Advertisement

Action plan interrupted: resolution of proactive interference while coordinating execution of multiple action plans during sleep deprivation

  • Lisa R. Fournier
  • Devon A. Hansen
  • Alexandra M. Stubblefield
  • Hans P. A. Van Dongen
Original Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

The ability to retain an action plan to execute another is necessary for most complex, goal-directed behavior. Research shows that executing an action plan to an interrupting event can be delayed when it partly overlaps (vs. does not overlap) with the retained action plan. This phenomenon is known as partial repetition costs (PRCs). PRCs reflect proactive interference, which may be resolved by inhibitory, executive control processes. We investigated whether these inhibitory processes are compromised due to one night of sleep deprivation. Participants were randomized to a sleep-deprived group or a well-rested control group. All participants performed an action planning task at baseline after a full night of sleep, and again either after a night of sleep deprivation (sleep-deprived group) or a full night of sleep (control group). In this task, two visual events occurred in a sequence. Participants retained an action plan to the first event in working memory while executing a speeded action to the second (interrupting) event; afterwards, they executed the action to the first event. The two action plans either partly overlapped (required the same hand) or did not (required different hands). Results showed slower responses to the interrupting event during sleep deprivation compared to baseline and the control group. However, the magnitude of the PRCs was no different during sleep deprivation compared to baseline and the control group. Thus, one night of sleep deprivation slowed global responses to the interruption, but inhibitory processes involved in reducing proactive interference while responding to an interrupting event were not compromised. These findings are consistent with other studies that show sleep deprivation degrades global task performance, but does not necessarily degrade performance on isolated, executive control components of cognition. The possibility that our findings involve local as opposed to central inhibition is also discussed.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the Human Sleep and Cognition Laboratory in the Sleep and Performance Research Center at Washington State University for their help conducting the study. This research was supported by Office of Naval Research Grant N00014-13-1-0302.

Funding

This research was supported by Office of Naval Research Grant N00014-13-1-0302 awarded to co-author, Hans Van Dongen.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ancoli-Israel, S. (2005). Actigraphy. In M. H. Kryger, T. Roth & W. C. Dement (Eds.), Principles and practice of sleep medicine (fourth edn., pp. 1459–1467). Philadelphia: Saunders.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2005). Frontal lobe mechanisms that resolve proactive interference. Cerebral Cortex, 15(12), 2003–2012.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhi075.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Banich, M. T., & Depue, B. E. (2015). Recent advances in understanding neural systems that support inhibitory control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 1, 17–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjork, R. A. (1980). Retrieval inhibition as an adaptive mechanism in human memory. In H. I. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness (pp. 309–330). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539–546.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bratzke, D., Rolke, B., Steinborn, M. B., & Ulrich, R. (2009). The effect of 40 h constant wakefulness on task-switching efficiency. Journal of Sleep Research, 18(2), 167–172.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00729.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bratzke, D., Steinborn, M. B., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2012). Effects of sleep loss and circadian rhythm on executive inhibitory control in the Stroop and Simon tasks. Chronobiology International, 29(1), 55–61.  https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2011.635235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of variation in working memory. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cain, S. W., Silva, E. J., Chang, A.-M., Ronda, J. M., & Duffy, J. F. (2011). One night of sleep deprivation affects reaction time, but not interference or facilitation in a Stroop task. Brain and Cognition, 76(1), 37–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(5), 529–553.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.11.5.529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(4), 354–373.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.123.4.354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Couyoumdjian, A., Sdoia, S., Tempesta, D., Curcio, G., Rastellini, E., De Gennaro, L., & Ferrara, M. (2010). The effects of sleep and sleep deprivation on task-switching performance. Journal of Sleep Research, 19, 64–70.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.2009.00774.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dinges, D. F., & Powell, J. W. (1985). Microcomputer analyses of performance on a portable, simple visual RT task during sustained operations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 17, 652–655.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doran, S. M., Van Dongen, H. P. A., & Dinges, D. F. (2001). Sustained attention performance during sleep deprivation: Evidence of state instability. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 139, 253–267.  https://doi.org/10.4449/aib.v139i3.503.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Drummond, S. P., Gillin, J. C., & Brown, G. G. (2001). Increased cerebral response during a divided attention task following sleep deprivation. Journal of Sleep Research, 10(2), 85–92.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2869.2001.00245.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Durmer, J. S., & Dinges, D. F. (2005). Neurocognitive consequences of sleep deprivation. Seminars in Neurology, 25(1), 117–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Engle, R. W., Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., & Shisler, R. J. (1995). A resource account of inhibition. Psychological Science, 6, 122–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. (pp. 102–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fournier, L. R., Behmer, L. P. Jr., & Stubblefield, A. M. (2014). Interference due to shared features between action plans is influenced by working memory span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 1524–1529.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0627-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fournier, L. R., & Gallimore, J. M. (2013). What makes an event: Temporal integration of stimuli or actions? Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75(6), 1293–1305.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0461-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fournier, L. R., Gallimore, J. M., Feiszli, K. R., & Logan, G. D. (2014). On the importance of being first: Serial order effects in the interaction between action plans and ongoing actions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(1), 163–169.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0486-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Habeck, C., Rakitin, B. C., Moeller, J., Scarmeas, N., Zarahn, E., Brown, T., & Stern, Y. (2004). An event-related fMRI study of the neurobehavioral impact of sleep deprivation on performance of a delayed-match-to-sample task. Cognitive Brain Research, 18(3), 306–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrison, Y., & Horne, J. A. (2000). The impact of sleep deprivation on decision making: A review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(3), 236–249.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.6.3.236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(11), 494–500.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hommel, B. (2005). How much attention does an event file need? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 1067–1082.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.1067.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000103. (discussion 878–937).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 68, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Honn, K. A., Grant, D. A., Hinson, J. M., Whitney, P., & Van Dongen, H. P. A. (2018). Total sleep deprivation does not significantly degrade semantic encoding. Chronobiology International.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2017.1411361. (in press).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Iber, C., Ancoli-Israel, S., Chesson, A. L., & Quan, S. F. (2007). The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events. Rules, terminology and technical specifications. Westchester: American Academy of Sleep Medicine.Google Scholar
  33. Jackson, M. L., Gunzelmann, G., Whitney, P., Hinson, J. M., Belenky, G., Rabat, A., & Van Dongen, H. P. A. (2013). Deconstructing and reconstructing cognitive performance in sleep deprivation. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 17(3), 215–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2012.06.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Jennings, J. R., Monk, T. H., & Van der Molen, M. W. (2003). Sleep deprivation influences some but not all processes of supervisory attention. Psychological Science, 14(5), 473–479.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, K., & Harrison, Y. (2001). Frontal lobe function, sleep loss and fragmented sleep. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 5(6), 463–475.  https://doi.org/10.1053/smrv.2001.0203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jonides, J., & Nee, D. E. (2006). Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory. Neuroscience, 139(1), 181–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In A. R. A. Conway, M. J. C.Jarrold, A. Kane, Miyake & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 21–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kühn, S., Keizer, A. W., Colzato, L. S., Rombouts, S. B., & Hommel, B. (2011). The neural underpinnings of event-file management: Evidence for stimulus-induced activation of and competition among stimulus-response bindings. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 896–904.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lim, J., & Dinges, D. F. (2008). Sleep deprivation and vigilant attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1129, 305–322.  https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1417.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lim, J., & Dinges, D. F. (2010). A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. Psychological Bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018883.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Lo, J. C., Groeger, J. A., Santhi, N., Arbon, E. L., Lazar, A. S., Hasan, S., Von Schantz, M., Archer, S. N., & Dijk, D. J. (2012). Effects of partial and acute total sleep deprivation on performance across cognitive domains, individuals and circadian phase. PLoS One, 7(9), e45987.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045987.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Logan, G. D. (2007). What it costs to implement a plan: Plan-level and task-level contributions to switch costs. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 591–602.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Masson, M. E. J., & Loftus, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 203–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mattson, P. S., & Fournier, L. R. (2008). An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 36(7), 1236–1247.  https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.7.1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mattson, P. S., Fournier, L. R., & Behmer, L. P. (2012). Frequency of the first feature in action sequences influences feature binding. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(7), 1446–1460.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0335-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meyer, D. E., & Gordon, P. C. (1985). Speech production: Motor programming of phonetic features. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Noël, X., Van der Linden, M., Brevers, D., Campanella, S., Verbanck, P., Hanak, C., Kornreich, C., & Verbruggen, F. (2013). Separating intentional inhibition of prepotent responses and resistance to proactive interference in alcohol-dependent individuals. Drub and Alcohol Dependency, 128(3), 200–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.08.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Oberauer, K. (2009). Design for a working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 45–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pilcher, J. J., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1996). Effects of sleep deprivation on performance: A meta-analysis. Sleep, 19(4), 318–326.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1975.37.2.479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime 2.0]. (2012). http://www.pstnet.com.
  52. Redick, T. S., Broadway, J. M., Meier, M. E., Kuriakose, P. S., Unsworth, N., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(3), 164–171.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science, 306, 443–447.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Roberts, R. J., Hager, L. D., & Heron, C. (1994). Prefrontal cognitive processes: Working memory and inhibition in the antisaccade task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(4), 374–393.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.123.4.374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 418–436.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sagaspe, P., Sanchez-Ortuno, M., Charles, A., Taillard, J., Valtat, C., Bioulac, B., & Philip, P. (2006). Effects of sleep deprivation on color-word, emotional, and specific Stroop interference and on self-reported anxiety. Brain and Cognition, 60(1), 76–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2005.10.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Satterfield, B. C., Hinson, J. M., Whitney, P., Schmidt, M. A., Wisor, J. P., & Van Dongen, H. P. A. (2018). Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genotype affects cognitive control during total sleep deprivation. Cortex, 99, 179–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sevald, C. A., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53(2), 91–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90067-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1625–1640.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1625.Google Scholar
  60. Tucker, A. M., Stern, Y., Basner, R. C., & Rakitin, B. C. (2011). The prefrontal model revisited: Double dissociations between young sleep deprived and elderly subjects on cognitive components of performance. Sleep, 34(8), 1039–1050.  https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.1158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Tucker, A. M., Whitney, P., Belenky, G., Hinson, J. M., & Van Dongen, H. P. A. (2010). Effects of sleep deprivation on dissociated components of executive functioning. Sleep, 33(1), 47–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex spans and their relation to higher-order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1038–1066.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Van Dongen, H. P. A., Maislin, G., Mullington, J. M., & Dinges, D. F. (2003). The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: Dose-response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep, 26(2), 117–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Whitney, P., & Hinson, J. M. (2010). Measurement of cognition in studies of sleep deprivation. Progress in Brain Research, 185, 37–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Whitney, P., Hinson, J. M., Jackson, M. L., & Van Dongen, H. P. A. (2015). Feedback blunting: Total sleep deprivation impairs decision making that requires updating based on feedback. Sleep, 18(5), 745.  https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.4668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Whitney, P., Hinson, J. M., Satterfield, B. C., Grant, D. A., Honn, K. A., & Van Dongen, H. P. A. (2017). Sleep deprivation diminishes attentional control effectivenss and impairs flexible adaptation to changing conditions. Scientific Reports, 7, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16165-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wiediger, M. D., & Fournier, L. R. (2008). An action sequence withheld in memory can delay execution of visually guided actions: The generalization of response compatibility interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1136–1149.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wimmer, F., Hoffmann, R. F., Bonato, R. A., & Moffitt, A. R. (1992). The effects of sleep deprivation on divergent thinking and attention processes. Journal of Sleep Research, 1(4), 223–230.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.1992.tb00043.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Yaniv, I., Meyer, D. E., Gordon, P. C., Huff, C. A., & Sevald, C. A. (1990). Vowel similarity, connectionist models, and syllable structure in motor programming of speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.Sleep and Performance Research CenterWashington State UniversitySpokaneUSA
  3. 3.Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State UniversitySpokaneUSA

Personalised recommendations