Developmental expression of homeobox genes in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi
Homeobox genes are a large family of genes that encode helix–turn–helix transcription factors that play fundamental roles in such developmental processes including body axis formation and cell specification. They have been found in a wide variety of organisms, from fungi to plants and animals, with some classes being specific to the Metazoa. While it was once thought that organismal complexity was tied to gene complexity, sequencing of genomes from a cnidarian, poriferan, and placozoan have shown no clear correlation. However, little attention has been paid to ctenophores, another early branching taxon. Ctenophores are mostly pelagic marine animals, with complex morphological features, so understanding the gene content and expression of this nonbilaterian phylum is of key interest to evolutionary biology. Expression information from developmental genes in ctenophores is sparse. In this study, we isolated seven homeobox genes from the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and examined their expression through development. Phylogenetic analyses of these genes placed four in the ANTP class and three in the PRD class. These are the first reported full-length PRD class genes, although our analyses could not place them into specific families. We have found that most of these homeobox genes begin expression at gastrulation, and their expression patterns suggest a possible role in patterning of the tentacle apparati and pharynx.
KeywordsHomeobox Ctenophore Metazoan evolution
The authors would like to thank Andreas Hejnol, Eric Röttinger, and two anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved this manuscript. We also thank David Q. Matus for assistance in phylogenetic analyses and Atsuko Yamada and students from the Embryology course for helping to collect animals. Without the support of the Marine Biological Laboratory (Woods Hole, MA, USA), this work could not have been done. This work was supported by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program to K.P. and grants from NASA and NSF to M.Q.M.
- Ax P (1996) Multicellular animals: a new approach to the phylogenetic order in nature. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Chun C (1880) Die Ctenophoren des Golfes von Neapel und der angrenzenden Meeres-Abschnitte. In: Fauna und Flora des Golfes Neapel, vol 1. Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 1–311Google Scholar
- Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, Smith SA, Seaver E, Rouse GW, Obst M, Edgecombe GD, Sorensen MV, Haddock SHD, Schmidt-Rhaesa A, Okusu A, Kristensen RM, Wheeler WC, Martindale MQ, Giribet G (2008) Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452:745–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez-Nicaise M-L (1991) Ctenophora. In: Harrison FW, Westfall JA (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates: Placozoa, Porifera, Cnidaria and Ctenophora. vol. 2. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 359–418Google Scholar
- Hyman LH (1940) The invertebrates: protozoa through Ctenophora. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Metschnikoff E (1885) Vergleichend-embryologische Studien. IV. Ueber die gastrulation und mesodermbildung der Ctenophoren. Z Wiss Zool 42:648–656Google Scholar
- Putnam NH, Srivastava M, Hellsten U, Dirks B, Chapman J, Salamov A, Terry A, Shapiro H, Lindquist E, Kapitonov VV, Jurka J, Genikhovich G, Grigoriev IV, Lucas SM, Steele RE, Finnerty JR, Technau U, Martindale MQ, Rokhsar DS (2007) Sea anemone genome reveals ancestral eumetazoan gene repertoire and genomic organization. Science 317:86–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reverberi G, Ortolani G (1965) The development of the ctenophores egg. Riv Biol 58:113–137Google Scholar