Reproducibility of the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology classification of papillary urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder
- First Online:
- 142 Downloads
This study assessed the diagnostic agreement and intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology Consensus Classification of Urothelial Neoplasms (1998 WHO/ISUP classification) and the 1973 WHO classification.
A teaching set with 5 slides of each papillary neoplasm of low malignant potential, low-grade papillary carcinoma, high-grade papillary carcinoma, and a guideline, as well as a study set of 30 slides containing ten cases of each category, were sent to participants. Six pathologists expert in urological pathology reviewed the 30 slides of non-invasive papillary urothelial tumors in the study set. Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility were evaluated using intra- and inter-rater techniques (kappa statistic).
A moderate to substantial intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was achieved for both the 1998 WHO/ISUP and 1973 WHO classification. The results of the two classification systems were not different statistically (P>0.05). Reproducibility was lower in low-grade tumors for both classifications.
The new proposed classification system for non-invasive urothelial neoplasms does not increase the reproducibility. There is still a need for uniformity in grading in order to compare the different studies and therapies and to provide more accurate information for management.
KeywordsBladder neoplasms Urothelium World Health Organization Classification
- 15.Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR, Mostofi FK, The Bladder Consensus Conference Committee (1999) The World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Am J Surg Pathol 22:1435–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Mostofi FK, Sobin LH, Torloni H (1973) Histological typing of urinary bladder tumours. Volume 10. Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- 25.Mostofi FK, Davis CJ, Seterhenn IA (1999) Histological typing of urinary bladder tumors. World Health Organization international histological classification of tumours, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 30.Oosterhuis JWA, Schapers RFM, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Pauwels RPE, Newling DW, ten Kate F (2002) Histological grading of papillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: prognostic value of the 1998 WHO/ISUP classification system and comparison with conventional grading systems. J Clin Pathol 55:900–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Reuter VE, Melamed MR (1999) The urothelial tract. In: Sternberg SS (ed) Diagnostic surgical pathology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 1871Google Scholar
- 35.Robertson AJ, Swanson Beck J, Burnett RA, Howatson SR, Lee FD, Lessells AM, McLaren KM, Moss SM, Simpson JG, Smith GD, Tavadia HB, Walker F (1990) Observer variability in histopathological reporting of transitional cell carcinoma and epithelial dysplasia in bladders. J Clin Pathol 43:17–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Schapers RFM, Pauwels RPE, Wıjnen JThM, Arends JW, Thunnissen FBJM, Coebergh JWW, Smeets AWGB, Bosman FT (1994) A simplified grading method of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: reproducibility, clinical significance and comparison with other prognostic parameters. Br J Urol 73:625–631PubMedGoogle Scholar