Virchows Archiv

, 454:125 | Cite as

Retroperitoneal margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen: anatomic mapping for the surgical pathologist

  • Mahmoud A. Khalifa
  • Vlad Maksymov
  • Corwyn Rowsell
Review and Perspective

Abstract

Surgical margin status of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen is an independent predictor of survival in patients with pancreatic head cancer. Although most surgical pathologists are familiar with the protocols for grossing and evaluation of the various margins of the specimen, the currently prevailing definitions of the retroperitoneal surgical margin minimize the fact that this margin is actually a combination of surfaces of different anatomical structures. The unfamiliarity with its detailed anatomy often creates communication gaps when the pathologic findings are presented to other members of the multidisciplinary team. The following discussion is the collective opinion of hepato-pancreato-biliary pathologists in two tertiary care Canadian medical centers in this field. It describes the authors’ proposed nomenclature and landmarks for anatomic mapping of the retroperitoneal margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy resected specimen. Increasing familiarity with the subtleties of the retroperitoneal margin is expected to improve communication and sets the stage for future quality improvement initiatives and translational research in the multidisciplinary setting.

Keywords

Surgical margins Whipple’s specimen Pancreaticoduodenectomy Anatomy Pancreas 

References

  1. 1.
    Allema JH, Reinders ME, vanGulik TM et al (1995) Prognostic factors for suvival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with carcinoma of the pancreatic region. Cancer 75:2069–2076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fuhrman GM, Leach SD, Staley CA et al (1996) Rationale for en bloc resection in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma adherent to the superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence. Pancreatic Tumor Study Group. Ann Surg 223(2):154–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li D, Xie K, Wolff RA, Abbruzzese JL (2004) Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 363:1049–1057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL et al (2006) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 13:1035–1046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F et al (2008) Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1651–1660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Verbeke CS, Menon KV (2008) Variability in reporting resection margin status in pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 247:716–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM et al (2004) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with en block portal vein resection for pancreatic carcinoma with suspected portal vein involvement. World J Surg 28(6):602–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tseng JF, Raut CP, Lee JE et al (2004) Pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection; margin status and survival duration. J Gastrointest Surg 8(8):935–949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verbeke CS (2007) Resection margins and R1 rates in pancreatic cancer—are we there yet. Histopathology 52(7):787–796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fuhrman GM, Charnsangavej C, Abbruzzese JL et al (1994) Thin-section contrast-enhanced computer tomography accurately predicts the resectability of malignant pancreatic neoplasms. Am J Surg 167:104–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Staley CA, Cleary KR, Abbruzzese JL et al (1996) The need for standardized pathologic staging of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens. Pancreas 12:373–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zamboni G, Capelli P, Pesci A et al (2000) Pancreatic head mass; what can be done? Classification: the pathological point of view. JOP.J Pancreas (on line) 1(3suppl):77–84Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Compton CC (2007) Exocrine pancreas: protocol applied to all carcinomas of the exocrine pancreas. Available from College of American Pathologists web site. http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/cancer_protocols/2005/pancreasexo05_pw.doc
  14. 14.
    Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC et al (2007) Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 246(1):52–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khalifa MA (2007) Intraoperative assessment of the Whipple’s resection specimen. J Clin Pathol 60:975–980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khalifa MA, Maksymov V, Rowsell CH et al (2007) A novel approach to the intraoperative assessment of the uncinate margin of the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen. Hepato Pancreato Biliary (HPB) 9:146–149Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rowsell CH, Hanna S, Hsieh E et al (2007) Improved lymph node retrieval in Whipple specimens as a result of implementation of a new uncinate margin protocol. Hepato Pancreato Biliary (HPB) 9:388–391Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nato M, Miwa K, Kitagawa H et al (2005) Pancreas head carcinoma: frequency of invasion to soft tissue adherent to the superior mesenteric artery. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1056–1061Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou GW, Wu WD, Xiao WD et al (2005) Pancreatectomy combined with superior mesenteric-portal vein resection: report of 32 cases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 4:130–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aramaki M, Matsumoto T, Etoh T et al (2003) Clinical significance of combined pancreas and portal vein resection in surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 50(49):263–266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luttges J, Vogel I, Menke M et al (1998) The retroperitoneal resection margin and vessel involvement are important factors determining survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Virchows Arch 433:237–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV et al (2006) Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93:1232–1237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahmoud A. Khalifa
    • 1
  • Vlad Maksymov
    • 2
  • Corwyn Rowsell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PathologySunnybrook Health Sciences CenterTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of PathologyMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations