Performance characteristics of Pap test, VIA, VILI, HR-HPV testing, cervicography, and colposcopy in diagnosis of significant cervical pathology
- 679 Downloads
We sought to evaluate the performance of diagnostic tools to establish an affordable setting for early detection of cervical cancer in developing countries. We compared the performance of different screening tests and their feasibility in a cohort of over 12,000 women: conventional Pap smear, liquid-based cytology, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), visual inspection with Iodine solution (VILI), cervicography, screening colposcopy, and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing (HR-HPV) collected by physician and by self-sampling. HR-HPV assay collected by the physician has the highest sensitivity (80 %), but high unnecessary referrals to colposcopy (15.1 %). HR-HPV test in self-sampling had a markedly lower (57.1 %) sensitivity. VIA, VILI, and cervicography had a poor sensitivity (47.4, 55, and 28.6 %, respectively). Colposcopy presented with sensitivity of 100 % in detecting CIN2+, but the lowest specificity (66.9 %). Co-testing with VIA and VILI Pap test increased the sensitivity of stand-alone Pap test from 71.6 to 87.1 % and 71.6 to 95 %, respectively, but with high number of unnecessary colposcopies. Co-testing with HR-HPV importantly increased the sensitivity of Pap test (to 86 %), but with high number of unnecessary colposcopies (17.5 %). Molecular tests adjunct to Pap test seems a realistic option to improve the detection of high-grade lesions in population-based screening programs.
KeywordsCancer prevention Pap test Hybrid capture Colposcopy Screening program
This study has been supported by the European Commission, INCO-DEV Programme (contract# ICA4-CT-2001-10013). The generous contribution of DIGENE Corporation (USA) donating the HCII tests at our disposal is gratefully acknowledged.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that any conflict of interest, mainly financial agreement with companies whose products, are alluded to in the paper.
- 1.Estimate 2010: Incidence of cancer in Brazil. [eletronic] Rio de Janeiro: Brazilian National Cancer Institute; 2009 [cited 2010 04/01/2010]; Available from: http://www.inca.gov.br/estimativa/2010/conteudo_view.asp?ID=5
- 2.Syrjänen K, Naud P, Derchain S, Roteli-Martins C, Longatto-Filho A, Tatti S, Branca M, Erzen M, Hammes LS, Matos J, Gontijo R, Sarian L, Braganca J, Arlindo FC, Maeda MY, Lörincz A, Dores GB, Costa S, Syrjänen S (2005) Comparing PAP smear cytology, aided visual inspection, screening colposcopy, cervicography and HPV testing as optional screening tools in Latin America. Study design and baseline data of the LAMS study. Anticancer Res 25(5):3469–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Longatto-Filho A, Maeda MY, Erzen M, Branca M, Roteli-Martins C, Naud P, Derchain SF, Hammes L, Matos J, Gontijo R, Sarian LO, Lima TP, Tatti S, SyrjäneS SK (2005) Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study. Acta Cytol 49(5):500–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Sarian LO, Derchain SF, Naud P, Roteli-Martins C, Longatto-Filho A, Tatti S, Branca M, Erzen M, Serpa-Hammes L, Matos J, Gontijo R, Bragança JF, Lima TP, Maeda MY, Lörincz A, Dores GB, Costa S, Syrjänen S, Syrjänen K (2005) Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine (VILI), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervical screening tools in Latin America. This report refers to partial results from the LAMS (Latin AMerican Screening) study. J Med Screen 12(3): 142-9Google Scholar
- 5.Arbyn M, Sankaranarayanan R, Muwonge R, Keita N, Dolo A, Mbalawa CG, Nouhou SB, Wesley R, Somanathan T, Sharma A, Shastri S, Basu P (2008) Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India. Int J Cancer 123(1):153–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Fahey, M.T., Irwin L, P. Macaskill P Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy. Am J Epidemiol 141(7): 680-9.Google Scholar
- 10.Ronco G, Cuzick J, Pierotti P, Cariaggi MP, Dalla Palma P, Naldoni C, Ghiringhello B, Giorgi-Rossi P, Minucci D, Parisio F, Pojer A, Schiboni ML, Sintoni C, Zorzi M, Segnan N, Confortini M (2007) Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trial. BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.39196.740995.BEGoogle Scholar
- 11.Davey E, Barratt A, Irwig L, Chan SF, Macaskill P, Mannes P, Saville AM (2006) Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review. Lancet 367(9505):122–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Dinshaw KA, Mahe C, Jayant K, Shastri SS, Malvi SG, Chinoy R, Kelkar R, Budukh AM, Keskar V, Rajeshwarker R, Muwonge R, Kane S, Parkin DM, Chauhan MK, Desai S, Fontaniere B, Frappart L, Kothari A, Lucas E, Panse N (2005) A cluster randomized controlled trial of visual, cytology and human papillomavirus screening for cancer of the cervix in rural India. Int J Cancer 116(4):617–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Sankaranarayanan R, Wesley R, Thara S, Dhakad N, Chandralekha B, Sebastian P, Chithrathara K, Parkin DM, Nair MK (2003) Test characteristics of visual inspection with 4 % acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI) in cervical cancer screening in Kerala, India. Int J Cancer 106(3):404–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Syrjänen K, Derchain S, Roteli-Martins C, Longatto-Filho A, Hammes LS, Sarian L (2008) Value of conventional pap smear, liquid-based cytology, visual inspection and human papillomavirus testing as optional screening tools among Latin American women <35 and > or =35 years of age: experience from the Latin American Screening Study. Acta Cytol 52(6):641–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, Jayant K, Muwonge R, Budukh AM, Hingmire S, Malvi SG, Thorat R, Kothari A, Chinoy R, Kelkar R, Kane S, Desai S, Keskar VR, Rajeshwarkar R, Panse N, Dinshaw KA (2009) HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med 360(14):1385–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Longatto-Filho A, Roteli-Martins C, Hammes L, Etlinger D, Pereira SM, Erzen M, Branca M, Naud P, Derchain SF, Sarian LO, Matos J, Gontijo R, Lima T, Maeda MY, Tatti S, Syrjänen S, Syrjänen K (2008) Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as cervical cancer screening option. Experience from the LAMS study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 29(4):327–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Costa S, Sideri M, Syrjänen K, Terzano P, De Nuzzo M, De Simone P, Cristiani P, Finarelli AC, Bovicelli A, Zamparelli A, Bovicelli L (2000) Combined Pap smear, cervicography and HPV DNA testing in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer. Acta Cytol 44(3):310–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Schneider DL, Herrero R, Bratti C, Greenberg MD, Hildesheim A, Sherman ME, Morales J, Hutchinson ML, Sedlacek TV, Lorincz A, Mango L, Wacholder S, Alfaro M, Schiffman M (1999) Cervicography screening for cervical cancer among 8460 women in a high-risk population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:290–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Monsonego J, Hudgens MG, Zerat L, Zerat JC, Syrjänen K, Smith JS (2012) Risk assessment and clinical impact of liquid-based cytology, oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and mRNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening (The FASE Study). Gynecol Oncol 125(1):175–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar