Development Genes and Evolution

, Volume 222, Issue 1, pp 29–44

The medicinal leech genome encodes 21 innexin genes: different combinations are expressed by identified central neurons

  • Brandon Kandarian
  • Jasmine Sethi
  • Allan Wu
  • Michael Baker
  • Neema Yazdani
  • Eunice Kym
  • Alejandro Sanchez
  • Lee Edsall
  • Terry Gaasterland
  • Eduardo Macagno
Original Article
  • 467 Downloads

Abstract

Gap junctional proteins are important components of signaling pathways required for the development and ongoing functions of all animal tissues, particularly the nervous system, where they function in the intracellular and extracellular exchange of small signaling factors and ions. In animals whose genomes have been sufficiently sequenced, large families of these proteins, connexins, pannexins, and innexins, have been found, with 25 innexins in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans Starich et al. (Cell Commun Adhes 8: 311–314, 2001) and at least 37 connexins in the zebrafish Danio rerio Cruciani and Mikalsen (Biol Chem 388:253–264, 2009). Having recently sequenced the medicinal leech Hirudo verbana genome, we now report the presence of 21 innexin genes in this species, nine more than we had previously reported from the analysis of an EST-derived transcriptomic database Dykes and Macagno (Dev Genes Evol 216: 185–97, 2006); Macagno et al. (BMC Genomics 25:407, 2010). Gene structure analyses show that, depending on the leech innexin gene, they can contain from 0 to 6 introns, with closely related paralogs showing the same number of introns. Phylogenetic trees comparing Hirudo to another distantly related leech species, Helobdella robusta, shows a high degree of orthology, whereas comparison to other annelids shows a relatively low level. Comparisons with other Lophotrochozoans, Ecdyzozoans and with vertebrate pannexins suggest a low number (one to two) of ancestral innexin/pannexins at the protostome/deuterostome split. Whole-mount in situ hybridization for individual genes in early embryos shows that ∼50% of the expressed innexins are detectable in multiple tissues. Expression analyses using quantitative PCR show that ∼70% of the Hirudo innexins are expressed in the nervous system, with most of these detected in early development. Finally, quantitative PCR analysis of several identified adult neurons detects the presence of different combinations of innexin genes, a property that may underlie the participation of these neurons in different adult coupling circuits.

Keywords

Gap junctions Neurodevelopment Evolution Medicinal leech Neural circuits 

Supplementary material

427_2011_387_MOESM1_ESM.png (475 kb)
Supplemental Fig. 1Sequence alignment of the 21 Hirudo verbana innexin proteins reported here. The program ClustalW was used to perform the multiple alignments of the innexin sequences, while Jalview (Waterhouse et al. 2009) was used to generate the image. The amino acids are colored according to the "Zappo" coloring scheme that denotes groups of residues with similar physicochemical properties. For example, the four transmembrane regions are predominantly pink, representing aliphatic or hydrophobic amino acids, while the two extracellular loops each display the highly conserved pair of cysteines in yellow. Other correspondences are: aromatic, orange; positive, blue; negative, red, hydrophilic, blue; and conformationally special, purple. The conservation score, quality score and consensus levels, indicated in three rows below the aligned sequences, were automatically calculated by the Jalview software, as described in the Jalview documentation (http://www.jalview.org/help.html) (PNG 474 kb)
427_2011_387_MOESM2_ESM.tif (531 kb)
High-resolution image (TIFF 531 kb)
427_2011_387_MOESM3_ESM.tif (235 kb)
High-resolution image (TIFF 235 kb)
427_2011_387_MOESM4_ESM.tif (3.7 mb)
High-resolution image (TIFF 235 kb)
427_2011_387_MOESM5_ESM.tif (101 kb)
High-resolution image (TIFF 101 kb)
427_2011_387_MOESM6_ESM.doc (70 kb)
Supplementary Table 1Nomenclature, accession numbers and correspondence of the 21 Hirudo and 21 Helobdella innexin genes, as determined from sequence orthology analysis as described in the text. The analysis suggests that the ancestor of the Hirudo and Helobdella had 19 innexin genes, and that subsequent independent duplications raised that number to 21 in present day representative species (DOC 70 kb)
427_2011_387_MOESM7_ESM.doc (60 kb)
Supplementary Table 2Accession numbers for the Capitella teleta innexin genes used in this report (DOC 60 kb)
427_2011_387_MOESM8_ESM.doc (51 kb)
Supplementary Table 3Accession numbers for the Lottia gigantea innexin genes used in this report (DOC 51 kb)

References

  1. Altun ZF, Chen B, Wang ZW, Hall DH (2009) High resolution map of Caenorhabditis elegans gap junction proteins. Dev Dyn 238:1936–1950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babenko VN, Rogozin IB, Mekhedov SL, Koonin EV (2004) Prevalence of intron gain over intron loss in the evolution of paralogous gene families. Nucleic Acids Res 32:3724–3733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer R, Lehmann C, Martini J, Eckardt F, Hoch M (2004) Gap junction channel protein innexin 2 is essential for epithelial morphogenesis in the Drosophila embryo. Mol Biol Cell 15(6):2992–3004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer R, Löer B, Ostrowski K, Martini J, Weimbs A, Lechner H, Hoch M (2005) Intercellular communication: the Drosophila innexin family of gap junctional proteins. Chem Biol 12:515–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Ari Y (2001) Developing networks play a similar melody. Trends Neurosci 24:353–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bevans CG, Kordel M, Rhee SK, Harris AL (1998) Isoform composition of connexin channels determines selectivity among second messengers and uncharged molecules. J Biol Chem 273:2808–2816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blankenship AG, Feller MB (2010) Mechanisms underlying spontaneous patterned activity in developing neural circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:18–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borda E, Siddall ME (2004) Arhynchobdellida (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Hirudinida): phylogenetic relationships and evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol 30:213–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang Q, Gonzalez M, Pinter MJ, Balice-Gordon RJ (1999) Gap junctional coupling and patterns of connexin expression among neonatal rat lumbar spinal motor neurons. J Neurosci 19:10813–10828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cina C, Maass K, Theis M, Willecke K, Bechberger JF, Naus CC (2010) Involvement of the cytoplasmic C-terminal domain of connexin43 in neuronal migration. J Neurosci 29:2009–2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cruciani V, Mikalsen SO (2009) Evolutionary selection pressure and family relationships among connexin genes. Biol Chem 388:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curtin KD, Zhang Z, Wyman RJ (2002a) Gap junction proteins expressed during development are required for adult neural function in the Drosophila optic lamina. J Neurosci 22:7088–7096PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Curtin KD, Zhang Z, Wyman RJ (2002b) Gap junction proteins are not interchangeable in development of neural function in the Drosophila visual system. J Cell Sci 115:3379–3388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dacheux RF, Raviola E (1982) Horizontal cells in the retina of the rabbit. J Neurosci 2:1486–1493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dale N (2008) Dynamic ATP signaling and neural development. J Physiol 586:2429–2436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dykes IM, Macagno ER (2006) Molecular characterization and embryonic expression of innexins in the leech Hirudo medicinalis. Dev Genes Evol 216:185–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dykes IM, Freeman FM, Bacon JP, Davies JA (2004) Molecular basis of gap junctional communication in the CNS of the leech Hirudo medicinalis. J Neurosci 24:886–894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elias LA, Wang DD, Kriegstein AR (2007) Gap junction adhesion is necessary for radial migration in the neocortex. Nature 448:901–907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaudieri S, Leelayuwat C, Townend DC, Kulski JK, Dawkins RL (1997) Genomic characterization of the region between HLA-B and TNF: implications for the evolution of multicopy gene families. J Mol Evolut 44(Suppl 1):S147–S154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giepmans BN (2004) Gap junctions and connexin-interacting proteins. Cardiovasc Res 62:233–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodenough DA, Paul DL (2009) Gap junctions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1:a002576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris AL (2008) Connexin specificity of second messenger permeation: real numbers at last. J Gen Physiol 131:287–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herve J-C, Phelan P, Bruzzone R, White TW (2005) Connexins, innexins and pannexins: bridging the communication gap. Biochim Biophys Acta 1719:3–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jordan IK, Wolf YI, Koonin EV (2004) Duplicated genes evolve slower than singletons despite the initial rate increase. BMC Evol Biol 4:22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kandler K, Katz LC (1995) Neuronal coupling and uncoupling in the developing nervous system. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5:98–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuffler SW, Potter DD (1964) Glia in the leech central nervous system: physiological properties and neuron–glia relationship. J Neurophysiol 27:290–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lopresti V, Macagno ER, Levinthal C (1974) Structure and development of neuronal connections in isogenic organisms: transient gap junctions between growing optic axons and lamina neuroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 71:1098–1102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lynch M, Conery JS (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290:1151–1155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Macagno ER, Gaasterland T, Edsall L, Bafna V, Soares MB, Scheetz T, Casavant T, Da Silva C, Wincker P, Tasiemski A, Salzet M (2010) Construction of a medicinal leech transcriptome database and its application to the identification of leech homologs of neural and innate immune genes. BMC Genomics 25:407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maeda S, Tsukihara T (2011) Structure of the gap junction channel and its implications for its biological functions. Cell Mol Life Sci 68:1115–1129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Majoros WH, Pertea M, Salzberg SL (2004) TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders. Bioinformatics 20:2878–2879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marin-Burgin A, Eisenhart FJ, Baca SM, Kristan WB Jr, French KA (2005) Sequential development of electrical and chemical synaptic connections generates a specific behavioral circuit in the leech. J Neurosci 25:2478–2489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marin-Burgin A, Eisenhart FJ, Kristan WB Jr, French KA (2006) Embryonic electrical connections appear to pre-figure a behavioral circuit in the leech CNS. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 192:123–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muller KJ, Nicholls JG, Stent GS (1981) Neurobiology of the leech. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, p 279Google Scholar
  35. Palacios-Prado N, Bukauskas FF (2009) Heterotypic gap junction channels as voltage-sensitive valves for intercellular signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:14855–14860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Panchin YV (2005) Evolution of gap junction proteins—the pannexin alternative. J Exp Biol 208:1415–1419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Personius KE, Chang Q, Mentis GZ, O'Donovan MJ, Balice-Gordon RJ (2007) Reduced gap junctional coupling leads to uncorrelated motor neuron firing and precocious neuromuscular synapse elimination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:11808–11813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phelan P (2005) Innexins: members of an evolutionarily conserved family of gap-junction proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1711:225–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Phelan P, Goulding LA, Tam JL, Allen MJ, Dawber RJ, Davies JA, Bacon JP (2008) Molecular mechanism of rectification at identified electrical synapses in the Drosophila giant fiber system. Curr Biol 18:1955–1960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Plum A, Hallas G, Magin T, Dombrowski F, Hagendorff A, Schumacher B, Wolpert C, Kim J, Lamers WH, Evert M, Meda P, Traub O, Willecke K (2000) Unique and shared functions of different connexins in mice. Curr Biol 10:1083–1091PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reynolds SA, French KA, Baader A, Kristan WB Jr (1998a) Development of spontaneous and evoked behaviors in the medicinal leech. J Comp Neurol 402:168–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reynolds SA, French KA, Baader A, Kristan WB Jr (1998b) Staging of middle and late embryonic development in the medicinal leech, Hirudo medicinalis. J Comp Neurol 402:155–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sethi J, Zhao B, Cuvillier-Hot V, Boidin-Wichlacz C, Salzet M, Macagno ER, Baker MW (2010) The receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase HmLAR1 is up-regulated in the CNS of the adult medicinal leech following injury and is required for neuronal sprouting and regeneration. Mol Cell Neurosci 45:430–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Siddall ME, Trontelj P, Utevsky SY, Nkamany M, Macdonald KS (2007) Diverse molecular data demonstrate that commercially available medicinal leeches are not Hirudo medicinalis. Proc Biol Sci 274:1481–1487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Söhl G, Maxeiner S, Willecke K (2005) Expression and functions of neuronal gap junctions. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:191–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sosinsky GE, Boassa D, Dermietzel R, Duffy HS, Laird DW, MacVicar B, Naus CC, Penuela S, Scemes E, Spray DC, Thompson RJ, Zhao HB, Dahl G (2011) Pannexin channels are not gap junction hemichannels. Channels 5:193–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Starich T, Sheehan M, Jadrich J, Shaw J (2001) Innexins in C. elegans. Cell Commun Adhes 8:311–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N, Hartmann S, Hösel C, Kube M, Lieb B, Meyer A, Tiedemann R, Purschke G, Bleidorn C (2011) Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature 471:95–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Theis M, Söhl G, Eiberger J, Willecke K (2005) Emerging complexities in identity and function of glial connexins. Trends Neurosci 28:188–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Todd KL, Kristan WB Jr, French KA (2010) Gap junction expression is required for normal chemical synapse formation. J Neurosci 30:15277–15285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walton KD, Navarrete R (1991) Postnatal changes in motoneurone electrotonic coupling studied in the in vitro rat lumbar spinal cord. J Physiol 433:283–305PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ (2009) Jalview version 2: a multiple sequence alignment and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25:1189–1191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wenning A (1987) Salt and water regulation in Macrobdella decora (Hirudinea: Gnathobdelliformes) under osmotic stress. J Exp Biol 131:337–349Google Scholar
  54. Werner R, Levine E, Rabadan-Diehl C, Dahl G (1989) Formation of hybrid cell-cell channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:5380–5384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. White TW (2002) Unique and redundant connexin contributions to lens development. Science 295:319–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu TD, Watanabe CK (2005) GMAP: a genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics 21:1859–1875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yen MR, Saier MH (2007) Gap junctional proteins of animals: the innexin/pannexin superfamily. Biophys Mol Biol 94:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yuste R, Peinado A, Katz LC (1992) Neuronal domains in developing neocortex. Science 257:665–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang Z, Curtin KD, Sun YA, Wyman RJ (1999) Nested transcripts of gap junction gene have distinct expression patterns. J Neurobiol 40:288–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang YE, Vibranovski MD, Krinsky BH, Long M (2011) A cautionary note for retrocopy identification: DNA-based duplication of intron-containing genes significantly contributes to the origination of single exon genes. Bioinformatics 27:1749–1753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zoran MJ, Funte LR, Kater SB, Haydon PG (1993) Neuron-muscle contact changes presynaptic resting calcium set-point. Dev Biol 158:163–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brandon Kandarian
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jasmine Sethi
    • 1
    • 3
  • Allan Wu
    • 1
  • Michael Baker
    • 1
  • Neema Yazdani
    • 1
  • Eunice Kym
    • 1
    • 4
  • Alejandro Sanchez
    • 1
    • 3
  • Lee Edsall
    • 1
    • 5
  • Terry Gaasterland
    • 1
    • 5
  • Eduardo Macagno
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Mount Sinai School of MedicineOne Gustave L. Levy PlaceNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.The Scripps Research InstituteLa JollaUSA
  4. 4.UCSF Pharmacy SchoolSan FranciscoUSA
  5. 5.Marine Biology Research DivisionScripps Institution of OceanographyLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations