Psychological Research

, Volume 83, Issue 1, pp 26–36 | Cite as

Embracing your emotions: affective state impacts lateralisation of human embraces

  • Julian PackheiserEmail author
  • Noemi Rook
  • Zeynep Dursun
  • Janne Mesenhöller
  • Alrescha Wenglorz
  • Onur Güntürkün
  • Sebastian Ocklenburg
Original Article


Humans are highly social animals that show a wide variety of verbal and non-verbal behaviours to communicate social intent. One of the most frequently used non-verbal social behaviours is embracing, commonly used as an expression of love and affection. However, it can also occur in a large variety of social situations entailing negative (fear or sadness) or neutral emotionality (formal greetings). Embracing is also experienced from birth onwards in mother–infant interactions and is thus accompanying human social interaction across the whole lifespan. Despite the importance of embraces for human social interactions, their underlying neurophysiology is unknown. Here, we demonstrated in a well-powered sample of more than 2500 adults that humans show a significant rightward bias during embracing. Additionally, we showed that this general motor preference is strongly modulated by emotional contexts: the induction of positive or negative affect shifted the rightward bias significantly to the left, indicating a stronger involvement of right-hemispheric neural networks during emotional embraces. In a second laboratory study, we were able to replicate both of these findings and furthermore demonstrated that the motor preferences during embracing correlate with handedness. Our studies therefore not only show that embracing is controlled by an interaction of motor and affective networks, they also demonstrate that emotional factors seem to activate right-hemispheric systems in valence-invariant ways.



Julian Packheiser was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) through the Research Training Group “Situated Cognition” (GRK 2185/1). Additionally, we would like to thank John Tuff and Catrona Anderson for translating the cover stories from German to English. We also want to thank Judith Schmitz for proof-reading the manuscript. Finally, we would like to thank the reviewers for their helpful suggestions.

Author contributions

JP and NR analysed the data, wrote the manuscript and supervised the experiments. SO conceived the experiment, analysed the data, supervised the experiments and reviewed the manuscript. OG reviewed the manuscript and provided the laboratory setting to perform the experiments. ZD, JM and AW performed the data acquisition.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Data access

We have full access to our data and allow the journal to review the data if requested.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Supplementary material

426_2018_985_MOESM1_ESM.docx (30 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 29 KB)
426_2018_985_MOESM2_ESM.docx (31 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 30 KB)
426_2018_985_MOESM3_ESM.sav (62 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (SAV 62 KB)
426_2018_985_MOESM4_ESM.sav (14 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (SAV 14 KB)


  1. Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). Cortical systems for the recognition of emotion in facial expressions. Journal of neuroscience, 16(23), 7678–7687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahern, G. L., & Schwartz, G. E. (1979). Differential lateralization for positive versus negative emotion. Neuropsychologia, 17(6), 693–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, P. A., & Leibowitz, K. (1978). The development and nature of the construct touch avoidance. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 3(2), 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boeving, E. R., Belnap, S. C., & Nelson, E. L. (2017). Embraces are lateralized in spider monkeys (Ateles fusciceps rufiventris). American Journal of primatology, 79(6).
  5. Borod, J. C. (1993). Cerebral mechanisms underlying facial, prosodic, and lexical emotional expression: A review of neuropsychological studies and methodological issues. Neuropsychology, 7(4), 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchanan, T. W., Lutz, K., Mirzazade, S., Specht, K., Shah, N. J., Zilles, K., & Jäncke, L. (2000). Recognition of emotional prosody and verbal components of spoken language: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 9(3), 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapelain, A., Pimbert, P., Aube, L., Perrocheau, O., Debunne, G., Bellido, A., & Blois-Heulin, C. (2015). Can population-level laterality stem from social pressures? Evidence from cheek kissing in humans. PLoS One, 10(8), e0124477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Churches, O., Callahan, R., Michalski, D., Brewer, N., Turner, E., Keage, H. A. D., Nicholls, M. E. R. (2012). How academics face the world: A study of 5829 homepage pictures. PLoS One, 7(7), e38940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corballis, M. C. (2014). Left brain, right brain: Facts and fantasies. PLoS Biology, 12(1), e1001767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson, R. J., & Fox, N. A. (1982). Asymmetrical brain activity discriminates between positive and negative affective stimuli in human infants. Science, 218(4578), 1235–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demaree, H. A., Everhart, D. E., Youngstrom, E. A., & Harrison, D. W. (2005). Brain lateralization of emotional processing: Historical roots and a future incorporating “dominance”. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolcos, F., LaBar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2004). Dissociable effects of arousal and valence on prefrontal activity indexing emotional evaluation and subsequent memory: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 23(1), 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ekeberg, Ø, Seeberg, I., & Ellertsen, B. B. (1989). The prevalence of flight anxiety in Norway. Nordisk Psykiatrisk Tidsskrift, 43(5), 443–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elias, L. J., Bryden, M. P., & Bulman-Fleming, M. B. (1998). Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization. Neuropsychologia, 36(1), 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernández-Carriba, S., Loeches, Á, Morcillo, A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2002). Asymmetry in facial expression of emotions by chimpanzees. Neuropsychologia, 40(9), 1523–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forsell, L. M., & Åström, J. A. (2012). Meanings of hugging: From greeting behavior to touching implications. Comprehensive Psychology, 1, 02–17.Google Scholar
  17. Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Güntürkün, O. (2003). Human behaviour: Adult persistence of head-turning asymmetry. Nature, 421(6924), 711–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haggard, M. P., & Parkinson, A. M. (1971). Stimulus and task factors as determinants of ear advantages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23(2), 168–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harms, V., Reese, M., & Elias, L. J. (2014). Lateral bias in theatre-seat choice. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition, 19(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harms, V. L., Poon, L. J., Smith, A. K., & Elias, L. J. (2015). Take your seats: Leftward asymmetry in classroom seating choice. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach. (2003). IfD-Umfrage 7043. 27.02.2012.Google Scholar
  23. Karenina, K., Giljov, A., Ingram, J., Rowntree, V. J., & Malashichev, Y. (2017). Lateralization of mother–infant interactions in a diverse range of mammal species. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1, 0030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kestenbaum, R., & Nelson, C. A. (1992). Neural and behavioral correlates of emotion recognition in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Landis, T., Assal, G., & Perret, E. (1979). Opposite cerebral hemispheric superiorities for visual associative processing of emotional facial expressions and objects. Nature, 278(5706), 739–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laurian, S., Bader, M., Lanares, J., & Oros, L. (1991). Topography of event-related potentials elicited by visual emotional stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 10(3), 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ley, R. G., & Bryden, M. P. (1979). Hemispheric differences in processing emotions and faces. Brain and Language, 7(1), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Major, B. (1981). Gender patterns in touching behavior. In C. Mayo & N. M. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior (pp. 15–38). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Ocklenburg, S., Beste, C., & Güntürkün, O. (2013). Handedness: A neurogenetic shift of perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10), 2788–2793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ocklenburg, S., & Güntürkün, O. (2009). Head-turning asymmetries during kissing and their association with lateral preference. Laterality, 14(1), 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ocklenburg, S., & Güntürkün, O. (2017). The lateralized brain: The neuroscience and evolution of hemispheric asymmetries. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prete, G., Laeng, B., Fabri, M., Foschi, N., & Tommasi, L. (2015). Right hemisphere or valence hypothesis, or both? The processing of hybrid faces in the intact and callosotomized brain. Neuropsychologia, 68, 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rabinowitz, F. E. (1991). The male-to-male embrace: Breaking the touch taboo in a men’s therapy group. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69(6), 574–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reiss, M., & Reiss, G. (1997). Ocular dominance: Some family data. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition, 2(1), 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sato, W., Kochiyama, T., Yoshikawa, S., Naito, E., & Matsumura, M. (2004). Enhanced neural activity in response to dynamic facial expressions of emotion: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 20(1), 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sedgewick, J. R., & Elias, L. J. (2016). Family matters: Directionality of turning bias while kissing is modulated by context. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition, 21(4–6), 662–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Silberman, E. K., & Weingartner, H. (1986). Hemispheric lateralization of functions related to emotion. Brain and Cognition, 5(3), 322–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Siniscalchi, M., Sasso, R., Pepe, A. M., Vallortigara, G., & Quaranta, A. (2010). Dogs turn left to emotional stimuli. Behavioural Brain Research, 208(2), 516–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Suberi, M., & McKeever, W. F. (1977). Differential right hemispheric memory storage of emotional and non-emotional faces. Neuropsychologia, 15(6), 757–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turnbull, O. H., Stein, L., & Lucas, M. D. (1995). Lateral preferences in adult embracing: A test of the “hemispheric asymmetry” theory of infant cradling. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 156(1), 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Gerwen, L. J., & Diekstra, R. F. (2000). Fear of flying treatment programs for passengers: An international review. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 71(4), 430–437.Google Scholar
  43. Van Gerwen, L. J., Spinhoven, P., Diekstra, R. F., & Van Dyck, R. (1997). People who seek help for fear of flying: Typology of flying phobics. Behavior Therapy, 28(2), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Abteilung Biopsychologie, Institut für Kognitive Neurowissenschaft, Fakultät für PsychologieRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations