Advertisement

Virchows Archiv

, Volume 450, Issue 3, pp 329–333 | Cite as

Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients

  • Calliope Maris
  • Benoît Martin
  • Jacques Creteur
  • Myriam Remmelink
  • Michael Piagnerelli
  • Isabelle SalmonEmail author
  • Jean-Louis Vincent
  • Pieter Demetter
Original Article

Abstract

The autopsy has long been regarded as an important tool for clinical confrontation, education and quality assurance. The aims of this study were to examine the correlation between the clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings in adult patients who died in an intensive care unit (ICU) and to identify the types of errors in diagnosis to improve quality of care. Autopsies from 289 patients who died in the ICU during a 2-year period were studied. Post-mortem examination revealed unexpected findings in 61 patients (21%) including malignancy, pulmonary embolism, aspergillosis, myocardial or mesenteric infarction and unsuspected bacterial, viral or fungal infection. These unexpected findings were classified as Goldman class I errors in 17 (6%), class II in 38 (13%) and class III in six (2%) cases. Although the incidence of unexpected findings with clinical significance was low, post-mortem examination remains a valuable source of pertinent information that may improve the management of ICU patients.

Keywords

Autopsy Intensive care Diagnostic discrepancy Post-mortem examination 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors declare that the experiments comply with the current laws of Belgium.

This work has been carried out with the support of grants awarded by the “Fondation Yvonne Boël” (Brussels, Belgium).

References

  1. 1.
    Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (1991) Recommendations on quality control and quality assurance in anatomic pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 15:1007–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker PB, Zarbo RJ, Howanitz PJ (1996) Quality assurance of autopsy face sheet reporting, final autopsy report turnaround time, and autopsy rates: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 10,003 autopsies from 418 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:1003–1008PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baron JH (2000) Clinical diagnosis and the function of the autopsy. J R Soc Med 93:463–466PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Battle RM, Pathak D, Humble CG, Key CR, Vanatta PR, Hill RB, Anderson RE (1987) Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses. JAMA 258:339–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauer FW, Robbins SL (1972) An autopsy study of cancer patients. I. Accuracy of the clinical diagnoses (1955 to 1965) Boston City Hospital. JAMA 221:1471–1474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berlot G, Dezzoni R, Viviani M, Silvestri L, Bussani R, Gullo A (1999) Does the length of stay in the intensive care unit influence the diagnostic accuracy? A clinical-pathological study. Eur J Emerg Med 6:227–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blosser AS, Zimmerman HE, Stauffer JL (1998) Do autopsies of critically ill patients reveal important findings that were clinically undetected? Crit Care Med 26:1332–1336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boers M, Nieuwenhuyzen Kruseman AC, Eulderink F, Hermans J, Thompson J (1988) Value of autopsy in internal medicine: a 1-year prospective study of hospital deaths. Eur J Clin Investig 18:314–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burton EC, Troxclair DA, Newman WP 3rd (1998) Autopsy diagnoses of malignant neoplasms: how often are clinical diagnoses incorrect? JAMA 280:1245–1248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Combes A, Mokhtari M, Couvelard A, Trouillet JL, Baudot J, Hénin D, Gibert C, Chastre J (2004) Clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med 164:389–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dhar V, Perlman M, Vilela MI, Haque KN, Kirpalani H, Cutz E (1998) Autopsy in a neonatal intensive care unit: utilization patterns and associations of clinicopathologic discordances. J Pediatr 132:75–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dimopoulos G, Piagnerelli M, Berre J, Eddafali B, Salmon I, Vincent JL (2003) Disseminated aspergillosis in intensive care unit patients: an autopsy study. J Chemother 15:71–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dimopoulos G, Piagnerelli M, Berre J, Salmon I, Vincent JL (2004) Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful? Intensive Care Med 30:2080–2085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Egervary M, Szende B, Roe FJ, Lee PN (2000) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of lung cancer in Budapest in an institute specializing in chest diseases. Pathol Res Pract 196:761–766PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fernandez-Segoviano P, Lazaro A, Esteban A, Rubio JM, Iruretagoyena JR (1988) Autopsy as quality assurance in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 16:683–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Geha DJ, Roberts GD (1994) Laboratory detection of fungemia. Clin Lab Med 14:83–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, Cohn LH, Bettmann M, Weisberg M (1983) The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 308:1000–1005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldman L (1984) Diagnostic advances v the value of the autopsy. 1912–1980. Arch Pathol Lab Med 108:501–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gut AL, Ferreira AL, Montenegro MR (1999) Autopsy: quality assurance in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 25:360–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haber SL (1996) Whither the autopsy? Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:714–717Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Herbrecht R, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Bennett JE, Greene RE, Oestmann JW, Kern WV, Marr KA, Ribaud P, Lortholary O, Sylvester R, Rubin Rh, Wingard JR, Stak P, Durand C, Caillot D, Thiel E, Chandrasekar PH, Hodges MR, Schlamm HT, Troke PF, De Pauw B, Invasive Fungal Infections Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Global Aspergillus Study Group (2002) Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med 347:408–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Juvin P, Teissiere F, Brion F, Desmonts JM, Durigon M (2000) Postoperative death and malpractice suits: is autopsy useful? Anesth Analg 91:344–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kamal IS, Forsyth DR, Jones JR (1997) Does it matter who requests necropsies? Propective study of clinical audit on rate of requests. BMJ 314:1729PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kumar P, Taxy J, Angst DB, Mangurten HH (1998) Autopsies in children: are they still useful? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 152:558–563PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar P, Angst DB, Taxy J, Mangurten HH (2000) Neonatal autopsies: a 10-year experience. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 154:38–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Landefeld CS, Chren MM, Myers A, Geller R, Robbins S, Goldman L (1988) Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital. N Engl J Med 318:1249–1254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lundberg GD (1996) College of American Pathologists Conference XXIX on restructuring autopsy practice for health care reform: let’s make this autopsy conference matter. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:736–738PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lundberg GD (1998) Low-tech autopsies in the era of high-tech medicine: continued value for quality assurance and patient safety. JAMA 280:1273–1274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marche C (1990) The autopsy and AIDS. Evaluation and perspectives. Ann Pathol 10:225–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marwick C (1995) Pathologists request autopsy revival. JAMA 273:1889–1891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McPhee SJ, Bottles K (1985) Autopsy: moribund art or vital science? Am J Med 78:107–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McPhee SJ, Bottles K, Lo B, Saika G, Crommie D (1986) To redeem them from death. Reactions of family members to autopsy. Am J Med 80:665–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McPhee SJ (1996) Maximizing the benefits of autopsy for clinicians and families. What needs to be done. Arch Pathol Lab Med 120:743–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mort TC, Yeston NS (1999) The relationship of pre mortem diagnoses and post mortem findings in a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 27:299–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nadrous HF, Afessa B, Pfeifer A, Peters SG (2003) The role of autopsy in the intensive care unit. Mayo Clin Proc 78:947–950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nichols L, Aronica P, Babe C (1998) Are autopsies obsolete? Am J Clin Pathol 110:210–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    O’Grady G (2003) Death of the teaching autopsy. BMJ 327:802–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ong AW, Cohn SM, Cohn KA, Jaramillo DH, Parbhu R, McKenney MG, Barquist ES, Bell MD (2002) Unexpected findings in trauma patients dying in the intensive care unit: results of 153 consecutive autopsies. J Am Coll Surg 194:401–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Perkins GD, McAuley DF, Davies S, Gao F (2003) Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill patients: an observational study. Crit Care 7:R129–R132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Potet F (1996) Autopsy. A method for evaluating the quality of care. Ann Pathol 16:409–413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rao MG, Rangwala AF (1990) Diagnostic yield from 231 autopsies in a community hospital. Am J Clin Pathol 93:486–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Roberts WC (1978) The autopsy: its decline and suggestion for its revival. N Engl J Med 299:332–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Roosen J, Frans E, Wilmer A, Knockaert DC, Bobbaers H (2000) Comparison of premortem clinical diagnoses in critically ill patients and subsequent autopsy findings. Mayo Clin Proc 75:562–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Salib E, Tadros G, Ambrose A (2000) Autopsy in elderly psychiatric inpatients: a retrospective review of autopsy findings of deceased elderly psychiatric inpatients in north Cheshire 1980–1996. Med Sci Law 40:20–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sarode VR, Datta BN, Banerjee AK, Banerjee CK, Joshi K, Bhusnurmath B, Radotra BD (1993) Autopsy findings and clinical diagnoses: a review of 1,000 cases. Human Pathol 24:194–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Silfvast T, Takkunen O, Kolho E, Andersson LC, Rosenberg P (2003) Characteristics of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a 5-year review. Intensive Care Med 29:321–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Slavin G, Kirkham N, Underwood JCE, Molt JM, Hopkins A, Jackson BT, Windsor CWO (1991) The autopsy and audit. Report of the Joint Working Party of the Royal College of Pathologists, the Royal College of Physicians of London and the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Royal College of Pathologists, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sonderegger-Iseli K, Burger S, Muntwyler J, Salomon F (2000) Diagnostic errors in three medical areas: a necropsy study. Lancet 355:2027–2031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Start RD, Firth JA, Macgillivray F, Cross SS (1995) Have declining clinical necropsy rates reduced the contribution of necropsy to medical research? J Clin Pathol 48:402–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tai DY, El-Bilbeisi H, Tewari S, Mascha EJ, Wiedemann HP, Arroliga AC (2001) A study of consecutive autopsies in a medical ICU: a comparison of clinical cause of death and autopsy diagnosis. Chest 119:530–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Autopsy Working Party (2004) The decline of the hospital autopsy: a safety and quality issue for healthcare in Australia. Med J Aust 180:281–285Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tse GM, Lee JC (2000) A 12-month review of autopsies performed at a university-affiliated teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 6:190–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Twigg SJ, McCrirrick A, Sanderson PM (2001) A comparison of post mortem findings with post hoc estimated clinical diagnoses of patients who die in a United Kingdom intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 27:706–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yalamarthi S, Ridley S, Barker T (1998) Agreement between ante-mortem diagnoses, death certificates and post-mortem causes of death in critically ill patients. Clin Intensive Care 9:100–104Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yesner R, Robinson MJ, Goldman L, Reichert CM, Engel L (1985) A symposium on the autopsy. Pathol Annu 20:441–477PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Calliope Maris
    • 1
  • Benoît Martin
    • 1
  • Jacques Creteur
    • 2
  • Myriam Remmelink
    • 1
  • Michael Piagnerelli
    • 2
  • Isabelle Salmon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean-Louis Vincent
    • 2
  • Pieter Demetter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PathologyErasme University HospitalBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Intensive CareErasme University Hospital, Free University of BrusselsBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations