Advertisement

Interaction dynamics between grouping principles in touch: phenomenological and psychophysical evidence

  • Antonio PrietoEmail author
  • Julia Mayas
  • Soledad Ballesteros
Original Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated the interactions between the grouping principles of spatial proximity and texture similarity in touch. For that purpose, we adapted to touch two paradigms widely employed in vision. In Experiment 1, we used an experimental phenomenological task consisting of rating the strength of grouping in both acting alone and conjoined cooperative and competitive conditions. In Experiment 2, participants performed a psychophysical task in which an objective (in)correct response was defined by selectively attending to one grouping cue in different blocks of trials. The results showed that spatial proximity dominated over texture similarity when the two principles were conjoined in competition. In addition, the present results are compatible with an additive model of grouping effects as indicated by the greater grouping effect in the cooperative condition and the smaller grouping effect in the competitive condition relative to a.0cting alone grouping principles. The similarities and differences between vision and touch are discussed.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research reported in this article was supported by a Doctoral Fellowship from MECD Granted to AP (FPU13/05914). It was also partially supported by Grants from the Spanish Government (PSI2013-41409R) awarded to SB and from the Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (2014-028-UNED-PROY) awarded to JM.

References

  1. Alais, D., Blake, R., & Lee, S. H. (1998). Visual features that vary together over time group together over space. Nature Neuroscience, 1(2), 160–164.  https://doi.org/10.1038/414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballesteros, S., & Heller, M. A. (2008). Haptic object identification. Human Haptic Perception: Basics and Applications.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-7612-3_16.Google Scholar
  3. Ballesteros, S., Millar, S., & Reales, J. M. (1998). Symmetry in haptic and in visual shape perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 60(3), 389–404.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206862.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballesteros, S., & Reales, J. M. (2004). Visual and haptic discrimination of symmetry in unfamiliar displays extended in the z-axis. Perception, 33(3), 315–327.  https://doi.org/10.1068/p5017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballesteros, S., & Reales, J. M. (2005). Haptic priming and recognition in young adults, normal aging, and alzheimer’s disease: Evidence for dissociable memory systems. Touch and Blindness: Psychology and Neuroscience, 42(8), 1063–1070.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615671.Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Av, M. B., & Sagi, D. (1995). Perceptual grouping by similarity and proximity: Experimental results can be predicted by intensity autocorrelations. Vision Research, 35(6), 853–866.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(94)00173-J.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryden, M. P. (1977). Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia, 15(4–5), 617–624.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(77)90067-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, D., Nesbitt, K. V., & Wilkins, K. (2007a). The Gestalt principle of continuation applies to both the haptic and visual grouping of elements. In ProceedingsSecond Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, World Haptics 2007 (pp. 15–20).  https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2007.113.
  9. Chang, D., Nesbitt, K. V., & Wilkins, K. (2007b). The gestalt principles of similarity and proximity apply to both the haptic and visual grouping of elements. In Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series (Vol. 64, pp. 79–86).  https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2007.113.
  10. Dakin, S. C. (2015). Seeing statistical regularities: Texture and pattern perception. The Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199686858.013.054.Google Scholar
  11. Fagot, J., Arnaud, B., Chlambretto, M., & Fayolle, R. (1992). Lateralization in haptic processing: An apparatus for analyzing manual strategies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24(1), 54–59.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2011). To what extent do Gestalt grouping principles influence tactile perception? Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 538–561.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Grunwald, M. (2008). Human haptic perception: Basics and applications. Human haptic perception: Basics and applications.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-7612-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Han, S. (2004). Interactions between proximity and similarity grouping: An event-related brain potential study in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 367(1), 40–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.05.098.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Han, S., Ding, Y., & Song, Y. (2002). Neural mechanisms of perceptual grouping in humans as revealed by high density event related potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 319(1), 29–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02502-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Han, S., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Interactions between perceptual organization based on Gestalt laws and those based on hierarchical processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(7), 1287–1298.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Heller, M. A., & Ballesteros, S. (2006). Touch and Blindness: Psychology and Neuroscience. Taylor & Francis Group.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615671.
  18. Heller, M. A., & Joyner, T. D. (1993). Mechanisms in the haptic horizontal-vertical illusion: Evidence from sighted and blind subjects. Perception and Psychophysics, 53(4), 422–428.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206785.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kimchi, R., & Razpurker-Apfeld, I. (2004). Perceptual grouping and attention: not all groupings are equal. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(4), 687–696.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., & Reed, C. (1987). There’s more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(4), 356–369.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.116.4.356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kubovy, M., & Gepshtein, S. (2003). Perceptual grouping in space and in space-time: An exercise in phenomenological psychophysics. Perceptual Organization in Vision: Behavioral and Neural Perspectives.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410608918.Google Scholar
  22. Kubovy, M., Holcombe, A. O., & Wagemans, J. (1998). On the lawfulness of grouping by proximity. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 71–98.  https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1997.0673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kubovy, M., & van den Berg, M. (2008). The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: A probabilistic model of grouping by proximity and similarity in regular patterns. Psychological Review, 115(1), 131–154.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kubovy, M., & Wagemans, J. (1995). Grouping by proximity and multistability in dot lattices: A quantitative Gestalt theory. Psychological Science, 6(4), 225–234.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00597.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (2009). Haptic perception: A tutorial. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 71(7), 1439–1459.  https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.7.1439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Luna, D., & Montoro, P. R. (2011). Interactions between intrinsic principles of similarity and proximity and extrinsic principle of common region in visual perception. Perception, 40(12), 1467–1477.  https://doi.org/10.1068/p7086.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Luna, D., Villalba-García, C., Montoro, P. R., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2016). Dominance dynamics of competition between intrinsic and extrinsic grouping cues. Acta Psychologica, 170, 146–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.07.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Navon, D. (1981). Do attention and decision follow perception? Comment on Miller. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(6), 1175–1182.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.7.6.1175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nir, G., & Ben Shahar, O. (2015). How do multiple inducers group in perceptual completion stimuli—psychophysics and modeling. Journal of Vision, 15(12), 843.  https://doi.org/10.1167/15.12.843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Overvliet, K. E., Krampe, R. T., & Wagemans, J. (2012). Perceptual grouping in haptic search: The influence of proximity, similarity, and good continuation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(4), 817–821.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Overvliet, K. E., Krampe, R. T., & Wagemans, J. (2013). Grouping by proximity in haptic contour detection. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065412.Google Scholar
  35. Overvliet, K. E., & Plaisier, M. A. (2016). Perceptual grouping affects haptic enumeration over the fingers. Perception, 45(1–2), 71–82.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006615594958.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Palmer, S., & Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(1), 29–55.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200760.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Palmer, S. E. (1992). Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping. Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 436–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90014-S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Palmer, S. E. (2003). Perceptual organization and grouping. Perceptual Organization in Vision: Behavioral and Neural Perspectives.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410608918.Google Scholar
  39. Palmer, S. E., & Beck, D. M. (2007). The repetition discrimination task: An objective method for studying perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(1), 68–78.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Palmer, S. E., & Nelson, R. (2000). Late influences on perceptual grouping: illusory figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(7), 1321–1331.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112(4), 516–540.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.112.4.516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prieto, A., Mayas, J., & Ballesteros, S. (2014). Time course of grouping by proximity and similarity in a haptic speeded orientation task. In Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics) (Vol. 8618, pp. 379–385).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44193-0_47.
  43. Quinlan, P. T., & Wilton, R. N. (1998). Grouping by proximity or similarity? Competition between the Gestalt principles in vision. Perception, 27(4), 417–430.  https://doi.org/10.1068/p270417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Révész, G. (1953). Grundprinzipien des menschlichen und tierischen Daseins. Psychologische Forschung, 24(3), 215–229.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00424461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmidt, F., & Schmidt, T. (2013). Grouping principles in direct competition. Vision Research, 88, 9–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.06.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. van den Berg, M., Kubovy, M., & Schirillo, J. A. (2011). Grouping by regularity and the perception of illumination. Vision Research, 51(12), 1360–1371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Verlaers, K., Wagemans, J., & Overvliet, K. E. (2015). The effect of perceptual grouping on haptic numerosity perception. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 77(1), 353–367.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0770-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Vickery, T. J. (2008). Induced perceptual grouping. Psychological Science, 19(7), 693–701.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02144.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029333.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J. R., van der Helm, P. A., & van Leeuwen, C. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1218–1252.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029334.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Ward, L. M. (1983). On processing dominance: Comment on Pomerantz. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112(4), 541–546.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.112.4.541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II. Psychologische Forschung, 4(1), 301–350.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00410640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Williams, J. R. (2008). The declaration of Helsinki and public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization.  https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.08.050955.Google Scholar
  54. World Medical Association. (1964). WMA Declaration of Helsinki—Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. In 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland (p. 8).Google Scholar
  55. Zhang, S. (1998). Fourteen homogeneity of variance tests: When and how to use them. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED422392. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED422392.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Psicología Básica II, Studies on Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases Research GroupUniversidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations