Advertisement

Two rare cases of endosalpingiosis in the axillary sentinel lymph nodes: evaluation of immunohistochemical staining and one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay in patients with breast cancer

  • Sho Shiino
  • Masayuki YoshidaEmail author
  • Kenjiro Jimbo
  • Sota Asaga
  • Shin Takayama
  • Akiko Maeshima
  • Hitoshi Tsuda
  • Takayuki Kinoshita
  • Nobuyoshi Hiraoka
Brief Report

Abstract

Benign inclusions, such as endosalpingiosis, in an axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) can be misdiagnosed as metastatic breast carcinoma. However, endosalpingiosis is rare in lymph nodes above the diaphragm. Among 792 patients with breast carcinoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy at our center, 2 patients have experienced benign glandular inclusions in 3 SLNs, and all of these glandular inclusions were lined with columnar and ciliated epithelial cells. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the epithelial cells were positive for Müllerian markers (e.g., PAX8 and WT-1) and negative for mammary markers (e.g., mammaglobin, GCDFP-15, and GATA3), which confirm the diagnosis of endosalpingiosis. The epithelial cells were positive for CK19 but the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay revealed negative results for the axillary SLNs. Although endosalpingiosis is rare in axillary SLNs, care is needed to identify these rare cases and avoid unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection, overstaging, and overtreatment.

Keywords

Endosalpingiosis Benign glandular inclusion Axillary sentinel lymph node Immunohistochemistry OSNA assay 

Notes

Author contributions

SS and MY designed the study researched and analyzed the data; and wrote, edited, and reviewed the manuscript. HT analyzed the data and reviewed the manuscript. KJ, SA, ST, and TK provided clinical details and reviewed the manuscript. AM and NH provided pathological information and reviewed the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, Viale G, Zurrida S, Bedoni M, Costa A, de Cicco C, Geraghty JG, Luini A, Sacchini V, Veronesi P (1997) Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet 349:1864–1867.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01004-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corben AD, Nehhozina T, Garg K, Vallejo CE, Brogi E (2010) Endosalpingiosis in axillary lymph nodes: a possible pitfall in the staging of patients with breast carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 34:1211–1216.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181e5e03e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carney E, Cimino-Mathews A, Argani C, Kronz J, Vang R, Argani P (2014) A subset of nondescript axillary lymph node inclusions have the immunophenotype of endosalpingiosis. Am J Surg Pathol 38:1612–1617.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salehi AH, Omeroglu G, Kanber Y, Omeroglu A (2013) Endosalpingiosis in axillary lymph nodes simulating metastatic breast carcinoma: a potential diagnostic pitfall. Int J Surg Pathol 21:610–612.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896913502228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsujimoto M, Nakabayashi K, Yoshidome K, Kaneko T, Iwase T, Akiyama F, Kato Y, Tsuda H, Ueda S, Sato K, Tamaki Y, Noguchi S, Kataoka TR, Nakajima H, Komoike Y, Inaji H, Tsugawa K, Suzuki K, Nakamura S, Daitoh M, Otomo Y, Matsuura N (2007) One-step nucleic acid amplification for intraoperative detection of lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 13:4807–4816.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maiorano E, Mazzarol GM, Pruneri G, Mastropasqua MG, Zurrida S, Orvieto E, Viale G (2003) Ectopic breast tissue as a possible cause of false positive axillary sentinel lymph node biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol 27:513–518.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200304000-00012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fellegara G, Carcangiu ML, Rosai J et al (2011) Benign epithelial inclusions in axillary lymph nodes: report of 18 cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 35:1123–1133.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182237985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cimino-Mathews A (2018) Axillary lymph node inclusions. Surg Pathol Clin 11:43–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.path.2017.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horn L, Bilek K (1995) Frequency and histogenesis of pelvic retroperitoneal lymph node inclusions of the female genital tract. An immunohistochemical study of 34 cases. Pathol Res Pract 191:991–996.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0344-0338(11)80597-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henley JD, Michael HB, English GW, Roth LM (1995) Benign müllerian lymph node inclusions. An unusual case with implications for pathogenesis and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 119:841–844Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burmeister RE, Fechner RE, Franklin RR (1969) Endosalpingiosis of the peritoneum. Obstet Gynecol 34:310–318Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bhargava R (2007) Mammaglobin vs GCDFP-15: an immunohistologic validation survey for sensitivity and specificity. Am J Clin Pathol 127:103–113.  https://doi.org/10.1309/TDP92PQLDE2HLEET CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cimino-Mathews A, Subhawong A, Illei PB et al (2013) GATA3 expression in breast carcinoma: utility in triple negative, sarcomatoid and metastatic carcinomas. Hum Pathol 44:1341–1349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2012.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jimbo K, Kinoshita T, Suzuki J, Asaga S, Hojo T, Yoshida M, Tsuda H (2013) Sentinal and nonsentinel lymph node assessment using a combination of one-step nucleic acid amplification and conventional histological examination. Breast 22:1194–1199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2013.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stolnicu S, Preda O, Kinga S et al (2011) Florid papillary endosalpingiosis of the axillary lymph nodes. The Breast Journal 2011 17(3):268–272Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sho Shiino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Masayuki Yoshida
    • 3
    Email author
  • Kenjiro Jimbo
    • 1
  • Sota Asaga
    • 1
  • Shin Takayama
    • 1
  • Akiko Maeshima
    • 3
  • Hitoshi Tsuda
    • 4
  • Takayuki Kinoshita
    • 1
  • Nobuyoshi Hiraoka
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Breast SurgeryNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of MedicineKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Pathology and Clinical LaboratoriesNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Department of Basic PathologyNational Defense Medical CollegeTokorozawaJapan

Personalised recommendations