Advertisement

State of the art in post-mortem computed tomography: a review of current literature

  • Niccolò Norberti
  • Paolina Tonelli
  • Claudia Giaconi
  • Cosimo Nardi
  • Martina Focardi
  • Gabriella Nesi
  • Vittorio Miele
  • Stefano ColagrandeEmail author
Review and Perspectives

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) and other advanced diagnostic imaging techniques are gaining popularity in forensic pathology. This paper aims to define and offer complete and easily accessible “state of the art” for post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT), by reviewing the latest international literature. The proposed format answers the “five Ws” that follows: (1) What: We report the different kinds of CT scan and settings generally used in post-mortem imaging. The machine most employed is a 8/16-slice spiral CT, usually without contrast enhancement. The introduction of some variables, such as CT-guided biopsies, post-mortem ventilation, and PMCT angiography is becoming increasingly useful. (2) Why: Literature highlights the many advantages of PMCT. Limitations can be partly overcome by modern imaging techniques and combined evaluation with traditional autopsy. (3) Who: Most authors agree that collaboration between different specialists, i.e., radiologists and pathologists, is the best scenario, since radiologic, anatomic, and forensic skills are needed simultaneously. The most important human factor is “teamwork”. (4) When: Literature provides no absolute limits for performing PMCT. Some authors have tested PMCT as a replacement for conventional autopsy but found some limitations. Others evaluated PMCT as a guide or screening tool for traditional autopsy. (5) Where: Many research groups around the world have performed studies on the use of PMCT. Although few countries adopt PMCT in routine practice, its use is rapidly spreading.

Keywords

Post-mortem computed tomography PMCT Forensic radiology Virtual autopsy 

Notes

Contributions

Dr. Niccolò Norberti, Dr. Paolina Tonelli, and Prof. Stefano Colagrande conceived and designed the study, and wrote, edited and reviewed the manuscript.

Dr. Claudia Giaconi, Dr. Cosimo Nardi, Dr. Marina Focardi, Prof. Gabriella Nesi, and Dr. Vittorio Miele wrote edited and reviewed the manuscript.

All authors gave final approval for publication.

Dr. Niccolò Norberti takes full responsibility for the work as a whole, including the study design, access to data and the decision to submit and publish the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Poulsen K, Simonsen K (2006) Computed tomography as routine in connection with medico-legal autopsies. Forensic Sci Int 171:190–197Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baglivo M, Winklhofer S, Hatch GM, Ampanozi G, Thali MJ, Ruder TD (2013) The rise of forensic and post-mortem radiology- analysis of the literature between the year 2000 and 2011. J Forensic Radiol and Imaging 1:3–9Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolliger SA, Thali MJ, Ross S, Buck S, Naether U, Vock P (2008) Virtual autopsy using imaging: bridging radiologic and forensic sciences. A review of the Virtopsy and similar projects. Eur Radiol 18:273–282Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1006–1012Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leth PM (2015) Computed tomography in forensic medicine. Dan Med J 62(4):B5070Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roberts IS, Beneamore RE, Benbow EW, Lee SH, Harris JN, Jackson A, Mallett S, Patankar T, Peebles C, Roobottom C, Traill ZC (2012) Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult death: a validation study. Lancet 379:136–142Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Le Blanc-Louvry I, Thureau S, Duval C, Papin-Lefebvre F, Thiebot J, Dacher JN, Gricourt C, Touré E, Proust B (2013) Post-mortem computed tomography compared to forensic autopsy findings: a French experience. Eur Radiol 23:1829–1835Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Apitzsch JC, Westphal S, Penzkofer T, Kuhl CK, Knüchel R, Mahnken AH (2014) The use of contrast-enhanced post mortem CT in the detection of cardiovascular deaths. PLoS One 9(4):e93101Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flach PM, Gascho D, Schweitzer W, Ruder TD, Berger N, Ross SG, Thali MJ, Ampanozi G (2014) Imaging in forensic radiology: an illustrated guide for postmortem computed tomography technique and protocols. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10:583–606Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Bakker HM, Soerdjbalie-Maikoe V, Kubat B et al (2016) Forensic imaging in legal medicine in the Netherlands: retrospective analysis of over 1700 cases in 15 years’ experience. J Forensic Radiol and Imaging 6:1–7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gascho D, Thali MJ, Niemann T (2018) Post-mortem computed tomography: technical principles and recommended parameter settings for high-resolution imaging. Med Sci Law 58:70–82Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jackowski C (2013) Special issue on postmortem imaging. Forensic Sci Int 225:1–2Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ebert LC, Ptacek W, Breitbeck R, Fürst M, Kronreif G, Martinez RM, Thali M, Flach PM (2014) Virtobot 2.0: the future of automated surface documentation and CT-guided needle placement in forensic medicine. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10(2):179–186Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martinez RM, Ptacek W, Schweitzer W, Kronreif G, Furst M, Thali MJ, Ebert LC (2014) CT-guided, minimally invasive, postmortem needle biopsy using the B-rob II needle-positioning robot. J Forensic Sci 59(2):517–521Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bolliger SA, Filograna L, Spendlove D, Thali MJ, Dirnhofer S, Ross S (2010) Postmortem imaging-guided biopsy as an adjuvant to minimally invasive autopsy with CT and postmortem angiography: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(5):1051–1056Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Filograna L, Thali MJ (2017) Post-mortem CT imaging of the lungs: pathological versus non-pathological findings. Radiol Med 122:902–908Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rutty GN, Morgan B, Germerott T, Thali MJ, Athurs O (2016) Ventilated post-mortem computed tomography – a historical review. J Forensic Radiol and Imaging 4:35–42Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robinson C, Biggs MJ, Amoroso J, Pakkal M, Morgan B, Rutty GN (2014) Post-mortem computed tomography ventilation; simulating breath holding. Int J Legal Med 128:139–146Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rutty GN, Biggs MJ, Brough A, Robinson C, Mistry R, Amoroso J, Deshpande A, Morgan B (2015) Ventilated post-mortem computed tomography through the use of a definitive airway. Int J Legal Med 129:325–334Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Germerott T, Preiss US, Ebert LC, Ruder TD, Ross S, Flach PM, Ampanozi G, Filograna L, Thali MJ (2010) A new approach in virtopsy: postmortem ventilation in multislice computed tomography. Leg Med (Tokyo) 12(6):276–279Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shiotani S, Watanabe K, Kohno M, Ohashi N, Yamazaki K, Nakayama H (2004) Postmortem computed tomographic (PMCT) findings of pericardial effusion due to acute aortic dissection. Radiat Med 22:405–407Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grabherr S, Grimm J, Dominguez A, Vanhaebost J, Mangin P (2014) Advances in post-mortem CT-angiography. Br J Radiol 87(1036):20130488Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jackowski C, Persson A, Thali MJ (2008) Whole body postmortem angiography with a high viscosity contrast agent solution using poly ethylene glycol as contrast agent dissolver. J Forensic Sci 53:465–468Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saunders SL, Morgan B, Raj V, Robinson CE, Rutty GN (2011) Targeted post-mortem computed tomography cardiac angiography: proof of concept. Int J Legal Med 125:609–616Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grabherr S, Gygax E, Sollberger B, Ross S, Oesterhelweg L, Bolliger S, Christe A, Djonov V, Thali MJ, Dirnhofer R (2008) Two-step postmortem angiography with a modified heart-lung machine: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:345–351Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Okuda T, Shiotani S, Sakamoto N, Kobayashi T (2013) Background and current status of postmortem imaging in Japan: short history of “autopsy imaging (Ai)”. Forensic Sci Int 225:3–8Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grabherr S, Doenz F, Steger B, Dirnhofer R, Dominguez A, Sollberger B, Gygax E, Rizzo E, Chevallier C, Meuli R, Mangin P (2011) Multi-phase post-mortem CT angiography: development of a standardized protocol. Int J Legal Med 125:791–802Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ross S, Spendlove D, Bolliger S, Christe A, Oesterhelweg L, Grabherr S, Thali MJ, Gygax E (2008) Postmortem whole-body CT angiography: evaluation of two contrast media solutions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1380–1389Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Grabherr S, Grimm J, Baumann P, Mangin P (2015) Application of contrast media in post-mortem imaging (CT and MRI). Radiol Med 120:824–834Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grabherr S, Hess A, Karolczak M, Thali MJ, Friess SD, Kalender WA, Dirnhofer R, Djonov V (2008) Angiofil-mediated visualization of the vascular system by microcomputed tomography: a feasibility study. Microsc Res Tech 71(7):551–556Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chevallier C, Doenz F, Vaucher P, Palmiere C, Dominguez A, Binaghi S, Mangin P, Grabherr S (2013) Postmortem computed tomography angiography vs. conventional autopsy: advantages and inconveniences of each method. Int J Legal Med 27:981–989Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Filograna L, Bolliger SA, Ross SG, Ruder TD, Thali MJ (2011) Pros and cons of post-mortem CT imaging on aspiration diagnosis. Leg Med (Tokyo) 13:16–21Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jalalzadeh H, Giannakopoulos GF, Berger FH, Fronczek J, van de Goot FRW, Reijnders UJ, Zuidema WP (2015) Post-mortem imaging compared with autopsy in trauma victims – a systematic review. Forensic Sci Int 257:29–48Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moskala A, Wozniak K, Kluza P, Romaszko K, Lopatin O (2016) The importance of post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) in confrontation with conventional forensic autopsy of victims of motorcycle accidents. Leg Med (Tokyo) 18:25–30Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schulze C, Hoppe H, Schweitzer W, Schwendener N, Grabherr S, Jackowski C (2013) Rib fractures at postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) validated against the autopsy. Forensic Sci Int 233:90–98Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Carballeira Álvareza A, Mancini J, Tuchtan-Torrents L, Gache P, Bartoli C, Desfeuxd J, Piercecchi MD, Gorincoure G (2018) Diagnostic value of unenhanced postmortem computed tomography in the detection of traumatic abdominal injuries. Diagn Interv Imaging 99:397–402Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Makhlouf F, Scolan V, Ferretti G, Stahl C, Paysant F (2013) Gunshot fatalities: correlation between post-mortem multi-slice computed tomography and autopsy findings: a 30-months retrospective study. Legal Med 15:145–148Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kirchhoff SM, Scaparra EF, Grimm J, Scherr M, Graw M, Reiser MF, Peschel O (2016) Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and autopsy in deadly gunshot wounds—a comparative study. Int J Legal Med 130:819–826Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schnider J, Thali MJ, Ross S, Oesterhelweg L, Spendlove D, Bolliger DA (2009) Injuries due to sharp trauma detected by post-mortem multislice computed tomography (MSCT): a feasibility study. Leg Med (Tokyo) 11:4–9Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zech WD, Jackowski C, Schwendener N, Brencicova E, Schuster F, Lombardo P (2016) Postmortem CT versus forensic autopsy: frequent discrepancies of tracheobronchial content findings. Int J Legal Med 130:191–198Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Levy AD, Harcke HT, Getz JM, Mallak CT (2009) Multidetector computed tomography findings in deaths with severe burns. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 30:137–141Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Heinemann A, Vogel H, Heller M, Tzikas A, Püschel K (2015) Investigation of medical intervention with fatal outcome: the impact of post-mortem CT and CT angiography. Radiol Med 120:835–845Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Christe A, Aghayev E, Jackowski C, Thali MJ, Vock P (2008) Drowning- post-mortem imaging findings by computed tomography. Eur Radiol 18:283–290Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mishima S, Suzuki H, Fukunaga T, Nishitani Y (2018) Postmortem computed tomography findings in cases of bath-related death: applicability and limitation in forensic practice. Forensic Sci Int 282:195–203Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rutty G, Saunders S, Morgan B, Raj V (2012) Targeted cardiac post-mortem computed tomography angiography: a pictorial review. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 8(1):40–47Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Westphal SE, Apitzsch J, Penzkofer T, Mahnken AH, Knüchel R (2012) Virtual CT autopsy in clinical pathology: feasibility in clinical autopsies. Virchows Arch 461(2):211–219Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Inai K, Noriki S, Kinoshita K, Sakai T, Kimura H, Nishijima A, Iwasaki H, Naiki H (2016) Postmortem CT is more accurate than clinical diagnosis for identifying the immediate cause of death in hospitalized patients: a prospective autopsy-based study. Virchows Arch 469:101–109Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Eriksson A, Gustafsson T, Höistad M, Hultcrantz M, Jacobson S, Mejare I, Persson A (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of postmortem imaging vs autopsy-a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 89:249–269Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bedford PJ (2012) Routine CT scan combined with preliminary examination as a new method in determining the need for autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 8(4):390–394Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kasahara S, Makino Y, Hayakawa M, Yajima D, Ito H, Iwase H (2012) Diagnosable and non-diagnosable causes of death by postmortem computed tomography: a review of 339 forensic cases. Leg Med (Tokyo) 14:239–245Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Okumura M, Usumoto Y, Tsuji A, Kudo K, Ikeda N (2017) Analysis of postmortem changes in internal organs and gases using computed tomography data. Leg Med (Tokyo) 25:11–15Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Morikawa K, Hyodoh H, Matoba K, Mizuo K, Okazaki S, Watanabe S (2016) Time-related change evaluation of the cerebrospinal fluid using postmortem CT. Leg Med (Tokyo) 22:30–35Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Brough AL, Morgan B, Rutty GN (2015) Postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and disaster victim identification. Radiol Med 120:866–873Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ruder TD, Kraehenbuehl M, Gotsmy WF, Mathier S, Ebert LC, Thali MJ, Hatch GM (2012) Radiologic identification of disaster victims: a simple and reliable method using CT of the paranasal sinuses. Eur J Radiol 81(2):e132–e138Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shinkawa N, Hirai T, Nishii R, Yukawa N (2017) Usefulness of 2D fusion of postmortem CT and antemortem chest radiography studies for human identification. Jpn J Radiol 35(6):303–309Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bassed RB, Briggs C, Drummer OH (2011) Age estimation using CT imaging of the third molar tooth, the medial clavicular epiphysis, and the spheno-occipital synchondrosis: a multifactorial approach. Forensic Sci Int 10:273.e1–273.e5Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gurses MS, Inanir NT, Gokalp G, Fedakar R, Tobcu E, Ocakoglu G (2016) Evaluation of age estimation in forensic medicine by examination of medial clavicular ossification from thin-slice computed tomography images. Int J Legal Med 130(5):1343–1352Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cavaignac E, Savall F, Chantalat E, Faruch M, Reina N, Chiron P, Telmon N (2017) Geometric morphometric analysis reveals age-related differences in the distal femur of Europeans. J Exp Orthop 4(1):21Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Grabherr S, Cooper C, Ulrich-Bochsler S, Uldin T, Ross S, Oesterhelweg L, Bolliger S, Christe A, Schnyder P, Mangin P, Thali MJ (2009) Estimation of sex and age of “virtual skeletons”-a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 19(2):419–429Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sironi E, Taroni F, Baldinotti C, Nardi C, Norelli GA, Gallidabino M, Pinchi V (2018) Age estimation by assessment of pulp chamber volume: a Bayesian network for the evaluation of dental evidence. Int J Legal Med 132(4):1125–1138Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Torimitsu S, Makino Y, Saitoh H, Sakuma A, Ishii N, Inokuchi G, Motomura A, Chiba F, Hoshioka Y, Iwase H (2015) Estimation of sex in Japanese cadavers based on sternal measurements using multidetector computed tomography. Leg Med (Tokyo) 17(4):226–231Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Torimitsu S, Makino Y, Saitoh H, Sakuma A, Ishii N, Yajima D, Inokuchi G, Motomura A, Chiba F, Yamaguchi R, Hashimoto M, Hoshioka Y, Iwase H (2016) Sex estimation based on scapula analysis in a Japanese population using multidetector computed tomography. Forensic Sci Int 262:285.e1–285.e5Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tunis TS, Sarig R, Cohen H, Medlej B, Peled N, May H (2017) Sex estimation using computed tomography of the mandible. Int J Legal Med 131(6):1691–1700Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Flach PM, Thali MJ, Germerott T (2014) Times have changed! Forensic radiology - a new challenge for radiology and forensic pathology. AJR 202:325–334Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mangin P, Bonbled F, Vali M, Luna A, Bajanowski T, Hougen HP, Ludes B, Ferrara D, Cusack D, Keller E, Vieira N (2015) European Council of Legal Medicine (ECLM) accreditation of forensic pathology services in Europe. Int J Legal Med 129:395–403Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Leth PM, Struckmann H, Lauritsen J (2012) Interobserver agreements of the injury diagnoses obtained by postmortem computed tomography of traffic fatality victims and a comparison with autopsy results. Forensic Sci Int 225:15–19Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Burton JL, Underwood J (2007) Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet 28:1471–1480Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Blokker BM, Weustink AC, Wagensveld IM, von der Thüsen JH, Pezzato A, Dammers R, Bakker J, Renken NS, den Bakker MA, van Kemenade FJ, Krestin GP, Hunink MGM, Oosterhuis JW (2018) Conventional autopsy versus minimally invasive autopsy with postmortem MRI, CT, and CT-guided biopsy: comparison of diagnostic performance. Radiology 289(3):658–667Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Cecchetto G, Bajanowski T, Cecchi R, Favretto D, Grabherr S, Ishikawa T, Kondo T, Montisci M, Pfeiffer H, Bonati MR, Shokry D, Vennemann M, Ferrara SD (2017) Back to the future - part 1. The medico-legal autopsy from ancient civilization to the post-genomic era. Int J Legal Med 131:1069–1083Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Mishra B, Joshi MK, Lalwani S, Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumar S, Gupta A, Sagar S, Singhal M, Panda A, Rattan A (2018) A comparative analysis of the findings of postmortem computed tomography scan and traditional autopsy in traumatic deaths: is technology mutually complementing or exclusive? Arch Trauma Res 7:24–29Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Aghayev E, Staub L, Dirnhofer R, Ambrose T, Jackowski C, Yen K, Bolliger S, Christe A, Roeder C, Aebi M, Thali MJ (2008) Virtopsy – the concept of a centralized database in forensic medicine for analysis and comparison of radiological and autopsy data. J Forensic and Legal Med 15:135–140Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Langer R, Tröhler A, Schnüriger B, Trippel M, Blank A, Banz Y, Candinas D, Perren A, Lugli A (2019) Implementation of modern tools in autopsy practice-the way towards contemporary postmortal diagnostics. Virchows Arch 474:149–158Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Fliger A, Kölzer SC, Plenzig S, Heinbuch S, Kettner M, Ramsthaler F, Verhoff MA (2016) Bony injuries in homicide cases (1994–2014). A retrospective study. Int J Legal Med 130:1401–1408Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ross SG, Bolliger SA, Ampanozi G, Oesterhelweg L, Thali MJ, Flach PM (2014) Postmortem CT angiography: capabilities and limitations in traumatic and natural causes of death. Radiographics 34(3):830–846Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Leth PM, Thomsen J (2013) Experience with post-mortem computed tomography in southern Denmark 2006-11. J Forensic Radiol and Imaging 1:161–166Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Willaume T, Farrugia A, Kieffer EM, Charton J, Geraut A, Berthelon L, Bierry G, Raul JS (2017) The benefits and pitfalls of post-mortem computed tomography in forensic external examination: a retrospective study of 145 cases. Forensic Sci Int 286:70–80Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Busardò FP, Frati P, Guglielmi G, Grilli G, Pinto A, Rotondo A, Panebianco V, Fineschi V (2015) Postmortem computed tomography and postmortem computed tomography–angiography: a focused update. Radiol Med 120:810–823Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Rutty GN, Johnson C, Amoroso J, Robinson C, Bradley CJ, Morgan B (2017) Post-mortem computed tomography coaxial cutting needle biopsy to facilitate the detection of bacterioplankton using PCR probes as a diagnostic indicator for drowning. Int J Legal Med 131:211–216Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Elifritz JM, Nolte KB, Hatch GM, Adolphi NL, Gerrard C (2014) Forensic radiology. Forensic Sci 61(6):1563–1570Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Steenburg SD, Spitzer T, Rohdes A (2019) Post-mortem computed tomography improves completeness of the trauma registry: a single institution experience. Emerg Radiol 26:5–13Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Shao Y, Wan L, Zhang J, Li Z, Liu N, Huang P, Zou D, Chen Y (2017) Post-mortem computed tomography angiography using left ventricle cardiac puncture: a whole-body, angiographic approach. PLoS One 12:e0183408Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, Radiodiagnostic Unit No. 2University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria CareggiFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyPisaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Health Sciences, Forensic SciencesUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  4. 4.Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Division of Pathological AnatomyUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  5. 5.Department of ServicesAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria CareggiFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations