Development Genes and Evolution

, Volume 217, Issue 1, pp 13–27

Germ-cell cluster formation in the telotrophic meroistic ovary of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera, Polyphaga, Tenebrionidae) and its implication on insect phylogeny

Original Article


Tribolium castaneum has telotrophic meroistic ovarioles of the Polyphaga type. During larval stages, germ cells multiply in a first mitotic cycle forming many small, irregularly branched germ-cell clusters which colonize between the anterior and posterior somatic tissues in each ovariole. Because germ-cell multiplication is accompanied by cluster splitting, we assume a very low number of germ cells per ovariole at the beginning of ovariole development. In the late larval and early pupal stages, we found programmed cell death of germ-cell clusters that are located in anterior and middle regions of the ovarioles. Only those clusters survive that rest on posterior somatic tissue. The germ cells that are in direct contact with posterior somatic cells transform into morphologically distinct pro-oocytes. Intercellular bridges interconnecting pro-oocytes are located posteriorly and are filled with fusomes that regularly fuse to form polyfusomes. Intercellular bridges connecting pro-oocytes to pro-nurse cells are always positioned anteriorly and contain small fusomal plugs. During pupal stages, a second wave of metasynchronous mitoses is initiated by the pro-oocytes, leading to linear subclusters with few bifurcations. We assume that the pro-oocytes together with posterior somatic cells build the center of determination and differentiation of germ cells throughout the larval, pupal, and adult stages. The early developmental pattern of germ-cell multiplication is highly similar to the events known from the telotrophic ovary of the Sialis type. We conclude that among the common ancestors of Neuropterida and Coleoptera, a telotrophic meroistic ovary of the Sialis type evolved, which still exists in Sialidae, Raphidioptera, and a myxophagan Coleoptera family, the Hydroscaphidae. Consequently, the telotrophic ovary of the Polyphaga type evolved from the Sialis type.


Tribolium Cluster formation Insect Phylogeny Oogenesis 

Supplementary material

427_2006_114_Fig8_ESM.jpg (191 kb)
Supplementary Fig. S1

Pro-oocytes are connected by transverse bridges. a Part of section 97 showing that part of the germarial region in which pro-oocytes nest on the posterior somatic tissue (pS). Pro-oocytes are connected to each other by eccentrically localized intercellular bridges next to posterior somatic tissue. Huge areas of fusomal material stretch between neighboring bridges. All pro-oocytes are apparently larger than any other germ cell found in anterior regions. Lateral germ cells are bordered by inner sheath cells (iS), while germ cells of interior regions border each other or some rare somatic interstitial cells (not shown). b The drawing from the original section 97 shows pro-oocytes (numbered, magenta), and, in addition, the connections to pronurse cells (lighter magenta) depicted from other sections nearby. These bridges are shown in dark red as well as all fusomal regions (dark red stippling) of the nearby sections. b The drawing shows all germ cells of the posterior region of the germarium of section 97. Numbers written in pro-oocytes (magenta) refer to the numbers given in Fig. 5. Most of the pro-oocytes are directly connected to each other by intercellular bridges (thickened lines). Four pro-oocytes are connected to pronurse cells (lighter magenta) by intercellular bridges. Fusomal areas are shown by colored dots. A polyfusome stretches through most of the pro-oocyte–pro-oocyte intercellular bridges. The pro-oocyte–pronurse-cell intercellular bridges are filled with smaller fusomal areas. All intercellular bridges as well as those parts of the fusomes that can be seen on section 97 are drawn in lighter magenta, while all the intercellular bridges as well as those parts of the fusomes that can be seen on nearby sections are drawn in dark red (JPG 195 428 kb)


  1. Atkins DM (1963) The Cupedidae of the world. Can Entemol 95:140–162Google Scholar
  2. Berghammer A, Klingler M, Wimmer EA (1999) A universal marker for transgenic insects. Nature 402:370–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bucher G, Scholten J, Klingler M (2002) Parental RNAi in Tribolium (Coleoptera). Curr Biol 12:R85–R86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Büning J (1972) Untersuchungen am Ovar von Bruchidius obtectus Say. (Coleoptera–Polyphaga) zur Klärung des Oocytenwachstums in der Prävitellogenese. Z Zellforsch 128:241–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Büning J (1978) Development of telotrophic-meroistic ovarioles of polyphage beetles with special reference to the formation of nutritive cords. J Morphol 156:237–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Büning J (1979a) The trophic tissue of telotrophic ovarioles in polyphage Coleoptera. Zoomorphologie 93:33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Büning J (1979b) The trophic tissue of telotrophic ovarioles in polyphage Coleoptera. Zoomorphologie 93:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Büning J (1979c) The telotrophic-meroistic ovary of Megaloptera I. The ontogenetic development. J Morphol 162:37–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Büning J (1980) The ovary of Rhaphidia flavipes is telotrophic and of the Sialis type. Zoomorphologie 95:127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Büning J (1985) Morphology, ultrastructure, and germ cell cluster formation in ovarioles of aphids. J Morphol 186:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Büning J (1994) The insect ovary: ultrastructure, previtellogenic growth and evolution. Chapman and Hall, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Büning J (1998) The ovariole: structure, type, and phylogeny. In: Harrison FW, Locke M (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, vol. 11C. Insecta. Wiley, New York, pp 957–993Google Scholar
  13. Büning J (2005) The telotrophic ovary known from Neuropterida exists also in the myxophagan beetle Hydroscapha natans. Dev Genes Evol 215:597–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crowson RA (1981) The biology of the Coleoptera. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. de Cuevas M, Spradling AC (1998) The morphogenesis of the Drosophila fusome and its implications for oocyte specification. Development 125:2781–2789PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Deng W, Lin H (1997) Spectrosomes and fusomes anchor mitotic spindles during asymmetric germ cell divisions and facilitate the formation of a polarized microtubule array for oocyte specification in Drosophila. Dev Biol 189:79–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giardina A (1901) Origine dell’oocite e delle cellule nutrici nel Dytiscus. Internationale Monatsschrift für Anatomie und Physiologie 18:417–477Google Scholar
  18. Gottanka J, Büning J (1993) Mayflies (Ephemeroptera), the most “primitive” winged insects, have telotrophic meroistic ovaries. Roux’s Arch Dev Biol 203:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grieder NC, de Cuevas M, Spradling AC (2000) The fusome organizes the microtubule network during oocyte differentiation in Drosophila. Development 127:4253–4264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gruzova MN (1979a) Nuclear structure in telotrophic ovarioles of the darkling beetles. I. Trophocytes of Blaps lethifera (Tenebrionidae, Polyphaga) (light and electron microscope data). Ontogenez 10:13–23Google Scholar
  21. Gruzova MN (1979b) Nuclear structure in telotrophic ovarioles of the nocturnal ground beetles. III. The nucleus of oocytes. Electron microscope data. Ontogenez 10:332–339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris MP, Hasso SM, Ferguson MWJ, Fallon JF (2006) The development of archosaurian first-generation teeth in a chicken mutant. Curr Biol 16:371–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hörnschemeyer T (1998) Morphologie und Evolution des Flügelgelenks der Coleoptera und Neuroptera. Bonner Zool Monogr 43:1–126Google Scholar
  24. Huebner E, Anderson E (1972) A cytological study of the ovary of Rhodnius prolixus. III. Cytoarchitecture and development of the trophic chamber. J Morphol 138:1–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huebner E, Diehl-Jones W (1998) Developmental biology of insect ovaries: germ cells and nurse cell oocyte polarity. In: Harrison FW, Locke M (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, vol. 11C. Insecta. Wiley, New York, pp 957–993Google Scholar
  26. Huynh JR, St Johnston D (2004) The origin of asymmetry: early polarisation of the Drosophila germline cyst and oocyte. Curr Biol 14:R438–R449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jedrzejowska I, Kubrakiewicz J (2004) Ovariole development in telotrophic ovaries of snake flies (Rhaphidioptera). Folia Biol 52:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. King RC (1970) Ovarian development in Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Kloc M, Matuszewski B (1977) Extrachromosomal DNA and the origin of oocytes in the telotrophic-meroistic ovary of Creophilus maxillosus (L.) (Staphylinidae, Coleoptera-Polyphaga). Wilhelm Roux’s Arch 183:351–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kozhanova NI, Pasichnik M (1979) Differentiation of oocytes and nurse cells in telotrophic ovarioles of the beetle Coccinella septempunctata. Citologija 18:824–833Google Scholar
  31. Kristensen NP (1981) Phylogeny of insect orders. Annu Rev Entomol 26:135–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kubrakiewicz J (1997) Germ cell cluster organization in polytrophic ovaries of Neuroptera. Tissue Cell 29:221–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kubrakiewicz J, Jedrzejowska I, Bilinski SM (1998) Neuropteroidea—different ovary structure in related groups. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 36:179–187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kugler J-M, Rübsam R, Trauner J, Büning J (2006) The larval development of the telotrophic meroistic ovary in the bug Dysdercus intermedius (Heteroptera, Pyrrhocoridae). Arthropod Struct Dev 35:99–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kukalova-Peck J (1991) Fossil history and the evolution of hexapod structures. In: CSIRO (ed) Insects of Australia, vol 1. pp 141–179Google Scholar
  36. Kukalova-Peck J, Lawrence JF (1993) Evolution of the hind wing in Coleoptera. Can Entemol 125:181–258Google Scholar
  37. Lin H, Yue L, Spradling AC (1994) The Drosophila fusome, a germline-specific organelle, contains membrane skeletal proteins and functions in cyst formation. Development 120:947–956PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lorenzen M, Berghammer A, Brown S, Denell R, Klingler M, Beeman R (2003) piggyBac-mediated germline transformation in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Insect Mol Biol 12:433–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matuszewski B, Ciechomski K, Nurkowska J, Kloc M (1985) The linear clusters of oogonial cells in the development of telotrophic ovarioles in polyphage Coleoptera. Roux’s Arch Dev Biol 194:462–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McGrail M, Hays TS (1997) The microtubule motor cytoplasmic dynein is required for spindle orientation during germline cell divisions and oocyte determination in Drosophila. Development 124:2409–2419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mickoleit G (1973) Über den Ovipositor der Neuropteroidea und Coleoptera und seine phylogenetische Bedeutung (Insecta, Holometabola). Z Morphol Tiere 74:37–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pavlopoulos A, Berghammer A, Averof M, Klingler M (2004) Efficient transformation of the beetle Tribolium castaneum using the Minos transposable element: quantitative and qualitative analysis of genomic integration events. Genetics 167:737–746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rohdendorf BB (1944) A new family of Coleoptera from the permian of the Urals. C R Acad Sci USSR 44:252–253Google Scholar
  44. Spradling AC (1993) Germline cysts: communes that work. Cell 72:649–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spradling AC, Drummond-Barbosa D, Kai T (2001) Stem cells find their niche. Nature 414:14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Storto P, King R (1989) The role of polyfusomes in generating branched chains of cystocytes during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev Genet 10:70–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Theurkauf W, Alberts M, Jan Y, Jongens T (1993) A central role for microtubules in the differentiation of Drosophila oocytes. Development 118:1169–1180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Telfer WH (1975) Development and physiology of the oocyte–nurse cell syncytium. Adv Insect Physiol 11:223–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ullmann SL (1973) Oogenesis in Tenebrio molitor: histological and autoradiographical observations on pupal and adult ovaries. J Embryol Exp Morphol 30:179–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Whiting MF, Bradler S, Maxwell T (2003) Loss and recovery of wings in stick insects. Nature 421:264–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yamauchi H, Yoshitake N (1982) Origin and differentiation of the oocyte-nurse cell complex in the germarium of the earwig, Anisolabis maritima Borelli (Dermaptera, Labiduridae). Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 11:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, Chair of Developmental BiologyFriedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations