False memory susceptibility in coma survivors with and without a near-death experience

  • Charlotte Martial
  • Vanessa Charland-Verville
  • Hedwige Dehon
  • Steven Laureys
Original Article

Abstract

It has been postulated that memories of near-death experiences (NDEs) could be (at least in part) reconstructions based on experiencers’ (NDErs) previous knowledge and could be built as a result of the individual’s attempt to interpret the confusing experience. From the point of view of the experiencer, NDE memories are perceived as being unrivalled memories due to its associated rich phenomenology. However, the scientific literature devoted to the cognitive functioning of NDErs in general, and their memory performance in particular, is rather limited. This study examined NDErs’ susceptibility to false memories using the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) paradigm. We included 20 NDErs who reported having had their experience in the context of a life-threatening event (Greyson NDE scale total score ≥7/32) and 20 volunteers (matched for age, gender, education level, and time since brain insult) who reported a life-threatening event but without a NDE. Both groups were presented with DRM lists for a recall task during which they were asked to assign “Remember/Know/Guess” judgements to any recalled response. In addition, they were later asked to complete a post-recall test designed to obtain estimates of activation and monitoring of critical lures. Results demonstrated that NDErs and volunteers were equally likely to produce false memories, but that NDErs recalled them more frequently associated with compelling illusory recollection. Of particular interest, analyses of activation and monitoring estimates suggest that NDErs and volunteers groups were equally likely to think of critical lures, but source monitoring was less successful in NDErs compared to volunteers.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank our subjects for contributing their time to participate in this study. The authors thank Dr. Frank Larøi and Dr. Armand Mensen for reviewing the manuscript and providing their insightful comments.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was funded by the Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research (FNRS), the French Speaking Community Concerted Research Action (ARC–06/11–340), NSERC discovery grant, IAP research network P7/06 of the Belgian Government (Belgian Science Policy), the European Commission, the James McDonnell Foundation, Mind Science Foundation, and the European space agency (ESA).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Agrillo, C. (2011). Near-death experience: out-of-body and out-of-brain? Review of General Psychology, 15(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atwater, P. M. H. (2001). Coming back to life: Examining the after-effects of the near-death experience. New York: Ballantine Book.Google Scholar
  3. Beauregard, M., Courtemanche, J., & Paquette, V. (2009). Brain activity in near-death experiencers during a meditative state. Resuscitation, 80(9), 1006–1010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belanti, J., Perera, M., & Jagadheesan, K. (2008). Phenomenology of near-death experiences: A cross-cultural perspective. Transcultural Psychiatry, 45(1), 121–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 727–735.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackmore, S. (1993). Dying to live: Near-death experiences. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  7. Blanke, O., & Dieguez, S. (2009). Leaving body and life behind: Out-of-body and near-death experience. In S. Laureys & G. Tononi (Eds.), The neurology of consciousness (pp. 303–325). London: Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brainerd, C. J., Wright, R., Reyna, V. F., & Mojardin, A. H. (2001). Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(2), 307–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Braithwaite, J. J. (2008). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of the dying brain. Skeptic, 21, 8–16.Google Scholar
  10. Brédart, S. (2000). When false memories do not occur: Not thinking of the lure or remembering that it was not heard? Memory (Hove, England), 8, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabeza, R., Rao, S. M., Wagner, A. D., Mayer, A. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2001). Can medial temporal lobe regions distinguish true from false†¯? An event-related functional MRI study of veridical and illusory recognition memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(8), 4805–4810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cann, D., McRae, K., & Katz, A. (2011). False recall in the Deese–Roediger–McDermott paradigm: The roles of gist and associative strength. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(8), 1515–1542.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charland-Verville, V., Jourdan, J. P., Thonnard, M., Ledoux, D., Donneau, A. F., Quertemont, E., & Laureys, S. (2014). Near-death experiences in non-life-threatening events and coma of different etiologies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 203.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Clancy, S. A., McNally, R. J., Schacter, D. L., Lenzenweger, M. F., & Pitman, R. K. (2002). Memory distortion in people reporting abduction by aliens. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 455–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Ruiter, M. B., Elzinga, B. M., Phaf, R. H., & de Ruiter, M. B. (2006). Dissociation†¯: Cognitive Capacity or Dysfunction†¯? Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 7, 115–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 17–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dehon, H. (2006). Variations in processing resources and resistance to false memories in younger and older adults. Memory (Hove, England), 14, 692–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dehon, H. (2012). Illusory recollection: the compelling subjective remembrance of things that never happened. Insights from the DRM paradigm. Psychologica Belgica, 52, 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dehon, H., Bastin, C., & Larøi, F. (2008). The influence of delusional ideation and dissociative experiences on the resistance to false memories in normal healthy subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dehon, H., & Bredart, S. (2004). False memories: Young and older adults think of semantic associates at the same rate, but young adults are more successful at source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 19, 191–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dehon, H., Larøi, F., & Van der Linden, M. (2011). The influence of encoding style on the production of false memories in the DRM paradigm: new insights on individual differences in false memory susceptibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 583–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dell’Olio, A. J. (2010). Do near-death experiences provide a rational basis for belief in life after death? Sophia, 49, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deltour, J.J. (1993). Échelle de Vocabulaire Mill Hill de J. C. Raven: Adaptation Française et normes comparées du Mill Hill et du Standard Progressive Matrices (PM38). Braine-le-Château: Editions L’Application des Techniques Modernes SPRL.Google Scholar
  24. Dobson, C. S. (2007). Retrieval-based illusory recollections: Why study-test contextual changes impair source memory. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1211–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ellwood, G. F. (2000). Religious experience, religious worldviews, and near-death studies. Journal of Near Death Studies, 19, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elzinga, B. M., Phaf, R. H., Ardon, A. M., & Van Dyck, R. (2003). Directed forgetting between, but not within, dissociative personality states. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 237–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Facco, E., & Agrillo, C. (2012). Near-death-like experiences without life-threatening conditions or brain disorders: A hypothesis from a case report. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Farina, B., & Liotti, G. (2013). Does a dissociative psychopathological dimension exist ? A review on dissociative processes and symptoms in developmental trauma spectrum disorders. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 10(1), 11–18.Google Scholar
  29. Forgas, J. P., Laham, S. M., & Vargas, P. T. (2005). Mood effects on eyewitness memory: Affective influences on susceptibility to misinformation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 574–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. French, C. C. (2001). Dying to know the truth: Visions of a dying brain, or false memories? Lancet, 358, 2010–2011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gallo, D. (2006). Associative illusions of memory: associative illusions of memory: False memory research in drm and related tasks. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gallo, D. (2010). False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion. Memory and Cognition, 38(7), 833–848.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gallo, D., McDermott, K.B., Percer, J.M., & Roediger, H.L. (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 339–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gallo, D., & Roediger, H. L. (2003). The effects of associations and aging on illusory recollection. Memory and Cognition, 31(7), 1036–1044.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greyson, B. (1983). The near-death experience scale. Construction, reliability, and validity. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 171(6), 369–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Greyson, B. (2000a). Near-death experiences. In E. Cardeña, S. J. Lynn & S. Krippner (Eds.), Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence. Washigton, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  37. Greyson, B. (2000b). Dissociation in people who have near-death experiences: Out of their bodies or out of their minds? Lancet, 355(9202), 460–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Greyson, B. (2003). Incidence and correlates of near-death experiences in a cardiac care unit. General Hospital Psychiatry, 25(4), 269–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Greyson, B. (2007). Consistency of near-death experience accounts over two decades: Are reports embellished over time? Resuscitation, 73(3), 407–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Greyson, B., & Stevenson, G. (1980). The phenomenology of near-death experiences. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 1193–1196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Heaps, C., & Nash, M. (1999). Individual differences in imagination inflation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6(2), 313–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hou, Y., Huang, Q., Prakash, R., & Chaudhury, S. (2013). Infrequent near death experiences in severe brain injury survivors: A quantitative and qualitative study. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 16(1), 75–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hyman, I. J., & Billings, F. J. (1999). Individual differences and the creation of false childhood memories. Memory (Hove, England), 6, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johnson, M. K. (2006). Memory and reality. The American Psychologist, 61(8), 760–771.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kellehear, A. (1993). Culture, biology, and the near-death experience: A reappraisal. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181, 148–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kellehear, A., & Irwin, H. (1990). Five minutes after death: A study of beliefs and expectations. Journal of Near-Death Studies, 9(2), 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lampinen, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S., & Payne, D. G. (1998). Memory illusions and consciousness: Examining the phenomenology of true and false memories. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 16, 181–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lampinen, J. M., Ryals, D. B., & Smith, K. (2008). Compelling untruths: The effect of retention interval on content borrowing and vivid false memories. Memory (Hove, England), 16, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lange, R., Greyson, B., & Houran, J. (2004). A Rasch scaling validation of a “core” near-death experience. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 161–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lempert, T., Bauer, M., & Schmidt, D. (1994). Syncope: a videometric analysis of 56 episodes of transient cerebral hypoxia. Annals of Neurology, 36(2), 233–237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Loftus, E. F. (1996). Memory distortion and false memory creation. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychology and Law, 24, 281–295.Google Scholar
  54. McDermott, K. B., & Watson, J. M. (2001). The Rise and fall of false recall†¯: The impact of presentation duration. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 160–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Palmieri, A., Calvo, V., Kleinbub, J. R., Meconi, F., Marangoni, M., Barilaro, P., Broggio, A., Sambin, M., & Sessa, P. (2014). “Reality” of near-death-experience memories: evidence from a psychodynamic and electrophysiological integrated study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 429.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Parnia, S., Waller, D. G., Yeates, R., & Fenwick, P. (2001). A qualitative and quantitative study of the incidence, features and aetiology of near death experiences in cardiac arrest survivors. Resuscitation, 48(2), 149–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pasricha, S., & Stevenson, I. (1986). Near-death experiences in India: A preliminary report. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 165–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pezdek, K. (2007). It’s just not good science. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 29–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Raven, J. C., Raven, J., & Court, J. H. (1988). The Mill Hill vocabulary scale. Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
  60. Ring, K. (1980). Life at death: A scientific investigation of the near-death experience. New York: Coward, McCann & Geoghegan.Google Scholar
  61. Roediger, H. L., Balota, D. A., & Watson, J. M. (2001). Spreading activation and the arousal of false memories. In H. J. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 95–115). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814.Google Scholar
  63. Roediger, H. L., & Mcdermott, K. B. (2000). Tricks of memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(4), 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schacter, D. L., Koutstaal, W., & Norman, K. (1997). False memories and aging. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(6), 229–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schacter, D. L., Osowiecki, D., Kaszniak, W., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Valdiserri, M. (1994). Source memory: extending the boundaries of age-related deficits. Psychology and Aging, 9(1), 81–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schacter, D. L., & Slotnick, S. D. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of memory distortion. Neuron, 44(1), 149–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2005). With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory: Mood and the false memory effect. Psychological Science, 16(10), 785–791.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2011). Affect influences false memories at encoding: Evidence from recognition data. Emotion (Washington, D. C.), 11(4), 981–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thonnard, M., Charland-Verville, V., Brédart, S., Dehon, H., Ledoux, D., Laureys, S., & Vanhaudenhuyse, A. (2013). Characteristics of near-death experiences memories as compared to real and imagined events memories. PloS One, 8(3), e57620.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 25, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. van Lommel, P. (2011). Near-death experiences: The experience of the self as real and not as an illusion. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1234(1), 19–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van Lommel, P., van Wees, R., Meyers, V., & Elfferich, I. (2001). Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest†¯: A prospective study in the Netherlands. Lancet, 358, 2039–2045.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Varese, F., Barkus, E., & Bentall, R. P. (2012). Dissociation mediates the relationship between childhood trauma and hallucination-proneness. Psychological medicine, 42(05), 1025–1036.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Veltman, D. J., de Ruiter, M. B., Rombouts, S.A.R.B., Lazeron, R.H.C., Barkhof, F., van Dyck, R., Dolan, R. J., & Phaf, R. H. (2005). Neurophysiological correlates of increased verbal working memory in high-dissociative participants: A functional MRI study. Psychological Medicine, 35, 175–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wade, K., Sharman, S. J., Garry, M., Memon, A., Mazzoni, G., Merckelbach, H., & Loftus, E. (2007). False claims about false memory research. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(1), 18–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Whittlesea, B.W.A. (2002). False memory and the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: The prototype-familiarity illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Whittlesea, B.W.A., & Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don’t? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 96, 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Whittlesea, B.W.A., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26(3), 547–565.Google Scholar
  79. Winograd, E., Peluso, J. P., & Glover, T. A. (1998). Individual differences in Susceptibility to memory illusions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12(7), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Coma Science Group, GIGA Research Center and Neurology DepartmentUniversity and University Hospital of LiègeLiègeBelgium
  2. 2.Cognitive and Behavioral Clinical Psychology Unit, Psychology and Neuroscience of Cognition Research Unit (PsyNCog)University of LiègeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations