Reappraisal of PLA2R1 in membranous nephropathy: immunostaining method influence and association with IgG4-dominant phenotype
- 351 Downloads
The M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1) was identified recently as a specific target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. However, the influence of different sample preparation techniques on the immunostaining of PLA2R1 is unclear. Previous studies have identified IgG4 as the dominant subclass of PLA2R1 antibodies. However, it remains unclear whether the IgG subclass profiles of the glomerular immune complexes of PLA2R1-positive and -negative idiopathic membranous nephropathy cases are similar. To address these questions, we conducted the present study of 58 idiopathic membranous nephropathy cases. The PLA2R1 positivity rate for the paraffin-embedded sections was 61 %, whereas that for the frozen sections was 65 %. Nonspecific background staining was observed in the frozen sections. Discrepancies between different sample preparations occurred in three cases (6 %); two cases were PLA2R1-positive in paraffin sections and PLA2R1-negative in frozen sections and one case was PLA2R1-negative in paraffin sections and PLA2R1-positive in frozen sections. Regarding the IgG subclass profile, 89 % of the PLA2R1-positive cases demonstrated the IgG4-dominant/codominant phenotype versus 31 % of the PLA2R1-negative cases (p < 0.001). Clinical characteristics and pathological findings did not significantly differ between PLA2R1-positive and -negative cases. In summary, the PLA2R1 immunofluorescence results were not affected by the different sample preparation techniques, although paraffin-embedded sections were preferred for the histological detection of PLA2R1 because of the nonspecific background staining observed in frozen sections. The observed lower frequency of the non-IgG4-dominant/codominant phenotype in PLA2R1-negative idiopathic membranous nephropathy cases may suggest that there are heterogeneous subgroups of this disease.
KeywordsPLA2R1 IgG subclass Membranous nephropathy Immunofluorescence study
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 8.Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, Haas M, Sis B, Mengel M, Halloran PF, Baldwin W, Banfi G, Collins AB, Cosio F, David DS, Drachenberg C, Einecke G, Fogo AB, Gibson IW, Glotz D, Iskandar SS, Kraus E, Lerut E, Mannon RB, Mihatsch M, Nankivell BJ, Nickeleit V, Papadimitriou JC, Randhawa P, Regele H, Renaudin K, Roberts I, Seron D, Smith RN, Valente M (2008) Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions. Am J Transplant 8(4):753–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Dähnrich C, Komorowski L, Probst C, Seitz-Polski B, Esnault V, Wetzels JF, Hofstra JM, Hoxha E, Stahl RA, Lambeau G, Stöcker W, Schlumberger W (2013) Development of a standardized ELISA for the determination of autoantibodies against human M-type phospholipase A2 receptor in primary membranous nephropathy. Clin Chim Acta 421:213–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Hoxha E, Kneißler U, Stege G, Zahner G, Thiele I, Panzer U, Harendza S, Helmchen UM, Stahl RA (2012) Enhanced expression of the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor in glomeruli correlates with serum receptor antibodies in primary membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int 82(7):797–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Ma H, Beck LH Jr, Salant DJ (2011) Membranous nephropathy-associated anti-phospholipase A2 receptor IgG4 autoantibodies activate the lectin complement pathway [abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol 22:62AGoogle Scholar
- 24.Akiyama S, Akiyama M, Imai E, Ozaki T, Matsuo S, Maruyama S (2014) Prevalence of anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies in Japanese patients with membranous nephropathy. Clin Exp Nephrol (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
- 25.Coenen MJ, Hofstra JM, Debiec H, Stanescu HC, Medlar AJ, Stengel B, Boland-Augé A, Groothuismink JM, Bockenhauer D, Powis SH, Mathieson PW, Brenchley PE, Kleta R, Wetzels JF, Ronco P (2013) Phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1) sequence variants in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 24(4):677–683PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar