Advertisement

The effects of music on spatial reasoning

  • Caterina Padulo
  • Nicola Mammarella
  • Alfredo Brancucci
  • Mario Altamura
  • Beth FairfieldEmail author
Original Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Studies on the effects of music on spatial reasoning report conflicting results. Some studies show slight effects, and others show no effects but few seem to replicate the strong findings of the first study published in Rauscher et al. Nature, 365(6447), 611–612, (1993). Nonetheless, the debate about the performance enhancing “Mozart effect” remains to be of great interest. In this study, we manipulated different physical parameters of sound traces (amplitude and frequency) to investigate whether particular dimensions may explain the enhancement effects found in spatial tasks following music listening. To this end, we asked 179 undergraduates and 183 older adults to listen to 5-min sound traces (Mozart KV 448, amplitude modulation tone, frequency modulation tone, white noise) and then complete a spatial reasoning task. In particular, results showed that repetitive frequency changes, as occurring in Mozart’s melodies or in a frequency modulation tone, enhance performance.

Notes

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CP BF AB. Performed the experiments: CP BF. Analyzed data: CP BF. Wrote the manuscript: CP BF. Discussed results and provided comments: CP BF AB NM.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors disclose no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Borella, E., Carretti, B., Grassi, M., Nucci, M., & Sciore, R. (2014). Are age-related differences between young and older adults in an affective working memory test sensitive to the music effects? Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 298.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borella, E., Carretti, B., Meneghetti, C., Carbone, E., Vincenzi, M., Madonna, J. C., & Mammarella, N. (2017). Is working memory training in older adults sensitive to music? Psychological Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0961-8.Google Scholar
  3. Bradley, M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment semantic differential manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chabris, C. F., Steele, K. M., Dalla Bella, S., Peretz, I., Dunlop, T., Dawe, L. A., et al. (1999). Prelude or requiem for the “Mozart effect”? [5] (multiple letters). Nature, 5, 6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/23608.Google Scholar
  5. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.Google Scholar
  6. Hughes, J. R. (2001). The Mozart Effect.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ebeh.2001.0250
  7. Rauscher, Frances Shaw, Gordon & Kay, K. (1995). Listening to Mozart enhances spatial-temporal reasoning: towards a neurophysiological basis. Neuroscience Letters, 185, 44–47. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a900/2d8fba8eb96d166c003c604a367ebd5b69ff.pdf. Accessed 14 Sep 2018
  8. Leng, X., Shaw, G. L., & Wright, E. L. (1990). Coding of musical structure and the trion model of cortex. Music Perception, 5, 6.  https://doi.org/10.2307/40285485.Google Scholar
  9. Lints, A., & Gadbois, S. (2003). Is listening to mozart the only way to enhance spatial reasoning? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97(3), 1163–1174.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.97.3f.1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mammarella, N., Fairfield, B., & Cornoldi, C. (2007a). Does music enhance cognitive performance in healthy older adults? The Vivaldi effect. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 19, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mammarella, N., Fairfield, B., & Cornoldi, C. (2007b). Reality monitoring and resistance to forgetting under short delay intervals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600760227.Google Scholar
  12. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.117.Google Scholar
  13. Palumbo, R., Mammarella, N., Di Domenico, A., & Fairfield, B. (2018). When and where in aging: The role of music on source monitoring. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-018-0955-4.Google Scholar
  14. Pietschnig, J., Voracek, M., & Formann, A. K. (2010). Mozart effect-Shmozart effect: a meta-analysis. Intelligence, 38, 314–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L., & Ky, C. N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365(6447), 611–612.  https://doi.org/10.1038/365611a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rideout, B. E., Dougherty, S., & Wernert, L. (1998). Effect of music on spatial performance: a test of generality. Perceptual and Motor Skills.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.86.2.512.Google Scholar
  17. Rideout, B. E., & Taylor, J. (1997a). Enhanced spatial performance following 10 minutes exposure to music: a replication. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85(1), 112–114.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.85.1.112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rideout, B. E., & Taylor, J. (1997b). Enhanced spatial performance following 10 minutes exposure to music: a replication. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85(1), 112–114.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.85.1.112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schellenberg, E. G., Nakata, T., Hunter, P. G., & Tamoto, S. (2007). Exposure to music and cognitive performance: tests of children and adults. Psychology of Music, 35(1), 5–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735607068885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Steele, K. M. (2000). Arousal and mood factors in the “mozart effect”. Perceptual and Motor Skills.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.188.Google Scholar
  21. Steele, K. M., Bass, K. E., & Crook, M. D. (1999). The mystery of the mozart effect: failure to replicate. Psychological Science, 10(4), 366–369.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thompson, W. F., Schellenberg, E. G., & Husain, G. (2001a). Arousal, mood, and the mozart effect. Psychological Science, 12(3), 248–251.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thompson, W. F., Schellenberg, E. G., & Husain, G. (2001b). Arousal, mood, and the mozart effect. Psychological Science, 12(3), 248–251.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.Google Scholar
  25. Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. Psychological Corporation. Thesis_references-Converted #317Google Scholar
  26. Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial SciencesUniversity of ChietiChietiItaly
  2. 2.CeSI-Met, University of ChietiChietiItaly
  3. 3.Psychiatry Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental MedicineUniversity of FoggiaFoggiaItaly

Personalised recommendations