Early gallbladder carcinoma has a favorable outcome but Rokitansky–Aschoff sinus involvement is an adverse prognostic factor
- 541 Downloads
The general impression about gallbladder carcinomas is that they are uniformly fatal; however, for the early forms, an entirely different picture indicating a very good prognosis is evolving from the high-incidence regions. We subjected 190 early gallbladder carcinomas (EGBC), defined as carcinomas confined to and above the tunica muscularis (AJCC's Tis, T1a, and T1b), and identified in cholecystectomy specimens sampled entirely according to an established protocol, to detailed analysis. Average patient age was 57.9 years (29–95). In more than half of the cases (114/190; 60 %), the tumor was inapparent by gross examination. In 81 cases (42.6 %), carcinomatous epithelium abutted the muscularis, whereas 57.4 % (n = 109) were qualified as intramucosal with no overt contiguity with muscularis. Intraepithelial extension into Rokitansky–Aschoff sinuses (RAS) was found in 34 cases (17.8 %). At the time of data analysis, 171 patients (99 %) were alive. Overall actuarial survival was 92.3 % at 5 years and 90.4 % at 10 years. The 5- and 10-year actuarial survival rates of the intramucosal group (93.2 and 92.1 %, respectively) were not statistically different from that of the muscle-abutting group (89.7 % and 88.2 % ; p = 0.334). Patients with RAS involvement had a significantly shorter survival than those without (p < 0.001). Of the 33 patients with RAS involvement, 13 (39 %) died of disease, whereas only 6 of the 154 patients (4 %) without RAS involvement died of disease. Disease-related mortality in these cases occurred relatively late (median 48 months). EGBC has a very good prognosis with a 90 % 10-year survival rate. It is seen on average in patients almost a decade younger than those with advanced cancers. RAS involvement is an independent prognostic factor, and additional surgery may have to be considered for such cases. Occasional recurrences are encountered several years later, which suggests a field-effect phenomenon and warrants long-term follow-up.
KeywordsGallbladder Adenocarcinoma Early stage
This study was financed in part by the Office of Research of the Universidad de la Frontera and Fondecyt Grant 1090171.
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Adsay NV, Klimstra DS (2007) Tumors of the bile ducts and pathologic aspects. In: Blumgart LH (ed) Surgery of the liver, biliary tract and pancreas, 4th edn. Elsevier, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 2.Albores-Saavedra J, Henson DE, Klimstra DS (2000) Tumors of the gallbladder, extrahepatic bile ducts, and ampulla of vater. Atlas of tumor pathology, 3rd edn. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, pp 21–35Google Scholar
- 15.Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds) (2010) Gallbladder cancer. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 20.Goetze TO, Paolucci V (2011) Immediate radical re-resection of incidental T1b gallbladder cancer and the problem of an adequate extent of resection (Results of the German Registry “Incidental Gallbladder Cancer”). Zentralbl Chir Mar 1Google Scholar
- 26.Klimstra DS, Adsay NV (2008) Pathology of biliary tract cancer. In: Kelsen DP (ed) Gastrointestinal oncology: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 31.Roa I (2005) Proposición de procesamiento de biopsias de la vesícula biliar, clasificación y etapificación el cáncer de la vesícula biliar. Rev Chil Cirugia 57:436–442Google Scholar