Advertisement

Virchows Archiv

, Volume 457, Issue 1, pp 21–25 | Cite as

Indian ink vs tissue marking dye: a quantitative comparison of two widely used macroscopical staining tool

  • Kemal KosemehmetogluEmail author
  • Gunes Guner
  • Deniz Ates
Original Article

Abstract

The evaluation of the surgical margins is a major concern in surgical pathology, and marking of surgical margins with substances such as alcian blue, Tipp-ex, artist's pigments, colored gelatin, starch, erythrocyte layers, etc. was recommended for this purpose; Indian ink and tissue marking dyes are widely used. As there is no systematic study comparing tissue marking dyes and Indian ink as the most common substances used for the purpose, this study was conducted to compare the two. Penetration into the tissue, brightness under the microscope, the spreading area of one drop of dye on tissue paper, the intensity of colors, and unit price were compared for each of the five colors of Rotring's Indian ink and Thermo–Shandon's tissue marking dyes, applied on reduction mammoplasty specimens. Rotring's Indian ink is proved to be just as effective as Thermo–Shandon's tissue marking dye and bares the majority of the characteristics of a perfect staining substance, which are easily applied, quickly fixed, durable and cheap, contain no potential contaminants, be work safe, would not smudge/stain surrounding tissues, and look bright under the microscope without obscuring the view.

Keywords

Surgical margin Gross specimen 

Notes

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Dimenstein IB (2009) Grossing biopsies: an introduction to general principles and techniques. Ann Diagn Pathol 13:106–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armstrong JS, Weinzwieg IP, Davies JD (1990) Differential marking of excision planes in screened breast lesions by organically coloured gelatins. J Clin Pathol 43:604–607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chan KW, Lui I, Chung WB (1989) Marking planes of surgical excision on specimens with mixture of India ink and acetone. J Clin Pathol 42:893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiam HW, Maslen PG, Hoffman GJ (2003) Marking the surgical margins of specimens: commercial acrylic pigments are reliable, rapid and safe. Pathology 35:204–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarke TJ (1991) Differential marking of surgical excision planes. J Clin Pathol 44:87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harris MD (1990) Tipp-ex fluid: convenient marker for surgical resection margins. J Clin Pathol 43:346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paterson DA, Davies JD (1988) Marking planes of surgical excision on breast biopsy specimens: use of artists' pigments suspended in acetone. J Clin Pathol 41:1013–1016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Salerno A (1998) Fixing Indian ink on resection margins. Histopathology 33:284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salerno A, Trent R, Jackson PJ, Cook MG (1995) A rapid and safe method to fix india ink on specimen resection margins. J Clin Pathol 48:689–690CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shinde V, Phelan C, Gater W, Thomas J (2008) Inking a specimen without the mess. J Clin Pathol 61:783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wright RG, Osborne J (1991) Modification of the alcian blue method for marking breast biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol 44:174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hunter-Craig C, Lee-McDonagh B, Penman HG (1991) Marking of resection margins. J Clin Pathol 44:874–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prophet EB, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (U.S.), American Registry of Pathology (1994) Laboratory methods in histotechnology. American Registry of Pathology, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Corpas FJ, Chaki M, Fernandez-Ocana A, Valderrama R, Palma JM, Carreras A, Begara-Morales JC, Airaki M, del Rio LA, Barroso JB (2008) Metabolism of reactive nitrogen species in pea plants under abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 49:1711–1722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miller L Stuff (2007) Quantifying western blots without expensive commercial quantification software. http://www.lukemiller.org/journal/2007/08/quantifying-western-blots-without.html. Accessed 10 March 2010
  16. 16.
    Molavi DW (2008) Prostate. In: Molavi DW (ed) The practice of surgical pathology: a beginner's guide to the diagnostic process. Springer, New York, pp 95–106Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PathologyAnkara Ataturk Education and Research HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of PathologyHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations