Rapid evolution of a novel signalling mechanism by concerted duplication and divergence of a BMP ligand and its extracellular modulators
- 307 Downloads
Gene duplication and divergence is widely considered to be a fundamental mechanism for generating evolutionary novelties. The Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs) are a diverse family of signalling molecules found in all metazoan genomes that have evolved by duplication and divergence from a small number of ancestral types. In the fruit fly Drosophila, there are three BMPs: Decapentaplegic (Dpp) and Glass bottom boat (Gbb), which are the orthologues of vertebrate BMP2/4 and BMP5/6/7/8, respectively, and Screw (Scw), which, at the sequence level, is equally divergent from Dpp and Gbb. It has recently been shown that Scw has arisen from a duplication of Gbb in the lineage leading to higher Diptera. We show that since this duplication event, Gbb has maintained the ancestral BMP5/6/7/8 functionality while Scw has rapidly diverged. The evolution of Scw was accompanied by duplication and divergence of a suite of extracellular regulators that continue to diverge together in the higher Diptera. In addition, Scw has become restricted in its receptor specificity: Gbb proteins can signal through the Type I receptors Thick veins (Tkv) and Saxophone (Sax), while Scw signals through Sax. Thus, in a relatively short span of evolutionary time, the duplication event that gave rise to Scw produced not only a novel ligand but also a novel signalling mode that is functionally distinct from the ancestral Gbb mode. Our results demonstrate the plasticity of the BMP pathway not only in evolving new family members and new functions but also new signalling modes by redeploying key regulators in the pathway.
KeywordsBone morphogenetic protein Drosophila Signalling Evolution
The authors would like to thank Claire Greer and James Patterson for their contributions to the early stages of this work and to the Drosophila Stock Centers, Malaria Research and Reference Reagent Resource, and the Drosophila Genome Resource Center for reagents. We are grateful to Wendy Gibson for providing Glossina morsitans, and Hazel Smith for the stalk-eyed flies Teleopsis dalmanni and Diasemopsis meigenii, Mark Wamalwa for access to the draft version of the G. morsitans genome, and Al Handler for access to the draft version of the C. capitata genome and Elio Sucena for performing the BLAST searches for Gbb and Scw. We would like to thank Hilary Ashe, Mark Dionne, Florian Maderspacher, and Stefan Thomsen for critical reading of the manuscript and to colleagues in the School of Life Sciences for helpful discussions. During the writing of this manuscript, C.F. was supported by a Wellcome Trust Programme Grant to Juan-Pablo Couso. The research was funded by grants from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/C508050/1) and Medical Research Council (G0500916) to R.P.R.
- Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. CSHL Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
- Pirrotta V (1988) Vectors for P-element transformation in Drosophila. In: Rodriguez RL, Denhardt DT (eds) Vectors: a survey of molecular cloning vectors and their uses. Butterworth, Boston, pp 437–456Google Scholar
- Raftery AE (1996) Hypothesis testing and model selection. In: Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ (eds) Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 163–188Google Scholar
- Ronquist F, van der Mark P, Huelsenbeck JP (2009) Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using MRBAYES. In: Lemey P, Salemi M, Vandamme A-M (eds) The phylogenetic handbook. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar