Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Multisensory aversive stimuli differentially modulate negative feelings in near and far space

Abstract

Affect, space, and multisensory integration are processes that are closely linked. However, it is unclear whether the spatial location of emotional stimuli interacts with multisensory presentation to influence the emotional experience they induce in the perceiver. In this study, we used the unique advantages of virtual reality techniques to present potentially aversive crowd stimuli embedded in a natural context and to control their display in terms of sensory and spatial presentation. Individuals high in crowdphobic fear navigated in an auditory–visual virtual environment, in which they encountered virtual crowds presented through the visual channel, the auditory channel, or both. They reported the intensity of their negative emotional experience at a far distance and at a close distance from the crowd stimuli. Whereas auditory–visual presentation of close feared stimuli amplified negative feelings, auditory–visual presentation of distant feared stimuli did not amplify negative feelings. This suggests that spatial closeness allows multisensory processes to modulate the intensity of the emotional experience induced by aversive stimuli. Nevertheless, the specific role of auditory stimulation must be investigated to better understand this interaction between multisensory, affective, and spatial representation processes. This phenomenon may serve the implementation of defensive behaviors in response to aversive stimuli that are in position to threaten an individual’s feeling of security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Aiello, J. R. (1987). Human spatial behavior. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 389–504). New York: Wiley.

  2. Baumgartner, T., Lutz, K., Schmidt, C. F., & Jäncke, L. (2006). The emotional power of music: how music enhances the feeling of affective pictures. Brain Research, 1075(1), 151–164. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.065.

  3. Bolognini, N., Frassinetti, F., Serino, A., & Làdavas, E. (2005). “Acoustical vision” of below threshold stimuli: interaction among spatially converging audiovisual inputs. Experimental Brain Research, 160(3), 273–282. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-2005-z.

  4. Bouchard, S., St-Jacques, J., Robillard, G., & Renaud, P. (2008). Anxiety increases the feeling of presence in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 17(4), 376–391.

  5. Brozzoli, C., Makin, T. R., Cardinali, L., Holmes, N. P., & Farnè, A. (2012). Peripersonal space. In M. M. Murray & M. T. Wallace (Eds.), The neural bases of multisensory processes. Baco Raton: CRC Press.

  6. Carpentier, T., Noisternig, M., & Warusfel, O. (2015). Twenty years of Ircam Spat: looking back, looking forward. In International Computer Music Conference Proceedings.

  7. Christensen, J. F., Gaigg, S. B., Gomila, A., Oke, P., & Calvo-Merino, B. (2014). Enhancing emotional experiences to dance through music: the role of valence and arousal in the cross-modal bias. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 757. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00757.

  8. Collignon, O., Girard, S., Gosselin, F., Roy, S., Saint-Amour, D., Lassonde, M., & Lepore, F. (2008). Audio-visual integration of emotion expression. Brain Research, 1242, 126–135. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.023.

  9. Conty, L., Russo, M., Loehr, V., Hugueville, L., Barbu, S., Huguet, P., & George, N. (2010). The mere perception of eye contact increases arousal during a word-spelling task. Social Neuroscience, 5(2), 171–186.

  10. Cowey, A., Small, M., & Ellis, S. (1994). Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia, 32(9), 1059–1066.

  11. Damasio, A. R. (1998). Emotion in the perspective of an integrated nervous system. Brain Research Reviews, 26(2–3), 83–86.

  12. De Gelder, B., Böcker, K. B., Tuomainen, J., Hensen, M., & Vroomen, J. (1999). The combined perception of emotion from voice and face: early interaction revealed by human electric brain responses. Neuroscience Letters, 260(2), 133–136.

  13. De Gelder, B., & Vroomen, J. (2000). The perception of emotion by ear and by eye. Cognition and Emotion, 14(3), 289–311.

  14. Diederich, A., & Colonius, H. (1987). Intersensory facilitation in the motor component? Psychological Research, 49, 23–29.

  15. Dolan, R. J., Morris, J. S., & De Gelder, B. (2001). Crossmodal binding of fear in voice and face. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(17), 10006–10. doi:10.1073/pnas.171288598.

  16. Dosey, M. A., & Meisels, M. (1969). Personal space and self-protection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11(2), 93–97.

  17. Ferri, F., Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Väljamäe, A., Vastano, R., & Costantini, M. (2015). Emotion-inducing approaching sounds shape the boundaries of multisensory peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia, 70, 468–475. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.001.

  18. Föcker, J., Gondan, M., & Röder, B. (2011). Preattentive processing of audio-visual emotional signals. Acta Psychologica, 137(1), 36–47. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.02.004.

  19. Giray, M., & Ulrich, R. (1993). Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(6), 1278–1291.

  20. Gondan, M., Lange, K., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2004). The redundant target effect is affected by modality switch costs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(2), 307–313.

  21. Gondan, M., Niederhaus, B., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2005). Multisensory processing in the redundant-target effect: a behavioral and event-related potential study. Perception and Psychophysics, 67(4), 713–726.

  22. Graziano, M. S. A., & Cooke, D. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia, 44(6), 845–859. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.009.

  23. Hagan, C. C., Woods, W., Johnson, S., Green, G. G. R., & Young, A. W. (2013). Involvement of right STS in audio-visual integration for affective speech demonstrated using MEG. PloS One, 8(8), e70648. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070648.

  24. Hall, E. T. (1963). A system for the notation of proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist, 65(5), 1003–1026.

  25. Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.

  26. Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1991). Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature, 350(6318), 498–500.

  27. Hayduk, L. A. (1978). Personal space: an evaluative and orienting overview. Psychological Bulletin, 85(1), 117–134. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.85.1.117.

  28. Hayduk, L. A. (1983). Personal space: where we now stand. Psychological Bulletin, 94(2), 293–335. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.94.2.293.

  29. Hietanen, J. K., Leppänen, J. M., Peltola, M. J., Linna-aho, K., & Ruuhiala, H. J. (2008). Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach-avoidance motivational brain systems. Neuropsychologia, 46(9), 2423–2430.

  30. Holmes, N. P., Sanabria, D., Calvert, G. A., & Spence, C. (2007). Tool-use: capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space? Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 43(3), 469–489.

  31. Huis in ‘t Veld, E. M. J., & De Gelder, B. (2015). From personal fear to mass panic: The neurological basis of crowd perception. Human Brain Mapping. doi:10.1002/hbm.22774.

  32. Kitagawa, N., Zampini, M., & Spence, C. (2005). Audiotactile interactions in near and far space. Experimental Brain Research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Expérimentation Cérébrale, 166(3–4), 528–537. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2393-8.

  33. Klasen, M., Chen, Y.-H., & Mathiak, K. (2012). Multisensory emotions: perception, combination and underlying neural processes. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 23(4), 381–392. doi:10.1515/revneuro-2012-0040.

  34. Kokinous, J., Kotz, S. A., Tavano, A., & Schröger, E. (2015). The role of emotion in dynamic audiovisual integration of faces and voices. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(5), 713–720. doi:10.1093/scan/nsu105.

  35. Kreifelts, B., Ethofer, T., Grodd, W., Erb, M., & Wildgruber, D. (2007). Audiovisual integration of emotional signals in voice and face: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 37(4), 1445–1456. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.020.

  36. Laurienti, P. J., Kraft, R. A., Maldjian, J. A., Burdette, J. H., & Wallace, M. T. (2004). Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance. Experimental Brain Research, 158, 405–414. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1913-2.

  37. Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D. V., Weiller, E., Amorim, P., Bonora, I., Sheehan, K. H., & Dunbar, G. C. (1997). The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. European Psychiatry, 12(5), 224–231.

  38. Li, Y., Long, J., Huang, B., Yu, T., Wu, W., Liu, Y., Liang, C., & Sun, P. (2013). Crossmodal integration enhances neural representation of task-relevant features in audiovisual face perception. Cerebral Cortex,. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht228.

  39. Ling, Y., Nefs, H. T., Morina, N., Heynderickx, I., & Brinkman, W. P. (2014). A meta-analysis on the relationship between self-reported presence and anxiety in virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety disorders. PLoS One, 9(5), e96144.

  40. Lourenco, S. F., Longo, M. R., & Pathman, T. (2011). Near space and its relation to claustrophobic fear. Cognition, 119(3), 448–453. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.009.

  41. Lovelace, C. T., Stein, B. E., & Wallace, M. T. (2003). An irrelevant light enhances auditory detection in humans: a psychophysical analysis of multisensory integration in stimulus detection. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(2), 447–453.

  42. Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 247–279.

  43. Miller, J. (1991). Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17(1), 160–169.

  44. Mobbs, D., Petrovic, P., Marchant, J. L., Hassabis, D., Weiskopf, N., Seymour, B., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). When fear is near: threat imminence elicits prefrontal-periaqueductal gray shifts in humans. Science (New York, N.Y.), 317(5841), 1079–1083.

  45. Moeck, T., Bonneel, N., Tsingos, N., Drettakis, G., Viaud-Delmon, I., & Alloza, D. (2007). Progressive Perceptual Audio Rendering of Complex Scenes. In: Proceedings of the 2007 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics and games, April 30-May 02, 2007. Seattle, Washington.

  46. Molholm, S., Ritter, W., Javitt, D. C., & Foxe, J. J. (2004). Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cerebral Cortex, 14(4), 452–465. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh007.

  47. Phillips, M. L., Drevets, W. C., Rauch, S. L., & Lane, R. (2003). Neurobiology of emotion perception I: the neural basis of normal emotion perception. Biological Psychiatry, 54(5), 504–514. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00168-9.

  48. Pourtois, G., De Gelder, B., Bol, A., & Crommelinck, M. (2005). Perception of facial expressions and voices and of their combination in the human brain. Cortex a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 41(1), 49–59.

  49. Previc, F. H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 123–164.

  50. Risberg, A., & Lubker, J. (1978). Prosody and speech-reading. Quarterly Progress and Status Report Prosody and Speechreading, 4, 1–16.

  51. Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., Gaggioli, A., Botella, C., & Alcañiz, M. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychology & Behavior : The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 10(1), 45–56.

  52. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (1997). The space around us. Science (New York, N.Y.), 277(5323), 190–191.

  53. Robillard, G., Bouchard, S., Fournier, T., & Renaud, P. (2003). Anxiety and presence during VR immersion: a comparative study of the reactions of phobic and non-phobic participants in therapeutic virtual environments derived from computer games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior : The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 6(5), 467–476. doi:10.1089/109493103769710497.

  54. Sambo, C. F., & Iannetti, G. D. (2013). Better safe than sorry? The safety margin surrounding the body is increased by anxiety. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 33(35), 14225–14230. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0706-13.2013.

  55. Sarlat, L., Warusfel, O., & Viaud-Delmon, I. (2006). Ventriloquism aftereffects occur in the rear hemisphere. Neuroscience Letters, 404(3), 324–329. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2006.06.007.

  56. Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001). The experience of presence: factor analytic insights. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10, 266–281.

  57. Serino, A., Pizzoferrato, F., & Làdavas, E. (2008). Viewing a face (especially one’s own face) being touched enhances tactile perception on the face. Psychological Science, 19(5), 434–438. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02105.x.

  58. Spence, C., Pavani, F., & Driver, J. (2004). Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4(2), 148–169.

  59. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, P. R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, A. G. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  60. Stein, B. E., & Stanford, T. R. (2008). Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 255–266. doi:10.1038/nrn2331.

  61. Suied, C., Bonneel, N., & Viaud-Delmon, I. (2009). Integration of auditory and visual information in the recognition of realistic objects. Experimental Brain Research Experimentelle Hirnforschung Expérimentation Cérébrale, 194(1), 91–102. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1672-6.

  62. Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26(2), 212–215.

  63. Taffou, M., Guerchouche, R., Drettakis, G., & Viaud-Delmon, I. (2013). Auditory–visual aversive stimuli modulate the conscious experience of fear. Multisensory Research, 26, 347–370. doi:10.1163/22134808-00002424.

  64. Taffou, M., Ondrej, J., O’Sullivan, C., Warusfel, O., & Viaud-Delmon, I. (2016). Judging crowds’ size by ear and by eye in virtual reality. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces.

  65. Taffou, M., & Viaud-Delmon, I. (2014). Cynophobic fear adaptively extends peri-personal space. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 5, 122. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00122.

  66. Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Kitagawa, N., Väljamäe, A., Zampini, M., Murray, M. M., & Spence, C. (2009). Auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions are spatially modulated by stimulated body surface and acoustic spectra. Neuropsychologia, 47(1), 195–203. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.025.

  67. Tanaka, A., Koizumi, A., Imai, H., Hiramatsu, S., Hiramoto, E., & De Gelder, B. (2010). I feel your voice. Cultural differences in the multisensory perception of emotion. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1259–1262. doi:10.1177/0956797610380698.

  68. Vagnoni, E., Lourenco, S. F., & Longo, M. R. (2012). Threat modulates perception of looming visual stimuli. Current Biology : CB, 22(19), R826–R827. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.053.

  69. Van den Stock, J., Grèzes, J., & De Gelder, B. (2008). Human and animal sounds influence recognition of body language. Brain Research, 1242, 185–190. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.040.

  70. Van der Stoep, N., Van der Stigchel, S., Nijboer, T. C. W., & Van der Smagt, M. J. (2015). Audiovisual integration in near and far space: effects of changes in distance and stimulus effectiveness. Experimental Brain Research, 234, 1175–1188. doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4248-2.

  71. Viaud-Delmon, I., Ivanenko, Y. P., Berthoz, A., & Jouvent, R. (2000). Adaptation as a sensorial profile in trait anxiety: a study with virtual reality. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 14(6), 583–601.

  72. Viaud-Delmon, I., Warusfel, O., Seguelas, A., Rio, E., & Jouvent, R. (2006). High sensitivity to multisensory conflicts in agoraphobia exhibited by virtual reality. European Psychiatry : The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 21(7), 501–508. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.10.004.

  73. Vines, B. W., Krumhansl, C. L., Wanderley, M. M., Dalca, I. M., & Levitin, D. J. (2011). Music to my eyes: cross-modal interactions in the perception of emotions in musical performance. Cognition, 118(2), 157–170. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.010.

  74. Vines, B. W., Krumhansl, C. L., Wanderley, M. M., & Levitin, D. J. (2006). Cross-modal interactions in the perception of musical performance. Cognition, 101, 80–113. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.09.003.

  75. Watson, R., Latinus, M., Noguchi, T., Garrod, O., Crabbe, F., & Belin, P. (2014). Crossmodal adaptation in right posterior superior temporal sulcus during face-voice emotional integration. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(20), 6813–6821. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4478-13.2014.

  76. Wolpe, J. (1973). The practice of behavior therapy (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon.

  77. Zampini, M., Torresan, D., Spence, C., & Murray, M. M. (2007). Auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in front and rear space. Neuropsychologia, 45(8), 1869–1877. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.12.004.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the EU FP7-ICT-2011-7 project VERVE (http://www.verveconsortium.eu/), Grant No. 288910. This work was performed within the Labex SMART (ANR-11-LABX-65) supported by French state funds managed by the ANR within the Investissements d’Avenir programme under reference ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02. The research leading to these results has also received funding from the program “Investissements d’avenir” ANR-10-IAIHU-06. We thank Thibaut Carpentier and Kévin Perros for their work on the elaboration of the auditory component of the virtual environment. We thank Camille Frey and Cassandra Visconti who contributed to the experimentation. We thank Nathalie George, Philippe Fossati and the SAN lab for their helpful comments during protocol elaboration.

Author information

Correspondence to Marine Taffou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taffou, M., Ondřej, J., O’Sullivan, C. et al. Multisensory aversive stimuli differentially modulate negative feelings in near and far space. Psychological Research 81, 764–776 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0774-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Emotional Experience
  • Aversive Stimulus
  • Multisensory Integration
  • Virtual Scene
  • Affective Event