Development Genes and Evolution

, Volume 217, Issue 6, pp 421–433 | Cite as

Segmental expression of Pax3/7 and Engrailed homologs in tardigrade development

Original Article

Abstract

How morphological diversity arises through evolution of gene sequence is a major question in biology. In Drosophila, the genetic basis for body patterning and morphological segmentation has been studied intensively. It is clear that some of the genes in the Drosophila segmentation program are functioning similarly in certain other taxa, although many questions remain about when these gene functions arose and which taxa use these genes similarly to establish diverse body plans. Tardigrades are an outgroup to arthropods in the Ecdysozoa and, as such, can provide insight into how gene functions have evolved among the arthropods and their close relatives. We developed immunostaining methods for tardigrade embryos, and we used cross-reactive antibodies to investigate the expression of homologs of the pair-rule gene paired (Pax3/7) and the segment polarity gene engrailed in the tardigrade Hypsibius dujardini. We find that in H. dujardini embryos, Pax3/7 protein localizes not in a pair-rule pattern but in a segmentally iterated pattern, after the segments are established, in regions of the embryo where neurons later arise. Engrailed protein localizes in the posterior ectoderm of each segment before ectodermal segmentation is apparent. Together with previous results from others, our data support the conclusions that the pair-rule function of Pax3/7 is specific to the arthropods, that some of the ancient functions of Pax3/7 and Engrailed in ancestral bilaterians may have been in neurogenesis, and that Engrailed may have a function in establishing morphological boundaries between segments that is conserved at least among the Panarthropoda.

Keywords

Engrailed Pax3/7 Ecdysozoa Segmentation Development 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Greg Wray, Nipam Patel, and members of the Goldstein lab for discussions and comments on the manuscript and Nipam Patel for generously sharing cross-reactive antibodies. This work was funded by NSF grant IBN-0235658 to BG.

Supplementary material

427_2007_152_MOESM1_ESM.mov (5.5 mb)
Supplementary file 1 Confocal stack of Pax3/7 stained embryo at the stage when there are approximately 40 nuclei with Pax3/7 localization in the developing head region. Green is Pax3/7, and purple is DNA. Film starts from the head region (MOV 5 mb)
427_2007_152_MOESM2_ESM.mov (82.7 mb)
Supplementary file 2 Confocal stack of Pax3/7 stained embryo at the stage when there are approximately 60 nuclei with Pax3/7 localization in the developing head region. Green is Pax3/7, and purple is DNA. Film starts from the head region (MOV 86 mb)
427_2007_152_MOESM3_ESM.mov (29.1 mb)
Supplementary file 3 Confocal stack of a lateral view of an Engrailed stained embryo at the stage when Engrailed localizes to stripes of cells at the posterior of each ectodermal segment. Green is Pax3/7, and purple is DNA (MOV 30 mb)
427_2007_152_Fig1_ESM.gif (289 kb)
Supplementary file 4

Individual confocal sections of the Pax3/7 stained embryo in S1. Anteriormost sections are upper left (GIF 295 kb)

427_2007_152_Fig1_ESM.tif (13.3 mb)
High resolution image file (TIF 13 kb)
427_2007_152_Fig2_ESM.gif (517 kb)
Supplementary file 5

Individual confocal sections of the Pax3/7 stained embryo in S2. Anteriormost sections are upper left (GIF 529 kb)

427_2007_152_Fig2_ESM.tif (26.6 mb)
High resolution image file (TIF 27 mb)
427_2007_152_Fig3_ESM.gif (376 kb)
Supplementary file 6

Individual confocal sections of the Engrailed stained embryo in S3. Left-most side of embryo sections are upper left (GIF 385 kb)

427_2007_152_Fig3_ESM.tif (31.5 mb)
High resolution image file (TIF 33 mb)
Supplementary file 7

Film of complete z-stack of DAPI-stained embryo just as endomesodermal pouches are forming. A–P and D–V are labeled in the film. Yellow arrowheads point to the four pouches that are visible in the embryo at this time. The two posterior-most pouches are completely enclosed, and the two anterior-most pouches are incompletely enclosed in this embryo (MOV 756 kb)

References

  1. Baylies MK, Martinez Arias A, Bate M (1995) wingless is required for the formation of a subset of muscle founder cells during Drosophila embryogenesis. Development 121:3829–3837PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bely AE, Wray GA (2001) Evolution of regeneration and fission in annelids: sights from engrailed- and orthodenticle-class gene expression. Development 128:2781–2791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhat KM, Schedl P (1997) Requirement for engrailed and invected genes reveals novel regulatory interactions between engrailed/invected, patched, gooseberry an wingless during Drosophila neurogenesis. Development 124:1675–1688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Budd GE (2001) Why are arthropods segmented? Evol Dev 3:332–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chipman AD, Arthur W, Akam M (2004) A double segment periodicity underlies segment generation in centipede development. Curr Biol 14:1250–1255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis GK, Patel NH (2003) Playing by pair-rules? Bioessays 25:425–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis GK, Jaramillo CA, Patel NH (2001) Pax group III genes and the evolution of insect pair-rule patterning. Development 128:3445–3458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis GK, D’Alessio JA, Patel NH (2005) Pax3/7 genes reveal conservation and divergence in the arthropod segmentation hierarchy. Dev Biol 285:169–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawes R, Dawson I, Falciani F, Tear G, Akam M (1994) Dax, a locust Hox gene related to fushi-tarazu but showing no pair-rule expression. Development 120:1561–1572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dearden PK, Donly C, Grbic M (2002) Expression of pair-rule gene homologues in a chelicerate: early patterning of the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Development 129:5461–5472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DiNardo S, O’Farrell PH (1987) Establishment and refinement of segmental pattern in the Drosophila embryo: spatial control of engrailed expression by pair-rule genes. Genes Dev 1:1212–1225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. DiNardo S, Kuner JM, Theis J, O’Farrell PH (1985) Development of embryonic pattern in D. melanogaster as revealed by accumulation of the nuclear engrailed protein. Cell 43:59–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eibye-Jacobsen J (1996) New observations on the embryology of the Tardigrada. Zool Anz 235:201–216Google Scholar
  14. Eriksson BJ, Larson ET, Thornquist P, Tait NN, Budd GE (2005) Expression of engrailed in the developing brain and appendages of the onychophoran Euperipatoides kangaransis (Reid). J Exp Zool 304B:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frasch M, Hoey T, Rushlow C, Doyle H, Levine M (1987) Characterization and localization of the Even-skipped protein of Drosophila. EMBO J 6:749–759PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman G (2003) Regional specification during embryogenesis in Rhynchonelliform brachiopods. Dev Biol 261:268–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garey JR (2001) Ecdysozoa: the relationship between the cycloneuralia and panarthropoda. Zool Anz 240:321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garey JR, Nelson DR, Mackey LY, Li J (1999) Tardigrade phylogeny: congruency of morphological and molecular evidence. Zool Anz 238:205–210Google Scholar
  19. Gutjahr T, Patel NH, Li X, Goodman CS, Noll M (1993) Analysis of the gooseberry locus in Drosophila embryos: gooseberry determines the cuticular pattern and activates gooseberry neuro. Development 118:21–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Haase A, Stern M, Wachtler K, Bicker G (2001) A tissue-specific marker of Ecdysozoa. Dev Genes Evol 211:428–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Halanych KM (2004) The new view of animal phylogeny. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 35:9–256Google Scholar
  22. Hejnol A, Schnabel R (2005) The eutardigrade Thulinia stephaniae has an indeterminate development and the potential to regulate early blastomere ablations. Development 132:1349–1361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes CL, Kaufman TC (2002) Exploring myriapod segmentation: the expression patterns of even-skipped, engrailed, and wingless in a centipede. Dev Biol 247:47–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Imai K, Takada N, Satoh N, Satou Y (2000) (beta)-catenin mediates the specification of endoderm cells in ascidian embryos. Development 127:3009–3020PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ingham PW (1991) Segment polarity genes and cell patterning within the Drosophila body segment. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1:261–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobs DK, Wray CG, Wedeen CJ, Kostriken R, DeSalle R, Staton JL, Gates RD, Lindberg DR (2000) Molluscan engrailed expression, serial organization, and shell evolution. Evol Dev 2:340–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jan LY, Jan YN (1982) Antibodies to horseradish peroxidase as specific neuronal markers in Drosophila and in grasshopper embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:2700–2704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kilchherr F, Baumgartner S, Bopp D, Frie E, Noll M (1986) Isolation of the paired gene of Drosophila and its spatial expression during early embryogenesis. Nature 321:493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koblar SA, Murphy M, Barrett GL, Underhill A, Gros P, Bartlett PF (1999) Pax-3 regulates neurogenesis in neural crest-derived precursor cells. J Neurosci Res 56:518–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kornberg T (1981) Engrailed: a gene controlling compartment and segment formation in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:1095–1099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Larsen CW, Hirst E, Alexandre C, Vincent JP (2003) Segment boundary formation in Drosophila embryos. Development 130:5625–5635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lowe CJ, Wray GA (1997) Radical alterations in the roles of homeobox genes during echinoderm evolution. Nature 389:718–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Macdonald PM, Ingham P, Struhl G (1986) Isolation, structure, and expression of even-skipped: a second pair-rule gene of Drosophila containing a homeo box. Cell 47:721–734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manzanares M, Marco R, Garesse R (1993) Genomic organization and developmental pattern of expression of the engrailed gene from the brine shrimp Artemia. Development 118:1209–1219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Marcus E (1929) Zur Embryologie der Tardigraden. Zool Jb Anat 50:333–384Google Scholar
  36. Minelli A, Fusco G (2004) Evo–devo perspectives on segmentation: model organisms, and beyond. TREE 19:424–429Google Scholar
  37. Müller M, v Weizsäcker E, Campos-Ortega JA (1996) Expression domains of a zebrafish homologue of the Drosophila pair-rule gene hairy correspond to primordia of alternating somites. Development 122:2071–2078PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nielsen C (1995) Animal evolution: interrelationships of the living phyla. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, NYGoogle Scholar
  39. Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E (1980) Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287:795–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Patel NH, Martin-Blanco E, Coleman KG, Poole SJ, Ellis MC, Kornberg TB, Goodman CS (1989) Expression of Engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids, and chordates. Cell 58:955–968PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patel NH, Ball EE, Goodman CS (1992) Changing role of even-skipped during the evolution of insect pattern formation. Nature 357:339–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pilato G, Guidetti R, Rebecchi L, Lisi O, Hansen JG, Bertolani R (2006) Geonemy, ecology, reproductive biology and morphology of the tardigrade Hypsibius zetlandicus (Eutardigrada: Hypsibiidae) with erection of Borealibius gen. n. Polar Biol 29:595–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prud’homme B, de Rosa R, Arendt D, Julien JF, Pajaziti R, Dorresteijn AW, Adoutte A, Wittbrodt J, Balavoine G (2003) Arthropod-like expression patterns of engrailed and wingless in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii suggest a role in segment formation. Curr Biol 13:1876–1881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seaver EC (2003) Segmentation: mono- or polyphyletic? Int J Dev Biol 47:583–595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Seaver EC, Shankland M (2001) Establishment of segment polarity in the ectoderm of the leech Helobdella. Development 128:1629–1641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Seaver EC, Paulson DA, Irvine SQ, Martindale MQ (2001) The spatial and temporal expression of Ch-en, the engrailed gene in the polychaete Chaetopterus, does not support a role in body axis segmentation. Dev Biol 236:195–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shain DH, Stuart DK, Huang FZ, Weisblat DA (2000) Segmentation of the central nervous system in leech. Development 127:735–744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Siddiqui SS, Babu P (1980) Kynurenine hydroxylase mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Gen Genet 179:21–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tautz D (2004) Segmentation. Dev Cell 7:301–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wedeen CJ, Weisblat DA (1991) Segmental expression of an engrailed-class gene during early development and neurogenesis in an annelid. Development 113:805–814PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wedeen CJ, Kostriken R, Leach D, Whitington P (1997) Segmentally iterated expression of an engrailed-class gene in the embryo of an Australian onychophoran. Dev Genes Evol 270:282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Whittaker JR (1977) Determination of alkaline phosphatase expression in endodermal cell lineages of an ascidian embryo. J Exp Zool 202:139–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biology DepartmentUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations