Serrated polyps of the colon: how reproducible is their classification?
- 1.3k Downloads
For several years, the lack of consensus on definition, nomenclature, natural history, and biology of serrated polyps (SPs) of the colon has created considerable confusion among pathologists. According to the latest WHO classification, the family of SPs comprises hyperplastic polyps (HPs), sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps), and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs). The term SSA/P with dysplasia has replaced the category of mixed hyperplastic/adenomatous polyps (MPs). The present study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of the diagnosis of SPs based on currently available diagnostic criteria and interactive consensus development. In an initial round, H&E slides of 70 cases of SPs were circulated among participating pathologists across Europe. This round was followed by a consensus discussion on diagnostic criteria. A second round was performed on the same 70 cases using the revised criteria and definitions according to the recent WHO classification. Data were evaluated for inter-observer agreement using Kappa statistics. In the initial round, for the total of 70 cases, a fair overall kappa value of 0.318 was reached, while in the second round overall kappa value improved to moderate (kappa = 0.557; p < 0.001). Overall kappa values for each diagnostic category also significantly improved in the final round, reaching 0.977 for HP, 0.912 for SSA/P, and 0.845 for TSA (p < 0.001). The diagnostic reproducibility of SPs improves when strictly defined, standardized diagnostic criteria adopted by consensus are applied.
KeywordsSerrated polyp Diagnosis Criteria Kappa statistics
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Snover DC, Ahnen DJ, Burt RW, Odze RD (2010) Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated polyposis. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (eds) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system, 4th edn. IARC, Lyon, pp 160–165Google Scholar
- 19.O’Brien MJ, Yang S, Mack C et al (2006) Comparison of microsatellite instability, CpG island methylation phenotype, BRAF and KRAS status in serrated polyps and traditional adenomas indicates separate pathways to distinct colorectal carcinoma end points. Am J Surg Pathol 30:1491–1501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Bustamente-Balen M, Bernet L, Cano R, Morell L, Lopez A (2009) Assessing the reproducibility of the microscopic diagnosis of sessile serrated adenoma of the colon. Rev Esp Enferm Dig (Madrid) 101:258–264Google Scholar
- 31.Chung SM, Chen YT, Panczykowski A, Schamberg N, Klimstra DS, Yantiss RK (2008) Serrated polyps with “intermediate features” of sessile serrated polyp and microvesicular hyperplastic polyp: a practical approach to the classification of nondysplastic serrated polyps. Am J Surg Pathol 32:407–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B, Kudo S et al (2000) Carcinoma of the colon and rectum. In: Hamilton SR, Aaltonen IA (eds) Tumours of the digestive system. WHO classification of tumours. IARC, Lyon, pp 113–114Google Scholar