Anatomy and Embryology

, Volume 210, Issue 2, pp 81–90 | Cite as

Morphogenetic movements during cranial neural tube closure in the chick embryo and the effect of homocysteine

  • Madeleine R. Brouns
  • Lydia A. Afman
  • Bart A. M. VanHauten
  • Johan W. M. Hekking
  • Eleonore S. Köhler
  • Henny W. M. van StraatenEmail author
Original Article


In order to unravel morphogenetic mechanisms involved in neural tube closure, critical cell movements that are fundamental to remodelling of the cranial neural tube in the chick embryo were studied in vitro by quantitative time-lapse video microscopy. Two main directions of movements were observed. The earliest was directed medially; these cells invaginated into a median groove and were the main contributors to the initial neural tube closure. Once the median groove was completed, cells changed direction and moved anteriorly to contribute to the anterior neural plate and head fold. This plate developed into the anterior neuropore, which started to close from the 4-somite stage onwards by convergence of its neural folds. Posteriorly, from the initial closure site onwards, the posterior neuropore started to close almost instantaneously by convergence of its neural folds. Homocysteine is adversely involved in human neural tube closure defects. After application of a single dose of homocysteine to chick embryos, a closure delay at the initial closure site and at the neuropores, flattening of the head fold and neural tube, and a halt of cell movements was seen. A possible interference of Hcy with actin microfilaments is discussed.


Chick Neurulation Neuropores Cell movements Homocysteine 

Supplementary material

Supplementary materials










  1. Aerts LAGJM van, Blom HJ, Deabreu RA, Trijbels FJM, Eskes TKAB, Peereboom-Stegeman JHJC, Noordhoek J (1994) Prevention of neural tube defects by and toxicity of L-homocysteine in cultured postimplantation rat embryos. Teratology 50:348–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Afman LA, Blom HJ, Put NMJ van der, Straaten HWM van (2003) Homocysteine interference in neurulation: a chick embryo model. BDRA 67:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bancroft M, Bellairs R (1975) Differentiation of the neural plate and neural tube in the young chick embryo. Anat Embryol 147:309–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman SC, Collignon J, Schoenwolf GC, Lumsden A (2001) Improved method for chick whole-embryo culture using a filter paper carrier. Dev Dynamics 220:284–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colas JF, Schoenwolf GC (2001) Towards a cellular and molecular understanding of neurulation. Dev Dynamics 221:117–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Copp AJ, Greene ND, Murdoch JN (2003) The genetic basis of mammalian neurulation. Nat Rev Genet 4:784–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Czeizel AE, Dudas I (1992) Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. New Engl J Med 327:1832–1835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dardik R, Savion N, Gal N, Varon D (2002) Flow conditions modulate homocysteine induced changes in the expression of endothelial cell genes associated with cell-cell interaction and cytoskeletal rearrangement. Thromb Haemost 88:1047–1053PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson LA, Keller RE (1999) Neural tube closure in Xenopus laevis involves medial migration, directed protrusive activity, cell intercalation and convergent extension. Development 126:4547–4556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Epeldegui M, Pena-Melian A, Varela-Moreiras G, Perez-Miguelsanz J (2002) Homocysteine modifies development of neurulation and dorsal root ganglia in chick embryos. Teratology 65:171–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ezin AM, Skoglund P, Keller R (2003) The midline (notochord and notoplate) patterns the cell motility underlying convergence and extension of the Xenopus neural plate. Dev Biol 256:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gordon R (1985) A review of the theories of vertebrate neurulation and their relationship to the mechanics of neural tube birth defect review. J Embryol Exp Morphol 89:229–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Greene NE, Dunlevy LE, Copp AJ (2003) Homocysteine is embryotoxic but does not cause neural tube defects in mouse embryos. Anat Embryol 206:185–191PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamburger V, Hamilton HG (1951) A Series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen DK, Grafton TF, Melnyk S, James SJ (2001) Lack of embryotoxicity of homocysteine thiolactone in mouse embryos in vitro. Reprod Toxicol 15:239–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Juriloff DM, Harris MJ, Tom C, Macdonald KB (1991) Normal mouse strains differ in the site of initiation of closure of the cranial neural tube. Teratology 44:225–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Keller R, Shih J, Sater A (1992) The cellular basis of the convergence and extension of the Xenopus neural plate. Dev Dynamics 193:199–217Google Scholar
  18. Kubova H, Folbergrova J, Mares P (1995) Seizures induced by homocysteine in rats during ontogenesis. Epilepsia 36:750–756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawson T, Anderson H, Schoenwolf GC (2001) Cellular mechanisms of neural fold formation and morphogenesis in the chick embryo. Anat Rec 262:153–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Moephuli SR, Klein NW, Baldwin MT, Krider HM (1997) Effects of methionine on the cytoplasmic distribution of actin and tubulin during neural tube closure in rat embryos. Proc Natl Acd Sci USA 94:543–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morriss-Kay G, Tuckett F (1985) The role of microfilaments in cranial neurulation in rat embryos: effects of short-term exposure to cytochalasin D. J Embryol Exp Morphol 88:333–348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group (1991) Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the medical research council vitamin study. Lancet 338:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nagele RG, Lee HY (1987) Studies on the mechanisms of neurulation in the chick: morphometric analysis of the relationship between regional variations in cell shape and sites of motive force generation. J Exp Zool 241:197–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakatsu T, Uwabe C, Shiota K (2000) Neural tube closure in humans initiates at multiple sites: evidence from human embryos and implications for the pathogenesis of neural tube defects. Anat Embryol 201:455–466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Put NMJ van der, Eskes TKAB, Blom HJ (1997) Is the common 677C->T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene a risk factor for neural tube defects? A meta-analysis. Q J Med 90:111–115Google Scholar
  26. Rafelski SM, Theriot JA (2004) Crawling toward a unified model of cell mobility: spatial and temporal regulation of actin dynamics. Annu Rev Biochem 73:209–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenquist TH, Ratashak SA, Selhub J (1996) Homocysteine induces congenital defects of the heart and neural tube: effect of folic acid. Proc Natl Acd Sci USA 93:15227–15232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sadler TW (1998) Mechanisms of neural tube closure and defects. Mental Retard Dev Disab Res Rev 4:247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schoenwolf GC (1982) On the morphogenesis of the early rudiments of the developing central nervous system. Scan Electron microsc 1982/I:289–308Google Scholar
  30. Schoenwolf GC, Alvarez IS (1989) Roles of neuroepithelial cell rearrangement and division in shaping of the avian neural plate. Development 106:427–439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shum ASW, Copp AJ (1996) Regional differences in morphogenesis of the neuroepithelium suggest multiple mechanisms of spinal neurulation in the mouse. Anat Embryol 194:65–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith JL, Schoenwolf GC (1987) Cell cycle and neuroepithelial cell shape during bending of the chick neural plate. Anat Rec 218:196–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Steegers-Theunissen RPM, Boers GHJ, Trijbels FJM, Finkelstein JD, Blom HJ, Thomas CMG, Borm GF, Wouters MGAJ, Eskes TKAB (1994) Maternal hyperhomocysteinemia: a risk factor for neural- tube defects? Metabolism 43:1475–1148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Straaten HWM van, Jaskoll T, Rousseau AMJ, Terwindt-Rouwenhorst EAW, Greenberg G, Shankar K, Melnick M (1993) Raphe of the posterior neural tube in the chick embryo-its closure and reopening as studied in living embryos with a high definition light microscope. Dev Dynamics 198:65–76Google Scholar
  35. Straaten HWM van, Janssen HCJP, Peeters MCE, Copp AJ, Hekking JWM (1996) Neural tube closure in the chick embryo is multiphasic. Dev Dynamics 207:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Straaten HWM van, Peeters MCE, Szpak KWF, Hekking JWM (1997) Initial closure of the mesencephalic neural groove in the chick embryo involves a releasing zipping-up mechanism. Dev Dynamics 209:333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Straaten HWM, van Sieben I, Hekking JWM (2002) Multistep role for actin in initial closure of the mesencephalic neural groove in the chick embryo. Dev Dynamics 224:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tuckett F, Morriss Kay GM (1985) The kinetic behaviour of the cranial neural epithelium during neurulation in the rat. J Embryol Exp Morphol 85:111–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wallingford JB, Harland RM (2001) Xenopus dishevelled signaling regulates both neural and mesodermal convergent extension: parallel forces elongating the body axis. Development 128:2581–2592PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ybot Gonzalez P, Copp AJ (1999) Bending of the neural plate during mouse spinal neurulation is independent of actin microfilaments. Dev Dynamics 215:273–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madeleine R. Brouns
    • 1
  • Lydia A. Afman
    • 2
  • Bart A. M. VanHauten
    • 1
  • Johan W. M. Hekking
    • 1
  • Eleonore S. Köhler
    • 1
  • Henny W. M. van Straaten
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy and EmbryologyUniversity MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Human NutritionUniversity WageningenWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations