey JJ, Mansvelder HD (2009) Nicotinic actions on neuronal networks for cognition: general principles and long-term consequences. Biochem Pharmacol 78:668–676PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Potasiewicz A, Hołuj M, Kos T, Popik P, Arias HR, Nikiforuk A (2017) 3-Furan-2-yl-N-p-tolyl-acrylamide, a positive allosteric modulator of the α7 nicotinic receptor, reverses schizophrenia-like cognitive and social deficits in rats. Neuropharmacology 113:188–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Rasia-Filho AA, Londero RG, Achaval M (2000) Functional activities of the amygdala: an overview. J Psychiatry Neurosci 25:14–23PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Reep RL, Winans SS (1982a) Afferent connections of dorsal and ventral agranular insular cortex in the hamster Mesocricetus auratus. Neuroscience 7:1265–1288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Reep RL, Winans SS (1982b) Efferent connections of dorsal and ventral agranular insular cortex in the hamster, Mesocricetus auratus. Neuroscience 7:2609–2635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Robbins TW, Roberts AC (2007) Differential regulation of fronto-executive function by the monoamines and acetylcholine. Cereb Cortex 17:i151–i160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Roozendaal B, Koolhaas JM, Bohus B (1991) Central amygdala lesions affect behavioral and autonomic balance during stress in rats. Physiol Behav 50:777–781PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Sah P, Faber ES, Lopez De Armentia M, Power J (2003) The amygdaloid complex: anatomy and physiology. Physiol Rev 83:803–834PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Saha S (2005) Role of the central nucleus of the amygdala in the control of blood pressure: descending pathways to medullary cardiovascular nuclei. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 32:450–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Salas R, Fung B, Sturm R, De Biasi M (2013) Abnormal social behavior in nicotinic acetylcholine receptor β4 subunit-null mice. Nicotine Tob Res 15:983–986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Senba E, Ueyama T (1997) Stress-induced expression of immediate early genes in the brain and peripheral organs of the rat. Neurosci Res 29:183–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Shah AA, Treit D (2003) Excitotoxic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex attenuate fear responses in the elevated-plus maze, social interaction and shock probe burying tests. Brain Res 969:183–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Shiba Y, Oikonomidis L, Sawiak S, Fryer TD, Hong YT, Cockcroft G, Santangelo AM, Roberts AC (2017) Converging prefronto-insula-amygdala pathways in negative emotion regulation in marmoset monkeys. Biol Psychiatry 82:895–903PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Showers C, Cantor N (1985) Social cognition: a look at motivated strategies. Ann Rev Psychol 36:275–305Google Scholar
  90. Valk SL, Bernhardt BC, Trautwein FM, Böckler A, Kanske P, Guizard N, Collins DL, Singer T (2017) Structural plasticity of the social brain: differential change after socio-affective and cognitive mental training. Sci Adv 3:e1700489PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. Vertes RP (2004) Differential projections of the infralimbic and prelimbic cortex in the rat. Synapse 51:32–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Vertes RP (2006) Interactions among the medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus and midline thalamus in emotional and cognitive processing in the rat. Neuroscience 142:1–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Viau V, Sawchenko PE (2002) Hypophysiotropic neurons of the paraventricular nucleus respond in spatially, temporally, and phenotypically differentiated manners to acute vs. repeated restraint stress: rapid publication. J Comp Neurol 445:293–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Wallis CU, Cardinal RN, Alexander L, Roberts AC, Clarke HF (2017) Opposing roles of primate areas 25 and 32 and their putative rodent homologs in the regulation of negative emotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:E4075–E4084PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Wei J, Zhong P, Qin L, Tan T, Yan Z (2017) Chemicogenetic restoration of the prefrontal cortex to amygdala pathway ameliorates stress-induced deficits. Cereb Cortex 11:1–11Google Scholar
  96. Weinberg MS, Girotti M, Spencer RL (2007) Restraint-induced fra-2 and c-fos expression in the rat forebrain: relationship to stress duration. Neuroscience 150:478–486PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. Yokoyama C, Sasaki K (1999) Regional expressions of Fos-like immunoreactivity in rat cerebral cortex after stress; restraint and intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharide. Brain Res 816:267–275PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Nosjean
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fabrice de Chaumont
    • 2
  • Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin
    • 2
  • Sylvie Granon
    • 1
  1. 1.Neuroscience Paris-Saclay Institute (Neuro-PSI)UMR CNRS 9197, Université Paris-SudOrsay CedexFrance
  2. 2.Institut PasteurUnité d’Analyse d’Images Biologiques, CNRS UMR 3691ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations