Predicting outcomes in non-muscle invasive (Ta/T1) bladder cancer: the role of molecular grade based on luminal/basal phenotype
Bladder cancer tumors can be divided into two molecular subtypes referred to as luminal or basal. Each subtype may react differently to current chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Likewise, the technology required for comprehensive molecular analysis is expensive and not yet applicable for routine clinical diagnostics. Therefore, it has been suggested that the immunohistochemical expressions of only two markers, luminal (CK20+, CK5/6–) and basal (CK5/6+, CK20–), is sufficient to identify the molecular subtypes of bladder cancer. This would represent a molecular grade that could be used in daily practice. Molecular classification is done using immunohistochemistry to assess luminal-basal phenotype based on tissular expression of CK20 and CK5/6 as surrogate for luminal or basal subtypes, respectively. A series of 147 non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma cases was selected, and the tumors were divided into four subgroups based on the presence of CK20 and/or CK5/6, that is, null (CK20−, CK5/6−), mixed (CK20+, CK5/6+), basal (CK20−, CK5/6+), and luminal (CK20+, CK5/6−) categories. Survival analysis was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Hazard ratios were calculated by Cox multivariate analysis. The molecular grade included cases with null (n = 89), mixed (n = 6), basal (n = 20), and luminal (n = 32) phenotypes with differences in recurrence-free, progression-free and cancer-specific survival associated with molecular-grade categories in patients with low- or high-grade Ta, or high-grade T1 tumors. The multivariate analysis identified the luminal phenotype as a predictor of more aggressive neoplasms. Our findings provide a rationale to investigate luminal and basal subtypes of bladder cancer using two gene expression signatures as surrogate markers and show that non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma can be stratified into biologically and clinically different subgroups by using an immunohistochemical classifier.
KeywordsBladder cancer Survival Prognosis Luminal Basal Molecular grade
ALB conceived and designed the study and wrote, edited, and reviewed the manuscript. ALB, JR, PA, and PLF designed the study and reviewed the manuscript. JR, PA, and PLF performed the statistical analysis and reviewed the manuscript. JF, AC, VH, and AB collected and analyzed data and reviewed the manuscript. AB performed and evaluated RT-PCR methods. RM and LC critically read and edited the final manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.
Supported in part by the Grant PI17/01981 (FIS (Ministry of Health), Madrid, Spain).
Compliance with ethical standards
Approval from an institutional review board was obtained.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients included in the study.
- 3.Gontero P, Sylvester R, Pisano F, Joniau S, Vander Eeckt K, Serretta V, Larré S, di Stasi S, van Rhijn B, Witjes AJ, Grotenhuis AJ, Kiemeney LA, Colombo R, Briganti A, Babjuk M, Malmström PU, Oderda M, Irani J, Malats N, Baniel J, Mano R, Cai T, Cha EK, Ardelt P, Varkarakis J, Bartoletti R, Spahn M, Johansson R, Frea B, Soukup V, Xylinas E, Dalbagni G, Karnes RJ, Shariat SF, Palou J (2015) Prognostic factors and risk groups in T1G3 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients initially treated with bacillus calmette-guérin: results of a retrospective multicenter study of 2451 patients. Eur Urol 67:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Dadhania V, Zhang M, Zhang L, Bondaruk J, Majewski T, Siefker-Radtke A, Guo CC, Dinney C, Cogdell DE, Zhang S, Lee S, Lee JG, Weinstein JN, Baggerly K, McConkey D, Czerniak B (2016) Meta-analysis of the luminal and basal subtypes of bladder cancer and the identification of signature immunohistochemical markers for clinical use. EBioMedicine 12:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Dyrskjot L, Zieger K, Real FX, Malats N, Carrato A, Hurst C, Kotwal S, Knowles M, Malmstrom PU, de la Torre M, Wester K, Allory Y, Vordos D, Caillault A, Radvanyi F, Hein AMK, Jensen JL, Jensen KME, Marcussen N, Orntoft TF (2007) Gene expression signatures predict outcome in non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: a multicenter validation study. Clin Cancer Res 13:3545–3551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Hedegaard J, Lamy P, Nordentoft I, Algaba F, Høyer S, Ulhøi BP, Vang S, Reinert T, Hermann GG, Mogensen K, Thomsen MBH, Nielsen MM, Marquez M, Segersten U, Aine M, Höglund M, Birkenkamp-Demtröder K, Fristrup N, Borre M, Hartmann A, Stöhr R, Wach S, Keck B, Seitz AK, Nawroth R, Maurer T, Tulic C, Simic T, Junker K, Horstmann M, Harving N, Petersen AC, Calle ML, Steyerberg EW, Beukers W, van Kessel KEM, Jensen JB, Pedersen JS, Malmström PU, Malats N, Real FX, Zwarthoff EC, Ørntoft TF, Dyrskjøt L (2016) Comprehensive transcriptional analysis of early-stage urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Cell 30:27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.McConkey DJ, Choi W, Shen Y et al (2016) A prognostic gene expression signature in the molecular classification of chemotherapy-naïve urothelial cancer is predictive of clinical outcomes from neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a phase 2 trial of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisp. Eur Urol 69:855–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.McConkey DJ, Choi W. (2018) Molecular subtypes of bladder cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2018 20(10):77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-018-0727-5
- 27.Sanli O, Dobruch J, Knowles MA et al (2017) Bladder cancer. Nat Rev Dis Prim 3:1–19Google Scholar
- 34.Choi W, Porten S, Kim S, Willis D, Plimack ER, Hoffman-Censits J, Roth B, Cheng T, Tran M, Lee IL, Melquist J, Bondaruk J, Majewski T, Zhang S, Pretzsch S, Baggerly K, Siefker-Radtke A, Czerniak B, Dinney CPN, McConkey DJ (2014) Identification of distinct basal and luminal subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with different sensitivities to frontline chemotherapy. Cancer Cell 25:152–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar