Advertisement

Development Genes and Evolution

, Volume 220, Issue 9–10, pp 235–250 | Cite as

Rapid evolution of a novel signalling mechanism by concerted duplication and divergence of a BMP ligand and its extracellular modulators

  • Cornelia Fritsch
  • Robert Lanfear
  • Robert P. Ray
Original Article

Abstract

Gene duplication and divergence is widely considered to be a fundamental mechanism for generating evolutionary novelties. The Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs) are a diverse family of signalling molecules found in all metazoan genomes that have evolved by duplication and divergence from a small number of ancestral types. In the fruit fly Drosophila, there are three BMPs: Decapentaplegic (Dpp) and Glass bottom boat (Gbb), which are the orthologues of vertebrate BMP2/4 and BMP5/6/7/8, respectively, and Screw (Scw), which, at the sequence level, is equally divergent from Dpp and Gbb. It has recently been shown that Scw has arisen from a duplication of Gbb in the lineage leading to higher Diptera. We show that since this duplication event, Gbb has maintained the ancestral BMP5/6/7/8 functionality while Scw has rapidly diverged. The evolution of Scw was accompanied by duplication and divergence of a suite of extracellular regulators that continue to diverge together in the higher Diptera. In addition, Scw has become restricted in its receptor specificity: Gbb proteins can signal through the Type I receptors Thick veins (Tkv) and Saxophone (Sax), while Scw signals through Sax. Thus, in a relatively short span of evolutionary time, the duplication event that gave rise to Scw produced not only a novel ligand but also a novel signalling mode that is functionally distinct from the ancestral Gbb mode. Our results demonstrate the plasticity of the BMP pathway not only in evolving new family members and new functions but also new signalling modes by redeploying key regulators in the pathway.

Keywords

Bone morphogenetic protein Drosophila Signalling Evolution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Claire Greer and James Patterson for their contributions to the early stages of this work and to the Drosophila Stock Centers, Malaria Research and Reference Reagent Resource, and the Drosophila Genome Resource Center for reagents. We are grateful to Wendy Gibson for providing Glossina morsitans, and Hazel Smith for the stalk-eyed flies Teleopsis dalmanni and Diasemopsis meigenii, Mark Wamalwa for access to the draft version of the G. morsitans genome, and Al Handler for access to the draft version of the C. capitata genome and Elio Sucena for performing the BLAST searches for Gbb and Scw. We would like to thank Hilary Ashe, Mark Dionne, Florian Maderspacher, and Stefan Thomsen for critical reading of the manuscript and to colleagues in the School of Life Sciences for helpful discussions. During the writing of this manuscript, C.F. was supported by a Wellcome Trust Programme Grant to Juan-Pablo Couso. The research was funded by grants from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/C508050/1) and Medical Research Council (G0500916) to R.P.R.

Supplementary material

427_2010_341_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.1 mb)
Supplement 1   (PDF 1.11 MB)

References

  1. Arora K, Nusslein-Volhard C (1992) Altered mitotic domains reveal fate map changes in Drosophila embryos mutant for zygotic dorsoventral patterning genes. Development 114:1003–1024PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arora K, Levine MS, O’Connor MB (1994) The screw gene encodes a ubiquitously expressed member of the TGF-beta family required for specification of dorsal cell fates in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev 8:2588–2601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballard SL, Jarolimova J, Wharton KA (2010) Gbb/BMP signaling is required to maintain energy homeostasis in Drosophila. Dev Biol 337:375–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonds M, Sands J, Poulson W, Harvey C, Von Ohlen T (2007) Genetic screen for regulators of ind expression identifies shrew as encoding a novel twisted gastrulation-like protein involved in Dpp signaling. Dev Dyn 236:3524–3531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Casillas S, Negre B, Barbadilla A, Ruiz A (2006) Fast sequence evolution of Hox and Hox-derived genes in the genus Drosophila. BMC Evol Biol 6:106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Riese MJ, Killinger MA, Hoffmann FM (1998) A genetic screen for modifiers of Drosophila decapentaplegic signaling identifies mutations in punt, Mothers against dpp and the BMP-7 homologue, 60A. Development 125:1759–1768PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dick A, Hild M, Bauer H, Imai Y, Maifeld H, Schier AF, Talbot WS, Bouwmeester T, Hammerschmidt M (2000) Essential role of Bmp7 (snailhouse) and its prodomain in dorsoventral patterning of the zebrafish embryo. Development 127:343–354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Erwin DH, Davidson EH (2002) The last common bilaterian ancestor. Development 129:3021–3032PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan YL, Postlethwait J (1999) Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151:1531–1545PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaunt MW, Miles MA (2002) An insect molecular clock dates the origin of the insects and accords with palaeontological and biogeographic landmarks. Mol Biol Evol 19:748–761PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Herpin A, Lelong C, Favrel P (2004) Transforming growth factor-beta-related proteins: an ancestral and widespread superfamily of cytokines in metazoans. Dev Comp Immunol 28:461–485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Holley SA, Jackson PD, Sasai Y, Lu B, De Robertis EM, Hoffmann FM, Ferguson EL (1995) A conserved system for dorsal-ventral patterning in insects and vertebrates involving sog and chordin. Nature 376:249–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Innis CA, Shi J, Blundell TL (2000) Evolutionary trace analysis of TGF-beta and related growth factors: implications for site-directed mutagenesis. Protein Eng 13:839–847CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Katoh Y, Katoh M (2006) Comparative integromics on BMP/GDF family. Int J Mol Med 17:951–955PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lemons D, McGinnis W (2006) Genomic evolution of Hox gene clusters. Science 313:1918–1922CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Little SC, Mullins MC (2009) Bone morphogenetic protein heterodimers assemble heteromeric type I receptor complexes to pattern the dorsoventral axis. Nat Cell Biol 11:637–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lynch M, Conery JS (2000) The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290:1151–1155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lynch M, Force A (2000) The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154:459–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. CSHL Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  21. McCabe BD, Marques G, Haghighi AP, Fetter RD, Crotty ML, Haerry TE, Goodman CS, O’Connor MB (2003) The BMP homolog Gbb provides a retrograde signal that regulates synaptic growth at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Neuron 39:241–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. McGregor AP (2005) How to get ahead: the origin, evolution and function of bicoid. Bioessays 27:904–913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Neul JL, Ferguson EL (1998) Spatially restricted activation of the SAX receptor by SCW modulates DPP/TKV signaling in Drosophila dorsal-ventral patterning. Cell 95:483–494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Newfeld SJ, Wisotzkey RG, Kumar S (1999) Molecular evolution of a developmental pathway: phylogenetic analyses of transforming growth factor-beta family ligands, receptors and Smad signal transducers. Genetics 152:783–795PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nguyen M, Park S, Marques G, Arora K (1998) Interpretation of a BMP activity gradient in Drosophila embryos depends on synergistic signaling by two type I receptors, SAX and TKV. Cell 95:495–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Connor MB, Umulis D, Othmer HG, Blair SS (2006) Shaping BMP morphogen gradients in the Drosophila embryo and pupal wing. Development 133:183–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pirrotta V (1988) Vectors for P-element transformation in Drosophila. In: Rodriguez RL, Denhardt DT (eds) Vectors: a survey of molecular cloning vectors and their uses. Butterworth, Boston, pp 437–456Google Scholar
  28. Rafiqi AM, Lemke S, Ferguson S, Stauber M, Schmidt-Ott U (2008) Evolutionary origin of the amnioserosa in cyclorrhaphan flies correlates with spatial and temporal expression changes of zen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:234–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Raftery AE (1996) Hypothesis testing and model selection. In: Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ (eds) Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 163–188Google Scholar
  30. Rawson JM, Lee M, Kennedy EL, Selleck SB (2003) Drosophila neuromuscular synapse assembly and function require the TGF-beta type I receptor saxophone and the transcription factor Mad. J Neurobiol 55:134–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ray RP, Wharton KA (2001) Context-dependent relationships between the BMPs gbb and dpp during development of the Drosophila wing imaginal disk. Development 128:3913–3925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ronquist F, van der Mark P, Huelsenbeck JP (2009) Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using MRBAYES. In: Lemey P, Salemi M, Vandamme A-M (eds) The phylogenetic handbook. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Serpe M, Ralston A, Blair SS, O’Connor MB (2005) Matching catalytic activity to developmental function: tolloid-related processes Sog in order to help specify the posterior crossvein in the Drosophila wing. Development 132:2645–2656CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Shimmi O, O’Connor MB (2003) Physical properties of Tld, Sog, Tsg and Dpp protein interactions are predicted to help create a sharp boundary in Bmp signals during dorsoventral patterning of the Drosophila embryo. Development 130:4673–4682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shimmi O, Ralston A, Blair SS, O’Connor MB (2005a) The crossveinless gene encodes a new member of the Twisted gastrulation family of BMP-binding proteins which, with Short gastrulation, promotes BMP signaling in the crossveins of the Drosophila wing. Dev Biol 282:70–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Shimmi O, Umulis D, Othmer H, O’Connor MB (2005b) Facilitated transport of a Dpp/Scw heterodimer by Sog/Tsg leads to robust patterning of the Drosophila blastoderm embryo. Cell 120:873–886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Singer MA, Penton A, Twombly V, Hoffmann FM, Gelbart WM (1997) Signaling through both type I DPP receptors is required for anterior-posterior patterning of the entire Drosophila wing. Development 124:79–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Suchard MA, Weiss RE, Sinsheimer JS (2001) Bayesian selection of continuous-time Markov chain evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol 18:1001–1013PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Twombly V, Bangi E, Le V, Malnic B, Singer MA, Wharton KA (2009) Functional analysis of saxophone, the Drosophila gene encoding the BMP type I receptor ortholog of human ALK1/ACVRL1 and ACVR1/ALK2. Genetics 183:563–579, 1SI-8SICrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Van der Zee M, da Fonseca RN, Roth S (2008) TGFbeta signaling in Tribolium: vertebrate-like components in a beetle. Dev Genes Evol 218:203–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Vilmos P, Sousa-Neves R, Lukacsovich T, Marsh JL (2005) crossveinless defines a new family of Twisted-gastrulation-like modulators of bone morphogenetic protein signalling. EMBO Rep 6:262–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wharton KA, Thomsen GH, Gelbart WM (1991) Drosophila 60A gene, another transforming growth factor beta family member, is closely related to human bone morphogenetic proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:9214–9218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wharton KA, Cook JM, Torres-Schumann S, de Castro K, Borod E, Phillips DA (1999) Genetic analysis of the bone morphogenetic protein-related gene, gbb, identifies multiple requirements during Drosophila development. Genetics 152:629–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Whelan S, Goldman N (2001) A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol 18:691–699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang Z (2007) PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24:1586–1591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang Z, Nielsen R, Goldman N, Pedersen AM (2000) Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Yeates DK, Wiegmann BM (1999) Congruence and controversy: toward a higher-level phylogeny of Diptera. Annu Rev Entomol 44:397–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang J (2003) Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Tends in Ecology and Evolution 18:292–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cornelia Fritsch
    • 1
  • Robert Lanfear
    • 2
  • Robert P. Ray
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Life SciencesUniversity of SussexBrightonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Centre for Macroevolution and Macroecology, Ecology Evolution and Genetics, Research School of BiologyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations