Segmental expression of Pax3/7 and Engrailed homologs in tardigrade development
- 737 Downloads
How morphological diversity arises through evolution of gene sequence is a major question in biology. In Drosophila, the genetic basis for body patterning and morphological segmentation has been studied intensively. It is clear that some of the genes in the Drosophila segmentation program are functioning similarly in certain other taxa, although many questions remain about when these gene functions arose and which taxa use these genes similarly to establish diverse body plans. Tardigrades are an outgroup to arthropods in the Ecdysozoa and, as such, can provide insight into how gene functions have evolved among the arthropods and their close relatives. We developed immunostaining methods for tardigrade embryos, and we used cross-reactive antibodies to investigate the expression of homologs of the pair-rule gene paired (Pax3/7) and the segment polarity gene engrailed in the tardigrade Hypsibius dujardini. We find that in H. dujardini embryos, Pax3/7 protein localizes not in a pair-rule pattern but in a segmentally iterated pattern, after the segments are established, in regions of the embryo where neurons later arise. Engrailed protein localizes in the posterior ectoderm of each segment before ectodermal segmentation is apparent. Together with previous results from others, our data support the conclusions that the pair-rule function of Pax3/7 is specific to the arthropods, that some of the ancient functions of Pax3/7 and Engrailed in ancestral bilaterians may have been in neurogenesis, and that Engrailed may have a function in establishing morphological boundaries between segments that is conserved at least among the Panarthropoda.
KeywordsEngrailed Pax3/7 Ecdysozoa Segmentation Development
We thank Greg Wray, Nipam Patel, and members of the Goldstein lab for discussions and comments on the manuscript and Nipam Patel for generously sharing cross-reactive antibodies. This work was funded by NSF grant IBN-0235658 to BG.
Film of complete z-stack of DAPI-stained embryo just as endomesodermal pouches are forming. A–P and D–V are labeled in the film. Yellow arrowheads point to the four pouches that are visible in the embryo at this time. The two posterior-most pouches are completely enclosed, and the two anterior-most pouches are incompletely enclosed in this embryo (MOV 756 kb)
- Eibye-Jacobsen J (1996) New observations on the embryology of the Tardigrada. Zool Anz 235:201–216Google Scholar
- Garey JR, Nelson DR, Mackey LY, Li J (1999) Tardigrade phylogeny: congruency of morphological and molecular evidence. Zool Anz 238:205–210Google Scholar
- Halanych KM (2004) The new view of animal phylogeny. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 35:9–256Google Scholar
- Marcus E (1929) Zur Embryologie der Tardigraden. Zool Jb Anat 50:333–384Google Scholar
- Minelli A, Fusco G (2004) Evo–devo perspectives on segmentation: model organisms, and beyond. TREE 19:424–429Google Scholar
- Nielsen C (1995) Animal evolution: interrelationships of the living phyla. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, NYGoogle Scholar
- Prud’homme B, de Rosa R, Arendt D, Julien JF, Pajaziti R, Dorresteijn AW, Adoutte A, Wittbrodt J, Balavoine G (2003) Arthropod-like expression patterns of engrailed and wingless in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii suggest a role in segment formation. Curr Biol 13:1876–1881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar