Advertisement

Inducing spontaneous future thoughts in younger and older adults by priming future-oriented personal goals

  • Magda JordãoEmail author
  • Maria Salomé Pinho
  • Peggy L. St. Jacques
Original Article

Abstract

In the past 15 years, the study of spontaneous thoughts (i.e., thoughts coming to mind without intention and effort) has received increased attention. Spontaneous future thoughts (SFTs) are particularly important (e.g., in planning), yet difficult to study with regard to age differences. Two main problems arise: (1) lab tasks including word-cues induce more past than future thoughts; (2) younger adults report more spontaneous thoughts than older adults. To improve the elicitation of SFTs, we developed a future-oriented goal-related priming procedure and analyzed the extension of the goal-related priming effect in SFTs to older adults, to examine whether age-related changes in personal goals compromise the elicitation of SFTs. We also controlled for methodological factors that could influence age groups differently (including demand, retrospection, meta-awareness and instruction bias). Twenty-seven younger and 27 older adults performed a low-demand vigilance task including word-cues and were periodically stopped to describe their thoughts. The vigilance task was divided into two parts and, between them, participants performed a future-oriented goal-related priming task. An additional group of 27 younger participants performed the same procedure with a control task based on word counting. We found a significant increase in SFTs after priming in both age groups, but not in the control group, indicating that the priming manipulation was effective. This result suggests that age-related changes in personal goals do not disrupt the relation between personal goals and SFT frequency. The similar pattern of overall spontaneous thought in both age groups is also discussed considering methodological factors.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by a Ph.D. Grant (SFRH/BD/103338/2014) provided to the first author by the Foundation for Science and Technology, through the Human Capital Operating Programme, supported by the European Social Fund and national funds from the Portuguese Ministry for Science, Technology and Higher Education. The authors would like to thank Ana Carolina Artiaga, Elzbieta Campos, Lénia Amaral, Maria João Martins, Paulo Ramos and Rafaela Miranda, for their support in the data coding process, and Inês Castro Nunes for her support in the translation of the priming task.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants

All procedures carried out in this investigation with human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional ethics committee and/or with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Supplementary material

426_2019_1146_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (87 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 87 kb)
426_2019_1146_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (134 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 133 kb)

References

  1. Antrobus, J. S., Singer, J. L., & Greenberg, S. (1966). Studies in the stream of consciousness: Experimental enhancement and suppression of spontaneous cognitive processes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 399–417.Google Scholar
  2. Balota, D. A., Dolan, P. O., & Duchek, J. M. (2000). Memory changes in healthy young and older adults. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 395–410). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barreto, J., Leuschner, A., Santos, F., & Sobral, M. (2008). Escala de Depressão Geriátrica [Geriatric Depression Scale]. In Grupo de Estudos de Envelhecimento Cerebral e Demência (GEECD), Escalas e Testes na Demência (2nd edn., pp. 71–72). Lisboa: Novartis.Google Scholar
  4. Barzykowski, K., & Niedźwieńska, A. (2016). The effects of instruction on the frequency and characteristics of involuntary autobiographical memories. PLoS One, 11(6), e0157121.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157121.Google Scholar
  5. Barzykowski, K., & Niedźwieńska, A. (2018). Priming involuntary autobiographical memories in the lab. Memory, 26(2), 277–289.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1353102.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Ball, R., & Ranieri, W. F. (1996). Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories-IA and-II in psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3), 588–597.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13.Google Scholar
  7. Berntsen, D. (2009). Involuntary autobiographical memories: An introduction to the unbidden past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Berntsen, D., & Jacobsen, A. S. (2008). Involuntary (spontaneous) mental time travel into the past and future. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1093–1104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.001.Google Scholar
  9. Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2002). Emotionally charged autobiographical memories across the life span: The recall of happy, sad, traumatic and involuntary memories. Psychology and Aging, 17(4), 636–652.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.636.Google Scholar
  10. Berntsen, D., Rubin, D. C., & Salgado, S. (2015). The frequency of involuntary autobiographical memories and future thoughts in relation to daydreaming, emotional distress, and age. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 352–372.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.07.007.Google Scholar
  11. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings: Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  12. Callard, F., Smallwood, J., Golchert, J., & Margulies, D. S. (2013). The era of the wandering mind? Twenty-first century research on self-generated mental activity. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00891.Google Scholar
  13. Carstensen, L. L., & DeLiema, M. (2018). The positivity effect: A negativity bias in youth fades with age. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 7–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.07.009.Google Scholar
  14. Christoff, K. (2012). Undirected thought: Neural determinants and correlates. Brain Research, 1428, 51–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.09.060.Google Scholar
  15. Christoff, K., Irving, Z. C., Fox, K. C. R., Spreng, R. N., & Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2016). Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: A dynamic framework. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(11), 718–731.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.113.Google Scholar
  16. Cole, S. N., & Berntsen, D. (2016). Do future thoughts reflect personal goals? Current concerns and mental time travel into the past and future. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 273–284.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1044542.Google Scholar
  17. Cole, S. N., Staugaard, S. R., & Berntsen, D. (2016). Inducing involuntary and voluntary mental time travel using a laboratory paradigm. Memory and Cognition, 44(3), 376–389.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0564-9.Google Scholar
  18. Conway, M. A. (1990). Associations between autobiographical memories and concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(5), 799–812.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.5.799.Google Scholar
  19. Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107(2), 261–288.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.261.Google Scholar
  20. Cox, W. M., & Klinger, E. (2002). Motivational structure: Relationships with substance use and processes of change. Addictive Behaviors, 27(6), 925–940.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00290-3.Google Scholar
  21. Craik, F. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances (pp. 409–422). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  22. D’Argembeau, A. (2016). The role of personal goals in future-oriented mental time travel. In K. Michaelian, S. B. Klein, & K. K. Szpunar (Eds.), Seeing the future: Theoretical perspective on future-oriented mental time travel (pp. 199–214). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. D’Argembeau, A., & Mathy, A. (2011). Tracking the construction of episodic future thoughts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(2), 258–271.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022581.Google Scholar
  24. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146.Google Scholar
  25. Finnbogadóttir, H., & Berntsen, D. (2011). Involuntary and voluntary mental time travel in high and low worriers. Memory, 19(6), 625–640.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.595722.Google Scholar
  26. Finnbogadóttir, H., & Berntsen, D. (2013). Involuntary future projections are as frequent as involuntary memories, but more positive. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 272–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.014.Google Scholar
  27. Frank, D. J., Nara, B., Zavagnin, M., Touron, D. R., & Kane, M. J. (2015). Validating older adults’ reports of less mind-wandering: An examination of eye movements and dispositional influences. Psychology and Aging, 30(2), 266–278.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000031.Google Scholar
  28. Giambra, L. M. (1989). Task-unrelated thought frequency as a function of age: A laboratory study. Psychology and Aging, 4(2), 136–143.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.4.2.136.Google Scholar
  29. Giambra, L. M. (2000a). Frequency and intensity of daydreaming: Age changes and age differences from late adolescent to the old-old. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 19(3), 229–267.  https://doi.org/10.2190/xn4w-1cre-b0mh-84xt.Google Scholar
  30. Giambra, L. M. (2000b). The temporal setting, emotions, and imagery of daydreams: Age changes and age differences from late adolescent to the old-old. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 19(4), 367–413.Google Scholar
  31. Hall, S. A., Rubin, D. C., Miles, A., Davis, S. W., Wing, E. A., Cabeza, R., & Berntsen, D. (2014). The neural basis of involuntary episodic memories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(10), 2385–2399.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00633.Google Scholar
  32. Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). Deconstructing episodic memory with construction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 299–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.001.Google Scholar
  33. Irish, M. (2016). Semantic memory as the essential scaffold for future-oriented mental time travel. In K. Michaelian, S. B. Klein, & K. K. Szpunar (Eds.), Seeing the future: Theoretical perspective on future-oriented mental time travel. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Jackson, J. D., Weinstein, Y., & Balota, D. A. (2013). Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms. Frontiers in Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00742.Google Scholar
  35. Janssen, S. M. J., & Rubin, D. C. (2011). Age effects in cultural life scripts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 291–298.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1690.Google Scholar
  36. Johannessen, K. B., & Berntsen, D. (2010). Current concerns in involuntary and voluntary autobiographical memories. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 847–860.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.01.009.Google Scholar
  37. Jordano, M. L., & Touron, D. R. (2017). Priming performance-related concerns induces task-related mind-wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 55, 126–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.08.002.Google Scholar
  38. Klinger, E. (1975). Consequences of commitment to and disengagement from incentives. Psychological Review, 82(1), 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076171.Google Scholar
  39. Klinger, E. (1978). Modes of normal conscious flow. In K. S. Pope & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The stream of consciousness: Scientific investigations into the flow of human experience (pp. 225–258). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  40. Klinger, E., Koster, E. H. W., & Marchetti, I. (2018). Spontaneous thought and goal pursuit from functions such as planning to dysfunctions such as rumination. In K. Christoff & K. C. R. Fox (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of spontaneous thought: Mind-wandering, creativity, and dreaming.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190464745.013.24.
  41. Kopp, K., D’Mello, S., & Mills, C. (2015). Influencing the occurrence of mind wandering while reading. Consciousness and Cognition, 34, 52–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.003.Google Scholar
  42. Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125.Google Scholar
  43. Mace, J. H. (2005). Priming involuntary autobiographical memories. Memory, 13(8), 874–884.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210444000485.Google Scholar
  44. Mace, J. H. (2010). Understanding autobiographical remembering from a spreading activation perspective. In J. H. Mace (Ed.), The act of remembering (pp. 181–201). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. Maillet, D., & Schacter, D. L. (2016a). From mind wandering to involuntary retrieval: Age-related differences in spontaneous cognitive processes. Neuropsychologia, 80, 142–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.017.Google Scholar
  46. Maillet, D., & Schacter, D. L. (2016b). When the mind wanders: Distinguishing stimulus-dependent from stimulus-independent thoughts during incidental encoding in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31(4), 370–379.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000099.Google Scholar
  47. Maillet, D., Seli, P., & Schacter, D. L. (2017). Mind-wandering and task stimuli: Stimulus-dependent thoughts influence performance on memory tasks and are more often past- versus future-oriented. Consciousness and Cognition, 52, 55–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.04.014.Google Scholar
  48. Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). Consider it done! Plan making can eliminate the cognitive effects of unfulfilled goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 667–683.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024192.Google Scholar
  49. Mazzoni, G., Vannucci, M., & Batool, I. (2014). Manipulating cues in involuntary autobiographical memory: Verbal cues are more effective than pictorial cues. Memory and Cognition, 42(7), 1076–1085.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0420-3.Google Scholar
  50. McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 188–207.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018298.Google Scholar
  51. McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2013). Dispatching the wandering mind? Toward a laboratory method for cuing “spontaneous” off-task thought. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00570.Google Scholar
  52. McVay, J. C., Meier, M. E., Touron, D. R., & Kane, M. J. (2013). Aging ebbs the flow of thought: Adult age differences in mind wandering, executive control, and self-evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 142(1), 136–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.006.Google Scholar
  53. Mevel, K., Landeau, B., Fouquet, M., La Joie, R., Villain, N., Mézenge, F., & Chételat, G. (2013). Age effect on the default mode network, inner thoughts, and cognitive abilities. Neurobiology of Aging, 34(4), 1292–1301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.08.018.Google Scholar
  54. Mitchell, K. J., Raye, C. L., Ebner, N. C., Tubridy, S. M., Frankel, H., & Johnson, M. K. (2009). Age-group differences in medial cortex activity associated with thinking about self-relevant agendas. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 438–449.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015181.Google Scholar
  55. Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.Google Scholar
  56. Nettelbeck, T., & Burns, N. R. (2010). Processing speed, working memory and reasoning ability from childhood to old age. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 379–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.032.Google Scholar
  57. O’Callaghan, C., Shine, J. M., Lewis, S. J. G., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Irish, M. (2015). Shaped by our thoughts—A new task to assess spontaneous cognition and its associated neural correlates in the default network. Brain and Cognition, 93, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.11.001.Google Scholar
  58. Parks, C. W., Klinger, E., & Perlmutter, M. (1989). Dimensions of thought as a function of age, gender and task difficulty. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 8(1), 49–62.  https://doi.org/10.2190/M6GA-J94F-VRV1-77DR.Google Scholar
  59. Plimpton, B., Patel, P., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2015). Role of triggers and dysphoria in mind-wandering about past, present and future: A laboratory study. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 261–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.014.Google Scholar
  60. Redondo, J., Fraga, I., Padrón, I., & Comesaña, M. (2007). The Spanish adaptation of ANEW (Affective Norms for English Words). Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 600–605.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193031.Google Scholar
  61. Ruby, F. J. M., Smallwood, J., Engen, H., & Singer, T. (2013). How self-generated thought shapes mood—The relation between mind-wandering and mood depends on the socio-temporal content of thoughts. PLoS One, 8(10), e77554.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077554.Google Scholar
  62. Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: Remembering the past and imagining the future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 773–786.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2087.Google Scholar
  63. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., Hassabis, D., Martin, V. C., Spreng, R. N., & Szpunar, K. K. (2012). The future of memory: Remembering, imagining, and the brain. Neuron, 76(4), 677–694.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.001.Google Scholar
  64. Schlagman, S., Kliegel, M., Schulz, J., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2009). Differential effects of age on involuntary and voluntary autobiographical memory. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 397–411.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a005785.Google Scholar
  65. Schlagman, S., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2008). Involuntary autobiographical memories in and outside the laboratory: How different are they from voluntary autobiographical memories? Memory and Cognition, 36(5), 920–932.  https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.36.5.920.Google Scholar
  66. Schmidtke, D. S., Schröder, T., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2014). ANGST: Affective norms for German sentiment terms, derived from the affective norms for English words. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1108–1118.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0426-y.Google Scholar
  67. Seli, P., Maillet, D., Smilek, D., Oakman, J. M., & Schacter, D. L. (2017). Cognitive aging and the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind wandering. Psychology and Aging, 32(4), 315–324.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000172.Google Scholar
  68. Seli, P., Risko, E. F., & Smilek, D. (2016). On the necessity of distinguishing between unintentional and intentional mind wandering. Psychological Science, 27(5), 685–691.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616634068.Google Scholar
  69. Simões, M. R., Freitas, S., Santana, I., Firmino, H., Martins, C., Nasreddine, Z., & Vilar, M. (2008). Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): Versão portuguesa [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): Portuguese version]. Serviço de Avaliação Psicológica da Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra.Google Scholar
  70. Singer, J. L. (1975). Navigating the stream of consciousness: Research in daydreaming and related inner experience. American Psychologist, 30(7), 727–738.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076928.Google Scholar
  71. Smallwood, J., Nind, L., & O’Connor, R. C. (2009). When is your head at? An exploration of the factors associated with the temporal focus of the wandering mind. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 118–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.11.004.Google Scholar
  72. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946–958.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946.Google Scholar
  73. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 487–518.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331.Google Scholar
  74. Soares, A. P., Comesaña, M., Pinheiro, A. P., Simões, A., & Frade, C. S. (2012). The adaptation of the Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW) for European Portuguese. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 256–269.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0131-7.Google Scholar
  75. Song, X., & Wang, X. (2012). Mind wandering in Chinese daily lives—An experience sampling study. PLoS One, 7(9), e44423.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044423.Google Scholar
  76. St. Jacques, P. L., & Levine, B. (2007). Ageing and autobiographical memory for emotional and neutral events. Memory, 15(2), 129–144.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210601119762.Google Scholar
  77. Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Maj, M., Van der Linden, M., & D’Argembeau, A. (2011). Mind-wandering: Phenomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method. Acta Psychologica, 136(3), 370–381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.002.Google Scholar
  78. Vannucci, M., Batool, I., Pelagatti, C., & Mazzoni, G. (2014). Modifying the frequency and characteristics of involuntary autobiographical memories. PLoS One, 9(4), e89582.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089582.Google Scholar
  79. Vannucci, M., & Chiorri, C. (2018). Individual differences in self-consciousness and mind wandering: Further evidence for a dissociation between spontaneous and deliberate mind wandering. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 57–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.022.Google Scholar
  80. Vannucci, M., Pelagatti, C., Chiorri, C., & Mazzoni, G. (2015a). Visual object imagery and autobiographical memory: Object Imagers are better at remembering their personal past. Memory, 24(4), 455–470.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1018277.Google Scholar
  81. Vannucci, M., Pelagatti, C., Hanczakowski, M., Mazzoni, G., & Paccani, C. R. (2015b). Why are we not flooded by involuntary autobiographical memories? Few cues are more effective than many. Psychological Research, 79(6), 1077–1085.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0632-y.Google Scholar
  82. Vannucci, M., Pelagatti, C., & Marchetti, I. (2017). Manipulating cues in mind wandering: Verbal cues affect the frequency and the temporal focus of mind wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 53, 61–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.004.Google Scholar
  83. Weinstein, Y. (2018). Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways. Behavior Research Methods, 50(2), 642–661.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9.Google Scholar
  84. Weinstein, Y., De Lima, H. J., & van der Zee, T. (2018). Are you mind-wandering, or is your mind on task? The effect of probe framing on mind-wandering reports. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(2), 754–760.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1322-8.Google Scholar
  85. Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1983). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17(1), 37–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations