Virchows Archiv

, Volume 448, Issue 3, pp 256–261

The impact of large sections and 3D technique on the study of lobular in situ and invasive carcinoma of the breast

  • Maria P. Foschini
  • Alberto Righi
  • Maria C. Cucchi
  • Teresa Ragazzini
  • Stefano Merelli
  • Bruna Santeramo
  • Vincenzo Eusebi
Original article


The aim of the present study was to investigate the type of intraglandular spread of lobular neoplasia (LN) and its relationship with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) through three-dimensional (3D) stereomicroscopy and analyses of large histological sections (histological macrosections, HM). Fifteen cases showing multiple foci of in situ LN and/or ILC (1 pure LN, 12 LN+ILC, and 2 pure ILC) constituted the basis of the present study. Thirteen cases were treated with mastectomy (including the case of pure LN), and two cases were treated with quadrantectomy. In all cases, large parallel 5-mm-thick sections were embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Selected large paraffin blocks were investigated with stereomicroscopy. The H&E-stained HM were then compared with the corresponding tissues examined using stereomicroscopy. (1) LN was multicentric in nine cases. (2) The average maximum distance among LN foci was 37.9 mm, while the average maximum distance among ILC areas was 58.2 mm. (3) On 3D examination, LN-filled acini and ducts appeared dilated. When “Pagetoid spread” was present, the ducts were lined by a continuous layer of neoplastic epithelium. (4) No anastomoses between lobes were observed in the two cases where glandular trees were visualized. (5) In 12 cases, ILC areas enveloped ducts and acini affected by LN—an association that was more than coincidental. (6) Multicentric ILC areas not associated with LN indicated vascular spread. It is concluded that the information given in LN and ILC, obtained by analyses of large histological sections, is far superior than that obtained by analyses of conventional histological sections, which underestimate multiple distant small foci of invasion. 3D sections are useful in understanding the architecture of specific lesions.


Invasive lobular carcinoma Lobular neoplasia Large sections Macrosections 


  1. 1.
    Dalton AJ (1949) Histogenesis of the mammary gland of the mouse. In: Moulton FR (ed) A symposium on mammary tumors in mice. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, pp 39–46Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Damiani S, Peterse JL, Eusebi V (2002) Malignant neoplasms infiltrating “pseudoangiomatous” stromal hyperplasia of the breast: an unrecognized pathway of tumor spread. Histopathology 41:208–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellis IO, Humphreys S, Michell M, Pinder SE, Wells CA, Zakhour HD (2004) Guidelines for breast needle core biopsy handling and reporting in breast screening assessment. J Clin Pathol 57:897–902CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elsheikh TM, Silverman JF (2005) Follow-up surgical excision is indicated when breast core needle biopsies show atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ. A correlative study of 33 patients with review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 29:534–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eusebi V, Magalhaes F, Azzopardi JG (1992) Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: an aggressive tumor showing apocrine differentiation. Hum Pathol 23:655–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faverly DRG, Holland R, Burgers L (1992) An original stereomicroscopic analysis of the mammary glandular tree. Virchows Arch 421:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Faverly DRG, Burgers L, Bult P, Holland R (1994) Three dimensional imaging of mammary ductal carcinoma in situ: clinical implications. Semin Diagn Pathol 11(3):193–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foote FW, Stewart FW (1941) Lobular carcinoma in situ. Am J Pathol 17:491–500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foschini MP, Tot T, Eusebi V (2002) Large-section (macrosection) histologic slides. In: Silverstein MJ (ed) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 249–524Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Going JJ, Moffat DF (2004) Escaping from flatland: clinical and biological aspects of human mammary duct anatomy in three dimensions. J Pathol 203:538–544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holland R, Faverly DRG (2002) The local distribution of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: whole-organ studies. In: Silverstein MJ (ed) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast, chap 19. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 240–248Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jackson PA, Merchant W, McCormick CJ, Cook MG (1994) A comparison of large block macrosectioning and conventional techniques in breast pathology. Virchows Arch 425:243–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ohtake T, Kimijima I, Fukushima T et al (2001) Computer-assisted complete three-dimensional reconstruction of the mammary ductal/lobular systems. Cancer 91:2263–2272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Page DL, Schuyler PA, Dupont WD, Jensen RA, Plummer WD Jr, Simpson JF (2003) Atypical lobular hyperplasia as a unilateral predictor of breast cancer risk: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 361:125–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosen PP, Kosloff C, Lieberman PH, Adair F, Braun DW (1978) Lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 2:225–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schnitt SJ, Morrow M (1999) Lobular carcinoma in situ: current concepts and controversies. Semin Diagn Pathol 16(3):209–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tot T (2003) The diffuse type of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: morphology and prognosis. Virchows Arch 443:718–724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tot T (2005) DCIS, cytokeratins, and the theory of the sick lobe. Virchows Arch 447:1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tot T, Tabar L, Dean PB (2000) The pressing need for better histologic–mammographic correlation of the many variations in normal breast anatomy. Virchows Arch 437:338–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weidner N, Semple JP (1992) Pleomorphic variant of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Hum Pathol 23:1167–1171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wellings SR, Jensen HM (1973) On the origin and progression of ductal carcinoma in the human breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 50:1111–1118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    WHO (2203). Tumours of the breast and female genital organs. In: Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (Kleihues P, Sobin L) (eds). WHO classification of tumours, 3rd (5th) edn. IARC Press, LyonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria P. Foschini
    • 1
  • Alberto Righi
    • 1
  • Maria C. Cucchi
    • 2
  • Teresa Ragazzini
    • 1
  • Stefano Merelli
    • 3
  • Bruna Santeramo
    • 4
  • Vincenzo Eusebi
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Section of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Oncological SciencesUniversity of Bologna, Bellaria HospitalBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Section of Oncologic Surgery, Department of Oncological SciencesUniversity of Bologna, Bellaria HospitalBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Oncological SciencesUniversity of Bologna, Bellaria HospitalBolognaItaly
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryClinica Villa LauraBolognaItaly
  5. 5.Anatomia PatologicaOspedale BellariaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations