Brain Structure and Function

, Volume 217, Issue 3, pp 761–765 | Cite as

Effect of tongue stimulation on nystagmus eye movements in blind patients

Short Communication

Abstract

We have observed dramatic effects of tactile tongue stimulation on nystagmus eye movements in patients with acquired blindness, and we report these results. Six adult subjects (3 subjects with light perception or worse vision and 3 normal subjects) were included in this study. Causes of blindness included traumatic explosion, anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, and central retinal artery occlusion. Duration of blindness was 15, 3 and 1.5 years, respectively. A video eye tracking system (Eyelink 1000) was used to record eye movements. The eye movement recording (EMR) was repeated four times in a span of 20 min. Two of the EMRs were performed without tongue stimulation and two with tongue stimulation in randomized order. A tongue stimulus was applied to the surface of the tongue using a Brainport device that produces an electrical tactile stimulus. The nystagmus waveform characteristics and frequency were analyzed. We found that all blind subjects showed continuous jerk nystagmus with slow and quick phases, mainly in horizontal plane in their primary eye positions. The recorded nystagmus waveforms were jerk with linear velocity slow phases. When the tongue stimulus was applied, the frequency of nystagmus was significantly reduced by 47, 40, and 11%, and relative amplitude was reduced by 43, 45, and 6% for three blind subjects, respectively. In conclusion, we think our results that tongue stimulation influences nystagmus eye movements support a link between non-visual sensory input and ocular motor activity.

Keywords

Nystagmus Eye movement Ocular motor Tongue 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was partly supported by the DCED State of PA, and Department of Ophthalmology, Akron Children’s Hospital.

References

  1. Balslev D, Miall RC (2008) Eye position representation in human anterior parietal cortex. J Neurosci 28(36):8968–8972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balslev D, Albert NB, Miall C (2011) Eye muscle proprioception is represented bilaterally in the sensorimotor cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 32(4):624–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blekher T, Yamada T, Yee RD, Abel LA (1998) Effects of acupuncture on foveation characteristics in congenital nystagmus. Br J Ophthalmol 82(2):115–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Büttner-Ennever JA, Büttner U (1988) Neuroanatomy of the oculomotor system. The reticular formation. Rev Oculomot Res 2:119–176Google Scholar
  5. Dell’Osso LF, Traccis S, Abel LA et al (1988) Contact lenses and congenital nystagmus. Clin Vision Sci 3:229–232Google Scholar
  6. Donaldson IM, Knox PC (2000) Afferent signals from the extraocular muscles affect the gain of the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex in the alert pigeon. Vis Res 40(8):1001–1011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guthrie BL, Porter JD, Sparks DL (1983) Corollary discharge provides accurate eye position information to the oculomotor system. Science 221(4616):1193–1195Google Scholar
  8. Hall EC, Gordon J, Abel LA, Hainline L, Abramov I (2000) Nystagmus waveforms in blindness. Vis Impair Res 2(2):65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hertle RW, Dell’Osso LF, FitzGibbon EJ, Thompson D, Yang D, Mellow SD (2003) Horizontal rectus tenotomy in patients with congenital nystagmus: results in 10 adults. Ophthalmology 110(11):2097–2105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knox PC (2008) Induced extraocular muscle afferent signals: from pigeons to people. Prog Brain Res 171:29–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kömpf D, Piper HF (1987) Eye movements and vestibulo-ocular reflex in the blind. J Neurol 234(5):337–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Langer TP, Kaneko CR (1984) Brainstem afferents to the omnipause region in the cat: a horseradish peroxidase study. J Comp Neurol 230(3):444–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leigh RJ, Zee DS (1980) Eye movements of the blind. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 19(3):328–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis RF, Zee DS, Gaymard BM, Guthrie BL (1994) Extraocular muscle proprioception functions in the control of ocular alignment and eye movement conjugacy. J Neurophysiol 72(2):1028–1031PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewis RF, Zee DS, Goldstein HP, Guthrie BL (1999) Proprioceptive and retinal afference modify postsaccadic ocular drift. J Neurophysiol 82(2):551–563PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lewis RF, Zee DS, Hayman MR, Tamargo RJ (2001) Oculomotor function in the rhesus monkey after deafferentation of the extraocular muscles. Exp Brain Res 141(3):349–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. May EF, Truxal AR (1997) Loss of vision alone may result in seesaw nystagmus. J Neuroophthalmol 17(2):84–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pozo MA, Cervero F (1993) Neurons in the rat spinal trigeminal complex driven by corneal nociceptors: receptive-field properties and effects of noxious stimulation of the cornea. J Neurophysiol 70(6):2370–2378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sheth NV, Dell’Osso LF, Leigh RJ, Van Doren CL, Peckham HP (1995) The effects of afferent stimulation on congenital nystagmus foveation periods. Vis Res 35(16):2371–2382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Taibbi G, Wang ZI, Dell’osso LF (2008) Infantile nystagmus syndrome: broadening the high-foveation-quality field with contact lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 2(3):585–589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang M, Wang X, Goldberg ME (2008) Monkey primary somatosensory cortex has a proprioceptive representation of eye position. Prog Brain Res 171:37–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Laboratory of Visual and Ocular Motor Neurophysiology, Vision Center, Department of OphthalmologyAkron Children’s Hospital, Northeast Ohio Medical UniversityAkronUSA
  2. 2.UPMC Eye CenterUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations