Eye blinks are related to auditory information processing: evidence from a complex speech perception task

  • S. Oliver Kobald
  • Edmund Wascher
  • Holger Heppner
  • Stephan Getzmann
Original Article


There is increasing evidence that spontaneous eye blinks are related to mental states and can predict performance in certain tasks because of their relation to dopaminergic activity. Moreover, it has been shown that eye blinks while performing visual tasks are preferably executed not before all available information and even the manual response has been processed and given. Thus, blinks provide a natural endpoint of visual information processing. In the present study, we investigate to what degree such functional assignment of eye blinks also applies when only auditory stimuli are processed. For that, we present blink analyses on data of an auditory stock price monitoring task to examine the timing and frequency of blinks relative to the temporal dynamics of the task and different kinds of available cues. Our results show that blinks are meaningfully rather than randomly paced, although no visual information has to be processed. Blinks are significantly accelerated if a no-go trial is indicated which made all the subsequent information irrelevant. Although the stimuli were exclusively auditory, blinks were mostly inhibited during stimulus presentation. Taken together, blinks depend on the information being presented and mark a distinct point in time at which this information is conclusively processed. These findings deliver further support for the usefulness of eyeblink analyses, independently of the modality of the information being processed.



We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript.


The original study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG GE 1920/3-1).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee of the Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors. All participants gave their informed written consent prior to the experimental procedures.

Supplementary material

426_2017_952_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (3.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (XSLX 3276 kb)
426_2017_952_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (4.7 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (XSLX 4825 kb)


  1. Adam, A. R., Mallan, K. M., & Lipp, O. V. (2009). The effect of emotional and attentional load on attentional startle modulation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 74(3), 266–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boksem, M. A. S., & Tops, M. (2008). Mental fatigue: Costs and benefits. Brain Research Reviews, 59(1), 125–139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonneh, Y. S., Adini, Y., & Polat, U. (2016). Contrast sensitivity revealed by spontaneous eyeblinks: Evidence for a common mechanism of oculomotor inhibition. Journal of Vision, 16(7), 1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley, M. M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (1991). Startle and emotion: Lateral acoustic probes and the bilateral blink. Psychophysiology, 28(3), 285–295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bregman, A. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(5), 975–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colzato, L. S., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., van Wouwe, N. C., Pannebakker, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2009). Dopamine and inhibitory action control: Evidence from spontaneous eye blink rates. Experimental Brain Research, 196(3), 467–474.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Darwin, C. J. (2008). Listening to speech in the presence of other sounds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences, 363(1493), 1011–1021.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Doughty, M. J., & Naase, T. (2006). Further analysis of the human spontaneous eye blink rate by a cluster analysis-based approach to categorize individuals with “normal” versus “frequent” eye blink activity. Eye and Contact Lens, 32(6), 294–299.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitzpatrick, E., Hohl, N., Silburn, P., O’Gorman, C., & Broadley, S. A. (2012). Case–control study of blink rate in Parkinson’s disease under different conditions. Journal of Neurology, 259(4), 739–744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fukuda, K. (2001). Eye blinks: New indices for the detection of deception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40(3), 239–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Getzmann, S., & Falkenstein, M. (2011). Understanding of spoken language under challenging listening conditions in younger and older listeners: A combined behavioral and electrophysiological study. Brain Research, 1415, 8–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Getzmann, S., Lewald, J., & Falkenstein, M. (2014). Using auditory pre-information to solve the cocktail-party problem: Electrophysiological evidence for age-specific differences. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8(DEC), 1–13.Google Scholar
  15. Groman, S. M., James, A. S., Seu, E., Tran, S., Clark, T. A., Harpster, S. N., Jentsch, J. D. (2014). In the blink of an eye: Relating positive-feedback sensitivity to striatal dopamine D2-like receptors through blink rate. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(43), 14443–14454.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Karson, C. N. (1983). Spontaneous eye-blink rates and dopaminergic systems. Brain, 106(3), 643–653.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lipp, O. V., Blumenthal, T. D., & Adam, A. R. (2001). Attentional modulation of blink startle at long, short, and very short lead intervals. Biological Psychology, 58(2), 89–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lipp, O. V., Siddle, D. A. T., & Dall, P. J. (1997). The effect of emotional and attentional processes on blink startle modulation and on electrodermal responses. Psychophysiology, 34(3), 340–347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mackert, A., Flechtner, K. M., Woyth, C., & Frick, K. (1991). Increased blink rates in schizophrenics. Influences of neuroleptics and psychopathology. Schizophrenia Research, 4(1), 41–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Meyberg, S., Werkle-Bergner, M., Sommer, W., & Dimigen, O. (2015). Microsaccade-related brain potentials signal the focus of visuospatial attention. Neuroimage, 104, 79–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakano, T. (2015). Blink-related dynamic switching between internal and external orienting networks while viewing videos. Neuroscience Research, 96, 54–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakano, T., Kato, M., Morito, Y., Itoi, S., & Kitazawa, S. (2013). Blink-related momentary activation of the default mode network while viewing videos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(2), 702–706.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakano, T., Yamamoto, Y., Kitajo, K., Takahashi, T., & Kitazawa, S. (2009). Synchronization of spontaneous eyeblinks while viewing video stories. Proceedings of Biological Sciences The Royal Society, 276(1673), 3635–3644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oh, J., Jeong, S.-Y., & Jeong, J. (2012). The timing and temporal patterns of eye blinking are dynamically modulated by attention. Human Movement Science, 31(6), 1353–1365.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Orchard, L. N., & Stern, J. A. (1991). Blinks as an index of cognitive activity during reading. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26(2), 108–116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pannasch, S., Dornhoefer, S. M., Unema, P. J., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (2001). The omnipresent prolongation of visual fixations: Saccades are inhibited by changes in situation and in subject’s activity. Vision Research, 41(25–26), 3345–3351.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rolfs, M., Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2008). Toward a model of microsaccade generation: The case of microsaccadic inhibition. Journal of Vision, 8(11), 5.1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sarter, M., Gehring, W. J., & Kozak, R. (2006). More attention must be paid: The neurobiology of attentional effort. Brain Research Reviews, 51, 145–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shin, Y. S., Chang, W., Park, J., Im, C.-H., Lee, S. I., Kim, I. Y., & Jang, D. P. (2015). Correlation between inter-blink interval and episodic encoding during movie watching. PLoS One, 10(11), e0141242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Slagter, H. A., Georgopoulou, K., & Frank, M. J. (2015). Spontaneous eye blink rate predicts learning from negative, but not positive, outcomes. Neuropsychologia, 71(March 2016), 126–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sweeney, D. F., Millar, T. J., & Raju, S. R. (2013). Tear film stability: A review. Experimental Eye Research, 117, 28–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor, J. R., Elsworth, J. D., Lawrence, M. S., Sladek, J. R., Roth, R. H., & Redmond, D. E. (1999). Spontaneous blink rates correlate with dopamine levels in the caudate nucleus of MPTP-treated monkeys. Experimental Neurology, 158(1), 214–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Valsecchi, M., & Turatto, M. (2009). Microsaccadic responses in a bimodal oddball task. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 73(1), 23–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. van Bochove, M. E., Van der Haegen, L., Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2013). Blinking predicts enhanced cognitive control. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(2), 346–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van der Post, J., de Waal, P. P., de Kam, M. L., Cohen, A. F., & van Gerven, J. M. A. (2004). No evidence of the usefulness of eye blinking as a marker for central dopaminergic activity. Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 18(1), 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Verleger, R. (1991). The instruction to refrain from blinking affects auditory P3 and N1 amplitudes. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78(3), 240–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wascher, E., Heppner, H., & Hoffmann, S. (2014). Towards the measurement of event-related EEG activity in real-life working environments. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 91(1), 3–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wascher, E., Heppner, H., Kobald, S. O., Arnau, S., Getzmann, S., & Möckel, T. (2016). Age-sensitive effects of enduring work with alternating cognitive and physical load. A study applying mobile EEG in a real life working scenario. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(January), 711.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Wascher, E., Heppner, H., Möckel, T., Kobald, S. O., & Getzmann, S. (2015). Eye-blinks in choice response tasks uncover hidden aspects of information processing. EXCLI Journal, 14, 1207–1218.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Widmann, A., Engbert, R., & Schröger, E. (2014). Microsaccadic responses indicate fast categorization of sounds: A novel approach to study auditory cognition. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(33), 11152–11158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang, T., Mou, D., Wang, C., Tan, F., Jiang, Y., Lijun, Z., & Li, H. (2015). Dopamine and executive function: Increased spontaneous eye blink rates correlate with better set-shifting and inhibition, but poorer updating. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 96(3), 155–161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang, T., Wang, C., Tan, F., Mou, D., Zheng, L., & Chen, A. (2016). Different relationships between central dopamine system and sub-processes of inhibition: Spontaneous eye blink rate relates with N2 but not P3 in a Go/Nogo task. Brain and Cognition, 105(6), 95–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Oliver Kobald
    • 1
  • Edmund Wascher
    • 1
  • Holger Heppner
    • 2
  • Stephan Getzmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human FactorsDortmundGermany
  2. 2.Bielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations